In article , says...

Facts schmacts. Bush is great. Bush gets his support from God. Bush
it taking the war to the terrorists on their own territory so they won't
come here. Bush needs to be reelected because if those lilly-livered
liberals get into office we'll have a defense department that implodes,
we'll have an increase in terror attacks around the world, most of
the worlds nations will hate us, we'll have government spending
like youve never seen before, we'll have huge deficits that are
unsound for the economy, we'll be sending BILLIONS of dollars
to other countries and we'll have leaders that we just can't trust
to tell us the truth.

Don't forget that the Candy Floss haired God and his sidekick, the
Teutonic Jesus will be frowning on us for four years. We probably won't
win a battle, the Rider Cup or a Wimbledon for the first four years of
Kerry's term.

But maybe they'll warm to the idea and give us break during Kerry's
second term and then Edwards/Clinton first and second terms should be a
breeze.

We can probably attract most of the Gods (even Mohammed) to our side
with 16 years of a Democratic Executive branch. Maybe Hillary will be
ready to lead by then.

jps

"jps" wrote in message unsound for the economy, we'll be
But maybe they'll warm to the idea and give us break during Kerry's
second term and then Edwards/Clinton first and second terms should be a
breeze.

We can probably attract most of the Gods (even Mohammed) to our side
with 16 years of a Democratic Executive branch. Maybe Hillary will be
ready to lead by then.

jps

Serious question.
Why are you people so high on Hillary? She has never shown leadership
ability. Was a 2nd rate, forgetful attorney. Could not keep her husband
under any sort of marital control. There are great females available as
candidates. A lot more qualified than Hillary. So why Hillary? California
has 2 female senators. Feinstein is a lot sharper and more qualified. Now
Boxer is a different story. IMO not qualified to be a city council person.

"Calif Bill" wrote in message link.net...
"jps" wrote in message unsound for the economy, we'll be
But maybe they'll warm to the idea and give us break during Kerry's
second term and then Edwards/Clinton first and second terms should be a
breeze.

We can probably attract most of the Gods (even Mohammed) to our side
with 16 years of a Democratic Executive branch. Maybe Hillary will be
ready to lead by then.

jps

Serious question.
Why are you people so high on Hillary? She has never shown leadership
ability. Was a 2nd rate, forgetful attorney. Could not keep her husband
under any sort of marital control. There are great females available as
candidates. A lot more qualified than Hillary. So why Hillary? California
has 2 female senators. Feinstein is a lot sharper and more qualified. Now
Boxer is a different story. IMO not qualified to be a city council person.

Guess you are just ignorant of fact...again.... Hillary is doing a
fantastic job in NY. Creating lots of needed programs, etc. She has
even stepped in to stop forclosure on some farms in western NY,
working with the farmers and banks to get them back on track, and no,
not with government money.

On Thu, 08 Jul 2004 06:09:44 GMT, "Calif Bill"
wrote:

[elided]

Serious question.
Why are you people so high on Hillary? She has never shown leadership
ability. Was a 2nd rate, forgetful attorney. Could not keep her husband
under any sort of marital control.

Sir:

I must ask: is "marital control" your preferred model of a life partnership?

Curious notion.

Most sincerely,
W.T. Hatch

There are great females available as
candidates. A lot more qualified than Hillary. So why Hillary? California
has 2 female senators. Feinstein is a lot sharper and more qualified. Now
Boxer is a different story. IMO not qualified to be a city council person.

"W.T. Hatch" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 08 Jul 2004 06:09:44 GMT, "Calif Bill"

wrote:

[elided]

Serious question.
Why are you people so high on Hillary? She has never shown leadership
ability. Was a 2nd rate, forgetful attorney. Could not keep her husband
under any sort of marital control.

Sir:

I must ask: is "marital control" your preferred model of a life
partnership?

Curious notion.

Most sincerely,
W.T. Hatch

I think it falls into the same category as "She couldn't keep her man" or
"He couldn't keep his woman" - that sort of bull****.

Doug Kanter wrote:
"W.T. Hatch" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 08 Jul 2004 06:09:44 GMT, "Calif Bill"

wrote:

[elided]

Serious question.
Why are you people so high on Hillary? She has never shown leadership
ability. Was a 2nd rate, forgetful attorney. Could not keep her husband
under any sort of marital control.

Sir:

I must ask: is "marital control" your preferred model of a life
partnership?

Curious notion.

Most sincerely,
W.T. Hatch

I think it falls into the same category as "She couldn't keep her man" or
"He couldn't keep his woman" - that sort of bull****.



Maybe Binary Bill has one of those old-fashioned Republican marriages,
where, if his wife doesn't adhere to his standards, he beats the crap
out of her.

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Doug Kanter wrote:
"W.T. Hatch" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 08 Jul 2004 06:09:44 GMT, "Calif Bill"

wrote:

[elided]

Serious question.
Why are you people so high on Hillary? She has never shown leadership
ability. Was a 2nd rate, forgetful attorney. Could not keep her
husband
under any sort of marital control.

Sir:

I must ask: is "marital control" your preferred model of a life
partnership?

Curious notion.

Most sincerely,
W.T. Hatch

I think it falls into the same category as "She couldn't keep her man"
or
"He couldn't keep his woman" - that sort of bull****.



Maybe Binary Bill has one of those old-fashioned Republican marriages,
where, if his wife doesn't adhere to his standards, he beats the crap
out of her.

Do not judge the rest of us, by your standards.

"Calif Bill" wrote in message
ink.net...

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Doug Kanter wrote:
"W.T. Hatch" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 08 Jul 2004 06:09:44 GMT, "Calif Bill"

wrote:

[elided]

Serious question.
Why are you people so high on Hillary? She has never shown
leadership
ability. Was a 2nd rate, forgetful attorney. Could not keep her
husband
under any sort of marital control.

Sir:

I must ask: is "marital control" your preferred model of a life
partnership?

Curious notion.

Most sincerely,
W.T. Hatch

I think it falls into the same category as "She couldn't keep her man"
or
"He couldn't keep his woman" - that sort of bull****.



Maybe Binary Bill has one of those old-fashioned Republican marriages,
where, if his wife doesn't adhere to his standards, he beats the crap
out of her.

Do not judge the rest of us, by your standards.



Believe, me. we Dont',. ()

I don't know if Harry would beat his wife, but if she doesn't live up to his
standards he does "make up" a wife who does. I still can't believe he is so
embarrassed about his wife being a social worker that he would tell everyone
she is a doctor doctor.


"Calif Bill" wrote in message
ink.net...

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Doug Kanter wrote:
"W.T. Hatch" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 08 Jul 2004 06:09:44 GMT, "Calif Bill"

wrote:

[elided]

Serious question.
Why are you people so high on Hillary? She has never shown
leadership
ability. Was a 2nd rate, forgetful attorney. Could not keep her
husband
under any sort of marital control.

Sir:

I must ask: is "marital control" your preferred model of a life
partnership?

Curious notion.

Most sincerely,
W.T. Hatch

I think it falls into the same category as "She couldn't keep her man"
or
"He couldn't keep his woman" - that sort of bull****.



Maybe Binary Bill has one of those old-fashioned Republican marriages,
where, if his wife doesn't adhere to his standards, he beats the crap
out of her.

Do not judge the rest of us, by your standards.

"W.T. Hatch" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 08 Jul 2004 06:09:44 GMT, "Calif Bill"

wrote:

[elided]

Serious question.
Why are you people so high on Hillary? She has never shown leadership
ability. Was a 2nd rate, forgetful attorney. Could not keep her husband
under any sort of marital control.

Sir:

I must ask: is "marital control" your preferred model of a life
partnership?

Curious notion.

Most sincerely,
W.T. Hatch

There are great females available as
candidates. A lot more qualified than Hillary. So why Hillary?
California
has 2 female senators. Feinstein is a lot sharper and more qualified.
Now
Boxer is a different story. IMO not qualified to be a city council
person.


Well, most of the successful marriages are a partnership. Some control in
just respect and actions. Even Bill did not respect Hillary.