*JimH* wrote:
wrote in message
ups.com...


*JimH* wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...


*JimH* wrote:


Yes, you are an idiot Kevin.

Yes, ...

Glad to see you finally admit it Kevin. That is a positive first
step.

You are now on the road to recovery. We are here to help you Kevin.

Here goes Jim, off the deep end again. I suppose you'll now start the
lying, and childish name calling again? Oh, forgot, the childish name
calling has already started. But, alas, you've stooped to a new low
above......



"...a new low above...."?

Yes, where you took one word of a sentence I wrote, ..

No, I took 4 words from a sentence.


....and tried to make
it sound like I agreed with you saying I was an idiot.

I did not have to try hard. All I did was copy and paste what you wrote.
If you think that makes you an idiot, I would agree.



That kind of
childish behavior is how it started before when you went off the deep
end and started posting lie after lie after lie about me. Remember?


No.

Really? You DON'T remember posting lie after lie about me? Then what
did you apologize for?

*JimH* wrote:
wrote in message
ups.com...


*JimH* wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...


*JimH* wrote:


Yes, you are an idiot Kevin.

Yes, ...

Glad to see you finally admit it Kevin. That is a positive first
step.

You are now on the road to recovery. We are here to help you Kevin.

Here goes Jim, off the deep end again. I suppose you'll now start the
lying, and childish name calling again? Oh, forgot, the childish name
calling has already started. But, alas, you've stooped to a new low
above......



"...a new low above...."?

Yes, where you took one word of a sentence I wrote, ..

No, I took 4 words from a sentence.


....and tried to make
it sound like I agreed with you saying I was an idiot.

I did not have to try hard. All I did was copy and paste what you wrote.
If you think that makes you an idiot, I would agree.

Again, Jim, you are nothing short of a liar. You did NOT just "cut and
paste what I wrote". You took a PARTIAL SENTENCE, with the sole purpose
of TRYING to make it look like I answered a statement of yours entirely
different. Liar.

wrote in message
oups.com...


*JimH* wrote:
wrote in message
ups.com...


*JimH* wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...


*JimH* wrote:


Yes, you are an idiot Kevin.

Yes, ...

Glad to see you finally admit it Kevin. That is a positive first
step.

You are now on the road to recovery. We are here to help you
Kevin.

Here goes Jim, off the deep end again. I suppose you'll now start
the
lying, and childish name calling again? Oh, forgot, the childish
name
calling has already started. But, alas, you've stooped to a new low
above......



"...a new low above...."?

Yes, where you took one word of a sentence I wrote, ..

No, I took 4 words from a sentence.


....and tried to make
it sound like I agreed with you saying I was an idiot.

I did not have to try hard. All I did was copy and paste what you wrote.
If you think that makes you an idiot, I would agree.



That kind of
childish behavior is how it started before when you went off the deep
end and started posting lie after lie after lie about me. Remember?


No.

Really? You DON'T remember posting lie after lie about me? Then what
did you apologize for?


My apology should have been directed to everyone in this NG for thinking
that you would change. I asked for the attacks on you to stop but I was
told that you deserve everything coming your way. I still defended you
thinking you would change.

I was wrong....they were right.

Get it?

wrote in message
ups.com...


*JimH* wrote:
wrote in message
ups.com...


*JimH* wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...


*JimH* wrote:


Yes, you are an idiot Kevin.

Yes, ...

Glad to see you finally admit it Kevin. That is a positive first
step.

You are now on the road to recovery. We are here to help you
Kevin.

Here goes Jim, off the deep end again. I suppose you'll now start
the
lying, and childish name calling again? Oh, forgot, the childish
name
calling has already started. But, alas, you've stooped to a new low
above......



"...a new low above...."?

Yes, where you took one word of a sentence I wrote, ..

No, I took 4 words from a sentence.


....and tried to make
it sound like I agreed with you saying I was an idiot.

I did not have to try hard. All I did was copy and paste what you wrote.
If you think that makes you an idiot, I would agree.

Again, Jim, you are nothing short of a liar. You did NOT just "cut and
paste what I wrote". You took a PARTIAL SENTENCE, with the sole purpose
of TRYING to make it look like I answered a statement of yours entirely
different. Liar.




Even though you are wrong (as always), let me go along with you for the
moment.

Fact: I pasted these 4 words from your post : "..a new low above..."

Fact: You said I took a partial sentence (at first you said I took one word
even though there are 4) with the sold purpose of (according to you) trying
to make you look like an idiot and "to make it look like I answered a
statement of yours entirely different".

Fact: The complete sentence (if you can call it that) that I pasted from
was: "But, alas, you've stooped to a new low above......"

Question: Do either quotes of yours make sense Kevin?

Questions: How am I a liar Kevin? By proving you are an idiot?

"*JimH*" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
ups.com...


*JimH* wrote:
wrote in message
ups.com...


*JimH* wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...


*JimH* wrote:


Yes, you are an idiot Kevin.

Yes, ...

Glad to see you finally admit it Kevin. That is a positive first
step.

You are now on the road to recovery. We are here to help you
Kevin.

Here goes Jim, off the deep end again. I suppose you'll now start
the
lying, and childish name calling again? Oh, forgot, the childish
name
calling has already started. But, alas, you've stooped to a new low
above......



"...a new low above...."?

Yes, where you took one word of a sentence I wrote, ..

No, I took 4 words from a sentence.


....and tried to make
it sound like I agreed with you saying I was an idiot.

I did not have to try hard. All I did was copy and paste what you
wrote.
If you think that makes you an idiot, I would agree.

Again, Jim, you are nothing short of a liar. You did NOT just "cut and
paste what I wrote". You took a PARTIAL SENTENCE, with the sole purpose
of TRYING to make it look like I answered a statement of yours entirely
different. Liar.




Even though you are wrong (as always), let me go along with you for the
moment.

Fact: I pasted these 4 words from your post : "..a new low above..."

Fact: You said I took a partial sentence (at first you said I took one
word even though there are 4) with the sold purpose of (according to you)
trying to make you look like an idiot and "to make it look like I answered
a statement of yours entirely different".

Fact: The complete sentence (if you can call it that) that I pasted from
was: "But, alas, you've stooped to a new low above......"

Question: Do either quotes of yours make sense Kevin?

Questions: How am I a liar Kevin? By proving you are an idiot?

You don't have to prove it, Kevin does it every day he has access to a
computer

JohnH,
Anyone who would lie about his wife's education and chosen profession will
lie about anything.



"John H" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 09 Jun 2005 10:00:40 -0400, HarryKrause
wrote:

John H wrote:
On Thu, 09 Jun 2005 09:27:06 -0400, HarryKrause
wrote:


John H wrote:

On Thu, 9 Jun 2005 08:45:58 -0400, "*JimH*" wrote:



"John H" wrote in message
news:u3ega1d5fkg2gukdcd6v62hco9coedrjcv@4ax. com...


On Thu, 09 Jun 2005 08:21:16 -0400, HarryKrause

wrote:



*JimH* wrote:


wrote in message
news:1118317875.789105.278040@g14g2000cwa .googlegroups.com...



Curtis CCR wrote:



That's genious! Until there is an attack that is routed through
Canada
or Mexico, those borders shouldn't be an issue?

Where did I say that the borders "shouldn't be an issue"? I guess
you
and Jim and JohnH just don't get it, do you? You think it's okay
to
call others "ignorant", etc. but then turn around and state that
I've
said something I've NEVER said. Typical right wing spin, or
stupidity?
You be the judge.



Yes, you are an idiot Kevin.



Ahh. I see the Her-Fritz Act is back on stage.

Speaking of the stage...

Are you here to give Kevin some competition in the intellect
department?
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

I haven't heard much from Harry about his custom made 36 foot lobster
boat
or his radar that shows birds and water depths lately. I wonder why.


I think he's trying to figure out which one he should say the radar is
on.


Another installment from the Hertvik-Fritz-Herring Slimery.


Here's a hint for you, Herring. The radar set is NOT on the Parker,
though I did consider getting a small enclosed radome type set at one
time.

As for boatless Hertvik's question, it's been answered. By me and
several others. I'd say he was playing dumb, but I don't think he's
playing.


Harry, I *know* it's not on the Parker! Now I'm wondering which of the
Solomon's
charters you went on!


None.

Got a free ride, huh? That's great. Hope you helped pay for the gas!
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

On Sat, 11 Jun 2005 11:35:18 -0400, "John Jay" wrote:

JohnH,
Anyone who would lie about his wife's education and chosen profession will
lie about anything.



"John H" wrote in message
.. .
On Thu, 09 Jun 2005 10:00:40 -0400, HarryKrause
wrote:

John H wrote:
On Thu, 09 Jun 2005 09:27:06 -0400, HarryKrause
wrote:


John H wrote:

On Thu, 9 Jun 2005 08:45:58 -0400, "*JimH*" wrote:



"John H" wrote in message
news:u3ega1d5fkg2gukdcd6v62hco9coedrjcv@4ax .com...


On Thu, 09 Jun 2005 08:21:16 -0400, HarryKrause

wrote:



*JimH* wrote:


wrote in message
news:1118317875.789105.278040@g14g2000cw a.googlegroups.com...



Curtis CCR wrote:



That's genious! Until there is an attack that is routed through
Canada
or Mexico, those borders shouldn't be an issue?

Where did I say that the borders "shouldn't be an issue"? I guess
you
and Jim and JohnH just don't get it, do you? You think it's okay
to
call others "ignorant", etc. but then turn around and state that
I've
said something I've NEVER said. Typical right wing spin, or
stupidity?
You be the judge.



Yes, you are an idiot Kevin.



Ahh. I see the Her-Fritz Act is back on stage.

Speaking of the stage...

Are you here to give Kevin some competition in the intellect
department?
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

I haven't heard much from Harry about his custom made 36 foot lobster
boat
or his radar that shows birds and water depths lately. I wonder why.


I think he's trying to figure out which one he should say the radar is
on.


Another installment from the Hertvik-Fritz-Herring Slimery.


Here's a hint for you, Herring. The radar set is NOT on the Parker,
though I did consider getting a small enclosed radome type set at one
time.

As for boatless Hertvik's question, it's been answered. By me and
several others. I'd say he was playing dumb, but I don't think he's
playing.


Harry, I *know* it's not on the Parker! Now I'm wondering which of the
Solomon's
charters you went on!


None.

Got a free ride, huh? That's great. Hope you helped pay for the gas!
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

I promised to stop calling Harry names.
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

JohnH,
I didn't call Harry a name, I just pointed out the obvious, he will lie
about anything, his boat, his wife and his life.


"John H" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 11 Jun 2005 11:35:18 -0400, "John Jay"
wrote:

JohnH,
Anyone who would lie about his wife's education and chosen profession will
lie about anything.



"John H" wrote in message
. ..
On Thu, 09 Jun 2005 10:00:40 -0400, HarryKrause
wrote:

John H wrote:
On Thu, 09 Jun 2005 09:27:06 -0400, HarryKrause

wrote:


John H wrote:

On Thu, 9 Jun 2005 08:45:58 -0400, "*JimH*" wrote:



"John H" wrote in message
news:u3ega1d5fkg2gukdcd6v62hco9coedrjcv@4a x.com...


On Thu, 09 Jun 2005 08:21:16 -0400, HarryKrause

wrote:



*JimH* wrote:


wrote in message
news:1118317875.789105.278040@g14g2000c wa.googlegroups.com...



Curtis CCR wrote:



That's genious! Until there is an attack that is routed
through
Canada
or Mexico, those borders shouldn't be an issue?

Where did I say that the borders "shouldn't be an issue"? I
guess
you
and Jim and JohnH just don't get it, do you? You think it's okay
to
call others "ignorant", etc. but then turn around and state that
I've
said something I've NEVER said. Typical right wing spin, or
stupidity?
You be the judge.



Yes, you are an idiot Kevin.



Ahh. I see the Her-Fritz Act is back on stage.

Speaking of the stage...

Are you here to give Kevin some competition in the intellect
department?
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

I haven't heard much from Harry about his custom made 36 foot
lobster
boat
or his radar that shows birds and water depths lately. I wonder
why.


I think he's trying to figure out which one he should say the radar
is
on.


Another installment from the Hertvik-Fritz-Herring Slimery.


Here's a hint for you, Herring. The radar set is NOT on the Parker,
though I did consider getting a small enclosed radome type set at one
time.

As for boatless Hertvik's question, it's been answered. By me and
several others. I'd say he was playing dumb, but I don't think he's
playing.


Harry, I *know* it's not on the Parker! Now I'm wondering which of the
Solomon's
charters you went on!


None.

Got a free ride, huh? That's great. Hope you helped pay for the gas!
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

I promised to stop calling Harry names.
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."