On Sat, 05 Nov 2005 08:43:47 -0500, Bert Robbins wrote:


"thunder" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 04 Nov 2005 19:35:33 +0000, NOYB wrote:


Libby said something that blatantly contradicted Russert's testimony.
One
of them is lying about that conversation. The indictment suggests that
it
was Libby who lied...but the trial should show where the truth really
lies.

I'm starting to worry about you, NOYB. You are losing touch with
reality. You have read the indictment. Libby not only contradicted
Russert, but Cheney, a senior CIA officer, the Under Secretary of State,
a CIA briefer, Judith Miller, the White House Press Secretary, the
Assistant to the Vice President for Public Affairs, and the Counsel to
the Office of the Vice President, and that is only on one of the counts
in the indictment.

So, you've seen the secret GJ testimony? All you have in the indictment is
what Fitzgerald wants you to see.

That's right, and all of the above was in the indictment. It is *not* a
case of Libby's work against Russert's. It is a case of Libby's word
against *all* of those other sources. The only thing NOYB said that was
accurate was, "the trial should show where the truth really lies". That
is, if there is a trial.


Tim Russert, NBC's Wash.D.C Beaureu Chief, is contradicted by his on staff
on NBC Wash.D.C. correspondent that had a report published saying that
every one in DC knew Wilson's wife, Plame, worked at the CIA.

10 years ago I thought Russert to be a moderate, 5 years ago he started to
show left-wing leanings and today he has joined the left-wing of the
Democratic party.