Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#18
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 13 Jul 2005 08:43:49 -0400, DSK wrote:
John H. wrote: Wow, nice spin Chuck! I was wondering how y'all would turn that into a negative. Let's see now, what's happened he The huge projected deficit might not be as huge as once thought. The Bush/Cheney Cheerleaders have proclaimed that this is wonderful, fantastic news, all is rosy forever, and it *PROVES* that President Bush's economic policy (ie cut taxes, jack spending way way up) WORKS (just like it worked for Reagan, which it actually didn't). Others point out the fact that 1- the possibly decreased deficit is still huge, and that's bad... 2- it hasn't happened yet, nobody knows for sure if the deficit will be less than projected. You then accuse us of being negative. Golly gee, JohnH, if the facts are 'negative' then doesn't that say something about your anointed leader's policies right there? DSK So the news was really *bad* news? Suppose the deficit evaporated overnight. Would that be *really* bad news? -- John H. On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Real humans modify the monkey's tax cuts | General | |||
Progressive Message on the President's Budget | General | |||
( OT ) Budget deficit to swell to $445 billion | General | |||
Republican myths | General |