NOYB wrote:


Your analogy is extremely flawed as usual.


Well, then do tell, answer the question I asked. How do you know that
if the United States hadn't invaded Iraq, that binLaden would now be in
control of all of the mideast oil? ANSWER IT, you are the one who
stated it. It's nothing but speculation, and you know it, or else you'd
answer. So, to try to make it look like you actually know something,
instead of answering the bigger picture, you took a ****ing two word
sentence and gave a long winded diatribe filled with more
speculation!!!!! And you have the audacity to call other people dumb!
Now, care to try again? Here are the questions I asked in direct
response to YOU saying that if we hadn't invaded Iraq, bin Laden would
be in control of mideast oil:
What I said was "how do you know that bin Laden would now control all
of the oil in the mideast if we hadn't gone to war with Iraq"???? Now,
care to answer that? You have nothing but YOUR speculation. Would he
have TRIED to take complete control of the mideast? Hell, even that
question is a *maybe* at best. So, EVEN IF he tried, and we weren't at
war with Iraq, we could have done something then. Remember Kuwait?????

It's simple really, just answer the questions.