![]() |
"Crackpot realists" and the torture issue
"Harry Krause" wrote in message ... S. Maizlich wrote: S. Maizlich wrote: Tim Rutten had a great column in today's L.A. Times, about John McCain and the bill to outlaw torture by U.S. forces. Full article is he http://www.latimes.com/news/columnis...a-news-columns The best part is Rutten describing what C. Wright Mills referred to as "crackpot realism". Some highlights: The tough guy wing of the American media's commenting class always has been prone to what C. Wright Mills once called "crackpot realism." It's a little difficult to define precisely, but since its relationship to serious thinking is rather like that of pornography to art, you generally recognize it when you see it. A crackpot realist usually assumes an air of weary patience while instructing you on how their superior grasp of the "real world's" exigencies demands that you accept a morally preposterous conclusion. By the way, Rush Limbaugh is the "crackpot realist" par excellence. Here's an unlearned, uneducated crackpot - really, a *fruitcake* - who always tries to affect a world-weary, seen-it-all (*know*-it-all) condescension. His audience of obese red-staters, of course, just gobble it up like pigs in slop, morally preposterous conclusions and all. I thought Rush's excuse these days was that he was a drug addict, and therefore not responsible for his comments... I thought you told Wayne you were going to stop this? |
"Crackpot realists" and the torture issue
Despite the name calling, you do not seem to have answered the issue at
all. In this case of the a-bomb, would the person who ok-d the torture be legally liable? Of course he would. So, what is the solution? |
"Crackpot realists" and the torture issue
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:23 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com