|
OT Easy Answers to Conservative Lies
On 15 Dec 2005 10:01:01 -0800, wrote:
JimH wrote: wrote in message oups.com... JimH wrote: wrote in message oups.com... JimH wrote: wrote in message oups.com... JimH wrote: wrote in message ups.com... JimH wrote: wrote in message ups.com... JimH wrote: "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... JimH wrote: Although I disagree with it, that was a well written editorial Kevin. I saw no cussing or personal attacks in your post. I also see you did not use the words idiot, ignorant, dumb, dumbass, dip****, asshole or dolt even once. While I don't object to cussing, you do. Yet you republish the very words you claim offend you. Why is that? When they are used to attack or degrade a person they offend me. Gee, Jim, if that type of thing bothers you, what do you feel about someone who would post lies about someone's dead mother? How do you feel about someone who would make degrading remarks about someone's wife and children? You do just exactly that, you low life scum. I may have said something about Kevin's mother, wife and children smoking the weed he grows. Why does that offend you? YOU, you low life scum said those things about MY dead mother, MY wife, and MY children. YOU have proven yourself to be the lowest piece of **** here, Jim. A person just can't go any lower than that. **** you. Now, do something about that, you worthless little twit. So, Jim, how come your wife is so greedy that she made you sell your boat? Calm down. Remarks were made about Kevin's mother and wife smoking dope. You said you talked to Kevin over the weekend about the remarks with Kevin claiming he would talk to his lawyer to sue me. So, just what do you know about Kevin's mother and wife smoking dope? Answer. Nothing. Pure ignorance on your part, huh? Admit it. I did, however, say that I think your kids are being greedy for asking for a bike, iPod, Nintendo, PS2 and other things for Christmas, with the list, according to you, growing longer every day. If that offends you.........tough. Your wife is greedy for making you sell your boat for her. And yes, I think that ANYBODY who would bring someone's, ANYONE'S mother, or kids into a conversation is nothing short of a low life scum. It has nothing to do with "offending" me. You are just scum. Just a nasty little gnat like piece of ****. To make matters worse, I'm sure you lied about your wife saying that she thought it was okay for you to act in this manner. No woman would approve of her husband acting like you, unless she, too is a low life. When you see Kevin next weekend to discuss the things I said about his mother and wife, tell him happy anniversary for me.....I think it was one year last November. Kevin sent me a picture taken on his wedding day. We have it framed and sitting on a shelf in our family room. http://tinyurl.com/5mel5 Tell Kevin my wife says congratulations also. Kevin want's to know why you are such a low life piece of scum. Tell Kevin to post his question here and I will be happy to answer why I think his mother and wife smoke the marijuana he grows. I'll ask! Why DO you think his mother and wife smoke marijuana? Just a hunch, especially considering Kevin is your friend and you have posted in the marijuana NG. Just a hunch???!!!! What a piece of **** you are! Is it just a hunch about your penchant for young men? Do the posts you've made so far today endear you to such as Don, Harry, Chuck, jps, etc.? -- John Herring Hope your Christmas is Spectacular! ....and your New Year even Better! |
OT Easy Answers to Conservative Lies
"John H." wrote in message ... On 15 Dec 2005 10:01:01 -0800, wrote: JimH wrote: wrote in message oups.com... JimH wrote: wrote in message oups.com... JimH wrote: wrote in message oups.com... JimH wrote: wrote in message ups.com... JimH wrote: wrote in message ups.com... JimH wrote: "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... JimH wrote: Although I disagree with it, that was a well written editorial Kevin. I saw no cussing or personal attacks in your post. I also see you did not use the words idiot, ignorant, dumb, dumbass, dip****, asshole or dolt even once. While I don't object to cussing, you do. Yet you republish the very words you claim offend you. Why is that? When they are used to attack or degrade a person they offend me. Gee, Jim, if that type of thing bothers you, what do you feel about someone who would post lies about someone's dead mother? How do you feel about someone who would make degrading remarks about someone's wife and children? You do just exactly that, you low life scum. I may have said something about Kevin's mother, wife and children smoking the weed he grows. Why does that offend you? YOU, you low life scum said those things about MY dead mother, MY wife, and MY children. YOU have proven yourself to be the lowest piece of **** here, Jim. A person just can't go any lower than that. **** you. Now, do something about that, you worthless little twit. So, Jim, how come your wife is so greedy that she made you sell your boat? Calm down. Remarks were made about Kevin's mother and wife smoking dope. You said you talked to Kevin over the weekend about the remarks with Kevin claiming he would talk to his lawyer to sue me. So, just what do you know about Kevin's mother and wife smoking dope? Answer. Nothing. Pure ignorance on your part, huh? Admit it. I did, however, say that I think your kids are being greedy for asking for a bike, iPod, Nintendo, PS2 and other things for Christmas, with the list, according to you, growing longer every day. If that offends you.........tough. Your wife is greedy for making you sell your boat for her. And yes, I think that ANYBODY who would bring someone's, ANYONE'S mother, or kids into a conversation is nothing short of a low life scum. It has nothing to do with "offending" me. You are just scum. Just a nasty little gnat like piece of ****. To make matters worse, I'm sure you lied about your wife saying that she thought it was okay for you to act in this manner. No woman would approve of her husband acting like you, unless she, too is a low life. When you see Kevin next weekend to discuss the things I said about his mother and wife, tell him happy anniversary for me.....I think it was one year last November. Kevin sent me a picture taken on his wedding day. We have it framed and sitting on a shelf in our family room. http://tinyurl.com/5mel5 Tell Kevin my wife says congratulations also. Kevin want's to know why you are such a low life piece of scum. Tell Kevin to post his question here and I will be happy to answer why I think his mother and wife smoke the marijuana he grows. I'll ask! Why DO you think his mother and wife smoke marijuana? Just a hunch, especially considering Kevin is your friend and you have posted in the marijuana NG. Just a hunch???!!!! What a piece of **** you are! Is it just a hunch about your penchant for young men? Do the posts you've made so far today endear you to such as Don, Harry, Chuck, jps, etc.? -- John Herring Hope your Christmas is Spectacular! ...and your New Year even Better! Do they endear him to anyone here? I think most folks have giving up trying to defend him. He even turned on Chuck when Chuck tried to do so earlier today. My, my. |
OT Easy Answers to Conservative Lies
" JimH" wrote in message ... "John H." wrote in message ... On 15 Dec 2005 10:01:01 -0800, wrote: JimH wrote: wrote in message oups.com... JimH wrote: wrote in message oups.com... JimH wrote: wrote in message oups.com... JimH wrote: wrote in message ups.com... JimH wrote: wrote in message ups.com... JimH wrote: "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... JimH wrote: Although I disagree with it, that was a well written editorial Kevin. I saw no cussing or personal attacks in your post. I also see you did not use the words idiot, ignorant, dumb, dumbass, dip****, asshole or dolt even once. While I don't object to cussing, you do. Yet you republish the very words you claim offend you. Why is that? When they are used to attack or degrade a person they offend me. Gee, Jim, if that type of thing bothers you, what do you feel about someone who would post lies about someone's dead mother? How do you feel about someone who would make degrading remarks about someone's wife and children? You do just exactly that, you low life scum. I may have said something about Kevin's mother, wife and children smoking the weed he grows. Why does that offend you? YOU, you low life scum said those things about MY dead mother, MY wife, and MY children. YOU have proven yourself to be the lowest piece of **** here, Jim. A person just can't go any lower than that. **** you. Now, do something about that, you worthless little twit. So, Jim, how come your wife is so greedy that she made you sell your boat? Calm down. Remarks were made about Kevin's mother and wife smoking dope. You said you talked to Kevin over the weekend about the remarks with Kevin claiming he would talk to his lawyer to sue me. So, just what do you know about Kevin's mother and wife smoking dope? Answer. Nothing. Pure ignorance on your part, huh? Admit it. I did, however, say that I think your kids are being greedy for asking for a bike, iPod, Nintendo, PS2 and other things for Christmas, with the list, according to you, growing longer every day. If that offends you.........tough. Your wife is greedy for making you sell your boat for her. And yes, I think that ANYBODY who would bring someone's, ANYONE'S mother, or kids into a conversation is nothing short of a low life scum. It has nothing to do with "offending" me. You are just scum. Just a nasty little gnat like piece of ****. To make matters worse, I'm sure you lied about your wife saying that she thought it was okay for you to act in this manner. No woman would approve of her husband acting like you, unless she, too is a low life. When you see Kevin next weekend to discuss the things I said about his mother and wife, tell him happy anniversary for me.....I think it was one year last November. Kevin sent me a picture taken on his wedding day. We have it framed and sitting on a shelf in our family room. http://tinyurl.com/5mel5 Tell Kevin my wife says congratulations also. Kevin want's to know why you are such a low life piece of scum. Tell Kevin to post his question here and I will be happy to answer why I think his mother and wife smoke the marijuana he grows. I'll ask! Why DO you think his mother and wife smoke marijuana? Just a hunch, especially considering Kevin is your friend and you have posted in the marijuana NG. Just a hunch???!!!! What a piece of **** you are! Is it just a hunch about your penchant for young men? Do the posts you've made so far today endear you to such as Don, Harry, Chuck, jps, etc.? -- John Herring Hope your Christmas is Spectacular! ...and your New Year even Better! Do they endear him to anyone here? I think most folks have given up trying to defend him. He even turned on Chuck when Chuck tried to do so earlier today. My, my. edit |
OT Easy Answers to Conservative Lies
"John H." wrote in message ... On 15 Dec 2005 07:42:58 -0800, wrote: John H. wrote: On 15 Dec 2005 06:23:06 -0800, wrote: JimH wrote: wrote in message oups.com... Jack Goff wrote: On 14 Dec 2005 12:08:52 -0800, wrote: Your wife is greedy for making you sell your boat for her. And then he wrote: And yes, I think that ANYBODY who would bring someone's, ANYONE'S mother, or kids into a conversation is nothing short of a low life scum. Of course, ANYBODY who would bring ANYONE'S wife into a converstaion is nothing short of low life scum. Just a nasty little gnat-like piece of ****. To make matters worse, I'm sure your wife doesn't know you act in this manner. No woman would approve of her husband acting like atl-man or Kevin, unless she, too is a low life scum sucking pig. That's just another reason Kevin-man posts from work, not home. But since atl-man obviously thinks it's OK to talk about someone's wife, I'm sure he has no problem with this. Jack :-) I'm not Kevin, you idiot. But, alas, you need to chastise Jim Hertvik, not me. HE is the one who thinks it's okay to to talk about someone's wife, dead mother, even their children. Good morning alt_man. So sorry, but I never talked about *your* dead mother or wife. I did say that *your* kids are greedy though. Based on their 'ever growing' Christmas list you posted here they do indeed seem spoiled, materialistic and greedy. Have a nice How the hell do you know about what MY kids are, asshole? They are 6 and 10, you ****ing low life piece of ****. Feel like a REAL man talking **** about someone 6 and 10??? What a nasty little pussy you are. I'd LOVE to spit right in your **** stained face. You are truly lower than any person I've seen here. You know nothing about my kids. The list came from their letters to Santa. Have you ever known a kid that didn't go overboard in hope with those letters? What did you do, stomp on your kid's heads if they asked for anything more than an orange or two? Are you that poor? And YES, asshole, you HAVE talked about my dead mother, my wife, and my kids. You are a -poor excuse for a human, and a worse excuse for a man. No one here would agree that what you are doing is anything that any kind of stand up, real man would do. I ****ing DARE you to let your greedy wife know what you are saying about other people's famlies. Here is one of your wedding day pics I found of your lovely bride http://tinyurl.com/dy95q How can one who is as anti-Christmas as you are allow your children to write letters to Santa? Isn't there a bit of hypocrisy in there somewhere? -- John Herring The only hypocrite here is Jim Hertvik, the low life scum of usenet. I never said I was "anti-Christmas". Quite the contrary. I simply take it for what it is, which is NOT a holiday celebrating the birth of your Jesus. So you're a pagan? Kevin once again paints himself into a corner LMAO -- John Herring Hope your Christmas is Spectacular! ...and your New Year even Better! |
OT Easy Answers to Conservative Lies
On Thu, 15 Dec 2005 13:45:15 -0500, "P Fritz" wrote:
"John H." wrote in message .. . On 15 Dec 2005 07:42:58 -0800, wrote: John H. wrote: On 15 Dec 2005 06:23:06 -0800, wrote: JimH wrote: wrote in message oups.com... Jack Goff wrote: On 14 Dec 2005 12:08:52 -0800, wrote: Your wife is greedy for making you sell your boat for her. And then he wrote: And yes, I think that ANYBODY who would bring someone's, ANYONE'S mother, or kids into a conversation is nothing short of a low life scum. Of course, ANYBODY who would bring ANYONE'S wife into a converstaion is nothing short of low life scum. Just a nasty little gnat-like piece of ****. To make matters worse, I'm sure your wife doesn't know you act in this manner. No woman would approve of her husband acting like atl-man or Kevin, unless she, too is a low life scum sucking pig. That's just another reason Kevin-man posts from work, not home. But since atl-man obviously thinks it's OK to talk about someone's wife, I'm sure he has no problem with this. Jack :-) I'm not Kevin, you idiot. But, alas, you need to chastise Jim Hertvik, not me. HE is the one who thinks it's okay to to talk about someone's wife, dead mother, even their children. Good morning alt_man. So sorry, but I never talked about *your* dead mother or wife. I did say that *your* kids are greedy though. Based on their 'ever growing' Christmas list you posted here they do indeed seem spoiled, materialistic and greedy. Have a nice How the hell do you know about what MY kids are, asshole? They are 6 and 10, you ****ing low life piece of ****. Feel like a REAL man talking **** about someone 6 and 10??? What a nasty little pussy you are. I'd LOVE to spit right in your **** stained face. You are truly lower than any person I've seen here. You know nothing about my kids. The list came from their letters to Santa. Have you ever known a kid that didn't go overboard in hope with those letters? What did you do, stomp on your kid's heads if they asked for anything more than an orange or two? Are you that poor? And YES, asshole, you HAVE talked about my dead mother, my wife, and my kids. You are a -poor excuse for a human, and a worse excuse for a man. No one here would agree that what you are doing is anything that any kind of stand up, real man would do. I ****ing DARE you to let your greedy wife know what you are saying about other people's famlies. Here is one of your wedding day pics I found of your lovely bride http://tinyurl.com/dy95q How can one who is as anti-Christmas as you are allow your children to write letters to Santa? Isn't there a bit of hypocrisy in there somewhere? -- John Herring The only hypocrite here is Jim Hertvik, the low life scum of usenet. I never said I was "anti-Christmas". Quite the contrary. I simply take it for what it is, which is NOT a holiday celebrating the birth of your Jesus. So you're a pagan? Kevin once again paints himself into a corner LMAO -- John Herring Hope your Christmas is Spectacular! ...and your New Year even Better! He must have forgotten this one: ************************************************** **** On 12 Dec 2005 05:07:01 -0800, wrote: John H. wrote: http://www.powerpres.com/xmascard03.html -- John Herring Hope your Christmas is Spectacular, and your New Year even Better! I didn't know you were a Pagan. You Pagans sure like your holiday rituals such as decorating an evergreen tree, don't you? ************************************************** *********************** -- John Herring Hope your Christmas is Spectacular! ....and your New Year even Better! |
OT Easy Answers to Conservative Lies
wrote in message oups.com... Want to have some ammunition the next time a conservative begins talking about this sick drive toward what they like to term "smaller government" when they actually mean a government that kneels in supplication before Corporate America while passing tax "cuts" that just transfer the cost of government from the wealthy onto the backs of the middle-class and poor? Well, here are just a few questions, with supporting examples, to pose and then watch them squirm (the squirm part is the one I like best) First, for those who state that the Canadian national health system is a bad idea and that the "market" will keep the costs of medical coverage low and that the American medical community doesn't want it even discussed, call their bluff with this little quote from the premier medical journal of the AMA, the Journal of the American Medical Association (1) Stating early in the article that the "experiment with market medicine" is "a failure", it then goes on to proclaim that "The drive for profit is compromising the quality of care, the number of uninsured persons is increasing, those with insurance are increasingly dissatisfied, bureaucracy is proliferating, and costs are again rapidly escalating. We believe national health insurance deserves a second look." Remember, the Right could never uncover an intelligent reason to completely destroy Clinton's plan for a national health care system nor could they devise a system to offer in its place themselves (but all the Republicans have ever been good at is overturn whatever social net exists for the poor). Instead, they played on the average American's inability to differentiate between reality and actors mouthing scripts and scared the public with those reprehensible "Harry and Louise" ads where the two rather poor actors warned about having "Big Government in our medicine cabinets". Your argument is, thus, a simple one. When even the AMA states that we must revisit the question of a medical health system that covers every American, not just those who can afford it, and the best that the Rabid Right can offer in rebuttal is a poor imitation of a commercial, then it is, indeed, time for the Right to get out of the way of a fair and evenhanded healthcare system. When you hear the arguments about the over regulation of the pharmaceutical companies, remind them of the horror stories that are still being reported about the diabetes drug Rezulin. Because of the budget cuts forced on the FDA (Food & Drug Administration) by the Rabid Right at the behest of their corporate owners, the agency is forced to curtail the length and extent of its testing, putting the drug on its Congressionally mandated "6 month fast track" and, as in this case, even allow a physician on the payroll of the drug manufacturer to control and direct the testing. This massive and, without a doubt, illegal conflict of interest has resulted in the deaths of, so far, nearly a hundred Americans and has caused massive liver failure in one out of eight of the patients to whom it has been prescribed. Even when the evidence was produced that the drug's safety was simply too questionable to keep it on the market, the FDA folded to industry pressure and it is still being given to patients with diabetes with little or follow-up nor even a warning to physicians that they must constantly monitor these patients for the early signs of the decline in liver functions which inevitably lead to massive liver failure and a very painful and unnecessary death. Compare this sorry example of the Rabid Right's notion of corporate Nirvana with the episode in Sixties when an FDA physician, Dr. Francis O. Kelsey, first delayed, and ultimately withheld, approval of a proposed sedative meant primarily for pregnant women. Two years later, her logical actions, given her many doubts regarding the drug, were proven correct when thousands of disfigured newborns were born worldwide. Members of Congress as well as President Kennedy honored her insight and resolve in protecting the American public from the drug, thalidomide. Would she still have the power or available research to act in that fashion these days? Of course not. Would she even have been in a position to conduct the research which alerted her to the possible issues that would need to be investigated before placing the drug for sale to Americans? Of course not. Should we allow the Rabid Right to continue its on going destruction of the FDA? Of course not. It is our only protection from the greed and insanity of the Right and their owners in Corporate America. How much longer it will retain even a hint of its former regulatory powers is the only question that will probably count, though. (2, 3, 4) Finally, whenever these self-righteous moral midgets use the term the "scandal plagued Clinton Administration", remind them that in the long and truly despicable investigation by that little hemorrhoid, Starr, and all of his lackeys produced only one, JUST ONE, actual indictment and that was of the President lying about an incident that had absolutely nothing to do with his responsibilities to the office and even that mean spirited indictment, although used as the Rabid Right's justification for impeachment proceedings, resulted is a "not guilty" verdict. The only scandal during these last eighth years has been the absolute stupidity and smallness exhibited by the Rabid Right and their followers in the conservative media. Finally, remind them that during the horrors of the Reagan Administration, nearly four hundred of his appointees were investigated and ultimately indicted, with more than a hundred being found guilty and serving sentences or paying fines. Just be very certain that you are not within reach when you point this little anomaly out to them, though, since the Rabid Right hates being confronted with the truth about their little sock puppet God. Well, there are just a couple of the many easily refuted lies and misleading nonsense that passes for thought among the Rabid Right. All that is usually needed to negate any arguments that the Rabid Right can invent is, of course, only a mind capable of independent thought, a rare commodity within their ranks. See: http://www.rateitall.com/i-12891-gary-trudeau.aspx Again lies from the left! Gesh, don't they know it's easy to check facts today with google and the internet. |
OT Easy Answers to Conservative Lies
"Jeff Rigby" wrote in message ... wrote in message oups.com... Want to have some ammunition the next time a conservative begins talking about this sick drive toward what they like to term "smaller government" when they actually mean a government that kneels in supplication before Corporate America while passing tax "cuts" that just transfer the cost of government from the wealthy onto the backs of the middle-class and poor? Well, here are just a few questions, with supporting examples, to pose and then watch them squirm (the squirm part is the one I like best) First, for those who state that the Canadian national health system is a bad idea and that the "market" will keep the costs of medical coverage low and that the American medical community doesn't want it even discussed, call their bluff with this little quote from the premier medical journal of the AMA, the Journal of the American Medical Association (1) Stating early in the article that the "experiment with market medicine" is "a failure", it then goes on to proclaim that "The drive for profit is compromising the quality of care, the number of uninsured persons is increasing, those with insurance are increasingly dissatisfied, bureaucracy is proliferating, and costs are again rapidly escalating. We believe national health insurance deserves a second look." Remember, the Right could never uncover an intelligent reason to completely destroy Clinton's plan for a national health care system nor could they devise a system to offer in its place themselves (but all the Republicans have ever been good at is overturn whatever social net exists for the poor). Instead, they played on the average American's inability to differentiate between reality and actors mouthing scripts and scared the public with those reprehensible "Harry and Louise" ads where the two rather poor actors warned about having "Big Government in our medicine cabinets". Your argument is, thus, a simple one. When even the AMA states that we must revisit the question of a medical health system that covers every American, not just those who can afford it, and the best that the Rabid Right can offer in rebuttal is a poor imitation of a commercial, then it is, indeed, time for the Right to get out of the way of a fair and evenhanded healthcare system. When you hear the arguments about the over regulation of the pharmaceutical companies, remind them of the horror stories that are still being reported about the diabetes drug Rezulin. Because of the budget cuts forced on the FDA (Food & Drug Administration) by the Rabid Right at the behest of their corporate owners, the agency is forced to curtail the length and extent of its testing, putting the drug on its Congressionally mandated "6 month fast track" and, as in this case, even allow a physician on the payroll of the drug manufacturer to control and direct the testing. This massive and, without a doubt, illegal conflict of interest has resulted in the deaths of, so far, nearly a hundred Americans and has caused massive liver failure in one out of eight of the patients to whom it has been prescribed. Even when the evidence was produced that the drug's safety was simply too questionable to keep it on the market, the FDA folded to industry pressure and it is still being given to patients with diabetes with little or follow-up nor even a warning to physicians that they must constantly monitor these patients for the early signs of the decline in liver functions which inevitably lead to massive liver failure and a very painful and unnecessary death. Compare this sorry example of the Rabid Right's notion of corporate Nirvana with the episode in Sixties when an FDA physician, Dr. Francis O. Kelsey, first delayed, and ultimately withheld, approval of a proposed sedative meant primarily for pregnant women. Two years later, her logical actions, given her many doubts regarding the drug, were proven correct when thousands of disfigured newborns were born worldwide. Members of Congress as well as President Kennedy honored her insight and resolve in protecting the American public from the drug, thalidomide. Would she still have the power or available research to act in that fashion these days? Of course not. Would she even have been in a position to conduct the research which alerted her to the possible issues that would need to be investigated before placing the drug for sale to Americans? Of course not. Should we allow the Rabid Right to continue its on going destruction of the FDA? Of course not. It is our only protection from the greed and insanity of the Right and their owners in Corporate America. How much longer it will retain even a hint of its former regulatory powers is the only question that will probably count, though. (2, 3, 4) Finally, whenever these self-righteous moral midgets use the term the "scandal plagued Clinton Administration", remind them that in the long and truly despicable investigation by that little hemorrhoid, Starr, and all of his lackeys produced only one, JUST ONE, actual indictment and that was of the President lying about an incident that had absolutely nothing to do with his responsibilities to the office and even that mean spirited indictment, although used as the Rabid Right's justification for impeachment proceedings, resulted is a "not guilty" verdict. The only scandal during these last eighth years has been the absolute stupidity and smallness exhibited by the Rabid Right and their followers in the conservative media. Finally, remind them that during the horrors of the Reagan Administration, nearly four hundred of his appointees were investigated and ultimately indicted, with more than a hundred being found guilty and serving sentences or paying fines. Just be very certain that you are not within reach when you point this little anomaly out to them, though, since the Rabid Right hates being confronted with the truth about their little sock puppet God. Well, there are just a couple of the many easily refuted lies and misleading nonsense that passes for thought among the Rabid Right. All that is usually needed to negate any arguments that the Rabid Right can invent is, of course, only a mind capable of independent thought, a rare commodity within their ranks. See: http://www.rateitall.com/i-12891-gary-trudeau.aspx Again lies from the left! Gesh, don't they know it's easy to check facts today with google and the internet. Yes, they could not get out of the first paragraph without lying. |
OT Easy Answers to Conservative Lies
On 15 Dec 2005 06:23:06 -0800, wrote:
I'm not Kevin, you idiot. But, alas, you need to chastise Jim Hertvik, not me. HE is the one who thinks it's okay to to talk about someone's wife, dead mother, even their children. But atl-man (Kevin?) also wrote: I ****ing DARE you to let your greedy wife know what you are saying about other people's famlies. Here is one of your wedding day pics I found of your lovely bride http://tinyurl.com/dy95q So does atl-boy (Kevin?) think it's OK to talk about one's wife, or not? He seem very confused, yes? And posting his wedding pictures... does his wife know? bow-wow. |
OT Easy Answers to Conservative Lies
On Thu, 15 Dec 2005 10:49:05 -0500, " JimH" wrote:
Kevin, here is a collection of your *contributions* just this morning: =================== you are such a low life piece of scum. you idiot. you are such a nasty little **** By the way, are ALL of your kids prostituting? Are you still pimping? Asshole you ****ing low life piece of ****. you little low life pussy. I'd LOVE to spit right in your **** stained face What a nasty little pussy you are. ======================== Are you proud of that? His mama is very proud of him. Does he kiss her with that mouth? |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:51 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com