http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...09.html?sub=AR

It appears that Bush's agenda is still what the majority of people want.

"HarryKrause" wrote in message
...
Bert Robbins wrote:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...09.html?sub=AR

It appears that Bush's agenda is still what the majority of people want.

D'oh. No one expected the Dem to win in that District, not even the
candidate himself. But no one expected the race to be as close as it was.

It's a good sign. Republican boobi Americani are beginning to wake up to
the fraud of George W. Bush.

So what you are saying is that democrats win when they lose?

Only a democrat would see a loss as a good sign for victory. Total
delusional just as their ideas for a better America... Oh wait they
have no ideas just opposition. No wonder they always lose.

"Mule" wrote in message
ups.com...
Only a democrat would see a loss as a good sign for victory. Total
delusional just as their ideas for a better America... Oh wait they
have no ideas just opposition. No wonder they always lose.


What else do you expect from someone that lives in a fantasy land where he
owns a 36' lobsta boat and has a masters from yale?

"Dan J.S." wrote in message
...

"HarryKrause" wrote in message
...
Bert Robbins wrote:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...09.html?sub=AR

It appears that Bush's agenda is still what the majority of people want.

D'oh. No one expected the Dem to win in that District, not even the
candidate himself. But no one expected the race to be as close as it was.

It's a good sign. Republican boobi Americani are beginning to wake up to
the fraud of George W. Bush.

So what you are saying is that democrats win when they lose?


In their minds, yes.

*JimH* wrote:
"Dan J.S." wrote in message
...

"HarryKrause" wrote in message
...
Bert Robbins wrote:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...09.html?sub=AR

It appears that Bush's agenda is still what the majority of people want.

D'oh. No one expected the Dem to win in that District, not even the
candidate himself. But no one expected the race to be as close as it was.

It's a good sign. Republican boobi Americani are beginning to wake up to
the fraud of George W. Bush.

So what you are saying is that democrats win when they lose?


In their minds, yes.

What qualifications do you possess to be able to come to that
conclusion? Have you analyzed "their minds"? If so, using what analysis
procedure? How many subjects did you use? What was your statistical
results? Did you do all of this via rec.boats?

HarryKrause wrote:
Dan J.S. wrote:
"HarryKrause" wrote in message
...
Bert Robbins wrote:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...09.html?sub=AR

It appears that Bush's agenda is still what the majority of people want.
D'oh. No one expected the Dem to win in that District, not even the
candidate himself. But no one expected the race to be as close as it was.

It's a good sign. Republican boobi Americani are beginning to wake up to
the fraud of George W. Bush.

So what you are saying is that democrats win when they lose?




What I am saying is exactly what I said. No one, not even the candidate,
expected the vet to win in that backwards GOP district. The fact that he
pulled more than 45% of the vote is very, very telling.

They can't comprehend anything when they are so blinded by BushCo.
They're just lemmings.

wrote in message
oups.com...

*JimH* wrote:
"Dan J.S." wrote in message
...

"HarryKrause" wrote in message
...
Bert Robbins wrote:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...09.html?sub=AR

It appears that Bush's agenda is still what the majority of people
want.

D'oh. No one expected the Dem to win in that District, not even the
candidate himself. But no one expected the race to be as close as it
was.

It's a good sign. Republican boobi Americani are beginning to wake up
to
the fraud of George W. Bush.

So what you are saying is that democrats win when they lose?


In their minds, yes.

What qualifications do you possess to be able to come to that
conclusion? Have you analyzed "their minds"? If so, using what analysis
procedure? How many subjects did you use? What was your statistical
results? Did you do all of this via rec.boats?


Yes. I have that ability Kevin.

wrote in message
oups.com...

HarryKrause wrote:
Dan J.S. wrote:
"HarryKrause" wrote in message
...
Bert Robbins wrote:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...09.html?sub=AR

It appears that Bush's agenda is still what the majority of people
want.
D'oh. No one expected the Dem to win in that District, not even the
candidate himself. But no one expected the race to be as close as it
was.

It's a good sign. Republican boobi Americani are beginning to wake up
to
the fraud of George W. Bush.

So what you are saying is that democrats win when they lose?




What I am saying is exactly what I said. No one, not even the candidate,
expected the vet to win in that backwards GOP district. The fact that he
pulled more than 45% of the vote is very, very telling.

They can't comprehend anything when they are so blinded by BushCo.
They're just lemmings.


I will respond to you using your exact words you posted in this very thread:
------------------------
"What qualifications do you possess to be able to come to that
conclusion? Have you analyzed "their minds"? If so, using what analysis
procedure? How many subjects did you use? What was your statistical
results? Did you do all of this via rec.boats?"
---------------------------

You are a funny guy Kevin.

"*JimH*" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
oups.com...

*JimH* wrote:
"Dan J.S." wrote in message
...

"HarryKrause" wrote in message
...
Bert Robbins wrote:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...3/AR2005080300
209.html?sub=AR

It appears that Bush's agenda is still what the majority of people
want.

D'oh. No one expected the Dem to win in that District, not even the
candidate himself. But no one expected the race to be as close as it
was.

It's a good sign. Republican boobi Americani are beginning to wake
up
to
the fraud of George W. Bush.

So what you are saying is that democrats win when they lose?


In their minds, yes.

What qualifications do you possess to be able to come to that
conclusion? Have you analyzed "their minds"? If so, using what analysis
procedure? How many subjects did you use? What was your statistical
results? Did you do all of this via rec.boats?


Yes. I have that ability Kevin.

Kevin must be hitting the "schnapps whiskey" again