|
RPM's / Tach question
|
RPM's / Tach question
|
RPM's / Tach question
|
RPM's / Tach question
(Henry Blackmoore) wrote in message link.net...
In article , (basskisser) wrote: (Henry Blackmoore) wrote in message news:P4Udc.3649 No you said words that indicated that "if the wiring were bad, you would read zero R.P.M's. And that is simply not true and an ignorant statement. Simple as that. The wiring can be "bad" and still read something which is what my statement was saying numb numb. As usual your brain is clouded by smoke. Have any proof of that statement? "I would guess that it is the actual tach that is bad, seeing how you are reading SOMETHING. I'd think if the wiring were bad, you would read zero R.P.M.'s." Please show how, if the wiring were bad, that the tach would read HIGHER. Can you? OR was that just drunken babble? What is your IQ? About two below plant life? Can't answer the question, can you, drunken idiot? |
RPM's / Tach question
In article , (basskisser) wrote:
Path: (Henry Blackmoore) wrote in message link.net... In article , (basskisser) wrote: (Henry Blackmoore) wrote in message news:P4Udc.3649 No you said words that indicated that "if the wiring were bad, you would read zero R.P.M's. And that is simply not true and an ignorant statement. Simple as that. The wiring can be "bad" and still read something which is what my statement was saying numb numb. As usual your brain is clouded by smoke. Have any proof of that statement? "I would guess that it is the actual tach that is bad, seeing how you are reading SOMETHING. I'd think if the wiring were bad, you would read zero R.P.M.'s." Please show how, if the wiring were bad, that the tach would read HIGHER. Can you? OR was that just drunken babble? What is your IQ? About two below plant life? Can't answer the question, can you, drunken idiot? Look slow mind grok this: [YOU SAID] I would guess that it is the actual tach that is bad, seeing how you are reading SOMETHING. I'd think if the wiring were bad, you would read zero R.P.M.'s. [I REPLIED] Ever hear of excessive resistance? One can have "bad" wiring and still get a reading...(albeit usually much lower). -- I responded to JUST that paragraph of yours. Nothing else. Hello McFly? Anybody home? You stated that "I'd think if the wiring were bad, you would read zero R.P.M.'s." And since that simply is not true, the wiring can be "bad" and read zero r.p.m.'s. Thus my response. I never said anything about bad wiring being the cause of the original poster's problems. I know it is hard for you. So I will stop being insensitive and saying things like "dumb dumb" in reference to you. Better to use "mentally challenged". |
RPM's / Tach question
(Henry Blackmoore) wrote in message ink.net...
In article , (basskisser) wrote: Path: (Henry Blackmoore) wrote in message link.net... In article , (basskisser) wrote: (Henry Blackmoore) wrote in message news:P4Udc.3649 No you said words that indicated that "if the wiring were bad, you would read zero R.P.M's. And that is simply not true and an ignorant statement. Simple as that. The wiring can be "bad" and still read something which is what my statement was saying numb numb. As usual your brain is clouded by smoke. Have any proof of that statement? "I would guess that it is the actual tach that is bad, seeing how you are reading SOMETHING. I'd think if the wiring were bad, you would read zero R.P.M.'s." Please show how, if the wiring were bad, that the tach would read HIGHER. Can you? OR was that just drunken babble? What is your IQ? About two below plant life? Can't answer the question, can you, drunken idiot? Look slow mind grok this: [YOU SAID] I would guess that it is the actual tach that is bad, seeing how you are reading SOMETHING. I'd think if the wiring were bad, you would read zero R.P.M.'s. [I REPLIED] Ever hear of excessive resistance? One can have "bad" wiring and still get a reading...(albeit usually much lower). -- I responded to JUST that paragraph of yours. Nothing else. Hello McFly? Anybody home? You stated that "I'd think if the wiring were bad, you would read zero R.P.M.'s." And since that simply is not true, the wiring can be "bad" and read zero r.p.m.'s. Thus my response. I never said anything about bad wiring being the cause of the original poster's problems. I know it is hard for you. So I will stop being insensitive and saying things like "dumb dumb" in reference to you. Better to use "mentally challenged". So, I take it you simply didn't comprehend the part where the poster stated that the tach read HIGHER????? Can you show my HOW it would read higher? |
RPM's / Tach question
In article , (basskisser) wrote:
(Henry Blackmoore) wrote in message ink.net... In article , (basskisser) wrote: Path: (Henry Blackmoore) wrote in message link.net... In article , (basskisser) wrote: (Henry Blackmoore) wrote in message news:P4Udc.3649 No you said words that indicated that "if the wiring were bad, you would read zero R.P.M's. And that is simply not true and an ignorant statement. Simple as that. The wiring can be "bad" and still read something which is what my statement was saying numb numb. As usual your brain is clouded by smoke. Have any proof of that statement? "I would guess that it is the actual tach that is bad, seeing how you are reading SOMETHING. I'd think if the wiring were bad, you would read zero R.P.M.'s." Please show how, if the wiring were bad, that the tach would read HIGHER. Can you? OR was that just drunken babble? What is your IQ? About two below plant life? Can't answer the question, can you, drunken idiot? Look slow mind grok this: [YOU SAID] I would guess that it is the actual tach that is bad, seeing how you are reading SOMETHING. I'd think if the wiring were bad, you would read zero R.P.M.'s. [I REPLIED] Ever hear of excessive resistance? One can have "bad" wiring and still get a reading...(albeit usually much lower). -- I responded to JUST that paragraph of yours. Nothing else. Hello McFly? Anybody home? You stated that "I'd think if the wiring were bad, you would read zero R.P.M.'s." And since that simply is not true, the wiring can be "bad" and read zero r.p.m.'s. Thus my response. I never said anything about bad wiring being the cause of the original poster's problems. I know it is hard for you. So I will stop being insensitive and saying things like "dumb dumb" in reference to you. Better to use "mentally challenged". So, I take it you simply didn't comprehend the part where the poster stated that the tach read HIGHER????? Can you show my HOW it would read higher? That is irrelevant to the argument that we are having over your ignorant statement. Sorry no cigar 'asskisser. We need to drop the subject because it is straining your brain. |
RPM's / Tach question
(Henry Blackmoore) wrote in message hlink.net...
In article , (basskisser) wrote: (Henry Blackmoore) wrote in message ink.net... In article , (basskisser) wrote: Path: (Henry Blackmoore) wrote in message link.net... In article , (basskisser) wrote: (Henry Blackmoore) wrote in message news:P4Udc.3649 No you said words that indicated that "if the wiring were bad, you would read zero R.P.M's. And that is simply not true and an ignorant statement. Simple as that. The wiring can be "bad" and still read something which is what my statement was saying numb numb. As usual your brain is clouded by smoke. Have any proof of that statement? "I would guess that it is the actual tach that is bad, seeing how you are reading SOMETHING. I'd think if the wiring were bad, you would read zero R.P.M.'s." Please show how, if the wiring were bad, that the tach would read HIGHER. Can you? OR was that just drunken babble? What is your IQ? About two below plant life? Can't answer the question, can you, drunken idiot? Look slow mind grok this: [YOU SAID] I would guess that it is the actual tach that is bad, seeing how you are reading SOMETHING. I'd think if the wiring were bad, you would read zero R.P.M.'s. [I REPLIED] Ever hear of excessive resistance? One can have "bad" wiring and still get a reading...(albeit usually much lower). -- I responded to JUST that paragraph of yours. Nothing else. Hello McFly? Anybody home? You stated that "I'd think if the wiring were bad, you would read zero R.P.M.'s." And since that simply is not true, the wiring can be "bad" and read zero r.p.m.'s. Thus my response. I never said anything about bad wiring being the cause of the original poster's problems. I know it is hard for you. So I will stop being insensitive and saying things like "dumb dumb" in reference to you. Better to use "mentally challenged". So, I take it you simply didn't comprehend the part where the poster stated that the tach read HIGHER????? Can you show my HOW it would read higher? That is irrelevant to the argument that we are having over your ignorant statement. Sorry no cigar 'asskisser. We need to drop the subject because it is straining your brain. Idiot. |
RPM's / Tach question
In article , (basskisser) wrote:
(Henry Blackmoore) wrote in message hlink.net... In article , (basskisser) wrote: (Henry Blackmoore) wrote in message ink.net... In article , (basskisser) wrote: Path: (Henry Blackmoore) wrote in message link.net... In article , (basskisser) wrote: (Henry Blackmoore) wrote in message news:P4Udc.3649 No you said words that indicated that "if the wiring were bad, you would read zero R.P.M's. And that is simply not true and an ignorant statement. Simple as that. The wiring can be "bad" and still read something which is what my statement was saying numb numb. As usual your brain is clouded by smoke. Have any proof of that statement? "I would guess that it is the actual tach that is bad, seeing how you are reading SOMETHING. I'd think if the wiring were bad, you would read zero R.P.M.'s." Please show how, if the wiring were bad, that the tach would read HIGHER. Can you? OR was that just drunken babble? What is your IQ? About two below plant life? Can't answer the question, can you, drunken idiot? Look slow mind grok this: [YOU SAID] I would guess that it is the actual tach that is bad, seeing how you are reading SOMETHING. I'd think if the wiring were bad, you would read zero R.P.M.'s. [I REPLIED] Ever hear of excessive resistance? One can have "bad" wiring and still get a reading...(albeit usually much lower). -- I responded to JUST that paragraph of yours. Nothing else. Hello McFly? Anybody home? You stated that "I'd think if the wiring were bad, you would read zero R.P.M.'s." And since that simply is not true, the wiring can be "bad" and read zero r.p.m.'s. Thus my response. I never said anything about bad wiring being the cause of the original poster's problems. I know it is hard for you. So I will stop being insensitive and saying things like "dumb dumb" in reference to you. Better to use "mentally challenged". So, I take it you simply didn't comprehend the part where the poster stated that the tach read HIGHER????? Can you show my HOW it would read higher? That is irrelevant to the argument that we are having over your ignorant statement. Sorry no cigar 'asskisser. We need to drop the subject because it is straining your brain. Idiot. Wearing your blue-dress today Monica? |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:33 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com