Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 22 Mar 2004 01:43:17 GMT, "NOYB" wrote:
I saw the interview and wondered why the most important questions weren't asked: "if you were the terrorist czar for the past 24 years, why did you not see 9/11 coming? And where were you during the bombing of the marine barracks in Beirut? During Somalia? The first attack on the WTC? The USS Cole? The Khobar Towers? " The guy remained silent when we were turning tail in Beirut and Somalia, and he remained silent when the Clinton Administration was pursuing terrorists through criminal prosecution...rather than holding accountable the countries that sponsored them. His advice and/or policies likely played a large role in the strength of the enemy today. It's pure partisan politics. Clarke doesn't agree with going after the countries that sponsor terrorists. Instead, he advocates the laughable idea of punishing terrorists in our criminal courts. You may think his book and interview will make a difference. I'm telling you that 95% of Americans, if asked about him in a month, will say they never even heard of the guy. Isn't it funny how the hard questions never seem to get asked? Tim Russert had Sen. Kennedy on "Meet The Press," and Tim did much the same thing. Hard questions weren't asked, and pertinent questions were answered with, "Bush is bad, Bush is bad." I sent a message to Russert asking why NBC didn't just give Kennedy a free half hour to bash Bush. John H On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay! |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
) OT ) Bush's "needless war" | General | |||
OT--Not again! More Chinese money buying our politicians. | General |