BoatBanter.com

BoatBanter.com (https://www.boatbanter.com/)
-   General (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/)
-   -   Another example of Bush getting what he wanted... (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/45159-re-another-example-bush-getting-what-he-wanted.html)

NOYB June 21st 05 06:55 PM


wrote in message
oups.com...


NOYB wrote:

Do your own research if you want to find the exact number. However,
James
Hormel and Roger Gregory are two of the more high-profile individuals who
come to mind.


As suspected, NOYB blathers to protect his party, and can't offer the
numbers to back up his allegations.


What allegations? And WTF are you talking about?

Learn to follow a thread. Imbecile.



John H June 21st 05 07:17 PM

On Tue, 21 Jun 2005 07:57:13 -0400, HarryKrause wrote:

William Bruce wrote:
If it is Bad for Bush,
It is Good for the United States.



If it is bad for Kraus,
Then, Hell Harry, go on down the street to the next gay bar. You know 'em
all.

Cheers,
William




If you use a nym server or some other method to hide your identity
here, or if you post with a large number of different IDs here (aka
“Smithering”), or if you visit here only to take cheap shots at other
posters you don’t like, then you are not in the “rec.boats” newsgroup to
exchange thoughts with others who enjoy boating or fishing, and you’ll
probably be ignored by me and many others. More than likely, you’re
probably going to end up on the "filtered out" bozo list.


What the *hell* did your post have to do with boating or fishing, Harry?

"Posted on Mon, Jun. 20, 2005


Bush may bypass Senate as Democrats again block U.N. nominee

BY JAMES KUHNHENN
Knight Ridder Newspapers

WASHINGTON - (KRT) - Senate Democrats on Monday once again blocked the
nomination of John Bolton to be America's ambassador to the United
Nations, setting the stage for President Bush to consider bypassing
Senate confirmation by appointing Bolton while Congress is on a weeklong
July Fourth recess."

Was that supposed to be an exchange of boating or fishing thoughts?
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

John H June 21st 05 07:19 PM

On Tue, 21 Jun 2005 15:35:36 GMT, "NOYB" wrote:


"HarryKrause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:
"HarryKrause" wrote in message
...

NOYB wrote:

"HarryKrause" wrote in message
...


Posted on Mon, Jun. 20, 2005

Bush may bypass Senate as Democrats again block U.N. nominee

BY JAMES KUHNHENN
Knight Ridder Newspapers

WASHINGTON - (KRT) - Senate Democrats on Monday once again blocked the
nomination of John Bolton to be America's ambassador to the United
Nations, setting the stage for President Bush to consider bypassing
Senate confirmation by appointing Bolton while Congress is on a
weeklong July Fourth recess.

Democrats complained that the White House has refused to turn over
information about Bolton's activities while he was an official at the
State Department, which they say is crucial to determining his fitness
for the U.N. post.

Only three Democrats sided with Republicans in an attempt to end debate
and bring up the nomination for a final vote. Sen. George Voinovich of
Ohio, a Republican who opposes Bolton's nomination, voted with the
Democrats. Under Senate rules, Republicans needed 60 of the senators'
100 votes to end debate, but they mustered only 54.

"They put partisanship ahead of the Constitution and the Senate's right
to receive information from the executive branch of government," Senate
Democratic leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., said Monday of the Bush
administration. "Unless the president comes forward with information
which we're certain we're constitutionally entitled to, Bolton will not
get enough votes" to end debate on his nomination and move to a
decisive vote, Reid said.

On Monday, White House officials told one key Democrat that they were
willing to provide some but not all of the material Democrats had
requested. Democrats refused the offer and cast their challenge to
Bolton as a defense of the Senate's institutional rights rather than
the merits of his nomination.

http://www.kansascity.com/mld/kansas...s/politics/119



Quack attack: quack, quack, quack, quack.



Clinton did a recess appointment of the Ambassador to Saudi Arabia...so
what's your point?




How many major appointments did Clinton make of candidates refused a vote
in the US Senate?


He made 56 recess appointments in the first 6 1/2 years of his
Presidency. I couldn't find statistics for the last year and half.

So how many did Bush make?




How many recess appointments to major positions did Clinton make of
candidates refused a vote in the US Senate?

And if you find any, the second question:

How many recess appointments to major positions did Clinton make of
candidates TWICE refused a vote in the US senate?


Do your own research if you want to find the exact number. However, James
Hormel and Roger Gregory are two of the more high-profile individuals who
come to mind.


Next will be, "Well, how many recess appointments did Clinton make of candidates
whose last name was spelled B-O-L-T-O-N?"
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

[email protected] June 22nd 05 05:29 PM



NOYB wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...


NOYB wrote:

Do your own research if you want to find the exact number. However,
James
Hormel and Roger Gregory are two of the more high-profile individuals who
come to mind.


As suspected, NOYB blathers to protect his party, and can't offer the
numbers to back up his allegations.


What allegations? And WTF are you talking about?

Holy ****!!!! Are you REALLY that stupid?????? Well, I don't think so,
or else you would have replied with something substantial, as opposed
to what you really did, which was just childish name calling and
insults. Grow up.


*JimH* June 22nd 05 05:46 PM


wrote in message
ups.com...


NOYB wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...


NOYB wrote:

Do your own research if you want to find the exact number. However,
James
Hormel and Roger Gregory are two of the more high-profile individuals
who
come to mind.

As suspected, NOYB blathers to protect his party, and can't offer the
numbers to back up his allegations.


What allegations? And WTF are you talking about?

Holy ****!!!! Are you REALLY that stupid?????? Well, I don't think so,
or else you would have replied with something substantial, as opposed
to what you really did, which was just childish name calling and
insults. Grow up.


What does this have to do with boats Kevin?




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:19 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com