John Cairns wrote:
"Curtis CCR" wrote in message

Why has been on every mountaintop he can find for the
last year yelling, "These dirty *******s told everyone that my wife is
a CIA agent? Did you hear me?!?! I said these guys are telling people
that my wife is a CIA agent!!!"

Considering the fact that the people that might most be interested in her
agent status ALREADY knew, her husband publicizing the fact that someone in
the current administration revealed her identity as an agent doesn't make
ANY difference. The fact that this very serious national security crime has
been almost ignored by the mainstream media is rather troubling, I would
venture the guess that this would be Wilson's primary motivation for
publicizing it.

A host of people alledgedly knew she worked for the CIA. It has been
reported that it was common knowledge in D.C. "cocktail circuit" that
Wilson's wife worked for the CIA. Lot's of people knew PRIOR to the
White House's alledged leak. But nobody talked much about it because
it wasn't important. This goes to another element of the definition of
covert agent - the government needs to be taking step to keep her
identity secret.

This story is not being ignored by the mainstream media. So you even
have that fact wrong. But there are very few *facts* available for the
media to report. One fact that you still cannot prove is that a even a
misdemeanor, let alone a "serious national security crime" has been
committed.

On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 06:22:16 -0700, Curtis CCR wrote:


A host of people alledgedly knew she worked for the CIA. It has been
reported that it was common knowledge in D.C. "cocktail circuit" that
Wilson's wife worked for the CIA. Lot's of people knew PRIOR to the White
House's alledged leak. But nobody talked much about it because it wasn't
important. This goes to another element of the definition of covert agent
- the government needs to be taking step to keep her identity secret.

You seem to be concentrating on the Intelligence Identities Protection
Act. However, the prosecutor could be using the much broader Espionage
Act, similar to Reagan's use of it against Samuel Morison.

http://writ.corporate.findlaw.com/sc.../20030926.html