In article . net,
says...

"thunder" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 10 Sep 2005 14:04:13 +0000, NOYB wrote:



The ruling could have major implications for detainees at the U.S. naval
base at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, where many, like Padilla, have been deemed
"enemy combatants." Judge J. Michael Luttig wrote the decision for the
three-member panel in Richmond, Va. He is considered to be on President
Bush's short list of candidates to fill a vacancy on the Supreme Court.

The ruling *will* have major implications for all Americans. It's very
bad news for the Bill of Rights. You may want to refresh yourself on the
dying document. Pay special attention to the Fifth and Sixth Amendments.

http://usinfo.state.gov/usa/infousa/...cs/billeng.htm

Ironically, one of the Amici supporting Padilla was none other than Janet
Reno. Her name appears right alongside the ACLU, the National Association
of Criminal Defense Lawyers, the NYCLU, the CLU of SC, and other mutant,
traitorous leftie organizations.

With Reno presiding over the Justice Dept through the 90's, it's no wonder
why we were fighting an ineffective battle against terrorism before Bush
took office.

http://www.wiggin.com/db30/cgi-bin/p...%20Opinion.pdf

Just because he's guilty doesn't mean he doesn't deserve his day in
court just like any other citizen.

The laws of the land are fully capable of dealing with any of its
citizens.

You'd prefer Joseph Stalin running the country.

jps