![]() |
noaa weather maps
Ahoy,
When heavy weather moves in at the house, the first place I go to is http://www.srh.noaa.gov/radar/latest/ to get an idea of the storm location and the storm track. It is a wonderful tool that would be handy to have while boating. I can't afford mobile Inet on the boat (last I checked $80/month). Any one using a cheaper service? I was brainstorming (pun intended) with a buddy about the feasablily of transmitting the NOAA radar service over the weather channels. The radar image for the locale area could be transmitted (in digital) over the standard weather channel, with a slow baud rate to avoid using a lot of radio bandwidth. Taking 5-10 minutes to update wouldn't be a problem. A display (PC) would connect to the marine radio, decode and display the radar. The weather radio is already in place, most boats have marine radio and PC's are getting cheaper by the day. Any thoughts? |
noaa weather maps
It would be a lot cheaper to simply transmit the cable weather radar channel on
an unused TV channel. They could shove in some commercials to pay for it. 12v TVs are less than $100. I keep a small TV monitor tuned to that channel in our tiki hut so we can look at the weather before we decide to go but it would be nice to have it underway. |
noaa weather maps
"Mike" wrote in message om... Ahoy, When heavy weather moves in at the house, the first place I go to is http://www.srh.noaa.gov/radar/latest/ to get an idea of the storm location and the storm track. It is a wonderful tool that would be handy to have while boating. I can't afford mobile Inet on the boat (last I checked $80/month). Any one using a cheaper service? I was brainstorming (pun intended) with a buddy about the feasablily of transmitting the NOAA radar service over the weather channels. The radar image for the locale area could be transmitted (in digital) over the standard weather channel, with a slow baud rate to avoid using a lot of radio bandwidth. Taking 5-10 minutes to update wouldn't be a problem. A display (PC) would connect to the marine radio, decode and display the radar. The weather radio is already in place, most boats have marine radio and PC's are getting cheaper by the day. Any thoughts? I can get the weather map on my Nextel phone...but it only works out about 5 miles from land. Would it really take that long to download over the radio waves? My cell phone takes a few seconds. |
noaa weather maps
"NOYB" wrote in message ...
"Mike" wrote in message om... Ahoy, When heavy weather moves in at the house, the first place I go to is http://www.srh.noaa.gov/radar/latest/ to get an idea of the storm location and the storm track. It is a wonderful tool that would be handy to have while boating. I can't afford mobile Inet on the boat (last I checked $80/month). Any one using a cheaper service? I was brainstorming (pun intended) with a buddy about the feasablily of transmitting the NOAA radar service over the weather channels. The radar image for the locale area could be transmitted (in digital) over the standard weather channel, with a slow baud rate to avoid using a lot of radio bandwidth. Taking 5-10 minutes to update wouldn't be a problem. A display (PC) would connect to the marine radio, decode and display the radar. The weather radio is already in place, most boats have marine radio and PC's are getting cheaper by the day. Any thoughts? I can get the weather map on my Nextel phone...but it only works out about 5 miles from land. Would it really take that long to download over the radio waves? My cell phone takes a few seconds. Lets see, My NOAA chart is 320 x 320 pixels, or 102400 pixels. Lets say 8 bits per pixel, so 102400 bytes of uncompressed data. Now add header/error checking so 123000 bytes. The marine radio band can reliably handle say 300 baud. 300 / 10 bits/char (8 data bits 1 start bit, 1 stop bit) 30 char second. 102300/30 = 3410 sec/chart. 3410 sec / 60 sec/min approx 56 minutes/chart. Well, damn, another great idea shot down by cold hard facts. Thanks for the reply. Mike |
noaa weather maps
"Mike" wrote in message om... "NOYB" wrote in message ... "Mike" wrote in message om... Ahoy, When heavy weather moves in at the house, the first place I go to is http://www.srh.noaa.gov/radar/latest/ to get an idea of the storm location and the storm track. It is a wonderful tool that would be handy to have while boating. I can't afford mobile Inet on the boat (last I checked $80/month). Any one using a cheaper service? I was brainstorming (pun intended) with a buddy about the feasablily of transmitting the NOAA radar service over the weather channels. The radar image for the locale area could be transmitted (in digital) over the standard weather channel, with a slow baud rate to avoid using a lot of radio bandwidth. Taking 5-10 minutes to update wouldn't be a problem. A display (PC) would connect to the marine radio, decode and display the radar. The weather radio is already in place, most boats have marine radio and PC's are getting cheaper by the day. Any thoughts? I can get the weather map on my Nextel phone...but it only works out about 5 miles from land. Would it really take that long to download over the radio waves? My cell phone takes a few seconds. Lets see, My NOAA chart is 320 x 320 pixels, or 102400 pixels. Lets say 8 bits per pixel, so 102400 bytes of uncompressed data. Now add header/error checking so 123000 bytes. The marine radio band can reliably handle say 300 baud. 300 / 10 bits/char (8 data bits 1 start bit, 1 stop bit) 30 char second. 102300/30 = 3410 sec/chart. 3410 sec / 60 sec/min approx 56 minutes/chart. Well, damn, another great idea shot down by cold hard facts. I guess my cell phone doesn't have 102,400 pixels...or it's really, really efficient at uncompressing highly compressed data. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:45 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com