Expletives
 

From: "Doug Kanter"
Subject: Democrats lying about "he lied us into war."
Date: Monday, November 07, 2005 9:23 AM


What the ****'s the difference, moron?

Why is it that so many of the "progressives" in the NG think it is useful to
use expletives to emphasize their prospective on issues.

I also wonder why so many liberals find the word liberal to be such a
negative word that they use the expression "progressive".

Expletives
 

"Dr. Dr. Smithers" Ask Me about my Phd @ Diploma Mill .com wrote in
message ...

From: "Doug Kanter"
Subject: Democrats lying about "he lied us into war."
Date: Monday, November 07, 2005 9:23 AM


What the ****'s the difference, moron?

Why is it that so many of the "progressives" in the NG think it is useful
to use expletives to emphasize their prospective on issues.

I also wonder why so many liberals find the word liberal to be such a
negative word that they use the expression "progressive".




Certain terminology is reserved for use with certain types of people. It's
really not the problem you make it out to be. Language is beautiful, as
George Carlin has proven over and over again.

Expletives
 

Dr. Dr. Smithers wrote:
From: "Doug Kanter"
Subject: Democrats lying about "he lied us into war."
Date: Monday, November 07, 2005 9:23 AM


What the ****'s the difference, moron?

Why is it that so many of the "progressives" in the NG think it is useful to
use expletives to emphasize their prospective on issues.

I also wonder why so many liberals find the word liberal to be such a
negative word that they use the expression "progressive".


You suffer from a short memory. Recall "Tuuk"? Recall the decidedly
right wing individual who attempted to drive all the OT posters from
the NG with a non-stop barrage of profanity?

As far as the term "liberal" goes, some prefer to be called
"progressives" for the same reason that many of you "reactionaries"
would prefer to be called "conservatives".

Profanity should be used sparingly, for special emphasis. Overuse of
profanity usually indicates a limited vocabulary. Then again, there are
cases where one is attempting to communicate with people who don't
easily understand multi-syllable words and there is a limited supply of
four letter words that can be easily understood.

Expletives
 

Chuck,
I agree, if used very sparingly, a good expletive can be effective to
emphasize a point. If it is not used sparingly it loses all impact.


wrote in message
oups.com...

Dr. Dr. Smithers wrote:
From: "Doug Kanter"
Subject: Democrats lying about "he lied us into war."
Date: Monday, November 07, 2005 9:23 AM


What the ****'s the difference, moron?

Why is it that so many of the "progressives" in the NG think it is useful
to
use expletives to emphasize their prospective on issues.

I also wonder why so many liberals find the word liberal to be such a
negative word that they use the expression "progressive".


You suffer from a short memory. Recall "Tuuk"? Recall the decidedly
right wing individual who attempted to drive all the OT posters from
the NG with a non-stop barrage of profanity?

As far as the term "liberal" goes, some prefer to be called
"progressives" for the same reason that many of you "reactionaries"
would prefer to be called "conservatives".

Profanity should be used sparingly, for special emphasis. Overuse of
profanity usually indicates a limited vocabulary. Then again, there are
cases where one is attempting to communicate with people who don't
easily understand multi-syllable words and there is a limited supply of
four letter words that can be easily understood.

Expletives
 

Chuck,
Oh and you are correct there were some weak minded people from the right
whose inability to express themselves forced them to use expletives in
almost everyone of their posts. They were just as effective as those on the
left who can not communicate without using profanity.


wrote in message
oups.com...

Dr. Dr. Smithers wrote:
From: "Doug Kanter"
Subject: Democrats lying about "he lied us into war."
Date: Monday, November 07, 2005 9:23 AM


What the ****'s the difference, moron?

Why is it that so many of the "progressives" in the NG think it is useful
to
use expletives to emphasize their prospective on issues.

I also wonder why so many liberals find the word liberal to be such a
negative word that they use the expression "progressive".


You suffer from a short memory. Recall "Tuuk"? Recall the decidedly
right wing individual who attempted to drive all the OT posters from
the NG with a non-stop barrage of profanity?

As far as the term "liberal" goes, some prefer to be called
"progressives" for the same reason that many of you "reactionaries"
would prefer to be called "conservatives".

Profanity should be used sparingly, for special emphasis. Overuse of
profanity usually indicates a limited vocabulary. Then again, there are
cases where one is attempting to communicate with people who don't
easily understand multi-syllable words and there is a limited supply of
four letter words that can be easily understood.

Expletives
 

In article .com,
says...

Dr. Dr. Smithers wrote:
From: "Doug Kanter"
Subject: Democrats lying about "he lied us into war."
Date: Monday, November 07, 2005 9:23 AM


What the ****'s the difference, moron?

Why is it that so many of the "progressives" in the NG think it is useful to
use expletives to emphasize their prospective on issues.

I also wonder why so many liberals find the word liberal to be such a
negative word that they use the expression "progressive".


You suffer from a short memory. Recall "Tuuk"? Recall the decidedly
right wing individual who attempted to drive all the OT posters from
the NG with a non-stop barrage of profanity?

As far as the term "liberal" goes, some prefer to be called
"progressives" for the same reason that many of you "reactionaries"
would prefer to be called "conservatives".

Profanity should be used sparingly, for special emphasis. Overuse of
profanity usually indicates a limited vocabulary. Then again, there are
cases where one is attempting to communicate with people who don't
easily understand multi-syllable words and there is a limited supply of
four letter words that can be easily understood.

Amen.

jps

Expletives
 

In article , "Dr. Dr. Smithers"
Ask Me about my Phd @ Diploma Mill .com says...
Chuck,
Oh and you are correct there were some weak minded people from the right
whose inability to express themselves forced them to use expletives in
almost everyone of their posts. They were just as effective as those on the
left who can not communicate without using profanity.

What the **** is that supposed to mean?

jps

Expletives
 

I meant what I said, those who us expletives in their normal conversation or
posts normally are of limited mental capacity. Both right and left wing can
be just as guilty, and both are ineffective in their communication skills.


"jps" wrote in message
...
In article , "Dr. Dr. Smithers"
Ask Me about my Phd @ Diploma Mill .com says...
Chuck,
Oh and you are correct there were some weak minded people from the right
whose inability to express themselves forced them to use expletives in
almost everyone of their posts. They were just as effective as those on
the
left who can not communicate without using profanity.

What the **** is that supposed to mean?

jps

Expletives
 

On 8 Nov 2005 08:09:21 -0800, wrote:


Dr. Dr. Smithers wrote:
From: "Doug Kanter"
Subject: Democrats lying about "he lied us into war."
Date: Monday, November 07, 2005 9:23 AM


What the ****'s the difference, moron?

Why is it that so many of the "progressives" in the NG think it is useful to
use expletives to emphasize their prospective on issues.

I also wonder why so many liberals find the word liberal to be such a
negative word that they use the expression "progressive".


You suffer from a short memory. Recall "Tuuk"? Recall the decidedly
right wing individual who attempted to drive all the OT posters from
the NG with a non-stop barrage of profanity?

Recall how many times conservatives in the group made comments to Tuuk about his
posts?

As far as the term "liberal" goes, some prefer to be called
"progressives" for the same reason that many of you "reactionaries"
would prefer to be called "conservatives".

Profanity should be used sparingly, for special emphasis. Overuse of
profanity usually indicates a limited vocabulary. Then again, there are
cases where one is attempting to communicate with people who don't
easily understand multi-syllable words and there is a limited supply of
four letter words that can be easily understood.

Kevin hasn't been here for a while, Chuck. Other than those who have to use
vulgarities as adjectives, who can't understand multi-syllable words? Many of
both persuasions here have praised some of the stories/articles you've authored
and posted. Are you implying those doing the praising couldn't read your posts?

I find it hard to believe that you could or would defend something like:

"What the ****'s the difference, moron?"

--
John H

"It's *not* a baby kicking, bride of mine, it's just a fetus!"

Hypocrital Liberal

Expletives
 

In article , "Dr. Dr. Smithers"
Ask Me about my Phd @ Diploma Mill .com says...
I meant what I said, those who us expletives in their normal conversation or
posts normally are of limited mental capacity. Both right and left wing can
be just as guilty, and both are ineffective in their communication skills.


"jps" wrote in message
...
In article , "Dr. Dr. Smithers"
Ask Me about my Phd @ Diploma Mill .com says...
Chuck,
Oh and you are correct there were some weak minded people from the right
whose inability to express themselves forced them to use expletives in
almost everyone of their posts. They were just as effective as those on
the
left who can not communicate without using profanity.

What the **** is that supposed to mean?

jps

Jesus ****ing Christ, I was kidding!!!

Would it help if I put smiley faces on it??? ;^)

jps

Expletives
 

LOL
sure
; )


"jps" wrote in message
...
In article , "Dr. Dr. Smithers"
Ask Me about my Phd @ Diploma Mill .com says...
I meant what I said, those who us expletives in their normal conversation
or
posts normally are of limited mental capacity. Both right and left wing
can
be just as guilty, and both are ineffective in their communication
skills.


"jps" wrote in message
...
In article , "Dr. Dr. Smithers"
Ask Me about my Phd @ Diploma Mill .com says...
Chuck,
Oh and you are correct there were some weak minded people from the
right
whose inability to express themselves forced them to use expletives in
almost everyone of their posts. They were just as effective as those
on
the
left who can not communicate without using profanity.

What the **** is that supposed to mean?

jps

Jesus ****ing Christ, I was kidding!!!

Would it help if I put smiley faces on it??? ;^)

jps

Expletives
 

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...

It means, as always, that Smithers is full of sh*t.

jps,
See here is a perfect example. ; )

Expletives
 

John H. wrote:

I find it hard to believe that you could or would defend something like:

"What the ****'s the difference, moron?"

--
John H

It's hard to believe that you read my posts in this thread and reached
a conclusion that I was defending the vulgarity.

Expletives
 

wrote in message
oups.com...

Dr. Dr. Smithers wrote:
From: "Doug Kanter"
Subject: Democrats lying about "he lied us into war."
Date: Monday, November 07, 2005 9:23 AM


What the ****'s the difference, moron?

Why is it that so many of the "progressives" in the NG think it is useful
to
use expletives to emphasize their prospective on issues.

I also wonder why so many liberals find the word liberal to be such a
negative word that they use the expression "progressive".

snip

As far as the term "liberal" goes, some prefer to be called
"progressives" for the same reason that many of you "reactionaries"
would prefer to be called "conservatives".


Progressives? How funny. *Regressive's* would be more accurate. But I can
understand why many liberals do not want to be called such anymore as it
has become a word with so many negative images attached to it. ;-)

Expletives
 

John H. wrote:


Kevin hasn't been here for a while, Chuck.

Nice, huh?!?

Expletives
 

John H. wrote:

Kevin hasn't been here for a while, Chuck.

As far as I can tell, there hasn't been any non-fictional, non-Smithers
Kevins posting here since "KS" in September and KevingDHCP in August.

Before that, "Kevin & Debbie", Kevin Jed, and Kevin Despot all in July.
I notice that none of them have been back since.


--
~/Garth - 1966 Glastron V-142 Skiflite: "Blue-Boat"
"There is nothing - absolutely nothing - half so much worth doing
as simply messing about in boats."
-Kenneth Grahame, The Wind in the Willows

Expletives
 

8. jps
Nov 8, 2:29 pm show options

Newsgroups: rec.boats
From: jps - Find messages by this author
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 12:29:50 -0800
Local: Tues, Nov 8 2005 2:29 pm
Subject: Expletives
Reply | Reply to Author | Forward | Print | Individual Message | Show
original | Report Abuse

In article , "Dr. Dr. Smithers"
Ask Me about my Phd @ Diploma Mill .com says...




- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -

I meant what I said, those who us expletives in their normal conversation or
posts normally are of limited mental capacity. Both right and left wing can
be just as guilty, and both are ineffective in their communication skills.

"jps" wrote in message
...
In article , "Dr. Dr. Smithers"
Ask Me about my Phd @ Diploma Mill .com says...
Chuck,
Oh and you are correct there were some weak minded people from the right
whose inability to express themselves forced them to use expletives in
almost everyone of their posts. They were just as effective as those on
the
left who can not communicate without using profanity.


What the **** is that supposed to mean?


jps



Jesus ****ing Christ, I was kidding!!!

Would it help if I put smiley faces on it??? ;^)


jps




Of course, you would think that jesus had a middle name, and a vulgar
one at that

Expletives
 

wrote:
John H. wrote:

I find it hard to believe that you could or would defend something like:

"What the ****'s the difference, moron?"

--
John H

It's hard to believe that you read my posts in this thread and reached
a conclusion that I was defending the vulgarity.

He's not very bright.....