![]() |
|
OT--President's Job Approval at 46%
President Bush Job Approval
Saturday December 03, 2005--Forty-six percent (46%) of American adults approve of the way George W. Bush is performing his role as President. Fifty-three percent (53%) of Americans Disapprove of the President's performance. The President's Job Approval has been above the 43% mark in our last eight daily polls. Prior to that, it had generally been in the 40% to 43% range for more than a month. The low point for the President came October 28. His numbers stopped falling when Harriet Miers withdrew her name from consideration as a Supreme Court nominee. http://www.rasmussenreports.com/Bush_Job_Approval.htm ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
OT--President's Job Approval at 46%
Yup, he's just doing one hell of a job thesae days, right?
Please tell me one thing this presidummy has done in the last six months that anyone approves of. Capt. Jeff |
OT--President's Job Approval at 46%
NOYB wrote: President Bush Job Approval Saturday December 03, 2005--Forty-six percent (46%) of American adults approve of the way George W. Bush is performing his role as President. Fifty-three percent (53%) of Americans Disapprove of the President's performance. The President's Job Approval has been above the 43% mark in our last eight daily polls. Prior to that, it had generally been in the 40% to 43% range for more than a month. The low point for the President came October 28. His numbers stopped falling when Harriet Miers withdrew her name from consideration as a Supreme Court nominee. http://www.rasmussenreports.com/Bush_Job_Approval.htm Get real. Even Fox News has him at 42%, and the Wall Street Journal (that paragon of liberal bias) has him in the upper 30's. Here's a really good site for presidential poll fans. Pick your poll, pick your results. (As you did, picking the one poll that doesn't show Bush in the crapper). The truth is probably somewhere in the sum total of these couple of dozen polls: http://www.pollingreport.com/BushJob.htm |
OT--President's Job Approval at 46%
"Tamaroak" wrote in message . .. Yup, he's just doing one hell of a job thesae days, right? Please tell me one thing this presidummy has done in the last six months that anyone approves of. Appointed John Roberts. In case you forgot, 78 Senators approved of his appointment. |
OT--President's Job Approval at 47%!!!
wrote in message oups.com... NOYB wrote: President Bush Job Approval Saturday December 03, 2005--Forty-six percent (46%) of American adults approve of the way George W. Bush is performing his role as President. Fifty-three percent (53%) of Americans Disapprove of the President's performance. The President's Job Approval has been above the 43% mark in our last eight daily polls. Prior to that, it had generally been in the 40% to 43% range for more than a month. The low point for the President came October 28. His numbers stopped falling when Harriet Miers withdrew her name from consideration as a Supreme Court nominee. http://www.rasmussenreports.com/Bush_Job_Approval.htm Get real. Even Fox News has him at 42%, and the Wall Street Journal (that paragon of liberal bias) has him in the upper 30's. Here's a really good site for presidential poll fans. Pick your poll, pick your results. (As you did, picking the one poll that doesn't show Bush in the crapper). The truth is probably somewhere in the sum total of these couple of dozen polls: http://www.pollingreport.com/BushJob.htm Rasmussen polls daily...and has him at 47% as of today. Fox's poll is almost a week old...and he's at 42% in that poll...which is 6 points higher than it was four weeks ago. The WSJ poll that you mentioned is almost a month old. .. |
OT--President's Job Approval at 47%
"Harry Krause" wrote in message ... wrote: Rasmussen also polls nightly, which is absurd, because one bit of good or bad news skews the poll. LOL. When Rasmussen lists a number (like 47%), it's an average of the polling data from the prior 3 days. "A bit of good or bad news" won't skew the poll significantly. Just look at the three-week trend from Rasmussen. Bush has steadily climbed from 42/43% to today's number: 47%. " The national telephone survey of 1,500 Adults was conducted by Rasmussen Reports over the past three nights. Margin of sampling error is +/- 3 percentage points with a 95% level of confidence " |
OT--President's Job Approval at 46%
"Gene Kearns" wrote in message ... On Sat, 03 Dec 2005 22:50:01 GMT, "NOYB" wrote: President Bush Job Approval Saturday December 03, 2005--Forty-six percent (46%) of American adults approve of the way George W. Bush is performing his role as President. Fifty-three percent (53%) of Americans Disapprove of the President's performance. The President's Job Approval has been above the 43% mark in our last eight daily polls. Prior to that, it had generally been in the 40% to 43% range for more than a month. The low point for the President came October 28. His numbers stopped falling when Harriet Miers withdrew her name from consideration as a Supreme Court nominee. NOYB, I must admit, your frequent postings and the content contained therein have had far reaching changes in the way that I will vote in the future. I'm sure you have evoked similar epiphanies in other readers.... You mean that Harry's even-more-frequent posts haven't had an influence on your voting habits? |
OT--President's Job Approval at 46%
|
OT--President's Job Approval at 46%
"Gene Kearns" wrote in message ... On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 01:26:46 GMT, "NOYB" wrote: "Gene Kearns" wrote in message . .. On Sat, 03 Dec 2005 22:50:01 GMT, "NOYB" wrote: President Bush Job Approval Saturday December 03, 2005--Forty-six percent (46%) of American adults approve of the way George W. Bush is performing his role as President. Fifty-three percent (53%) of Americans Disapprove of the President's performance. The President's Job Approval has been above the 43% mark in our last eight daily polls. Prior to that, it had generally been in the 40% to 43% range for more than a month. The low point for the President came October 28. His numbers stopped falling when Harriet Miers withdrew her name from consideration as a Supreme Court nominee. NOYB, I must admit, your frequent postings and the content contained therein have had far reaching changes in the way that I will vote in the future. I'm sure you have evoked similar epiphanies in other readers.... You mean that Harry's even-more-frequent posts haven't had an influence on your voting habits? Probably would, but I miss a lot of his posts. When I have my filters active I see very little OT stuff.... and his sig line has even excluded a lot of his OnT posts. I'll be glad when this iteration of Agent is finished so I can cut the filters back on.... -- Give me a break Gene. Most of Harry's posts are done so without being noted as OT. How about another excuse? |
OT--President's Job Approval at 46%
On Tue, 06 Dec 2005 02:29:24 GMT, Gene Kearns wrote:
On Mon, 5 Dec 2005 21:10:26 -0500, " *JimH*" wrote: Give me a break Gene. Most of Harry's posts are done so without being noted as OT. How about another excuse? Since you have jumped to such a conclusion, would you care for an education? Since so many posters in this newsgroup have elected not to include the term "OT-" in their subject, thereby making it impossible to filter using conventional means, I have implemented a personal news server. It uses grep, filters on any message headers, any body content....even a sig line.... So, if a word, phrase, or any combination thereof is used that is included in my hit-list, the message is dropped.... even if *I* screw up and use one of those words. I didn't see any of Harry's messages for months, because he had words like, "Bush, Neo-Con, Republican, Kerry, Liberal, Democrat, etc" in his sig line. In fact, since you quoted some of Harry's original message, if the filters were on, I'd have never seen *your* post! I still think you should light up your boat! _ ___c \ _| \_ __\_| oooo \_____ ~~~~|______________/ ~~~~~ ~~~ ~~~~~~ ~~~ ~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~ }((((o ~~~~~~ }{{{{o ~~~~~~~ Did you know that spell check tries to substitute 'ooze' for the port holes in your cabin? I just thought I'd pass that on. I think it's the best of all the sig lines, except for mine, of course. But, if you put some Christmas lights, or maybe a wee tree on the bow, it would be stunning! |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:50 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com