"John H." wrote in message
...
On Fri, 29 Jul 2005 10:52:26 -0400, "*JimH*" wrote:



On Fri, 29 Jul 2005 10:43:37 -0400, HarryKrause
wrote:

John H. wrote:

Jim mentioned that his wife had a medical condition which caused him
to
sell his
boat. Harry has taken this as a major reason to put down Jim, or put
down Jim's
wife. Shame on him.

I don't "put down Jim" because his wife has some unspecified medical
condition, and I certainly don't put down Jim's wife, who, I imagine,
wonders every day why she married such a shnorrer.

No, I put down Jim because he is a slimeball, a snarky ass, a right-wing
retard, and a low-level lifeform pretending to be human. Oh, and I
notice that he has several times mentioned how often he and his wife go
boating with friends. I wouldn't draw any conclusions about that, but it
does seem to be at least in mild conflict with his claim as to why he
sold that bubble boat.



Mild conflict? How funny.

Yes, we are "boat-less" at the present time...and this after some 25 years
of boat ownership. sigh But you know the reason why we sold our 32
footer recently as I have posted it several time here. For that reason I
will not repeat the reason why.

Our kids grew up on our boats and on the lake (Lake Erie) since they were
6
month old babes. Both love the water and took to it instantly. Being
able
to enjoy weekends, holidays and vacation together on the boat as a family
was absolutely priceless and provided them with memories they will never
forget.

We will buy a smaller boat when we buy our retirement house on the water
in
a few years (or sooner). But that is not important at the moment.

Boat-less...indeed. But despite all this we remain *boaters*. Yes, one
can
remain a boater without owning a boat. I would guess we spend more time
on
the water and boating than you do. And you would never have seen a post
from me here during weekends, holiday or vacations when we owned a boat as
we were on it.

Despite all this the big questions to you Krause is: Why are you so
obsessed with the fact that I am boat-less for the moment and why does
that
bother you so? Does boat ownership somehow make one more credible or more
important? You apparently think so...why am I not surprised?

Understand this Krause: I am comfortable with the fact that we do not own
a
boat for the moment. My wife is comfortable with that fact. My kids are
comfortable with that fact. Despite that we are all happy and love each
other.

How can that be? I would rather be boat-less and happy than be the
grumpy
old man you are. Unlike you I do not have to make up stories about owning
a
phantom custom made 36 foot lobster boat. Unlike you I do not have to
make
up stories about phantom fishing trips and being on the water. Unlike you
I
do not post pictures of what I say is my wife that I lifted from the
internet. Unlike you I don't have to make up stories about my wife's job.
Unlike you I don't have to post pictures of my driveway and brag about how
long it is.

Yes, I don't have to make up stories about my life.....all things you do
right here....all things you have been caught in a lie doing so.

I am happy with my life, you obviously are not. You continue with the
lies
about your fantasy life because you need some sort of validation from the
folks here...members of an obscure boating NG of all things.....a
validation
that you need to show that are more than the grumpy old man eating cheese
doodles at his computer 24x7.

It must really suck to be you and to have to wake up each and every
morning
to look in the mirror knowing you have to live another day as Harry
Krause.

OUCH!!!


Why waste your time, Jim. You've said this before. It's not changed
Harry's
comments, and it won't.

--
John H.
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

It is now my standard response to him whenever he mentions me being without
a boat for the moment.

Harry Krause is like a monkey, a dog or a chimp..............sometimes you
have to keep repeating things till they finally get it.

Harry,
No one believes you have anyone filtered. You will continue to respond to
JimH's posts, just not directly. You will respond 2nd hand, and then cower
behind your "bozo bin".


"HarryKrause" wrote in message
...
John H. wrote:
On Fri, 29 Jul 2005 10:52:26 -0400, "*JimH*" wrote:


On Fri, 29 Jul 2005 10:43:37 -0400, HarryKrause
wrote:


I don't "put down Jim" because his wife has some unspecified medical
condition, and I certainly don't put down Jim's wife, who, I imagine,
wonders every day why she married such a shnorrer.

No, I put down Jim because he is a slimeball, a snarky ass, a
right-wing
retard, and a low-level lifeform pretending to be human. Oh, and I
notice that he has several times mentioned how often he and his wife
go
boating with friends. I wouldn't draw any conclusions about that, but
it
does seem to be at least in mild conflict with his claim as to why he
sold that bubble boat.


Mild conflict? How funny.

Yes, we are "boat-less" at the present time...and this after some 25
years
of boat ownership. sigh But you know the reason why we sold our 32
footer recently as I have posted it several time here. For that reason
I
will not repeat the reason why.


Why waste your time, Jim. You've said this before. It's not changed
Harry's
comments, and it won't.


I don't know why he bothers mentioning me at all. There's nothing about
Hertvik I really want to know. On my desktop computer, at least, he's back
where he belongs, in the trash receptacle. I wouldn't have responded at
all, except that you regurgitated his response to a post that was directed
to you.

Oh well.

On Fri, 29 Jul 2005 11:36:53 -0400, HarryKrause wrote:

John H. wrote:
On Fri, 29 Jul 2005 10:52:26 -0400, "*JimH*" wrote:


On Fri, 29 Jul 2005 10:43:37 -0400, HarryKrause
wrote:


I don't "put down Jim" because his wife has some unspecified medical
condition, and I certainly don't put down Jim's wife, who, I imagine,
wonders every day why she married such a shnorrer.

No, I put down Jim because he is a slimeball, a snarky ass, a right-wing
retard, and a low-level lifeform pretending to be human. Oh, and I
notice that he has several times mentioned how often he and his wife go
boating with friends. I wouldn't draw any conclusions about that, but it
does seem to be at least in mild conflict with his claim as to why he
sold that bubble boat.


Mild conflict? How funny.

Yes, we are "boat-less" at the present time...and this after some 25 years
of boat ownership. sigh But you know the reason why we sold our 32
footer recently as I have posted it several time here. For that reason I
will not repeat the reason why.


Why waste your time, Jim. You've said this before. It's not changed Harry's
comments, and it won't.


I don't know why he bothers mentioning me at all. There's nothing about
Hertvik I really want to know. On my desktop computer, at least, he's
back where he belongs, in the trash receptacle. I wouldn't have
responded at all, except that you regurgitated his response to a post
that was directed to you.

Oh well.

Here we go again. Harry, please don't offer excuses for all the 'filtered'
messages you respond to because you 'happened' to see it in another thread.

Give us a break.

--
John H.
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

JohnH,
That is Harry's way of "pretending" he does not see the messages. It allows
him to continue to make his insults and then pretend he does not see the
response.

It's funny to watch Harry, he actually believes someone believes any of his
tales.


"John H." wrote in message
...
On Fri, 29 Jul 2005 11:36:53 -0400, HarryKrause
wrote:

John H. wrote:
On Fri, 29 Jul 2005 10:52:26 -0400, "*JimH*" wrote:


On Fri, 29 Jul 2005 10:43:37 -0400, HarryKrause

wrote:


I don't "put down Jim" because his wife has some unspecified medical
condition, and I certainly don't put down Jim's wife, who, I imagine,
wonders every day why she married such a shnorrer.

No, I put down Jim because he is a slimeball, a snarky ass, a
right-wing
retard, and a low-level lifeform pretending to be human. Oh, and I
notice that he has several times mentioned how often he and his wife
go
boating with friends. I wouldn't draw any conclusions about that, but
it
does seem to be at least in mild conflict with his claim as to why he
sold that bubble boat.


Mild conflict? How funny.

Yes, we are "boat-less" at the present time...and this after some 25
years
of boat ownership. sigh But you know the reason why we sold our 32
footer recently as I have posted it several time here. For that reason
I
will not repeat the reason why.


Why waste your time, Jim. You've said this before. It's not changed
Harry's
comments, and it won't.


I don't know why he bothers mentioning me at all. There's nothing about
Hertvik I really want to know. On my desktop computer, at least, he's
back where he belongs, in the trash receptacle. I wouldn't have
responded at all, except that you regurgitated his response to a post
that was directed to you.

Oh well.

Here we go again. Harry, please don't offer excuses for all the 'filtered'
messages you respond to because you 'happened' to see it in another
thread.

Give us a break.

--
John H.
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

"Dr. Dr. . R. Name" wrote in message
...
JohnH,
That is Harry's way of "pretending" he does not see the messages. It
allows
him to continue to make his insults and then pretend he does not see the
response.

It's funny to watch Harry, he actually believes someone believes any of
his
tales.

But there are........Kevin and Don




"John H." wrote in message
...
On Fri, 29 Jul 2005 11:36:53 -0400, HarryKrause
wrote:

John H. wrote:
On Fri, 29 Jul 2005 10:52:26 -0400, "*JimH*" wrote:


On Fri, 29 Jul 2005 10:43:37 -0400, HarryKrause

wrote:


I don't "put down Jim" because his wife has some unspecified
medical
condition, and I certainly don't put down Jim's wife, who, I
imagine,
wonders every day why she married such a shnorrer.

No, I put down Jim because he is a slimeball, a snarky ass, a
right-wing
retard, and a low-level lifeform pretending to be human. Oh, and I
notice that he has several times mentioned how often he and his
wife
go
boating with friends. I wouldn't draw any conclusions about that,
but
it
does seem to be at least in mild conflict with his claim as to why
he
sold that bubble boat.


Mild conflict? How funny.

Yes, we are "boat-less" at the present time...and this after some 25
years
of boat ownership. sigh But you know the reason why we sold our
32
footer recently as I have posted it several time here. For that
reason
I
will not repeat the reason why.


Why waste your time, Jim. You've said this before. It's not changed
Harry's
comments, and it won't.


I don't know why he bothers mentioning me at all. There's nothing about
Hertvik I really want to know. On my desktop computer, at least, he's
back where he belongs, in the trash receptacle. I wouldn't have
responded at all, except that you regurgitated his response to a post
that was directed to you.

Oh well.

Here we go again. Harry, please don't offer excuses for all the
'filtered'
messages you respond to because you 'happened' to see it in another
thread.

Give us a break.

--
John H.
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

*JimH* wrote:

It figures Krause would take being called a great name-caller as a
compliment.

What about YOU, with your outlandish lies, piled on more lies, and
childish insults?

wrote in message
oups.com...

*JimH* wrote:

It figures Krause would take being called a great name-caller as a
compliment.

What about YOU, with your outlandish lies, piled on more lies, and
childish insults?


How funny. The king of insults, lies and pile ons jumping on me. You are
too funny Kevin.

John H. wrote:

Jim mentioned that his wife had a medical condition which caused him to sell his
boat. Harry has taken this as a major reason to put down Jim, or put down Jim's
wife. Shame on him.


Problem is...JimH's behavior here and his zero credibility make anything
he says suspect. Do we really know his claim is legit...or was there
another reason he's boatless. We'll never know for sure and can only
judge by what we read here. ( note: go back a few weeks and review his
antics with Chuck)

On Fri, 29 Jul 2005 12:23:16 -0400, HarryKrause wrote:

John H. wrote:
On Fri, 29 Jul 2005 11:36:53 -0400, HarryKrause wrote:

John H. wrote:
On Fri, 29 Jul 2005 10:52:26 -0400, "*JimH*" wrote:

On Fri, 29 Jul 2005 10:43:37 -0400, HarryKrause
wrote:

I don't "put down Jim" because his wife has some unspecified medical
condition, and I certainly don't put down Jim's wife, who, I imagine,
wonders every day why she married such a shnorrer.

No, I put down Jim because he is a slimeball, a snarky ass, a right-wing
retard, and a low-level lifeform pretending to be human. Oh, and I
notice that he has several times mentioned how often he and his wife go
boating with friends. I wouldn't draw any conclusions about that, but it
does seem to be at least in mild conflict with his claim as to why he
sold that bubble boat.


Mild conflict? How funny.

Yes, we are "boat-less" at the present time...and this after some 25 years
of boat ownership. sigh But you know the reason why we sold our 32
footer recently as I have posted it several time here. For that reason I
will not repeat the reason why.

Why waste your time, Jim. You've said this before. It's not changed Harry's
comments, and it won't.

I don't know why he bothers mentioning me at all. There's nothing about
Hertvik I really want to know. On my desktop computer, at least, he's
back where he belongs, in the trash receptacle. I wouldn't have
responded at all, except that you regurgitated his response to a post
that was directed to you.

Oh well.

Here we go again. Harry, please don't offer excuses for all the 'filtered'
messages you respond to because you 'happened' to see it in another thread.

Give us a break.


The only way I am going to see messages from Hertvik and a couple of
other losers here is when they are regurgitated by folks like you.

So solly.

Right, and because you are so totally disinterested in their comments, you'll
simply disregard and not respond to them. Correct?


--
John H.
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

On Fri, 29 Jul 2005 17:44:48 GMT, Don White wrote:

John H. wrote:

Jim mentioned that his wife had a medical condition which caused him to sell his
boat. Harry has taken this as a major reason to put down Jim, or put down Jim's
wife. Shame on him.


Problem is...JimH's behavior here and his zero credibility make anything
he says suspect. Do we really know his claim is legit...or was there
another reason he's boatless. We'll never know for sure and can only
judge by what we read here. ( note: go back a few weeks and review his
antics with Chuck)

Yes, Jim admitted to a lie. I have much more respect for someone who tells a
lie, admits it, and apologizes for same than for one who just lies and continues
the charade.

Not mentioning any names, of course.

--
John H.
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD