NOYB wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...

Doug Kanter wrote:

"NOYB" wrote in message
thlink.net...



Should we invade there next or should it be Iran?

Probably Iran, since they're closest to developing nukes. There may not

be


a need to hit Saudi Arabia militarily if we're able to isolate them from

the


rest of the Middle East.


Hit Saudi Arabia....pant...pant.....pant....I don't have words to

describe

how HOT HOT HOT you sound when you talk macho like that, with those sexy
action verbs. Not unlike President "Bring 'Em On". I have to go get some
fresh air.....




Would you like to


send your children?

Of course I wouldn't like it. However, my kids are 4 1/2, 2 1/2 and 1

years


old. I'd prefer we deal with the radical Islamics now rather than in 13
years when my oldest is draft age...*AND* those same countries have

nukes.



I have news for you, hot boy: If we keep dealing with the world in our
current fashion, we'll have the same problems when your kids are old

enough

to be drafted.



Perhaps the next target will be in SW Florida, where knobs-for-brains
lives.


Harry,
You've been wishing a terrorist strike down here for awhile. As much as you
and I disagree, I'd never wish that on you nor any another American.




You need some instruction in language. I'm not wishing anything. I feel
in my gut we are going to be attacked again by terrorists, and *if* it
does, I think it should be in "Bush Country," rather than in the more
civilized parts of the nation. Let the Bush supporters feel the pain
next time, eh?