OT Texas Republicans
"Harry Krause" wrote in message ... John Gaquin wrote: "thunder" wrote in message ....There is a major difference in having a belief, and acting on that belief. Yes -- that difference is called "courage". Not in Bush's case. In his case, it was pigheadedness, stupidity, and politics. Harry, I think you are going to find that your type of anti-Bush rhetoric will be the downfall of your and your party's attempts to oust him in the coming election. Personal attacks on people usually result in a backlash of support for them, particularly when they are perceived by many as an average guy trying to do his best in a very difficult situation. Harry Truman comes to mind. A better argument would include the identification of specific differences in policies and ideas for dealing with our global problems. Unfortunately, John Kerry has yet to identify any, other than to hand the problems back to the UN. If you recall, Bush tried this to no significant avail. Eisboch |
OT Texas Republicans
"Joe" wrote in message ...
Poor (FAS)kisser, never had a chance. Fried before birth. Have any evidence? Unlike you, I'm a man of conviction. You, on the other hand, talk the talk ONLY when hiding behind a newsgroup, AND an anonymous address. What a ****ing low life loser you are. Oh, and, hey, I thought you had added me to your blocked list. |
OT Texas Republicans
"NOYB" wrote in message news:zEifc.7017
Of course he lied. There were all sorts of reports available to Bush that indicated there were no WMD in Iraq. Don't worry Harry...we'll find the WMD's. Bush's comment about mustard gas recently found at a turkey farm in Libya should be proof that he hasn't given up the search. Oh, I think I get it! Bush invaded Iraq, because Libya has WMDs???? Every intelligence agency in the Western world knew Saddam had 'em. There were numerous reports before the war by Israeli intelligence (and others) that large convoys were leaving Iraq and heading to Syria. Although they haven't talked about it very much publicly, the Administration believes that Syria is hiding the WMD's. OH, so Bush didn't invade Iraq because Libya had WMD's, he invaded Iraq because Syria had them??? |
OT Texas Republicans
"Bill" wrote in message ...
"Harry Krause" wrote in message news:c3dhc2g=.844e1d7c1ae2e7e90bbc8c284ef604be@108 1964749.nulluser.com... jim-- wrote: I suppose it is a bad thing, but certainly not on the level of a current Senator killing a young lady named Mary Jo Kopechne then running away from the accident. Or perhaps not on the same level as a POTUS having oral sex with an intern. Sins, indeed, but they pale in comparision to Presidunce Bush lying to get us into a war with Iraq, and causing the deaths of thousands of people, including many non-combatant civilians. Yea why don't you and Asskisser go to Iraq and live since you don't like this country so much. If Clinton had done his job we would not be in the mess we are now. You can say what you want about Bush But you can not deny the truth that this is all Clinton's fault. He should be the one saying he was sorry to the American people. You can not say Clinton didn't lied either, their are court recorders stating the facts. Or are you going to say the Judge Lied to. Everyone lies except for Democrats. Yea that funny that demo don't lie....ha ha ha Because it's our patriotic duty to get that lying piece of **** out of office, and back to not being able to find oil in Texas. |
OT Texas Republicans
"NOYB" wrote in message link.net...
What year did you live in Naples basskisser? Why? |
OT Texas Republicans
"jim--" wrote in message ...
I suppose it is a bad thing, but certainly not on the level of a current Senator killing a young lady named Mary Jo Kopechne then running away from the accident. Or perhaps not on the same level as a POTUS having oral sex with an intern. Yeah, what to hell is up with those people? Don't they know that your not supposed to ENJOY anything, even sex?? We probably should spend, oh, say, $57 million to find out WHY! Oh, wait, never mind, all ready has been done. |
OT Texas Republicans
On Wed, 14 Apr 2004 22:02:07 +0000, NOYB wrote:
"thunder" wrote in message ... LOL, then he was clearly wrong, as there are no WMD. You sure about that? There's no way every intelligence agency in the Western World was wrong about their existance. I know that we'll find 'em eventually. I just hope that it's before the election. Unfortunately, I believe that it will require troops in Syria...and that won't happen until Bush's 2nd term. LOL, I don't think I could disagree with you more. First, *if* Bush is reelected, both he and the Army will still have their hands full with Iraq. I don't think even Bush is dumb enough to start yet another war. Second, no country would risk our wrath by accepting Iraq's WMD, *if* they existed. A terrorist network, perhaps, but no country. All of the WMD Iraq was accused of having, has a shelf life of 3-5 years. Why would Syria want WMD that is rapidly turning to goo. For a country, it is the capability to make WMD that is important, not the WMD itself. Let me once again state, Syria and Iraq are not allied. Syria sided with Iran in the Iran-Iraq War, and the US in the first Gulf War. Third, there were several intelligence sources that didn't believe Iraq was in possession of WMD capabilities when we invaded, including many agents in our own agencies. |
OT Texas Republicans
"Harry Krause" wrote in message news:c3dhc2g=.0973c1468580f0f8aff7c61aa587d290@108 2031194.nulluser.com... And despite the fact that his formal education did not offer him the advantages Bush had, he could plainly and well, without butchering standard English. Thank you for providing your own example of "butchering standard English". |
OT Texas Republicans
"Harry Krause" wrote in message ... NOYB wrote: "thunder" wrote in message ... LOL, then he was clearly wrong, as there are no WMD. You sure about that? There's no way every intelligence agency in the Western World was wrong about their existance. I know that we'll find 'em eventually. I just hope that it's before the election. Unfortunately, I believe that it will require troops in Syria...and that won't happen until Bush's 2nd term. They are on a truck right now, being driven by a Halliburton employee, eh? Oh, so that's it. The Mehdi Army is attacking our convoys and killing civilians in a search for WMD's that we're trying to "plant". Do you guys actually believe your own bull****? |
OT Texas Republicans
"Gary Warner" wrote in message ... "NOYB" wrote in message ink.net... You sure about that? There's no way every intelligence agency in the Western World was wrong about their existance. Galileo and I had a good laugh over this... So you're into necromancy, eh? Since you mentioned Galileo, then perhaps his theory on abstract dynamics applies he the weapons are there, but they can't be observed under anything less than ideal circumstances (ie--Saddam didn't have 1 year to hide them; Syria would let our guys in to take a look; scientists watching the current insurgency are no longer fearful to reveal their existence, etc). In fact, I'd say invoking Galileo's name is a pretty dumb way to prove that something *doen't* exist. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:42 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com