![]() |
|
On Fri, 05 Aug 2005 07:25:32 -0400, HarryKrause
wrote: I've saved your post so I can reread it once I know what it means. Right now, I'm reading Linux for Dummies. That would be me. I don't know about your personal coding skills, but in my experience, the Linux experience is very similar to the early DOS days only there is a more extensive set of commands. Personally, if you are wanting to experiment, put it on a separate machine and learn it first before deploying it - that seems to be the way a of of successful Linux deployments for personal computers seems to go. If you are doing this to be away from MS, think it through first. With Linux you are on your own. As always, do what you will - just some advice. Later, Tom |
On Fri, 05 Aug 2005 07:25:32 -0400, HarryKrause wrote:
Red Hat is one of the more commercial distributions. That isn't a bad thing, but there are many other distributions that may more closely fit your needs. Check some of them out at: http://distrowatch.com/ I've been using Linux for close to ten years now, and I've never looked back. When forced to use Windows, I break out in hives. ;-) Distributions can be a quite personal decision, but I have found Debian to be about perfect for my needs. Apt is the easiest way to keep a OS current, bar none. http://www.debian.org/distrib/ If you need any help/advice, drop me a line. If I don't have the answer, I should be able to find it. Be careful, Harry, your Windows days may be numbered. I've saved your post so I can reread it once I know what it means. Right now, I'm reading Linux for Dummies. That would be me. OK, I'll translate as best I can. Something you don't need to know right now, "Linux" technically is just the kernel, the software core, if you will. Something you do need to know right now, distributions are the entire operating system. There are similarities and differences amongst the distributions. Red Hat, I believe, is now primarily for business applications, with a subscription fee. Fedora is Red Hat for the masses (free). I would suggest going with Fedora, Suse, or Debian. They are all full blown Linuxes, with easy installs. Apt is a Debian, and other distribution, program to install additional programs and to keep your distribution current with bug fixes and security updates. |
On Wed, 03 Aug 2005 23:39:22 GMT, Gene Kearns
wrote: The is a very liberal upgrade policy Well, I've been using Agent for many years, and have been very happy with it, but I'll be darned if I'm going to support some gosh darned liberal software company. Damnit, anybody got a suggestion for a good old fashioned flag waving, god fearing, family oriented news reader? Rot In Hell Forte!!!! bb |
On Fri, 05 Aug 2005 11:51:11 +0000, Shortwave Sportfishing wrote:
I don't know about your personal coding skills, but in my experience, the Linux experience is very similar to the early DOS days only there is a more extensive set of commands. These days it can be, but it doesn't need to be. Most mainline distributions can have you up and running as easy or easier than a Windows install. You can use Linux fully GUI, but you have the option to use the command line. Personally, if you are wanting to experiment, put it on a separate machine and learn it first before deploying it - that seems to be the way a of of successful Linux deployments for personal computers seems to go. The easiest way these days, is a Live CD. You can run Linux of the CD, without ever having to install onto your hard drive. No muss, no fuss, albeit slower due to having to decompress. If you are doing this to be away from MS, think it through first. With Linux you are on your own. Not really, there is a tremendous amount of support out there. With Linux, you may not have a support desk to call, but you do have quite a few newsgroups. I have found Linux to be quite well documented online. I have never run into a problem that couldn't be solved with a little onlne reading. Linux really had come a long way. If you liked it then, you might want to give it another try. A couple of live CDs: http://www.pclinuxonline.com/pclos/ http://www.novell.com/products/linux...nux/index.html As always, do what you will - just some advice. Later, Tom |
Im using outlook express, works great for me has filters so you can filter
out some of the junk posts. Ed "bb" wrote in message ... On Wed, 03 Aug 2005 23:39:22 GMT, Gene Kearns wrote: The is a very liberal upgrade policy Well, I've been using Agent for many years, and have been very happy with it, but I'll be darned if I'm going to support some gosh darned liberal software company. Damnit, anybody got a suggestion for a good old fashioned flag waving, god fearing, family oriented news reader? Rot In Hell Forte!!!! bb |
On Fri, 05 Aug 2005 10:25:27 -0400, thunder
wrote: On Fri, 05 Aug 2005 11:51:11 +0000, Shortwave Sportfishing wrote: I don't know about your personal coding skills, but in my experience, the Linux experience is very similar to the early DOS days only there is a more extensive set of commands. These days it can be, but it doesn't need to be. Most mainline distributions can have you up and running as easy or easier than a Windows install. You can use Linux fully GUI, but you have the option to use the command line. I'll tell you the honest truth. I burned out writing long algorithms, proofing same, diagnosing same plus my regular job back in the original days when I was involved in some rather heavy theoretical physics and mathematics. I worked closely with some hyper-brainacs from high power physics labs around the world and frankly, I'm not interested in rewriting an operating system to suit me which is what would happen if I got a hold of open source software. :) Personally, if you are wanting to experiment, put it on a separate machine and learn it first before deploying it - that seems to be the way a of of successful Linux deployments for personal computers seems to go. The easiest way these days, is a Live CD. You can run Linux of the CD, without ever having to install onto your hard drive. No muss, no fuss, albeit slower due to having to decompress. I know - believe me, I've looked at it more than once. The problem is that I'm obsessive about these things (which can be a positive trait in the scientific world), but it's taken me 10 years to decompress from that environment and just enjoy my computational machinery. If you are doing this to be away from MS, think it through first. With Linux you are on your own. Not really, there is a tremendous amount of support out there. With Linux, you may not have a support desk to call, but you do have quite a few newsgroups. I have found Linux to be quite well documented online. I have never run into a problem that couldn't be solved with a little onlne reading. Linux really had come a long way. If you liked it then, you might want to give it another try. A couple of live CDs: http://www.pclinuxonline.com/pclos/ http://www.novell.com/products/linux...nux/index.html ~~ gets out a crucifix and waves it at the monitor ~~ BACK - BACK SPAWN OF THE DEVIL - BACK I SAY!!!! :) |
On Fri, 05 Aug 2005 14:09:23 GMT, bb wrote:
On Wed, 03 Aug 2005 23:39:22 GMT, Gene Kearns wrote: The is a very liberal upgrade policy Well, I've been using Agent for many years, and have been very happy with it, but I'll be darned if I'm going to support some gosh darned liberal software company. Damnit, anybody got a suggestion for a good old fashioned flag waving, god fearing, family oriented news reader? Rot In Hell Forte!!!! Wha? Oh, wait - I get it - I get jokes. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:27 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com