Bill McKee wrote:
Secret and prvate are two different items.

Yes, they must be, I don't know what a "prvate" is.

But, if you meant PRIVATE, you are STILL wrong. Just because a meeting
is deemed "secret", doesn't mean that someone wouldn't have knowledge
about it. See this:

se=B7cret ( P ) Pronunciation Key (skrt)
adj.
Kept hidden from knowledge or view; concealed

Now, if the MEETING were "hidden" from "view", would have no bearing on
whether you would have knowledge of it or not.

Do you EVER think before you come up with such drivel?

P. Fritz wrote:
"*JimH*" wrote in message
...

"PocoLoco" wrote in message
...
On 7 Sep 2005 04:43:39 -0700, wrote:


Your stupidity is shining brightly.

This from one who proclaimed himself the proud former owner of a
motorcycle
which was never even made??

--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

Some of his other *contributions* to the NG this morning:

=========================
"What a dumb ****."
=======================

"Harry, they CAN'T figure that out, that's why the idiots Fritz, JimH,
and JohnH, and even NOYB think I'm Kevin Noble!!!!!!"
=======================================

"I take it by your above slobbering diatribe that you know nothing about
cross posted messages, and how they happen?"
==================================

What a nice guy the basskisser fellow is.

That is why kevin is still the "King of the NG idiots"

See, Harry? I TOLD you the dumb ****s can't figure out how someone can
post from someone elses account and not be that person!!!!!

Kevin,

I am having trouble following your logic, it seems like you are agreeing
with Bill McKee, that secret and private are different items.

Since you agree with his premise that secret and private are different
items, why the personal attacks directed towards Bill?

wrote in message
oups.com...

Bill McKee wrote:
Secret and prvate are two different items.

Yes, they must be, I don't know what a "prvate" is.

But, if you meant PRIVATE, you are STILL wrong. Just because a meeting
is deemed "secret", doesn't mean that someone wouldn't have knowledge
about it. See this:

se·cret ( P ) Pronunciation Key (skrt)
adj.
Kept hidden from knowledge or view; concealed

Now, if the MEETING were "hidden" from "view", would have no bearing on
whether you would have knowledge of it or not.

Do you EVER think before you come up with such drivel?

On 8 Sep 2005 08:02:12 -0700, wrote:



See, Harry? I TOLD you the dumb ****s can't figure out how someone can
post from someone elses account and not be that person!!!!!

Perhaps you could tell us how a brilliant person would fabricate stories about a
non-existent motorcycle and then make up fake web pages to support his story?
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

On 8 Sep 2005 08:00:46 -0700, wrote:


Bill McKee wrote:
Secret and prvate are two different items.

Yes, they must be, I don't know what a "prvate" is.

But, if you meant PRIVATE, you are STILL wrong. Just because a meeting
is deemed "secret", doesn't mean that someone wouldn't have knowledge
about it. See this:

se·cret ( P ) Pronunciation Key (skrt)
adj.
Kept hidden from knowledge or view; concealed

Now, if the MEETING were "hidden" from "view", would have no bearing on
whether you would have knowledge of it or not.

Do you EVER think before you come up with such drivel?

A *real* thinking person would make up a story about owning a non-existent
motorcycle, and then try to convince all that he was telling the truth!

Be a man. Apologize for your lie.
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

"Starbucks" wrote in message
...
Kevin,

I am having trouble following your logic, it seems like you are agreeing
with Bill McKee, that secret and private are different items.

Since you agree with his premise that secret and private are different
items, why the personal attacks directed towards Bill?


Since I have a crappy keyboard, I missed typed. But Kevin hates me, as I
have shown him to be an idiot a couple of times. And basskisser is logic
challenged.

"PocoLoco" wrote in message
...
On 8 Sep 2005 08:00:46 -0700, wrote:


Bill McKee wrote:
Secret and prvate are two different items.

Yes, they must be, I don't know what a "prvate" is.

But, if you meant PRIVATE, you are STILL wrong. Just because a meeting
is deemed "secret", doesn't mean that someone wouldn't have knowledge
about it. See this:

se·cret ( P ) Pronunciation Key (skrt)
adj.
Kept hidden from knowledge or view; concealed

Now, if the MEETING were "hidden" from "view", would have no bearing on
whether you would have knowledge of it or not.

Do you EVER think before you come up with such drivel?

A *real* thinking person would make up a story about owning a non-existent
motorcycle, and then try to convince all that he was telling the truth!

Be a man. Apologize for your lie.
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

A Krause clone......it will not happen.