|
Truth: The Terror Bush Fears Most
Big deal. Dissenting voices in the Bush Administration get fired.
Dissenting voices in the Clinton Administration usually ended up dead under strange circumstances....a la Vincent Foster and Ron Brown. |
Truth: The Terror Bush Fears Most
"Harry Krause" wrote in message news:c3dhc2g=.5f5982983e66f57c73dbc7e7b7389ddb@108 0046738.nulluser.com... Did the administration neglect counterterrorism even after 9/11? After 9/11 the F.B.I. requested $1.5 billion for counterterrorism operations, but the White House slashed this by two-thirds. Krugman will be the next journalist to come out of the closet and admit to making stuff up. This statement is absolute bull****. |
Truth: The Terror Bush Fears Most
NOYB wrote:
Big deal. Dissenting voices in the Bush Administration get fired. Dissenting voices in the Clinton Administration usually ended up dead under strange circumstances....a la Vincent Foster and Ron Brown. That must be why guys like Ken Starr and Henry Hyde disappeared under suspicious circumstances... oh wait, they're still around and actively pursuing careers... Another bit of "logic" from "the right" that falls on it's face. Don't you guys have anything better to offer? DSK |
Truth: The Terror Bush Fears Most
|
Truth: The Terror Bush Fears Most
|
Truth: The Terror Bush Fears Most
"NOYB" wrote in message ink.net...
Big deal. Dissenting voices in the Bush Administration get fired. Dissenting voices in the Clinton Administration usually ended up dead under strange circumstances....a la Vincent Foster and Ron Brown. Please show any evidence that you have, that Vincent Foster and Ron Brown's deaths were the result of their "dissenting voices". Do you have any, or is this pure speculation with no fact? |
Truth: The Terror Bush Fears Most
"jps" wrote in message ... In article et, says... "Harry Krause" wrote in message news:c3dhc2g=.5f5982983e66f57c73dbc7e7b7389ddb@108 0046738.nulluser.com... Did the administration neglect counterterrorism even after 9/11? After 9/11 the F.B.I. requested $1.5 billion for counterterrorism operations, but the White House slashed this by two-thirds. Krugman will be the next journalist to come out of the closet and admit to making stuff up. This statement is absolute bull****. This statement is absolute truth. The records are there to prove it. Yeah, sure it is. "The records are there to prove it". LOL. What records? And where? |
Truth: The Terror Bush Fears Most
"jps" wrote in message ... In article et, says... Big deal. Dissenting voices in the Bush Administration get fired. Dissenting voices in the Clinton Administration usually ended up dead under strange circumstances....a la Vincent Foster and Ron Brown. Deflection. Not going to work. List of dissenters too long. The dissenters were all fired or promoted before they decided to write tell-all books...which makes their accusations appear as nothing more than sour grapes. |
Truth: The Terror Bush Fears Most
NOYB wrote:
"jps" wrote in message ... In article et, says... Big deal. Dissenting voices in the Bush Administration get fired. Dissenting voices in the Clinton Administration usually ended up dead under strange circumstances....a la Vincent Foster and Ron Brown. Deflection. Not going to work. List of dissenters too long. The dissenters were all fired or promoted before they decided to write tell-all books...which makes their accusations appear as nothing more than sour grapes. Except, of course, they are telling the truth..and your dumb boy Bush is a liar and a crook. But other than that... |
Truth: The Terror Bush Fears Most
basskisser wrote:
"NOYB" wrote in message ink.net... Big deal. Dissenting voices in the Bush Administration get fired. Dissenting voices in the Clinton Administration usually ended up dead under strange circumstances....a la Vincent Foster and Ron Brown. Please show any evidence that you have, that Vincent Foster and Ron Brown's deaths were the result of their "dissenting voices". Do you have any, or is this pure speculation with no fact? Nobby gets his info from reich-wing trashmeisters. |
Truth: The Terror Bush Fears Most
"jps" wrote in message ... In article et, says... "jps" wrote in message ... In article et, says... "Harry Krause" wrote in message news:c3dhc2g=.5f5982983e66f57c73dbc7e7b7389ddb@108 0046738.nulluser.com... Did the administration neglect counterterrorism even after 9/11? After 9/11 the F.B.I. requested $1.5 billion for counterterrorism operations, but the White House slashed this by two-thirds. Krugman will be the next journalist to come out of the closet and admit to making stuff up. This statement is absolute bull****. This statement is absolute truth. The records are there to prove it. Yeah, sure it is. "The records are there to prove it". LOL. What records? And where? Do a little research nobby. Google works just fine. Just as I thought. To use basskisser's logic (an oxymoron if I ever heard one!)...you made the allegation, so you provide the proof. |
Truth: The Terror Bush Fears Most
"NOYB" wrote in message .net... "jps" wrote in message ... In article et, says... "jps" wrote in message ... In article et, says... "Harry Krause" wrote in message news:c3dhc2g=.5f5982983e66f57c73dbc7e7b7389ddb@108 0046738.nulluser.com... Did the administration neglect counterterrorism even after 9/11? After 9/11 the F.B.I. requested $1.5 billion for counterterrorism operations, but the White House slashed this by two-thirds. Krugman will be the next journalist to come out of the closet and admit to making stuff up. This statement is absolute bull****. This statement is absolute truth. The records are there to prove it. Yeah, sure it is. "The records are there to prove it". LOL. What records? And where? Do a little research nobby. Google works just fine. Just as I thought. To use basskisser's logic (an oxymoron if I ever heard one!)...you made the allegation, so you provide the proof. If you do some research, not only won't you find proof of your allegation, you'll find that spending *increased*. http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,115085,00.html CLARKE: And in January 2001, the incoming Bush administration was briefed on the existing strategy. They were also briefed on these series of issues that had not been decided on in a couple of years. And the third point is the Bush administration decided then, you know, mid-January, to do two things. One, vigorously pursue the existing policy, including all of the lethal covert action findings, which we've now made public to some extent. And the point is, while this big review was going on, there were still in effect, the lethal findings were still in effect. The second thing the administration decided to do is to initiate a process to look at those issues which had been on the table for a couple of years and get them decided. So, point five, that process which was initiated in the first week in February, uh, decided in principle, uh in the spring to add to the existing Clinton strategy and to increase CIA resources, for example, for covert action, five-fold, to go after Al Qaeda. JIM ANGLE: You're saying that the Bush administration did not stop anything that the Clinton administration was doing while it was making these decisions, and by the end of the summer had increased money for covert action five-fold. Is that correct? CLARKE: All of that's correct. |
Truth: The Terror Bush Fears Most
"NOYB" wrote in message k.net...
"jps" wrote in message ... In article et, says... "jps" wrote in message ... In article et, says... "Harry Krause" wrote in message news:c3dhc2g=.5f5982983e66f57c73dbc7e7b7389ddb@108 0046738.nulluser.com... Did the administration neglect counterterrorism even after 9/11? After 9/11 the F.B.I. requested $1.5 billion for counterterrorism operations, but the White House slashed this by two-thirds. Krugman will be the next journalist to come out of the closet and admit to making stuff up. This statement is absolute bull****. This statement is absolute truth. The records are there to prove it. Yeah, sure it is. "The records are there to prove it". LOL. What records? And where? Do a little research nobby. Google works just fine. Just as I thought. To use basskisser's logic (an oxymoron if I ever heard one!)...you made the allegation, so you provide the proof. Do you think that is bad logic for some reason? If so, do tell, why? Now, are you going to comment on the Bush flip-flops? You asked for them, and I posted them. |
Truth: The Terror Bush Fears Most
In article . net,
says... "NOYB" wrote in message .net... "jps" wrote in message ... In article et, says... "jps" wrote in message ... In article et, says... "Harry Krause" wrote in message news:c3dhc2g=.5f5982983e66f57c73dbc7e7b7389ddb@108 0046738.nulluser.com... Did the administration neglect counterterrorism even after 9/11? After 9/11 the F.B.I. requested $1.5 billion for counterterrorism operations, but the White House slashed this by two-thirds. Krugman will be the next journalist to come out of the closet and admit to making stuff up. This statement is absolute bull****. This statement is absolute truth. The records are there to prove it. Yeah, sure it is. "The records are there to prove it". LOL. What records? And where? Do a little research nobby. Google works just fine. Just as I thought. To use basskisser's logic (an oxymoron if I ever heard one!)...you made the allegation, so you provide the proof. If you do some research, not only won't you find proof of your allegation, you'll find that spending *increased*. http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,115085,00.html CLARKE: And in January 2001, the incoming Bush administration was briefed on the existing strategy. They were also briefed on these series of issues that had not been decided on in a couple of years. And the third point is the Bush administration decided then, you know, mid-January, to do two things. One, vigorously pursue the existing policy, including all of the lethal covert action findings, which we've now made public to some extent. And the point is, while this big review was going on, there were still in effect, the lethal findings were still in effect. The second thing the administration decided to do is to initiate a process to look at those issues which had been on the table for a couple of years and get them decided. So, point five, that process which was initiated in the first week in February, uh, decided in principle, uh in the spring to add to the existing Clinton strategy and to increase CIA resources, for example, for covert action, five-fold, to go after Al Qaeda. JIM ANGLE: You're saying that the Bush administration did not stop anything that the Clinton administration was doing while it was making these decisions, and by the end of the summer had increased money for covert action five-fold. Is that correct? CLARKE: All of that's correct. Do the words counter terrorism and covert action mean the same thing to you? Anyone with a brain can discern that covert action is just one tactic in a counter terrorism strategy. Does the phrase "rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic" mean anything to you? jps |
Truth: The Terror Bush Fears Most
"jps" wrote in message ... In article . net, says... "NOYB" wrote in message .net... "jps" wrote in message ... In article et, says... "jps" wrote in message ... In article et, says... "Harry Krause" wrote in message news:c3dhc2g=.5f5982983e66f57c73dbc7e7b7389ddb@108 0046738.nulluser.com... Did the administration neglect counterterrorism even after 9/11? After 9/11 the F.B.I. requested $1.5 billion for counterterrorism operations, but the White House slashed this by two-thirds. Krugman will be the next journalist to come out of the closet and admit to making stuff up. This statement is absolute bull****. This statement is absolute truth. The records are there to prove it. Yeah, sure it is. "The records are there to prove it". LOL. What records? And where? Do a little research nobby. Google works just fine. Just as I thought. To use basskisser's logic (an oxymoron if I ever heard one!)...you made the allegation, so you provide the proof. If you do some research, not only won't you find proof of your allegation, you'll find that spending *increased*. http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,115085,00.html CLARKE: And in January 2001, the incoming Bush administration was briefed on the existing strategy. They were also briefed on these series of issues that had not been decided on in a couple of years. And the third point is the Bush administration decided then, you know, mid-January, to do two things. One, vigorously pursue the existing policy, including all of the lethal covert action findings, which we've now made public to some extent. And the point is, while this big review was going on, there were still in effect, the lethal findings were still in effect. The second thing the administration decided to do is to initiate a process to look at those issues which had been on the table for a couple of years and get them decided. So, point five, that process which was initiated in the first week in February, uh, decided in principle, uh in the spring to add to the existing Clinton strategy and to increase CIA resources, for example, for covert action, five-fold, to go after Al Qaeda. JIM ANGLE: You're saying that the Bush administration did not stop anything that the Clinton administration was doing while it was making these decisions, and by the end of the summer had increased money for covert action five-fold. Is that correct? CLARKE: All of that's correct. Do the words counter terrorism and covert action mean the same thing to you? Yes. Especially in the text that it was used. Here are Clarke's own words from 2002: ....add to the existing Clinton strategy and to increase CIA resources...for covert action, five-fold, to go after Al Qaeda. Anyone with a brain can discern that covert action is just one tactic in a counter terrorism strategy. Since al Qaeda was the main terrorist threat, increasing funding for covert actions against them *is* count-terrorism. You're not really that obtuse, are you? Does the phrase "rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic" mean anything to you? Does the phrase "increasing funding five-fold to buy more life boats on the Titanic" mean anything to you. |
Truth: The Terror Bush Fears Most
|
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:10 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com