John H. wrote:

I find it hard to believe that you could or would defend something like:

"What the ****'s the difference, moron?"

--
John H

It's hard to believe that you read my posts in this thread and reached
a conclusion that I was defending the vulgarity.

wrote:
John H. wrote:

I find it hard to believe that you could or would defend something like:

"What the ****'s the difference, moron?"

--
John H

It's hard to believe that you read my posts in this thread and reached
a conclusion that I was defending the vulgarity.

He's not very bright.....

John H. wrote:


Kevin hasn't been here for a while, Chuck.

Nice, huh?!?

John H. wrote:

Kevin hasn't been here for a while, Chuck.

As far as I can tell, there hasn't been any non-fictional, non-Smithers
Kevins posting here since "KS" in September and KevingDHCP in August.

Before that, "Kevin & Debbie", Kevin Jed, and Kevin Despot all in July.
I notice that none of them have been back since.


--
~/Garth - 1966 Glastron V-142 Skiflite: "Blue-Boat"
"There is nothing - absolutely nothing - half so much worth doing
as simply messing about in boats."
-Kenneth Grahame, The Wind in the Willows

wrote in message
oups.com...

Dr. Dr. Smithers wrote:
From: "Doug Kanter"
Subject: Democrats lying about "he lied us into war."
Date: Monday, November 07, 2005 9:23 AM


What the ****'s the difference, moron?

Why is it that so many of the "progressives" in the NG think it is useful
to
use expletives to emphasize their prospective on issues.

I also wonder why so many liberals find the word liberal to be such a
negative word that they use the expression "progressive".

snip

As far as the term "liberal" goes, some prefer to be called
"progressives" for the same reason that many of you "reactionaries"
would prefer to be called "conservatives".


Progressives? How funny. *Regressive's* would be more accurate. But I can
understand why many liberals do not want to be called such anymore as it
has become a word with so many negative images attached to it. ;-)