|
( OT ) Who said
"Jim" wrote in message ... Sorry Jim, Saddam's not coming back. Bin Laden will be caught soon. And your poor excuse for a candidate will lose. |
( OT ) Who said
Jim wrote:
You nuffnuff you really are. What??? you & your tax payer funded lying lefty bludger mates like krause would have sat back to await for the next 911 type attack?? What?? maybe held a protest to tell the terrorists to stop?? The prime & first function of any elected govt is to protect the citizens & W has done a sterling job for the US & carried the rest of the free world along also. Your cowardly lying candidate will loose because when the time comes people will realise the left are plain dishonest & can't be trusted with anything, not the economy, not the truth but especially not the country's safety. K I do like the way harry has created a new person mad dog dave, he meets him then hey the new person says harry is real, a lie person to support the NG liar; sick & certainly a dangerous puppy!!! Naturally the common people don't want war; neither in Russia, nor in England, nor in America, nor in Germany. That is understood. But after all, it is the leaders of the country who determine policy, and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is to tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country. Hermann Goering |
( OT ) Who said
K. Smith wrote:
You nuffnuff you really are. What??? you & your tax payer funded lying lefty bludger mates like krause would have sat back to await for the next 911 type attack?? What?? maybe held a protest to tell the terrorists to stop?? Wow...this is a long bender for you...you got someone buying your substances for you? |
( OT ) Who said
On Sun, 29 Feb 2004 05:54:41 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote: K. Smith wrote: You nuffnuff you really are. What??? you & your tax payer funded lying lefty bludger mates like krause would have sat back to await for the next 911 type attack?? What?? maybe held a protest to tell the terrorists to stop?? Wow...this is a long bender for you...you got someone buying your substances for you? She's swatting mosquitoes, Harry! John H On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay! |
( OT ) Who said
Yes - the arrogant lying puppet might win as a result of GOP lies,
deception and HUGE political contributions. And America will be the lesser for it. We will move further toward a 2 class society, hated as bully of the world, fouling our own nest, depleting our resources, and abusing our veterans, elderly, and children. Our states will be bankrupt, the bill of rights, a scrap of paper. This might be a good thing because once again the populace will catch on and (if we still have a vote) throw the *******s out for good. Joe wrote: "Jim" wrote in message ... Sorry Jim, Saddam's not coming back. Bin Laden will be caught soon. And your poor excuse for a candidate will lose. |
( OT ) Who said
If you post O.T.your a dumbazz,if you post o.t. with a false name , you are a
coward and and Azhole! |
( OT ) Who said
John H wrote in message . ..
On Sun, 29 Feb 2004 05:54:41 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: K. Smith wrote: You nuffnuff you really are. What??? you & your tax payer funded lying lefty bludger mates like krause would have sat back to await for the next 911 type attack?? What?? maybe held a protest to tell the terrorists to stop?? Wow...this is a long bender for you...you got someone buying your substances for you? She's swatting mosquitoes, Harry! John H Man, you get what you think are a couple of clever key words, and you wear it out, huh? Please post the name of the person you spoke with at Yamaha, U.S.A. Can't?? Why IS that? |
( OT ) Who said
|
( OT ) Who said
John H wrote in message . ..
On 1 Mar 2004 05:45:08 -0800, (basskisser) wrote: John H wrote in message . .. On Sun, 29 Feb 2004 05:54:41 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: K. Smith wrote: You nuffnuff you really are. What??? you & your tax payer funded lying lefty bludger mates like krause would have sat back to await for the next 911 type attack?? What?? maybe held a protest to tell the terrorists to stop?? Wow...this is a long bender for you...you got someone buying your substances for you? She's swatting mosquitoes, Harry! John H Man, you get what you think are a couple of clever key words, and you wear it out, huh? Please post the name of the person you spoke with at Yamaha, U.S.A. Can't?? Why IS that? Old news. You lost that one. John H No, sorry. You lied, and got caught. How did I lose? You didn't provide any information |
( OT ) Who said
John H wrote in message . ..
On 2 Mar 2004 04:19:14 -0800, (basskisser) wrote: John H wrote in message . .. On 1 Mar 2004 05:45:08 -0800, (basskisser) wrote: John H wrote in message . .. On Sun, 29 Feb 2004 05:54:41 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: K. Smith wrote: You nuffnuff you really are. What??? you & your tax payer funded lying lefty bludger mates like krause would have sat back to await for the next 911 type attack?? What?? maybe held a protest to tell the terrorists to stop?? Wow...this is a long bender for you...you got someone buying your substances for you? She's swatting mosquitoes, Harry! John H Man, you get what you think are a couple of clever key words, and you wear it out, huh? Please post the name of the person you spoke with at Yamaha, U.S.A. Can't?? Why IS that? Old news. You lost that one. John H No, sorry. You lied, and got caught. How did I lose? You didn't provide any information Let's see if I can spell this correctly.... Okay John H I KNEW you lied! You finally admit to it!! LIAR |
( OT ) Who said
On 2 Mar 2004 12:08:17 -0800, (basskisser) wrote:
John H wrote in message . .. On 2 Mar 2004 04:19:14 -0800, (basskisser) wrote: John H wrote in message . .. On 1 Mar 2004 05:45:08 -0800, (basskisser) wrote: John H wrote in message . .. On Sun, 29 Feb 2004 05:54:41 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: K. Smith wrote: You nuffnuff you really are. What??? you & your tax payer funded lying lefty bludger mates like krause would have sat back to await for the next 911 type attack?? What?? maybe held a protest to tell the terrorists to stop?? Wow...this is a long bender for you...you got someone buying your substances for you? She's swatting mosquitoes, Harry! John H Man, you get what you think are a couple of clever key words, and you wear it out, huh? Please post the name of the person you spoke with at Yamaha, U.S.A. Can't?? Why IS that? Old news. You lost that one. John H No, sorry. You lied, and got caught. How did I lose? You didn't provide any information Let's see if I can spell this correctly.... Okay John H I KNEW you lied! You finally admit to it!! LIAR Good job. You even spelled it correctly. Now, will this significantly reduce the number of your posts? John H On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay! |
( OT ) Who said
In article , Harry Krause wrote:
Jim wrote: Naturally the common people don't want war; neither in Russia, nor in England, nor in America, nor in Germany. That is understood. But after all, it is the leaders of the country who determine policy, and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is to tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country. Hermann Goering Indeed, the spiritual grandpappy of the current Republican neofascists. Here is a better teacher: Did Martin Luther really say this or did he plagiarize it like his college work? Let's see here... Martin Luther King Jr. plagiarized as an undergrad (MoreHouse College) and as a B.U. graduate. In fact Martin Luther plagiarized throughout most of his career. So please show me how a left-wing extremist downplays the intellectual theft of this dishonorable man? This should be interesting. We won't even get into Martin Luther King's adultery, nor his penchant for white prostitutes. Nor even his close association with members of the American Communist Party and his long history as a law-breaker. I betcha that he stole it. How pray tell is this man a "better teacher"? Teacher of what? A true revolution of values will lay hands on the world order and say of war: ‘This way of settling differences is not just.’ This business of burning human beings with napalm, of filling our nation’s homes with orphans and widows, of injecting poisonous drugs of hate into the veins of peoples normally humane, of sending men home from dark and bloody battlefields physically handicapped and psychologically deranged, cannot be reconciled with wisdom, justice, and love. A nation that continues year after year to spend more money on military defense than on programs of social uplift is approaching spiritual death. —Martin Luther King, Jr. |
( OT ) Who said
In article , Jim wrote:
Yes - the arrogant lying puppet might win as a result of GOP lies, deception and HUGE political contributions. And America will be the lesser for it. We will move further toward a 2 class society, hated as bully of the world, fouling our own nest, depleting our resources, and abusing our veterans, elderly, and children. Our states will be bankrupt, the bill of rights, a scrap of paper. This might be a good thing because once again the populace will catch on and (if we still have a vote) throw the *******s out for good. it must really suck to be you? Joe wrote: "Jim" wrote in message ... Sorry Jim, Saddam's not coming back. Bin Laden will be caught soon. And your poor excuse for a candidate will lose. |
( OT ) Who said
On Wed, 03 Mar 2004 01:31:57 +0000, Henry Blackmoore wrote:
Did Martin Luther really say this or did he plagiarize it like his college work? Including his faults, we should all be thankful of Martin Luther King's leadership. His following a non-violent agenda, when there were very many angry Americans, saved this country a tremendous amount of bloodshed. I personally believe King was the greatest American leader of the past 50 years, and I'm white. |
( OT ) Who said
|
( OT ) Who said
In article , thunder wrote:
On Wed, 03 Mar 2004 01:31:57 +0000, Henry Blackmoore wrote: Did Martin Luther really say this or did he plagiarize it like his college work? Including his faults, we should all be thankful of Martin Luther King's leadership. His following a non-violent agenda, when there were very many angry Americans, saved this country a tremendous amount of bloodshed. I personally believe King was the greatest American leader of the past 50 years, and I'm white. So totally dishonorable men who lie and cheat their way through life make great leaders in your humble opinion? Hmmm interesting... |
( OT ) Who said
|
( OT ) Who said
On Wed, 03 Mar 2004 18:11:00 +0000, Henry Blackmoore wrote:
So totally dishonorable men who lie and cheat their way through life make great leaders in your humble opinion? No, but I do have an opinion on anyone who would call Martin Luther King "totally dishonorable". |
( OT ) Who said
In article , thunder wrote:
On Wed, 03 Mar 2004 18:11:00 +0000, Henry Blackmoore wrote: So totally dishonorable men who lie and cheat their way through life make great leaders in your humble opinion? No, but I do have an opinion on anyone who would call Martin Luther King "totally dishonorable". I should have used 'partially' then?? dishonorable is dishonorable and MLK was a serial plagiarist. plagiarist: One who plagiarizes; or purloins the words, writings, or ideas of another, and passes them off as his own; a literary thief; a plagiary. www.dictionary.com with emphasis on the word 'thief' and "purloin". I could care less about your jaded liberal opinions... |
( OT ) Who said
Henry Blackmoore wrote:
So totally dishonorable men who lie and cheat their way through life make great leaders in your humble opinion? Of course not. Look at Bush...lied and cheated his way to the top, and he's a total failure as a president. |
( OT ) Who said
"Henry Blackmoore" wrote in message news:Ucp1c.19769 So totally dishonorable men who lie and cheat their way through life make great leaders in your humble opinion? Hmmm interesting... Well, JFK was a real WW2 hero, and then a great leader, yet as a "man" he had considerable shortcomings. And in the end he gave his life in service of this country, who am I to trash him? I judge a leader by how well he executes his job as shepard of the people he is supposed to be leading. In that regard, MLK did an outstanding job for his constituancy, and as a result our entire country. He can sort out any moral issues he had with God. I'd hire him again in a minute to lead, I wouldn't hire him to ghost write for me, and I wouldn't marry him. See the difference?? Both of these leaders practiced thier religion and well knew "the rules" of life. If God has issues with them regarding honesty and promiscuity, so be it. It's not for me to judge how they delt with the temptations that go with "life at the top". (Let me use another good and personal example. As a New Englander when I was young, I got to see and meet a young musician named Steven Tyler. I immediatly saw in him that "something", that "spark" that makes the difference between "good" and "legend". One of those very rare people that just personifies the "muse" in music. When he got to "the top", the temptations of life at the top almost killed him. In 1982 I got to thinking how the world really couldn't afford to lose another musical genius so soon after Lennon, but ol' Steven was damn_near_dead, I saw it close up and personal. Well, we all know that he rediscovered his spirituality, saved himself, gave up all the drugs and alcohol that were killing him and muting the muse, and as a net result he and his little band will go down as the most successfull American band in history. And the good he has done in getting "the message" out to young people about substance abuse is immeasurable. Not to mention all the good work generating food for the homeless that they have done. (If you donate 100 cans to a homeless shelter - they *make* time to meet you, shake your hand, and thank you personally.) Are any of these "great *men*" I don't judge men. But I do know that they are all national treasures in thier own fields. They added something to the American tapestry than no_one_else could have added. Despite faults and temptations, people like this become giants in thier chosen fields, be it politics, civil rights, or the joy of music. It's not for me to judge them, it's only for me to pray for these people and thank God for the gifts they bring to others in the short time they are here. Don't tell me about these peoples faults and weaknesses, we all have faults. I'm very thankfull for what legacy they leave behind. -W |
( OT ) Who said
On Thu, 04 Mar 2004 00:37:29 GMT, "Clams Canino"
wrote: "Henry Blackmoore" wrote in message news:Ucp1c.19769 So totally dishonorable men who lie and cheat their way through life make great leaders in your humble opinion? Hmmm interesting... Well, JFK was a real WW2 hero, and then a great leader, yet as a "man" he had considerable shortcomings. And in the end he gave his life in service of this country, who am I to trash him? I judge a leader by how well he executes his job as shepard of the people he is supposed to be leading. In that regard, MLK did an outstanding job for his constituancy, and as a result our entire country. He can sort out any moral issues he had with God. I'd hire him again in a minute to lead, I wouldn't hire him to ghost write for me, and I wouldn't marry him. See the difference?? Both of these leaders practiced thier religion and well knew "the rules" of life. If God has issues with them regarding honesty and promiscuity, so be it. It's not for me to judge how they delt with the temptations that go with "life at the top". (Let me use another good and personal example. As a New Englander when I was young, I got to see and meet a young musician named Steven Tyler. I immediatly saw in him that "something", that "spark" that makes the difference between "good" and "legend". One of those very rare people that just personifies the "muse" in music. When he got to "the top", the temptations of life at the top almost killed him. In 1982 I got to thinking how the world really couldn't afford to lose another musical genius so soon after Lennon, but ol' Steven was damn_near_dead, I saw it close up and personal. Well, we all know that he rediscovered his spirituality, saved himself, gave up all the drugs and alcohol that were killing him and muting the muse, and as a net result he and his little band will go down as the most successfull American band in history. And the good he has done in getting "the message" out to young people about substance abuse is immeasurable. Not to mention all the good work generating food for the homeless that they have done. (If you donate 100 cans to a homeless shelter - they *make* time to meet you, shake your hand, and thank you personally.) Are any of these "great *men*" I don't judge men. But I do know that they are all national treasures in thier own fields. They added something to the American tapestry than no_one_else could have added. Despite faults and temptations, people like this become giants in thier chosen fields, be it politics, civil rights, or the joy of music. It's not for me to judge them, it's only for me to pray for these people and thank God for the gifts they bring to others in the short time they are here. Don't tell me about these peoples faults and weaknesses, we all have faults. I'm very thankfull for what legacy they leave behind. -W Wow, Clams! That was very nicely written. Thank you. John H On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay! |
( OT ) Who said
Clams Canino wrote:
Well, JFK was a real WW2 hero, and then a great leader, yet as a "man" he had considerable shortcomings. And in the end he gave his life in service of this country, who am I to trash him? One of the issues I have with so many of the self-designated "conservatives" around here is that they trash-mouth a lot of people who have made great sacrifices for their country. Even if one doesn't think much of JFK, he *did* stand behind his beliefs, fought for the good of the whole country, and that deserves some respect. As for exaggerating Dr. Martin Luther King's plagiarism, I guess that is for those who think J.Edgar Hoover was a better American than MLK. In the end, bigotry and racism is what it comes down to. Is that a "conservative" principle? Don't tell me about these peoples faults and weaknesses, we all have faults. I'm very thankfull for what legacy they leave behind. Well said. Regards Doug King |
( OT ) Who said
"Joe" wrote in message ...
"Jim" wrote in message ... Sorry Jim, Saddam's not coming back. Bin Laden will be caught soon. And your poor excuse for a candidate will lose. Please show any references, and/or briefings you may have to back up your wild allegations. |
( OT ) Who said
John H wrote in message . ..
On Sun, 29 Feb 2004 05:54:41 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: K. Smith wrote: You nuffnuff you really are. What??? you & your tax payer funded lying lefty bludger mates like krause would have sat back to await for the next 911 type attack?? What?? maybe held a protest to tell the terrorists to stop?? Wow...this is a long bender for you...you got someone buying your substances for you? She's swatting mosquitoes, Harry! John H Like I said, some little thing sticks in your head, and you certainly wear it out. Trouble is, it makes YOU the pesky little gnat. |
( OT ) Who said
|
( OT ) Who said
|
( OT ) Who said
In article , Harry Krause wrote:
Henry Blackmoore wrote: So totally dishonorable men who lie and cheat their way through life make great leaders in your humble opinion? Of course not. Look at Bush...lied and cheated his way to the top, and he's a total failure as a president. you are too funny! |
( OT ) Who said
In article , DSK wrote:
Clams Canino wrote: Well, JFK was a real WW2 hero, and then a great leader, yet as a "man" he had considerable shortcomings. And in the end he gave his life in service of this country, who am I to trash him? One of the issues I have with so many of the self-designated "conservatives" around here is that they trash-mouth a lot of people who have made great sacrifices for their country. Even if one doesn't think much of JFK, he *did* stand behind his beliefs, fought for the good of the whole country, and that deserves some respect. As for exaggerating Dr. Martin Luther King's plagiarism, Exaggerate? Hardly. I barely scratched the surface. Perhaps you are not aware of the extent of the good Doctor's cheating? You are welcome to study it in your own time at your leisure. I guess that is for those who think J.Edgar Hoover was a better American than MLK. In the end, bigotry and racism is what it comes down to. I never said anything about J. Edgar Hoover. And here we go with the race card thingie. Why is it that the race card has to always be played when it comes to any criticism of somebody of color? I would feel the same way about a Anglo Dr. Martin Luther King. Is that a "conservative" principle? I don't know. Since you know so much. Tell us yourself. Don't tell me about these peoples faults and weaknesses, we all have faults. I'm very thankfull for what legacy they leave behind. We all have faults granted. But not all of us are prostitute-loving, womanizing, women-beating communists that cheat our way through college now are we? Well said. Thank-you Regards Doug King -- Pete Rose for President |
( OT ) Who said
Henry Blackmoore wrote:
I never said anything about J. Edgar Hoover. Of course not. You aren't smart enough to make the connection. ... And here we go with the race card thingie. Why is it that the race card has to always be played when it comes to any criticism of somebody of color? Why is that bigots & racists always complain about "playing the race card" when somebody points out that they are bigoted & racist? We all have faults granted. And you have far more than most. DSK |
( OT ) Who said
Perhaps, but you skipped right over the post with the meat and went for the
easier pickings. That says something about your character. MLK did enough good, that I'd rent him a hooker if he asked me. -W "Henry Blackmoore" wrote in message news:koN1c.21614 I never said anything about J. Edgar Hoover. And here we go with the race card thingie. Why is it that the race card has to always be played when it comes to any criticism of somebody of color? I would feel the same way about a Anglo Dr. Martin Luther King. |
( OT ) Who said
DSK wrote: Why is that bigots & racists always complain about "playing the race card" when somebody points out that they are bigoted & racist? You're black, aren't you? Wonder how I know? You play the race card. That makes you a racist. -- Charlie |
( OT ) Who said
In article , DSK wrote:
Henry Blackmoore wrote: I never said anything about J. Edgar Hoover. Of course not. You aren't smart enough to make the connection. ... And here we go with the race card thingie. Why is it that the race card has to always be played when it comes to any criticism of somebody of color? Why is that bigots & racists always complain about "playing the race card" when somebody points out that they are bigoted & racist? We all have faults granted. And you have far more than most. And you are no doubt perfect eh? DSK |
( OT ) Who said
In article wyQ1c.116691$4o.151121@attbi_s52, "Clams Canino" wrote:
Perhaps, but you skipped right over the post with the meat and went for the easier pickings. That says something about your character. MLK did enough good, that I'd rent him a hooker if he asked me. And that says something about your character and that isn't saying much... -W "Henry Blackmoore" wrote in message news:koN1c.21614 I never said anything about J. Edgar Hoover. And here we go with the race card thingie. Why is it that the race card has to always be played when it comes to any criticism of somebody of color? I would feel the same way about a Anglo Dr. Martin Luther King. |
( OT ) Who said
|
( OT ) Who said
|
( OT ) Who said
John H wrote in message . ..
On 8 Mar 2004 12:24:04 -0800, (basskisser) wrote: (Henry Blackmoore) wrote in message hlink.net... In article wyQ1c.116691$4o.151121@attbi_s52, "Clams Canino" wrote: Perhaps, but you skipped right over the post with the meat and went for the easier pickings. That says something about your character. MLK did enough good, that I'd rent him a hooker if he asked me. And that says something about your character and that isn't saying much... At least he has enough character to not make wild allegations about people without some factual material to back it up. And that is a lot more than can be said about you. Make it 38. John H And are you counting YOURS, also? |
( OT ) Who said
|
( OT ) Who said
In article , (basskisser) wrote:
John H wrote in message . .. On 8 Mar 2004 12:24:04 -0800, (basskisser) wrote: (Henry Blackmoore) wrote in message hlink.net... In article wyQ1c.116691$4o.151121@attbi_s52, "Clams Canino" wrote: Perhaps, but you skipped right over the post with the meat and went for the easier pickings. That says something about your character. MLK did enough good, that I'd rent him a hooker if he asked me. And that says something about your character and that isn't saying much... At least he has enough character to not make wild allegations about people without some factual material to back it up. And that is a lot more than can be said about you. Make it 38. John H And are you counting YOURS, also? I think that he is talking about your IQ fishkiss. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:39 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com