Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() basskisser wrote: Absolutely. Good science can not be biased. If it WERE flawed, it would be easily reputed. Reputed? Good God Almighty. -- Charlie |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Charles wrote in message ...
basskisser wrote: Absolutely. Good science can not be biased. If it WERE flawed, it would be easily reputed. Reputed? Good God Almighty. -- Charlie Never made a typo, there, Charlie? |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "basskisser" wrote in message om... Charles wrote in message ... basskisser wrote: Absolutely. Good science can not be biased. If it WERE flawed, it would be easily reputed. Reputed? Good God Almighty. -- Charlie Never made a typo, there, Charlie? It could certainly be a typo if the "p" and the "f" keys were next to or close to each other. The problem is, they are not. It was not a typo. Just as your spelling of the word "intelligence" (you spelled it "intelligents") was not. No one would care about your lack of spelling skills if you did not continually call people "stupid". Learn a lesson from this, laugh about it and move on. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Jim-- wrote: "basskisser" wrote in message om... Charles wrote in message ... basskisser wrote: Absolutely. Good science can not be biased. If it WERE flawed, it would be easily reputed. Reputed? Good God Almighty. -- Charlie Never made a typo, there, Charlie? It could certainly be a typo if the "p" and the "f" keys were next to or close to each other. The problem is, they are not. It was not a typo. Just as your spelling of the word "intelligence" (you spelled it "intelligents") was not. Exactly. -- Charlie |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Charles wrote in message ...
Jim-- wrote: "basskisser" wrote in message om... Charles wrote in message ... basskisser wrote: Absolutely. Good science can not be biased. If it WERE flawed, it would be easily reputed. Reputed? Good God Almighty. -- Charlie Never made a typo, there, Charlie? It could certainly be a typo if the "p" and the "f" keys were next to or close to each other. The problem is, they are not. It was not a typo. Just as your spelling of the word "intelligence" (you spelled it "intelligents") was not. Exactly. -- Charlie Charlie, would you care for me to google up some of YOUR gems? Exactly. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "John H" wrote in message ... On 4 Mar 2004 05:00:41 -0800, (basskisser) wrote: Charles wrote in message ... Jim-- wrote: "basskisser" wrote in message om... Charles wrote in message ... basskisser wrote: Absolutely. Good science can not be biased. If it WERE flawed, it would be easily reputed. Reputed? Good God Almighty. -- Charlie Never made a typo, there, Charlie? It could certainly be a typo if the "p" and the "f" keys were next to or close to each other. The problem is, they are not. It was not a typo. Just as your spelling of the word "intelligence" (you spelled it "intelligents") was not. Exactly. -- Charlie Charlie, would you care for me to google up some of YOUR gems? Exactly. You've got a lot of 'googling' to do, b'asskisser. Just remember, I'm first! John H On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay! And I am third. I believe that Henry was second. |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() basskisser wrote: Charlie, would you care for me to google up some of YOUR gems? Exactly. Are you sure you didn't mean YOU'RE? Goggle away there guy. Just remember, krause does not approve of googling up past posts. -- Charlie |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Charles wrote in message ...
basskisser wrote: Absolutely. Good science can not be biased. If it WERE flawed, it would be easily reputed. Reputed? Good God Almighty. -- Charlie Charlie, in the interest of fairness, I've taken two whole minutes to bring up some of YOUR jewels. Good God almighty. Interesting how some who think they are open-minded and bright and really the most closed minded and dumb people, like you. What to HELL does that above sentence mean? LOL! Gawd, it never stops with you. Gawd??? Is that a word? kinda like b'asskisser listening to rush limbaugh. A person's name, being a proper noun, should be capitalized, and if you were to look at my screen name, it is basskisser. Figures. Same way you democrats handle taxpayers now. Figures, punctuated like it is a complete sentence? |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|