"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...

As I have stated previously, there are only a handful of people who post
here regularly who I consider worthy.

Narcissistic Personality Disorder Diagnostic Criteria
A pervasive pattern of grandiosity (in fantasy or behavior), need for
admiration, and lack of empathy, beginning by early adulthood and present in
a variety of contexts, as indicated by five (or more) of the following:

1.. has a grandiose sense of self-importance (e.g., exaggerates
achievements and talents, expects to be recognized as superior without
commensurate achievements)
2.. is preoccupied with fantasies of unlimited success, power, brilliance,
beauty, or ideal love
3.. believes that he or she is "special" and unique and can only be
understood by, or should associate with, other special or high-status people
(or institutions)
4.. requires excessive admiration
5.. has a sense of entitlement, i.e., unreasonable expectations of
especially favorable treatment or automatic compliance with his or her
expectations
6.. is interpersonally exploitative, i.e., takes advantage of others to
achieve his or her own ends
7.. lacks empathy: is unwilling to recognize or identify with the feelings
and needs of others
8.. is often envious of others or believes that others are envious of him
or her
9.. shows arrogant, haughty behaviors or attitudes

On Wed, 17 Aug 2005 13:13:52 -0400, Harry Krause wrote:

John H. wrote:
On Wed, 17 Aug 2005 11:41:34 -0400, Harry Krause wrote:

John H. wrote:
On Wed, 17 Aug 2005 09:24:02 -0400, Harry Krause wrote:

Stanley Barthfarkle wrote:
You and your buttbuddy here wouldn't know the truth if it were handed to
you engraved on a stone tablet, dipstick. Both of you are just usenet
trolls of the lowest common denominator.
9a.. Ignores the naked truth, resorts to childish behavior such as
name-calling when cornered with pesky facts.


Yeah, sure, Farkle; you just believe whatever floats your little boat.
Netsock is a well-known troll, a twerp from OSU who posts here under
numerous handles and whines about 30 other posters, and "Smithers" is in
a category of his own, an insecure dweeb who posts here under about 50
different handles. You're being played by both of them.
Harry, did someone make a false statement about you? Can you refute the
statement with facts, or just call names?


OF course. You have, among others.
Can I refute these false statements you and others have made?
Of course I can.
Do I care to refute them?
Not usually. I don't care very much what dumbasses think.
The scum here repeat their b.s. over and over and over and over, their
buddies pick up on it, and it becomes part of the lore.

As I have stated previously, there are only a handful of people who post
here regularly who I consider worthy. They for the most part don't
engage in the dumbass behavior you and your idiot friends here enjoy so
much.



If you care so little, why make continuous posts such as those above? *I* made a
false statement about you? What did I say? If I told a lie about you, I
apologize. But, I'd like to know what it was.


Oh, puh-lease, John. Save your holier than thou b.s. for Hertvik, Fritz,
Robbins, Smithers and the other slimeballs. In addition to being a liar
and a name-caller, you also are the newsgroup's major instigator of what
you hope will be "trouble" for other posters. For an ex-army guy like
you, that is the epitome of cowardice.

So you can't find any lies I told about you? Other than the name I called you,
justified by the statements you were making about me, do you find that I call a
lot of names? Do you really consider me a 'leader' of the comments made about
you? They were being made long before I ever got here, Harry.

--
John H.
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

On Wed, 17 Aug 2005 13:51:16 -0400, Karen Greer wrote:


"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...

As I have stated previously, there are only a handful of people who post
here regularly who I consider worthy.

Narcissistic Personality Disorder Diagnostic Criteria
A pervasive pattern of grandiosity (in fantasy or behavior), need for
admiration, and lack of empathy, beginning by early adulthood and present in
a variety of contexts, as indicated by five (or more) of the following:

1.. has a grandiose sense of self-importance (e.g., exaggerates
achievements and talents, expects to be recognized as superior without
commensurate achievements)
2.. is preoccupied with fantasies of unlimited success, power, brilliance,
beauty, or ideal love
3.. believes that he or she is "special" and unique and can only be
understood by, or should associate with, other special or high-status people
(or institutions)
4.. requires excessive admiration
5.. has a sense of entitlement, i.e., unreasonable expectations of
especially favorable treatment or automatic compliance with his or her
expectations
6.. is interpersonally exploitative, i.e., takes advantage of others to
achieve his or her own ends
7.. lacks empathy: is unwilling to recognize or identify with the feelings
and needs of others
8.. is often envious of others or believes that others are envious of him
or her
9.. shows arrogant, haughty behaviors or attitudes



I wish Harry would go through these, one by one, honestly. I think it might be
an eye-opener for him.

--
John H.
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Wed, 17 Aug 2005 13:13:52 -0400, Harry Krause
wrote:

John H. wrote:
On Wed, 17 Aug 2005 11:41:34 -0400, Harry Krause
wrote:

John H. wrote:
On Wed, 17 Aug 2005 09:24:02 -0400, Harry Krause
wrote:

Stanley Barthfarkle wrote:
You and your buttbuddy here wouldn't know the truth if it were
handed to
you engraved on a stone tablet, dipstick. Both of you are just
usenet
trolls of the lowest common denominator.
9a.. Ignores the naked truth, resorts to childish behavior such as
name-calling when cornered with pesky facts.


Yeah, sure, Farkle; you just believe whatever floats your little
boat.
Netsock is a well-known troll, a twerp from OSU who posts here under
numerous handles and whines about 30 other posters, and "Smithers"
is in
a category of his own, an insecure dweeb who posts here under about
50
different handles. You're being played by both of them.
Harry, did someone make a false statement about you? Can you refute
the
statement with facts, or just call names?


OF course. You have, among others.
Can I refute these false statements you and others have made?
Of course I can.
Do I care to refute them?
Not usually. I don't care very much what dumbasses think.
The scum here repeat their b.s. over and over and over and over, their
buddies pick up on it, and it becomes part of the lore.

As I have stated previously, there are only a handful of people who
post
here regularly who I consider worthy. They for the most part don't
engage in the dumbass behavior you and your idiot friends here enjoy
so
much.



If you care so little, why make continuous posts such as those above?
*I* made a
false statement about you? What did I say? If I told a lie about you, I
apologize. But, I'd like to know what it was.


Oh, puh-lease, John. Save your holier than thou b.s. for Hertvik, Fritz,
Robbins, Smithers and the other slimeballs. In addition to being a liar
and a name-caller, you also are the newsgroup's major instigator of what
you hope will be "trouble" for other posters. For an ex-army guy like
you, that is the epitome of cowardice.

So you can't find any lies I told about you? Other than the name I called
you,
justified by the statements you were making about me, do you find that I
call a
lot of names? Do you really consider me a 'leader' of the comments made
about
you? They were being made long before I ever got here, Harry.

Harry is playing the NG equivalent of "I know you are but what am I?" No
wonder Kevin and Don idolize him.




--
John H.
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Wed, 17 Aug 2005 13:13:52 -0400, Harry Krause
wrote:

John H. wrote:
On Wed, 17 Aug 2005 11:41:34 -0400, Harry Krause
wrote:

John H. wrote:
On Wed, 17 Aug 2005 09:24:02 -0400, Harry Krause
wrote:

Stanley Barthfarkle wrote:
You and your buttbuddy here wouldn't know the truth if it were
handed to
you engraved on a stone tablet, dipstick. Both of you are just
usenet
trolls of the lowest common denominator.
9a.. Ignores the naked truth, resorts to childish behavior such as
name-calling when cornered with pesky facts.


Yeah, sure, Farkle; you just believe whatever floats your little
boat.
Netsock is a well-known troll, a twerp from OSU who posts here under
numerous handles and whines about 30 other posters, and "Smithers" is
in
a category of his own, an insecure dweeb who posts here under about
50
different handles. You're being played by both of them.
Harry, did someone make a false statement about you? Can you refute
the
statement with facts, or just call names?


OF course. You have, among others.
Can I refute these false statements you and others have made?
Of course I can.
Do I care to refute them?
Not usually. I don't care very much what dumbasses think.
The scum here repeat their b.s. over and over and over and over, their
buddies pick up on it, and it becomes part of the lore.

As I have stated previously, there are only a handful of people who
post
here regularly who I consider worthy. They for the most part don't
engage in the dumbass behavior you and your idiot friends here enjoy so
much.



If you care so little, why make continuous posts such as those above?
*I* made a
false statement about you? What did I say? If I told a lie about you, I
apologize. But, I'd like to know what it was.


Oh, puh-lease, John. Save your holier than thou b.s. for Hertv, Fritz,
Robbins, Smithers and the other slimeballs. In addition to being a liar
and a name-caller, you also are the newsgroup's major instigator of what
you hope will be "trouble" for other posters. For an ex-army guy like
you, that is the epitome of cowardice.

So you can't find any lies I told about you? Other than the name I called
you,
justified by the statements you were making about me, do you find that I
call a
lot of names? Do you really consider me a 'leader' of the comments made
about
you? They were being made long before I ever got here, Harry.

--
John H.
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD



Cool, I continue to be #1 on his list. That means I am really hitting home
when posting here about his lies and deceptions.

Funny thing...... Harry Krause's picture is next to the words 'slimeball',
'liar', 'psychopath" and 'internet stalker' in my latest edition of
Webster's. How appropriate.

JohnH,
What I think is so funny, is Harry really thinks he is innocent and would
fail to see he has 100% of the symptoms of someone with NPD. As a Dr. Dr. I
encourage him to seek help.




"John H." wrote in message
...
On Wed, 17 Aug 2005 13:51:16 -0400, Karen Greer wrote:


"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...

As I have stated previously, there are only a handful of people who post
here regularly who I consider worthy.

Narcissistic Personality Disorder Diagnostic Criteria
A pervasive pattern of grandiosity (in fantasy or behavior), need for
admiration, and lack of empathy, beginning by early adulthood and present
in
a variety of contexts, as indicated by five (or more) of the following:

1.. has a grandiose sense of self-importance (e.g., exaggerates
achievements and talents, expects to be recognized as superior without
commensurate achievements)
2.. is preoccupied with fantasies of unlimited success, power,
brilliance,
beauty, or ideal love
3.. believes that he or she is "special" and unique and can only be
understood by, or should associate with, other special or high-status
people
(or institutions)
4.. requires excessive admiration
5.. has a sense of entitlement, i.e., unreasonable expectations of
especially favorable treatment or automatic compliance with his or her
expectations
6.. is interpersonally exploitative, i.e., takes advantage of others to
achieve his or her own ends
7.. lacks empathy: is unwilling to recognize or identify with the
feelings
and needs of others
8.. is often envious of others or believes that others are envious of
him
or her
9.. shows arrogant, haughty behaviors or attitudes



I wish Harry would go through these, one by one, honestly. I think it
might be
an eye-opener for him.

--
John H.
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Wed, 17 Aug 2005 13:51:16 -0400, Karen Greer wrote:


"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...

As I have stated previously, there are only a handful of people who post
here regularly who I consider worthy.

Narcissistic Personality Disorder Diagnostic Criteria
A pervasive pattern of grandiosity (in fantasy or behavior), need for
admiration, and lack of empathy, beginning by early adulthood and present
in
a variety of contexts, as indicated by five (or more) of the following:

1.. has a grandiose sense of self-importance (e.g., exaggerates
achievements and talents, expects to be recognized as superior without
commensurate achievements)
2.. is preoccupied with fantasies of unlimited success, power,
brilliance,
beauty, or ideal love
3.. believes that he or she is "special" and unique and can only be
understood by, or should associate with, other special or high-status
people
(or institutions)
4.. requires excessive admiration
5.. has a sense of entitlement, i.e., unreasonable expectations of
especially favorable treatment or automatic compliance with his or her
expectations
6.. is interpersonally exploitative, i.e., takes advantage of others to
achieve his or her own ends
7.. lacks empathy: is unwilling to recognize or identify with the
feelings
and needs of others
8.. is often envious of others or believes that others are envious of
him
or her
9.. shows arrogant, haughty behaviors or attitudes



I wish Harry would go through these, one by one, honestly. I think it
might be
an eye-opener for him.

--
John H.
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

I am sure Harry Krause has. I am also sure he is in complete denial though.
The man (I use that term loosely) definitely needs psychiatric help and I
hope he seeks it out soon.

On Wed, 17 Aug 2005 16:25:18 -0400, Harry Krause wrote:

John H. wrote:
On Wed, 17 Aug 2005 13:13:52 -0400, Harry Krause wrote:

John H. wrote:
On Wed, 17 Aug 2005 11:41:34 -0400, Harry Krause wrote:

John H. wrote:
On Wed, 17 Aug 2005 09:24:02 -0400, Harry Krause wrote:

Stanley Barthfarkle wrote:
You and your buttbuddy here wouldn't know the truth if it were handed to
you engraved on a stone tablet, dipstick. Both of you are just usenet
trolls of the lowest common denominator.
9a.. Ignores the naked truth, resorts to childish behavior such as
name-calling when cornered with pesky facts.


Yeah, sure, Farkle; you just believe whatever floats your little boat.
Netsock is a well-known troll, a twerp from OSU who posts here under
numerous handles and whines about 30 other posters, and "Smithers" is in
a category of his own, an insecure dweeb who posts here under about 50
different handles. You're being played by both of them.
Harry, did someone make a false statement about you? Can you refute the
statement with facts, or just call names?

OF course. You have, among others.
Can I refute these false statements you and others have made?
Of course I can.
Do I care to refute them?
Not usually. I don't care very much what dumbasses think.
The scum here repeat their b.s. over and over and over and over, their
buddies pick up on it, and it becomes part of the lore.

As I have stated previously, there are only a handful of people who post
here regularly who I consider worthy. They for the most part don't
engage in the dumbass behavior you and your idiot friends here enjoy so
much.


If you care so little, why make continuous posts such as those above? *I* made a
false statement about you? What did I say? If I told a lie about you, I
apologize. But, I'd like to know what it was.

Oh, puh-lease, John. Save your holier than thou b.s. for Hertvik, Fritz,
Robbins, Smithers and the other slimeballs. In addition to being a liar
and a name-caller, you also are the newsgroup's major instigator of what
you hope will be "trouble" for other posters. For an ex-army guy like
you, that is the epitome of cowardice.

So you can't find any lies I told about you? Other than the name I called you,
justified by the statements you were making about me, do you find that I call a
lot of names? Do you really consider me a 'leader' of the comments made about
you? They were being made long before I ever got here, Harry.



So typical. It's not that I can't find your lies, Herring, it's that I
ain't playing your game.

I consider you the leading instigator of what you hope will be
"trouble" for posters you don't like.

Your opinion of me is most meaningful to me, but I think you reap what you sow.

--
John H.
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Wed, 17 Aug 2005 16:25:18 -0400, Harry Krause
wrote:

John H. wrote:
On Wed, 17 Aug 2005 13:13:52 -0400, Harry Krause
wrote:

John H. wrote:
On Wed, 17 Aug 2005 11:41:34 -0400, Harry Krause
wrote:

John H. wrote:
On Wed, 17 Aug 2005 09:24:02 -0400, Harry Krause
wrote:

Stanley Barthfarkle wrote:
You and your buttbuddy here wouldn't know the truth if it were
handed to
you engraved on a stone tablet, dipstick. Both of you are just
usenet
trolls of the lowest common denominator.
9a.. Ignores the naked truth, resorts to childish behavior such
as
name-calling when cornered with pesky facts.


Yeah, sure, Farkle; you just believe whatever floats your little
boat.
Netsock is a well-known troll, a twerp from OSU who posts here
under
numerous handles and whines about 30 other posters, and "Smithers"
is in
a category of his own, an insecure dweeb who posts here under
about 50
different handles. You're being played by both of them.
Harry, did someone make a false statement about you? Can you refute
the
statement with facts, or just call names?

OF course. You have, among others.
Can I refute these false statements you and others have made?
Of course I can.
Do I care to refute them?
Not usually. I don't care very much what dumbasses think.
The scum here repeat their b.s. over and over and over and over,
their
buddies pick up on it, and it becomes part of the lore.

As I have stated previously, there are only a handful of people who
post
here regularly who I consider worthy. They for the most part don't
engage in the dumbass behavior you and your idiot friends here enjoy
so
much.


If you care so little, why make continuous posts such as those above?
*I* made a
false statement about you? What did I say? If I told a lie about you,
I
apologize. But, I'd like to know what it was.

Oh, puh-lease, John. Save your holier than thou b.s. for Hertvik,
Fritz,
Robbins, Smithers and the other slimeballs. In addition to being a
liar
and a name-caller, you also are the newsgroup's major instigator of
what
you hope will be "trouble" for other posters. For an ex-army guy like
you, that is the epitome of cowardice.

So you can't find any lies I told about you? Other than the name I
called you,
justified by the statements you were making about me, do you find that
I call a
lot of names? Do you really consider me a 'leader' of the comments made
about
you? They were being made long before I ever got here, Harry.



So typical. It's not that I can't find your lies, Herring, it's that I
ain't playing your game.

I consider you the leading instigator of what you hope will be
"trouble" for posters you don't like.

Your opinion of me is most meaningful to me, but I think you reap what you
sow.

I.E.........John H. is the biggest threat to exposing harry's constant lies
because he lives and works so close.


--
John H.
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

On Wed, 17 Aug 2005 17:28:57 -0400, Harry Krause wrote:

John H. wrote:
On Wed, 17 Aug 2005 16:25:18 -0400, Harry Krause wrote:

John H. wrote:
On Wed, 17 Aug 2005 13:13:52 -0400, Harry Krause wrote:

John H. wrote:
On Wed, 17 Aug 2005 11:41:34 -0400, Harry Krause wrote:

John H. wrote:
On Wed, 17 Aug 2005 09:24:02 -0400, Harry Krause wrote:

Stanley Barthfarkle wrote:
You and your buttbuddy here wouldn't know the truth if it were handed to
you engraved on a stone tablet, dipstick. Both of you are just usenet
trolls of the lowest common denominator.
9a.. Ignores the naked truth, resorts to childish behavior such as
name-calling when cornered with pesky facts.


Yeah, sure, Farkle; you just believe whatever floats your little boat.
Netsock is a well-known troll, a twerp from OSU who posts here under
numerous handles and whines about 30 other posters, and "Smithers" is in
a category of his own, an insecure dweeb who posts here under about 50
different handles. You're being played by both of them.
Harry, did someone make a false statement about you? Can you refute the
statement with facts, or just call names?

OF course. You have, among others.
Can I refute these false statements you and others have made?
Of course I can.
Do I care to refute them?
Not usually. I don't care very much what dumbasses think.
The scum here repeat their b.s. over and over and over and over, their
buddies pick up on it, and it becomes part of the lore.

As I have stated previously, there are only a handful of people who post
here regularly who I consider worthy. They for the most part don't
engage in the dumbass behavior you and your idiot friends here enjoy so
much.


If you care so little, why make continuous posts such as those above? *I* made a
false statement about you? What did I say? If I told a lie about you, I
apologize. But, I'd like to know what it was.
Oh, puh-lease, John. Save your holier than thou b.s. for Hertvik, Fritz,
Robbins, Smithers and the other slimeballs. In addition to being a liar
and a name-caller, you also are the newsgroup's major instigator of what
you hope will be "trouble" for other posters. For an ex-army guy like
you, that is the epitome of cowardice.
So you can't find any lies I told about you? Other than the name I called you,
justified by the statements you were making about me, do you find that I call a
lot of names? Do you really consider me a 'leader' of the comments made about
you? They were being made long before I ever got here, Harry.


So typical. It's not that I can't find your lies, Herring, it's that I
ain't playing your game.

I consider you the leading instigator of what you hope will be
"trouble" for posters you don't like.

Your opinion of me is most meaningful to me, but I think you reap what you sow.


There's nothing in the fields of you, Fritz, Robbins, Hertvik, and
Smithers but chaff, The Five Circle Jerks.

Ah, your name-calling is music to my ears. You should write a few words in all
caps. Then you'd be right up there with b'asskisser.

--
John H.
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD