"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
John Gaquin wrote:

"Harry Krause" wrote in message

Ahh. I have it:


When XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX told XXXXXXXXX XXXX about XXXXX bin XXXXX"X plan
to

hijack airliners, XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX


Actually, as you well know now (and likely knew full well when you
spewed
the above), the entire doc is just a touch over a page in length,
contains
naught but general references, and only five instances of redaction, all
of
them clearly blanking the name of some intelligence agency or operative.
So, you record is intact.



You guys are kinda dense, eh?

No. Just reading and reporting the facts, jack, not listening to the spin.

Me again. (Eisboch)