Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Harry.Krause" wrote in message ... Bert Robbins wrote: "Harry.Krause" wrote in message ... Bert Robbins wrote: I'll bet Ullico's legal counsel has instructed Harry not to talk about this "issue" unless they approve of what he is saying. Ullico management saw that they could get rich off the backs of the little man, they were supposed to protect, and they did it and got caught. Harry wount' chime in on this issue. Yeah, I will. As usual, you are full of crap. None of your three posits here is true. So, you are willing to talk about Ullico management and its board of directors screwing over the clients by enriching their pockets on the backs of the working man? It doesn't matter how you try to sugar coat it the facts are out and your patron saint of the laborers was ****ing the laborers. As I stated, none of your posits is true. You said: I wouldn't "chime in" on this issue. I have. You said I had been instructed by legal counsel not to talk about this issue. I haven't. But, you have been sat down and told what you can say, what you cannot say and what questions to avoid altogether. No one got rich off the backs of anyone. The deals you reference had to do with the buying and selling of privately held stock. As far as I know, no one has been indicted in connection with the deals, and no working men or women lost a penny or any insurance coverage because of them. Those who bought and sold back their shares as individuals shouldn't have done so, and the profits they made have been paid back to the company, so far as I know, except in one case, which I believe is being pursued as a civil matter. So, you were "wrong" on that, too. That's because they got caught and had to disgourge their ill gotten gains. End of discussion. Now, if it gives you a woody to keep bring this up, go for it, but, as I stated, you were wrong on all your posits. No, the stain of this affair will forever haunt Ullico and taint its image. So, Bert, when are you going to stop posting as our anonymous intruder here? Annoymous intruder? You refer to me by name and then say I am an anonymous intruder. You're on the edge of the infamous bozo bin, Bert. As I stated last week, I only keep you out of it because there is a requirement tbat I keep at least one asshole out of it. You are the designee. But that can change. Go ahead and put me in your infamous bozo bin. I would be the first person you ever put in the "bozo" bin. Go play with one of your low-brain output buddies here, like Hertvik or Fritz. They're more your style and speed. Pathetic, try again! |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
OT--Not again! More Chinese money buying our politicians. | General | |||
OT - Politics of hate won't beat Bush | ASA | |||
Politics vs. Religion | ASA |