On Wed, 4 May 2005 17:39:02 -0400, "JimH" wrote:

~~ snippage ~~

Nope, it was a statement of fact. He is a tax cheat.

Nope. He did owe taxes, but in fact, it was a long battle with the
IRS which was settled out of court. He never cheated on his taxes -
he had a disagreement on what was owed.

He is a drug addict.

No, he is not. He is the same as you. You partake, he partakes.
Both just use different substances.

I made no judgement on the man or his behavior.

Yes you did.

You are barking up the wrong tree. ;-)

No I'm not.

Later,

Tom

"Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 4 May 2005 17:39:02 -0400, "JimH" wrote:

~~ snippage ~~

Nope, it was a statement of fact. He is a tax cheat.

Nope. He did owe taxes, but in fact, it was a long battle with the
IRS which was settled out of court. He never cheated on his taxes -
he had a disagreement on what was owed.

He is a drug addict.

No, he is not. He is the same as you. You partake, he partakes.
Both just use different substances.

I made no judgement on the man or his behavior.

Yes you did.

You are barking up the wrong tree. ;-)

No I'm not.

Later,

Tom


Did you ever admit when you were wrong Tom? If not, this is a good time to
start. ;-)

Jim