|
OT Those Nice Christian Conservatives
"John H." wrote in message ... On Tue, 06 Dec 2005 20:34:43 GMT, "Doug Kanter" wrote: wrote in message groups.com... Mirecki had referred to religious conservatives as "fundies," and said a course describing intelligent design as mythology would be ?a "nice slap in their big fat face." He has apologized for those comments And rightfully, he should...... Better that he cancelled the course, though. According to one of its main proponents (sort of like supporters or promoters, for you anti-edumacation Repubs), intelligent design has no actual content. Nothing to be studied. Again, this is according to one of the organizations which promotes the concept. I'd agree. -- John H Don't pull that "I'd agree" **** with me John. |
OT Those Nice Christian Conservatives
*JimH* wrote: An assumption is made by Kevin that they are actually of Christian belief and acting upon his comments in class. No, you idiot, those assumptions were made by ME, not Kevin. Nowhere in the story is that case definitely made. For all we know they were some left wing wackos or thugs paying back the professor for stiffing a prostitute. Him stating his attackers referred to his course means nothing. What conclusion would YOU come to, when the group mentioned his class syllabus? From the report: "I didn't know them," Mirecki said of his assailants, ..." The fact that Kevin once again violated copyright laws by not providing a link to the actual report also lessens the credibility of his post. Idiot!!! You ARE stupid!! |
OT Those Nice Christian Conservatives
|
OT Those Nice Christian Conservatives
In article , "Lord
Reginald Smithers" Ask me about my driveway leading up to my manor. says... jps, I try not to use profanity often because it diminishes it's effectiveness when I do use. Profanity is supposed to shock and emphasize a point. When it is used often, it does neither. I might go months without using profanity, so when I use it, those who know me listen carefully. I can't figure out what Doug achieved by using "Don't pull that **** with me" statement. I my opinion he just wasted a perfectly good "****" when he could have held it back when he really wanted to use a perfectly good "****". I thought it was applied with aplomb. About the softest **** I've seen this year. jps |
OT Those Nice Christian Conservatives
jps wrote: In article , says... "John H." wrote in message ... On Tue, 06 Dec 2005 20:34:43 GMT, "Doug Kanter" wrote: wrote in message groups.com... Mirecki had referred to religious conservatives as "fundies," and said a course describing intelligent design as mythology would be ?a "nice slap in their big fat face." He has apologized for those comments And rightfully, he should...... Better that he cancelled the course, though. According to one of its main proponents (sort of like supporters or promoters, for you anti-edumacation Repubs), intelligent design has no actual content. Nothing to be studied. Again, this is according to one of the organizations which promotes the concept. I'd agree. -- John H Don't pull that "I'd agree" **** with me John. Careful Doug, if you don't put a smiley face at the end, someone may misunderestimate your position not to mention your sense of humor. Plus, that vile language really has no place in these times of war. jps That's right, seeing how you aren't JohnH, Fritz, Smithers, or any other of Reverend JimH's circle jerk, you'll get a chastising from him! |
OT Those Nice Christian Conservatives
jps,
That is exactly my point. When you use the word "****" it should have some real punch to it. Who wants a soft ****, no one. "jps" wrote in message ... In article , "Lord Reginald Smithers" Ask me about my driveway leading up to my manor. says... jps, I try not to use profanity often because it diminishes it's effectiveness when I do use. Profanity is supposed to shock and emphasize a point. When it is used often, it does neither. I might go months without using profanity, so when I use it, those who know me listen carefully. I can't figure out what Doug achieved by using "Don't pull that **** with me" statement. I my opinion he just wasted a perfectly good "****" when he could have held it back when he really wanted to use a perfectly good "****". I thought it was applied with aplomb. About the softest **** I've seen this year. jps |
OT Those Nice Christian Conservatives
On Wed, 07 Dec 2005 01:12:43 GMT, "Doug Kanter" wrote:
"John H." wrote in message .. . On Tue, 06 Dec 2005 20:34:43 GMT, "Doug Kanter" wrote: wrote in message egroups.com... Mirecki had referred to religious conservatives as "fundies," and said a course describing intelligent design as mythology would be ?a "nice slap in their big fat face." He has apologized for those comments And rightfully, he should...... Better that he cancelled the course, though. According to one of its main proponents (sort of like supporters or promoters, for you anti-edumacation Repubs), intelligent design has no actual content. Nothing to be studied. Again, this is according to one of the organizations which promotes the concept. I'd agree. -- John H Don't pull that "I'd agree" **** with me John. Why not? What makes you think I don't agree that the intelligent design concept is not something that deserves a 'course'? -- John H MERRY CHRISTMAS! Wishing you Peace, Fellowship, and Good Humor as we celebrate the birth of OUR Lord, Jesus Christ on the Christmas Holy Day. |
OT Those Nice Christian Conservatives
JohnH,
It is a classic case of "The Lemmings are Coming ... The Lemmings are Coming". Either everyone who considers themselves a conservative, must agree that intelligent design is a viable theory, and thus all conservatives are just blind lemmings running for the cliff OR all those who believe this silliness and repeat the story that all conservatives are lemmings must themselves be lemmings running for the cliff. Since I also believe Intelligent Design is a nothing more than a fancy way of teaching creationalism, those who like to scream "lemmings" should keep their eyes open, it will be a great view as they plunge over the cliff. "John H." wrote in message ... On Wed, 07 Dec 2005 01:12:43 GMT, "Doug Kanter" wrote: "John H." wrote in message . .. On Tue, 06 Dec 2005 20:34:43 GMT, "Doug Kanter" wrote: wrote in message legroups.com... Mirecki had referred to religious conservatives as "fundies," and said a course describing intelligent design as mythology would be ?a "nice slap in their big fat face." He has apologized for those comments And rightfully, he should...... Better that he cancelled the course, though. According to one of its main proponents (sort of like supporters or promoters, for you anti-edumacation Repubs), intelligent design has no actual content. Nothing to be studied. Again, this is according to one of the organizations which promotes the concept. I'd agree. -- John H Don't pull that "I'd agree" **** with me John. Why not? What makes you think I don't agree that the intelligent design concept is not something that deserves a 'course'? -- John H MERRY CHRISTMAS! Wishing you Peace, Fellowship, and Good Humor as we celebrate the birth of OUR Lord, Jesus Christ on the Christmas Holy Day. |
OT Those Nice Christian Conservatives
"John H." wrote in message ... On Wed, 07 Dec 2005 01:12:43 GMT, "Doug Kanter" wrote: "John H." wrote in message . .. On Tue, 06 Dec 2005 20:34:43 GMT, "Doug Kanter" wrote: wrote in message legroups.com... Mirecki had referred to religious conservatives as "fundies," and said a course describing intelligent design as mythology would be ?a "nice slap in their big fat face." He has apologized for those comments And rightfully, he should...... Better that he cancelled the course, though. According to one of its main proponents (sort of like supporters or promoters, for you anti-edumacation Repubs), intelligent design has no actual content. Nothing to be studied. Again, this is according to one of the organizations which promotes the concept. I'd agree. -- John H Don't pull that "I'd agree" **** with me John. Why not? What makes you think I don't agree that the intelligent design concept is not something that deserves a 'course'? -- John H Actually, I was just harassing you for sport. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:12 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com