" *JimH*" wrote in message
...

"Gorf" wrote in message
. com...

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Gorf wrote:
" *JimH*" wrote in message
. ..
"Gorf" wrote in message
. com...
" *JimH*" wrote in message
...

What I read was a lot of accusation with absolutely no link or
sources
supporting the claims.

So to me it is nothing more than..............political crap.


Here's another beleive what you want....
Here's McKinney grilling Rumsfeld over the lost $$$
http://www.infowars.com/articles/us/...s_rumsfeld.htm



yawn

Wake me up when you find a credible source for your information.



so c-span is not credible? even when it is a video of House Hearing
on
FY06
Dept. of Defense Budget, March 11th, 2005.

I guess you only believe Karl Rove and faux news eh?




There isn't an instance in usenet history in which Jim Hertvik has
demonstrated possession of more than below-average intellect.

An amazing thing about some of these low-brain-output righties is their
absolute refusal to take reality into account in their support for
George W. Bush. No matter how Bush screws up, they're ready with the
excuses and rationalizations.

As much as I like Bill Clinton, I never held him up to be a paragon. He
was and is a bright, articulate, capable fellow with unlimited ability
to reveal his feelings for humanity, but, like most of us, he is a
flawed individual.

Bush, on the other hand, seems, as president, to be a model for
incompetency.



My statements had nothing to do with my like or dislike of George Bush and
his policies. They had everything to do with the credibility of the
articles posted.


LOL - I see where you are coming from and agree that the military is not
credible source of information. After all they blame the loss of 2.2
trillion in 1999 and another 1.1 trillion in 2004 on a computer glitch - ya
right.....

Like I said in the first post about this - if it was a corporation these
people would be behind bars.......