"Starbuck's" wrote in message
...
Harry,
Your thought process seems to off, this is not an either or situation. It
is possible, (and probably recommended) that we don't use a terrorist
hell-bent on destroying America or an uniformed dentist to protect our
civil liberties.

If you want to refute NOYB premise that Padilla is a gangbanger at best,
it would have made a much better argument that to say we have to either
entrust a terrorist or an uninformed dentist.

Life is not black and white, but you do not seem to understand the nuances
of the real world. I don't always agree with NYOB, but he consistently
out debates you on every issue.


Not too shabby for an "uniformed" dentist, eh?