"Harry Krause" wrote

| American Research Group
| http://americanresearchgroup.com/economy/
|


Independent pollster John Zogby says that although Mr. Bush is not
doing well in the polls, the Democrats aren't doing any better. "The
Democrats aren't scoring points in terms of landing any significant
punches on Bush or in terms of saying anything meaningful to the
American people," Mr. Zogby said.

More bad news for the Democrats at:
http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/r...?ArtNum=105779

Poor Harry Krause. Even when two-term President George W. Bush
is doing poorly in the polls the Democrats are so pathetic they
cannot capitalize on it.

CN

"Capt. Neal®" wrote in message
...

"Harry Krause" wrote

| American Research Group
| http://americanresearchgroup.com/economy/
|


Independent pollster John Zogby says that although Mr. Bush is not
doing well in the polls, the Democrats aren't doing any better. "The
Democrats aren't scoring points in terms of landing any significant
punches on Bush or in terms of saying anything meaningful to the
American people," Mr. Zogby said.

More bad news for the Democrats at:
http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/r...?ArtNum=105779

Poor Harry Krause. Even when two-term President George W. Bush
is doing poorly in the polls the Democrats are so pathetic they
cannot capitalize on it.

CN

But at least, Capt. Neal, the mentally ill have a spokesman and lobby in the
person of Harry Krause.

William Bruce wrote:
"Capt. Neal=AE" wrote in message
...

"Harry Krause" wrote

| American Research Group
| http://americanresearchgroup.com/economy/
|


Independent pollster John Zogby says that although Mr. Bush is not
doing well in the polls, the Democrats aren't doing any better. "The
Democrats aren't scoring points in terms of landing any significant
punches on Bush or in terms of saying anything meaningful to the
American people," Mr. Zogby said.

More bad news for the Democrats at:
http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/r...rtNum=3D105779

Poor Harry Krause. Even when two-term President George W. Bush
is doing poorly in the polls the Democrats are so pathetic they
cannot capitalize on it.

CN

But at least, Capt. Neal, the mentally ill have a spokesman and lobby in =
the
person of Harry Krause.


Speaking of spokespeople, you guys should be really proud of your
wanna-be-the-next senator from NY. She doesn't even have the presence
of mind to complete an attack sentence if somebody had misorganized her
prepared remarks. She must feet very passionate about her cause and
issues (not), as well as whatever insult she had been ordered to lob at
Hillary Clinton.

Very amusing video, regardless of party affiliation:


http://www.dscc.org/news/multimedia/20050812_pirro/

Gould,
I though it was like watching a train wreck. What did you find funny about
it?


wrote in message
oups.com...

William Bruce wrote:
"Capt. Neal®" wrote in message
...

"Harry Krause" wrote

| American Research Group
| http://americanresearchgroup.com/economy/
|


Independent pollster John Zogby says that although Mr. Bush is not
doing well in the polls, the Democrats aren't doing any better. "The
Democrats aren't scoring points in terms of landing any significant
punches on Bush or in terms of saying anything meaningful to the
American people," Mr. Zogby said.

More bad news for the Democrats at:
http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/r...?ArtNum=105779

Poor Harry Krause. Even when two-term President George W. Bush
is doing poorly in the polls the Democrats are so pathetic they
cannot capitalize on it.

CN

But at least, Capt. Neal, the mentally ill have a spokesman and lobby in
the
person of Harry Krause.


Speaking of spokespeople, you guys should be really proud of your
wanna-be-the-next senator from NY. She doesn't even have the presence
of mind to complete an attack sentence if somebody had misorganized her
prepared remarks. She must feet very passionate about her cause and
issues (not), as well as whatever insult she had been ordered to lob at
Hillary Clinton.

Very amusing video, regardless of party affiliation:


http://www.dscc.org/news/multimedia/20050812_pirro/

Juan Valdez wrote:
Gould,
I though it was like watching a train wreck. What did you find funny about
it?


It was funny as in sad and ironic. Take the personalities out of the
equation, and the wry humor remains. A political candidate steps
forward to claim she can do a better job representing the people of a
large and complex state than the incumbent can do. She stands up to
give a speech and begins a highly energized sentence with the
incumbent's name......(almost always a prelude to an insult or other
attack phrase).....and then demonstrates that she doesn't have the
presence of mind to complete a sentence without her notes!

It was "deer in the headlights" time. Obviously this woman has never
done any public speaking or performed on stage. When things go wrong,
as they always will, the show must go on.

She did demonstrate she is not prepared, does not have a platform or a
grasp on issues that she can call her own (and from which she can speak
extemporaneously if required), did not write her own speech or bother
to rehearse it, and is probably not better prepared, mentally, to serve
in the US Senate than the vast majority of people currently serving
there.

I think we just watched a political campaign begin to circle the bowl.
Dead silence in front of a banner proclaiming her "positive plan for
New York State."

I will give the woman points for slightly shrewd, however: After
realizing that she had just been filmed acting like a helpless,
clueless airhead for a full 20-25 seconds she did have the presence of
mind to lose whatever nastygram she was prepared to launch at Hillary.
If you're going to call names and make accusations (assuming that's
what was going to follow the words
"hillary clinton") it's really best to do so from a position of
perceived moral superiority. After actng the fool in her speech, the
last thing she really wanted (at that moment) would have been for
anybody to compare her to Hillary Clinton.

My daughter who lives in NYC claims the people of NY "love" Hillary.
I've got a few issues with her, myself, but the people of NY are the
audience she needs to appeal to and please. From the little I've been
able to learn (and it's years too early) I would consider voting for
Republican Senator Hagle from Nebraska over Hillary Clinton, if that's
how the finals played out in the 2008 POTUS race. Hillary will never
get the nomination, IMO.

wrote in message
oups.com...

.....and then demonstrates that she doesn't have the
presence of mind to complete a sentence without her notes!


She did demonstrate she is not prepared, does not have a platform or a
grasp on issues that she can call her own (and from which she can speak
extemporaneously if required), did not write her own speech or bother
to rehearse it, and is probably not better prepared, mentally, to serve
in the US Senate than the vast majority of people currently serving
there.


Well....remember that this country's walking dead voted twice to infest the
White House with a child who's got the same problems times 10. Based on
this, the woman may have a chance, but I hope there's enough native NY
skepticism to kick her to the curb.

Gould,
I though it was like watching a train wreck. What did you find funny about
it?


wrote in message
oups.com...

William Bruce wrote:
"Capt. Neal®" wrote in message
...

"Harry Krause" wrote

| American Research Group
| http://americanresearchgroup.com/economy/
|


Independent pollster John Zogby says that although Mr. Bush is not
doing well in the polls, the Democrats aren't doing any better. "The
Democrats aren't scoring points in terms of landing any significant
punches on Bush or in terms of saying anything meaningful to the
American people," Mr. Zogby said.

More bad news for the Democrats at:
http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/r...?ArtNum=105779

Poor Harry Krause. Even when two-term President George W. Bush
is doing poorly in the polls the Democrats are so pathetic they
cannot capitalize on it.

CN

But at least, Capt. Neal, the mentally ill have a spokesman and lobby in
the
person of Harry Krause.


Speaking of spokespeople, you guys should be really proud of your
wanna-be-the-next senator from NY. She doesn't even have the presence
of mind to complete an attack sentence if somebody had misorganized her
prepared remarks. She must feet very passionate about her cause and
issues (not), as well as whatever insult she had been ordered to lob at
Hillary Clinton.

Very amusing video, regardless of party affiliation:


http://www.dscc.org/news/multimedia/20050812_pirro/

In article ,
says...
Gould,
I though it was like watching a train wreck. What did you find funny about
it?

I'm not Gould but I found it funny as in disturbing. The Republicans
are trying to bloody Hillary by running a slashing bitch at her with a
knife and about 100 million dollars of funding.

They're trying to slow her down for 2008.

The bitch has about a 2% real chance of winning, even in Republican
strongholds. She's doing the Republicans a favor, who knows what
they're promising her other than a few million dollars and favorable
treatment of her felon husband.

jps

"jps" wrote in message
...
In article ,
says...
Gould,
I though it was like watching a train wreck. What did you find funny
about
it?

I'm not Gould but I found it funny as in disturbing. The Republicans
are trying to bloody Hillary by running a slashing bitch at her with a
knife and about 100 million dollars of funding.

They're trying to slow her down for 2008.

The bitch has about a 2% real chance of winning, even in Republican
strongholds. She's doing the Republicans a favor, who knows what
they're promising her other than a few million dollars and favorable
treatment of her felon husband.

Why all of the hostility towards an opposition candidate? Sounds like you
would be much happier in a communist country where only one "candidate" runs
for each office.