On Thu, 22 Jul 2004 16:58:29 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote:


"Dave Hall" wrote in message
.. .
On Thu, 22 Jul 2004 14:02:17 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote:


"Dave Hall" wrote in message
.. .
On Wed, 21 Jul 2004 17:04:04 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote:

"Dave Hall" wrote in message
.. .


"This is still the united states, dipstick, and BUSH hasn't been
convicted of anything. Ergo, the assumption is he is innocent."

Sound familiar? Or do you always apply a double standard?

Dave




Based on THAT logic, the Iraqis we killed should be brought back to
life,
since they died for nothing.

Which Iraqi's? The ones who were loyal to Saddam, or the ones involved
in the current insurgence?

Dave


No. The innocent ones who got in the way.

How many "innocents" died in WWII? Should the fact that innocents
often die in war, deter us from the greater common good?

Dave


What a kristian thing to say. Some died here, so others should die there.

It's the plain truth of war. I don't understand why so many of you
guys on the left seem to think we can conduct a major military
operation without people dying. It won't happen. We are continually
updating our military technology to minimize the risk to our troops,
and civilians. But no system is perfect, and the reality that people
will ultimately die, should not be a factor when war becomes necessary
to accomplish a worthy goal.

Dave