I don't know why I bother, but you are so much fun to tweak and watch you
squirm around.

NYOB was making the correct observation, that no one, including protestors
should walk up to someone house and bang on their windows. You compared
that action to protestors demonstration against the problem with the ballot
count in Florida. NYOB mentioned that the FL. demonstration was on public
property.

You than stated: "What makes you think that the conservatives were on
public property?
Most polling places are on private property, such as
churches. Also,
they could be just as guilty of "inciting a riot".

I pointed out, that ballots in Fl are not counted on private property, such
as churches or at the polling place, and the protestors were not on private
property. With all the police around their is no way any logical person
would assume they were guilty of "inciting a riot".

You were incorrect on all matters, yet you still fail to see that. It
appears that you have lost touch with reality.


"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
"John Smith" wrote in message
news:XUEac.148410$_w.1658261@attbi_s53...
LOL, the ballots were not being counted at the "polling places", this
was
the recount and was being conducted on public property, (i.e. government
offices), but in most states and or counties, the ballots are not
counted
in the individual "polling places", but are transported to a central
location to be counted, normally by machines. In Florida, they use
machines
to count the ballots.

The protestors could and would have been convicted of inciting a riot,
if
they were actually guilty of inciting a riot. Obviously those
administrators and the police did not view the problem as one that they
considered dangerous or a case of "inciting a riot".

If I were you I would be very careful about calling anyone stupid.

Why, you ARE stupid. You show it here every single day, by making
allegations that are not true, and also baseless. As for your inciting
a riot analogy, NOYB stated that if someone was doing such a thing,
that it WAS inciting a riot. You should be pointing that out to HIM,
not me. But, not to worry, I'm quite used to your stupid mistakes.



"basskisser" wrote in message
m...
"NOYB" wrote in message
link.net...
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:

To hell with compassion. If some mob of crazed lunatics start
banging
on
the windows of a person's house, they should be shot by the
owner...not
just
yelled at.



They almost reminded me of the krazed konservatives who banged on
the
doors while ballots were being counted in south Florida

...On *public* property...

making those
inside fear for their safety.

Despite the large police presence that was already there?

Of course, the folks on Rove's lawn were
better behaved.

..."on Rove's lawn" means they were trespassing on private property
and
inciting a riot. Both are crimes.

What makes you think that the conservatives were on public property?
Most polling places are on private property, such as churches. Also,
they could be just as guilty of "inciting a riot".