Karl Rove: Kompassionate Konservative
 

"Harry Krause" wrote in message

Demonstrators Swarm Around Rove's Home


Several hundred people stormed the small yard of President Bush's chief

The Democrat way -- terrorize kids, trespass on private property.

Classy folks - all so illegal aliens can get yet another free ride.

Karl Rove: Kompassionate Konservative
 

To hell with compassion. If some mob of crazed lunatics start banging on
the windows of a person's house, they should be shot by the owner...not just
yelled at.




"Harry Krause" wrote in message
news:c3dhc2g=.b0dd42d61f7d87beccb467738f5fe97f@108 0564906.nulluser.com...
Demonstrators Swarm Around Rove's Home

By Steven Ginsberg
Washington Post Staff Writer
Monday, March 29, 2004; Page B01

Several hundred people stormed the small yard of President Bush's chief
political strategist, Karl Rove, yesterday afternoon, pounding on his
windows, shoving signs at others and challenging Rove to talk to them
about a bill that deals with educational opportunities for immigrants.

Protesters poured out of one school bus after another, piercing an
otherwise quiet, peaceful Sunday in Rove's Palisades neighborhood in
Northwest, chanting, "Karl, Karl, come on out! See what the DREAM Act is
all about!"

Rove obliged their first request and opened his door long enough to say,
"Get off my property."

"Seems like he doesn't want to invite us in for tea," Emira Palacios
quipped to the crowd.

Others chanted, "Karl Rove ain't got no soul."

The crowd then grew more aggressive, fanning around the three accessible
sides of Rove's house, tracking him through the many windows, waving
signs that read "Say Yes to DREAM" and pounding on the glass. At one
point, Rove rushed to a window, pointed a finger and yelled something
inaudible.

Shortly thereafter, sirens shot through the neighborhood and Secret
Service agents and D.C. police joined the crowd on the lawn. Rove opened
his door long enough to talk to an officer, and the crowd serenaded them
with a stanza of "America the Beautiful."

The protest was organized by National People's Action, a coalition of
neighborhood advocacy groups based in Chicago.

Leaders said they want Bush to advocate for the Development, Relief and
Education for Alien Minors Act, a bill that would permit immigrants who
have lived in the United States for at least five years to apply for
legal resident status once they graduate from high school. The measure
would eliminate provisions of current federal law that discourage states
from providing in-state tuition to undocumented student immigrants.

Immigrant activists say that 50,000 to 65,000 undocumented students
graduate from U.S. high school each year and that many students can
afford college only at the reduced, in-state rates given to legal
residents.

The bill passed the Senate Judiciary Committee in the fall but has not
been brought before the full Senate for a vote.

Asked for Bush's position on the bill, spokesman Jim Morrell said, "The
president has laid out the principles he believes should guide
immigration discussion, and he is willing to work with Congress."

When pressed to state Bush's specific position on the DREAM legislation,
Morrell repeated his statement.

The coalition's leaders, who converge on Washington each year to
advocate for various issues, said they targeted Rove because they could
not get as close to the White House as they could to his house. Rove
also is one of Bush's main advisers, and he did not reply to their
requests for a meeting, leaders said.

"We want the DREAM Act, and Karl Rove is sitting on it," said Brenda
LaBlanc, a member of Iowa Citizens for Community Improvement.

Coalition leaders said the demonstrators were to protest other policies
at the houses of two Cabinet secretaries, Elaine L. Chao of Labor and
Ann M. Veneman of Agriculture.

But what the group really wanted was a conversation with Rove, who
declined to comment to a reporter through a Secret Service agent.

And after about 30 minutes of goading by protesters in English and
Spanish, Rove agreed to meet with two members of the coalition on the
condition that the rest of the protesters board their buses and leave
his street. The group obliged.

Rove opened his garage door and allowed Palacios and Inez Killingsworth
to enter. The meeting lasted two minutes and ended with Rove closing the
garage door on Palacios while she was still talking.

Palacios said that Rove was "very upset" and was "yelling in our faces"
and that Rove told them "he hoped we were proud to make his 14-year-old
and 10-year-old cry."

A White House spokesman said one of the children was a neighbor.

Palacios, trembling and in tears herself, said, "He is very offended
because we dared to come here. We dared to come here because he dared to
ignore us. I'm sorry we disturbed his children, but our children are
disturbed every day.

"He also said, 'Don't ever dare to come back,' " Palacios said. "We
will, if he continues to ignore us."

OT: Karl Rove: Kompassionate Konservative
 

Also Sprach John Gaquin :

Quit using alternate spellings in an attempt to bypass our spam filters,
jackass.

Dan

Karl Rove: Kompassionate Konservative
 

NOYB wrote:

To hell with compassion. If some mob of crazed lunatics start banging on
the windows of a person's house, they should be shot by the owner...not just
yelled at.



They almost reminded me of the krazed konservatives who banged on the
doors while ballots were being counted in south Florida, making those
inside fear for their safety. Of course, the folks on Rove's lawn were
better behaved.

OT: Karl Rove: Kompassionate Konservative
 

"Marshall Banana" wrote in message
...
Also Sprach John Gaquin :

Quit using alternate spellings in an attempt to bypass our spam filters,
jackass.

????? what are you talking about?

Karl Rove: Kompassionate Konservative
 

WaIIy wrote:
On Mon, 29 Mar 2004 21:08:59 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:


NOYB wrote:


To hell with compassion. If some mob of crazed lunatics start banging on
the windows of a person's house, they should be shot by the owner...not just
yelled at.




They almost reminded me of the krazed konservatives who banged on the
doors while ballots were being counted in south Florida, making those
inside fear for their safety. Of course, the folks on Rove's lawn were
better behaved.


You almost remind me of a reformed whore.

Almost


You don't need to try so hard, Wally; you've already retired the Dumber
than Dirt Trophy.

Karl Rove: Kompassionate Konservative
 

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:

To hell with compassion. If some mob of crazed lunatics start banging
on
the windows of a person's house, they should be shot by the owner...not
just
yelled at.



They almost reminded me of the krazed konservatives who banged on the
doors while ballots were being counted in south Florida

....On *public* property...

making those
inside fear for their safety.

Despite the large police presence that was already there?

Of course, the folks on Rove's lawn were
better behaved.

...."on Rove's lawn" means they were trespassing on private property and
inciting a riot. Both are crimes.

Karl Rove: Kompassionate Konservative
 

"NOYB" wrote in message link.net...
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:

To hell with compassion. If some mob of crazed lunatics start banging
on
the windows of a person's house, they should be shot by the owner...not
just
yelled at.



They almost reminded me of the krazed konservatives who banged on the
doors while ballots were being counted in south Florida

...On *public* property...

making those
inside fear for their safety.

Despite the large police presence that was already there?

Of course, the folks on Rove's lawn were
better behaved.

..."on Rove's lawn" means they were trespassing on private property and
inciting a riot. Both are crimes.

What makes you think that the conservatives were on public property?
Most polling places are on private property, such as churches. Also,
they could be just as guilty of "inciting a riot".

Karl Rove: Kompassionate Konservative
 

LOL, the ballots were not being counted at the "polling places", this was
the recount and was being conducted on public property, (i.e. government
offices), but in most states and or counties, the ballots are not counted
in the individual "polling places", but are transported to a central
location to be counted, normally by machines. In Florida, they use machines
to count the ballots.

The protestors could and would have been convicted of inciting a riot, if
they were actually guilty of inciting a riot. Obviously those
administrators and the police did not view the problem as one that they
considered dangerous or a case of "inciting a riot".

If I were you I would be very careful about calling anyone stupid.



"basskisser" wrote in message
m...
"NOYB" wrote in message
link.net...
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:

To hell with compassion. If some mob of crazed lunatics start
banging
on
the windows of a person's house, they should be shot by the
owner...not
just
yelled at.



They almost reminded me of the krazed konservatives who banged on the
doors while ballots were being counted in south Florida

...On *public* property...

making those
inside fear for their safety.

Despite the large police presence that was already there?

Of course, the folks on Rove's lawn were
better behaved.

..."on Rove's lawn" means they were trespassing on private property and
inciting a riot. Both are crimes.

What makes you think that the conservatives were on public property?
Most polling places are on private property, such as churches. Also,
they could be just as guilty of "inciting a riot".

OT: Karl Rove: Kompassionate Konservative
 

Also Sprach John Gaquin :

"Marshall Banana" wrote in message
...
Also Sprach John Gaquin :

Quit using alternate spellings in an attempt to bypass our spam filters,
jackass.

????? what are you talking about?

Kompassionate Konservative, George Shrub, Democraps, Republiklans,
etc. Changing spellings of words in order to bypass out killfiles, just
like all those reputable businessmen who want to sell me V.i.a.g_r-4 so I
can enl_arg.e my p.e_n+i.$,

Dan


--
GOD DAMN! THERE ARE A LOT OF MORONS AROUND ON THE INTERNET TODAY!

-- chris_madden.cs

Karl Rove: Kompassionate Konservative
 

"John Smith" wrote in message news:XUEac.148410$_w.1658261@attbi_s53...
LOL, the ballots were not being counted at the "polling places", this was
the recount and was being conducted on public property, (i.e. government
offices), but in most states and or counties, the ballots are not counted
in the individual "polling places", but are transported to a central
location to be counted, normally by machines. In Florida, they use machines
to count the ballots.

The protestors could and would have been convicted of inciting a riot, if
they were actually guilty of inciting a riot. Obviously those
administrators and the police did not view the problem as one that they
considered dangerous or a case of "inciting a riot".

If I were you I would be very careful about calling anyone stupid.

Why, you ARE stupid. You show it here every single day, by making
allegations that are not true, and also baseless. As for your inciting
a riot analogy, NOYB stated that if someone was doing such a thing,
that it WAS inciting a riot. You should be pointing that out to HIM,
not me. But, not to worry, I'm quite used to your stupid mistakes.



"basskisser" wrote in message
m...
"NOYB" wrote in message
link.net...
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:

To hell with compassion. If some mob of crazed lunatics start
banging
on
the windows of a person's house, they should be shot by the
owner...not
just
yelled at.



They almost reminded me of the krazed konservatives who banged on the
doors while ballots were being counted in south Florida

...On *public* property...

making those
inside fear for their safety.

Despite the large police presence that was already there?

Of course, the folks on Rove's lawn were
better behaved.

..."on Rove's lawn" means they were trespassing on private property and
inciting a riot. Both are crimes.

What makes you think that the conservatives were on public property?
Most polling places are on private property, such as churches. Also,
they could be just as guilty of "inciting a riot".

Karl Rove: Kompassionate Konservative
 

18


"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
"John Smith" wrote in message
news:XUEac.148410$_w.1658261@attbi_s53...
LOL, the ballots were not being counted at the "polling places", this
was
the recount and was being conducted on public property, (i.e. government
offices), but in most states and or counties, the ballots are not
counted
in the individual "polling places", but are transported to a central
location to be counted, normally by machines. In Florida, they use
machines
to count the ballots.

The protestors could and would have been convicted of inciting a riot,
if
they were actually guilty of inciting a riot. Obviously those
administrators and the police did not view the problem as one that they
considered dangerous or a case of "inciting a riot".

If I were you I would be very careful about calling anyone stupid.

Why, you ARE stupid. You show it here every single day, by making
allegations that are not true, and also baseless. As for your inciting
a riot analogy, NOYB stated that if someone was doing such a thing,
that it WAS inciting a riot. You should be pointing that out to HIM,
not me. But, not to worry, I'm quite used to your stupid mistakes.



"basskisser" wrote in message
m...
"NOYB" wrote in message
link.net...
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:

To hell with compassion. If some mob of crazed lunatics start
banging
on
the windows of a person's house, they should be shot by the
owner...not
just
yelled at.



They almost reminded me of the krazed konservatives who banged on
the
doors while ballots were being counted in south Florida

...On *public* property...

making those
inside fear for their safety.

Despite the large police presence that was already there?

Of course, the folks on Rove's lawn were
better behaved.

..."on Rove's lawn" means they were trespassing on private property
and
inciting a riot. Both are crimes.

What makes you think that the conservatives were on public property?
Most polling places are on private property, such as churches. Also,
they could be just as guilty of "inciting a riot".

Karl Rove: Kompassionate Konservative
 

jim-- wrote:

18



Your IQ?

Karl Rove: Kompassionate Konservative
 

No, 2 numbers when added together that make yours.


"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
jim-- wrote:

18



Your IQ?

Karl Rove: Kompassionate Konservative
 

I don't know why I bother, but you are so much fun to tweak and watch you
squirm around.

NYOB was making the correct observation, that no one, including protestors
should walk up to someone house and bang on their windows. You compared
that action to protestors demonstration against the problem with the ballot
count in Florida. NYOB mentioned that the FL. demonstration was on public
property.

You than stated: "What makes you think that the conservatives were on
public property?
Most polling places are on private property, such as
churches. Also,
they could be just as guilty of "inciting a riot".

I pointed out, that ballots in Fl are not counted on private property, such
as churches or at the polling place, and the protestors were not on private
property. With all the police around their is no way any logical person
would assume they were guilty of "inciting a riot".

You were incorrect on all matters, yet you still fail to see that. It
appears that you have lost touch with reality.


"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
"John Smith" wrote in message
news:XUEac.148410$_w.1658261@attbi_s53...
LOL, the ballots were not being counted at the "polling places", this
was
the recount and was being conducted on public property, (i.e. government
offices), but in most states and or counties, the ballots are not
counted
in the individual "polling places", but are transported to a central
location to be counted, normally by machines. In Florida, they use
machines
to count the ballots.

The protestors could and would have been convicted of inciting a riot,
if
they were actually guilty of inciting a riot. Obviously those
administrators and the police did not view the problem as one that they
considered dangerous or a case of "inciting a riot".

If I were you I would be very careful about calling anyone stupid.

Why, you ARE stupid. You show it here every single day, by making
allegations that are not true, and also baseless. As for your inciting
a riot analogy, NOYB stated that if someone was doing such a thing,
that it WAS inciting a riot. You should be pointing that out to HIM,
not me. But, not to worry, I'm quite used to your stupid mistakes.



"basskisser" wrote in message
m...
"NOYB" wrote in message
link.net...
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:

To hell with compassion. If some mob of crazed lunatics start
banging
on
the windows of a person's house, they should be shot by the
owner...not
just
yelled at.



They almost reminded me of the krazed konservatives who banged on
the
doors while ballots were being counted in south Florida

...On *public* property...

making those
inside fear for their safety.

Despite the large police presence that was already there?

Of course, the folks on Rove's lawn were
better behaved.

..."on Rove's lawn" means they were trespassing on private property
and
inciting a riot. Both are crimes.

What makes you think that the conservatives were on public property?
Most polling places are on private property, such as churches. Also,
they could be just as guilty of "inciting a riot".

OT: Karl Rove: Kompassionate Konservative
 

"Marshall Banana" wrote in message

Quit using alternate spellings in an attempt to bypass our spam
filters,
jackass.

????? what are you talking about?

Kompassionate Konservative, George Shrub, Democraps, Republiklans,
etc. Changing spellings of words in order to bypass out killfiles, just
like all those reputable businessmen who want to sell me V.i.a.g_r-4 so I
can enl_arg.e my p.e_n+i.$,

Dan, if you'd show me where and when I did that, I'd be glad to discuss it
with you. I think you've got me confused with someone else.

Karl Rove: Kompassionate Konservative
 

"John Smith" wrote in message news:H44bc.58355

You were incorrect on all matters, yet you still fail to see that. It
appears that you have lost touch with reality.

The fish smoocher is usually wrong on all matters of fact. Many here have
patiently tried to explain a logical thought process to the bass, and we all
usually wind up hitting the nearest bar.

OT: Karl Rove: Kompassionate Konservative
 

Marshall Banana wrote in message ...
Also Sprach John Gaquin :

"Marshall Banana" wrote in message
...
Also Sprach John Gaquin :

Quit using alternate spellings in an attempt to bypass our spam filters,
jackass.

????? what are you talking about?

Kompassionate Konservative, George Shrub, Democraps, Republiklans,
etc. Changing spellings of words in order to bypass out killfiles, just
like all those reputable businessmen who want to sell me V.i.a.g_r-4 so I
can enl_arg.e my p.e_n+i.$,


I was quite surprised by all of the people on the internet who were
worried about the size of my penis, until they also started worrying
about the size of my breasts!!

Karl Rove: Kompassionate Konservative
 

"John Smith" wrote in message news:H44bc.58355$JO3.36697@attbi_s04...
I don't know why I bother, but you are so much fun to tweak and watch you
squirm around.

NYOB was making the correct observation, that no one, including protestors
should walk up to someone house and bang on their windows. You compared
that action to protestors demonstration against the problem with the ballot
count in Florida. NYOB mentioned that the FL. demonstration was on public
property.

You than stated: "What makes you think that the conservatives were on
public property?
Most polling places are on private property, such as
churches. Also,
they could be just as guilty of "inciting a riot".

I pointed out, that ballots in Fl are not counted on private property, such
as churches or at the polling place, and the protestors were not on private
property. With all the police around their is no way any logical person
would assume they were guilty of "inciting a riot".

Do you suppose there were NO police around the conservative's
incident? If there WERE police there, then using your idiotic logic,
no crime was committed. Are you REALLY trying to say that, if there is
a police presence, no one can be guilty of inciting a riot?????
REALLY??