"John Smith" wrote in message news:XUEac.148410$_w.1658261@attbi_s53...
LOL, the ballots were not being counted at the "polling places", this was
the recount and was being conducted on public property, (i.e. government
offices), but in most states and or counties, the ballots are not counted
in the individual "polling places", but are transported to a central
location to be counted, normally by machines. In Florida, they use machines
to count the ballots.

The protestors could and would have been convicted of inciting a riot, if
they were actually guilty of inciting a riot. Obviously those
administrators and the police did not view the problem as one that they
considered dangerous or a case of "inciting a riot".

If I were you I would be very careful about calling anyone stupid.

Why, you ARE stupid. You show it here every single day, by making
allegations that are not true, and also baseless. As for your inciting
a riot analogy, NOYB stated that if someone was doing such a thing,
that it WAS inciting a riot. You should be pointing that out to HIM,
not me. But, not to worry, I'm quite used to your stupid mistakes.



"basskisser" wrote in message
m...
"NOYB" wrote in message
link.net...
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:

To hell with compassion. If some mob of crazed lunatics start
banging
on
the windows of a person's house, they should be shot by the
owner...not
just
yelled at.



They almost reminded me of the krazed konservatives who banged on the
doors while ballots were being counted in south Florida

...On *public* property...

making those
inside fear for their safety.

Despite the large police presence that was already there?

Of course, the folks on Rove's lawn were
better behaved.

..."on Rove's lawn" means they were trespassing on private property and
inciting a riot. Both are crimes.

What makes you think that the conservatives were on public property?
Most polling places are on private property, such as churches. Also,
they could be just as guilty of "inciting a riot".

18


"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
"John Smith" wrote in message
news:XUEac.148410$_w.1658261@attbi_s53...
LOL, the ballots were not being counted at the "polling places", this
was
the recount and was being conducted on public property, (i.e. government
offices), but in most states and or counties, the ballots are not
counted
in the individual "polling places", but are transported to a central
location to be counted, normally by machines. In Florida, they use
machines
to count the ballots.

The protestors could and would have been convicted of inciting a riot,
if
they were actually guilty of inciting a riot. Obviously those
administrators and the police did not view the problem as one that they
considered dangerous or a case of "inciting a riot".

If I were you I would be very careful about calling anyone stupid.

Why, you ARE stupid. You show it here every single day, by making
allegations that are not true, and also baseless. As for your inciting
a riot analogy, NOYB stated that if someone was doing such a thing,
that it WAS inciting a riot. You should be pointing that out to HIM,
not me. But, not to worry, I'm quite used to your stupid mistakes.



"basskisser" wrote in message
m...
"NOYB" wrote in message
link.net...
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:

To hell with compassion. If some mob of crazed lunatics start
banging
on
the windows of a person's house, they should be shot by the
owner...not
just
yelled at.



They almost reminded me of the krazed konservatives who banged on
the
doors while ballots were being counted in south Florida

...On *public* property...

making those
inside fear for their safety.

Despite the large police presence that was already there?

Of course, the folks on Rove's lawn were
better behaved.

..."on Rove's lawn" means they were trespassing on private property
and
inciting a riot. Both are crimes.

What makes you think that the conservatives were on public property?
Most polling places are on private property, such as churches. Also,
they could be just as guilty of "inciting a riot".

jim-- wrote:

18



Your IQ?

No, 2 numbers when added together that make yours.


"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
jim-- wrote:

18



Your IQ?

I don't know why I bother, but you are so much fun to tweak and watch you
squirm around.

NYOB was making the correct observation, that no one, including protestors
should walk up to someone house and bang on their windows. You compared
that action to protestors demonstration against the problem with the ballot
count in Florida. NYOB mentioned that the FL. demonstration was on public
property.

You than stated: "What makes you think that the conservatives were on
public property?
Most polling places are on private property, such as
churches. Also,
they could be just as guilty of "inciting a riot".

I pointed out, that ballots in Fl are not counted on private property, such
as churches or at the polling place, and the protestors were not on private
property. With all the police around their is no way any logical person
would assume they were guilty of "inciting a riot".

You were incorrect on all matters, yet you still fail to see that. It
appears that you have lost touch with reality.


"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
"John Smith" wrote in message
news:XUEac.148410$_w.1658261@attbi_s53...
LOL, the ballots were not being counted at the "polling places", this
was
the recount and was being conducted on public property, (i.e. government
offices), but in most states and or counties, the ballots are not
counted
in the individual "polling places", but are transported to a central
location to be counted, normally by machines. In Florida, they use
machines
to count the ballots.

The protestors could and would have been convicted of inciting a riot,
if
they were actually guilty of inciting a riot. Obviously those
administrators and the police did not view the problem as one that they
considered dangerous or a case of "inciting a riot".

If I were you I would be very careful about calling anyone stupid.

Why, you ARE stupid. You show it here every single day, by making
allegations that are not true, and also baseless. As for your inciting
a riot analogy, NOYB stated that if someone was doing such a thing,
that it WAS inciting a riot. You should be pointing that out to HIM,
not me. But, not to worry, I'm quite used to your stupid mistakes.



"basskisser" wrote in message
m...
"NOYB" wrote in message
link.net...
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:

To hell with compassion. If some mob of crazed lunatics start
banging
on
the windows of a person's house, they should be shot by the
owner...not
just
yelled at.



They almost reminded me of the krazed konservatives who banged on
the
doors while ballots were being counted in south Florida

...On *public* property...

making those
inside fear for their safety.

Despite the large police presence that was already there?

Of course, the folks on Rove's lawn were
better behaved.

..."on Rove's lawn" means they were trespassing on private property
and
inciting a riot. Both are crimes.

What makes you think that the conservatives were on public property?
Most polling places are on private property, such as churches. Also,
they could be just as guilty of "inciting a riot".

"Marshall Banana" wrote in message

Quit using alternate spellings in an attempt to bypass our spam
filters,
jackass.

????? what are you talking about?

Kompassionate Konservative, George Shrub, Democraps, Republiklans,
etc. Changing spellings of words in order to bypass out killfiles, just
like all those reputable businessmen who want to sell me V.i.a.g_r-4 so I
can enl_arg.e my p.e_n+i.$,

Dan, if you'd show me where and when I did that, I'd be glad to discuss it
with you. I think you've got me confused with someone else.

"John Smith" wrote in message news:H44bc.58355

You were incorrect on all matters, yet you still fail to see that. It
appears that you have lost touch with reality.

The fish smoocher is usually wrong on all matters of fact. Many here have
patiently tried to explain a logical thought process to the bass, and we all
usually wind up hitting the nearest bar.

Marshall Banana wrote in message ...
Also Sprach John Gaquin :

"Marshall Banana" wrote in message
...
Also Sprach John Gaquin :

Quit using alternate spellings in an attempt to bypass our spam filters,
jackass.

????? what are you talking about?

Kompassionate Konservative, George Shrub, Democraps, Republiklans,
etc. Changing spellings of words in order to bypass out killfiles, just
like all those reputable businessmen who want to sell me V.i.a.g_r-4 so I
can enl_arg.e my p.e_n+i.$,


I was quite surprised by all of the people on the internet who were
worried about the size of my penis, until they also started worrying
about the size of my breasts!!

"John Smith" wrote in message news:H44bc.58355$JO3.36697@attbi_s04...
I don't know why I bother, but you are so much fun to tweak and watch you
squirm around.

NYOB was making the correct observation, that no one, including protestors
should walk up to someone house and bang on their windows. You compared
that action to protestors demonstration against the problem with the ballot
count in Florida. NYOB mentioned that the FL. demonstration was on public
property.

You than stated: "What makes you think that the conservatives were on
public property?
Most polling places are on private property, such as
churches. Also,
they could be just as guilty of "inciting a riot".

I pointed out, that ballots in Fl are not counted on private property, such
as churches or at the polling place, and the protestors were not on private
property. With all the police around their is no way any logical person
would assume they were guilty of "inciting a riot".

Do you suppose there were NO police around the conservative's
incident? If there WERE police there, then using your idiotic logic,
no crime was committed. Are you REALLY trying to say that, if there is
a police presence, no one can be guilty of inciting a riot?????
REALLY??