And the Bush lies just keep on coming
 

"John H" wrote in message
...
On 2 Mar 2004 12:03:57 -0800, (basskisser) wrote:

John H wrote in message
John, what you seem to forget is that scientists use SCIENCE.
Regardless of their political bend. The basis of their report is not
their political referendum, it's the science that they use, to know
for a FACT, what Bush is doing to the environment.

Oh, I see. So there is always 100% agreement among scientists because
they all use science. So scientists are never biased one way or the
other.

Do you really believe that?

Absolutely. Good science can not be biased. If it WERE flawed, it
would be easily reputed.

John H

On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

Bear with me, b'asskisser, I'm a little slow. Are you suggesting that
anyone who calls himself a 'scientist' uses only 'good' science?
Wouldn't that mean that scientists could never disagree?

John H

What a silly question! Of course good scientists disagree. Just last week, I
read that there are two vastly different approaches to the true cause of mad
cow disease. The prion theory is one, and the other is....something else-I
don't remember. Neither side is calling the other stupid.

And the Bush lies just keep on coming
 

On Tue, 02 Mar 2004 21:10:29 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
.. .
On Tue, 02 Mar 2004 17:45:50 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
.. .

My boy? The last time I voted it was for Al Sharpton.

John H

John, baiting newsgroup visitors only works on Harry. Try again. :-)

What do you mean, baiting? I *did* vote for Al!

John H

Yeah. Right.

Honest!

Why??? The has no attractive qualities. Were you unimpressed with the other
choices?

I wanted to **** off Wesley Clark. I thought he was a scumbag of the
first order. I even got my wife to vote for Sharpton. I really wanted
Sharpton to get more votes than Clark, but it didn't happen.

If Edwards became the Democrat's choice, I might consider voting for
him. Not Kerry though. I think the alternative, Bush, is still better
than Kerry.

John H

On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

And the Bush lies just keep on coming
 

On Tue, 02 Mar 2004 20:51:13 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote:

"basskisser" wrote in message
. com...
John H wrote in message
John, what you seem to forget is that scientists use SCIENCE.
Regardless of their political bend. The basis of their report is not
their political referendum, it's the science that they use, to know
for a FACT, what Bush is doing to the environment.

Oh, I see. So there is always 100% agreement among scientists because
they all use science. So scientists are never biased one way or the
other.

Do you really believe that?

Absolutely. Good science can not be biased. If it WERE flawed, it
would be easily reputed.

I'm not playing both sides here, but in fact, most good science IS biased.
Most research begins with a theory and experiments are designed around that
theory. This doesn't detract from the value of the research, especially if
other scientists attack the problem from another angle eventually, which
they usually do.

With regard to pollution, you don't hear many (if any) scientists refuting
results which have been measured repeatedly for the past 20 years. Acid rain
is a perfect example. At this point in history, only idiots don't believe
that it wrecks bodies of water.


Does that mean Rush Limbaugh is an idiot when it comes to the
environment?

And, Doug, how come you're not working???

John H

On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

And the Bush lies just keep on coming
 

"John H" wrote in message
...

Why??? The has no attractive qualities. Were you unimpressed with the
other
choices?

I wanted to **** off Wesley Clark. I thought he was a scumbag of the
first order. I even got my wife to vote for Sharpton. I really wanted
Sharpton to get more votes than Clark, but it didn't happen.

If Edwards became the Democrat's choice, I might consider voting for
him. Not Kerry though. I think the alternative, Bush, is still better
than Kerry.

Well....I guess if you feel everyone should have equal rights....even
idiots... I prefer a shifty smart person to a dolt, though.

And the Bush lies just keep on coming
 

"John H" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 02 Mar 2004 20:51:13 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote:

"basskisser" wrote in message
. com...
John H wrote in message
John, what you seem to forget is that scientists use SCIENCE.
Regardless of their political bend. The basis of their report is not
their political referendum, it's the science that they use, to know
for a FACT, what Bush is doing to the environment.

Oh, I see. So there is always 100% agreement among scientists because
they all use science. So scientists are never biased one way or the
other.

Do you really believe that?

Absolutely. Good science can not be biased. If it WERE flawed, it
would be easily reputed.

I'm not playing both sides here, but in fact, most good science IS
biased.
Most research begins with a theory and experiments are designed around
that
theory. This doesn't detract from the value of the research, especially
if
other scientists attack the problem from another angle eventually, which
they usually do.

With regard to pollution, you don't hear many (if any) scientists
refuting
results which have been measured repeatedly for the past 20 years. Acid
rain
is a perfect example. At this point in history, only idiots don't believe
that it wrecks bodies of water.


Does that mean Rush Limbaugh is an idiot when it comes to the
environment?

If he believes acid rain is harmless, then yes, he's an idiot. Scientists
have laced coal with tracer chemicals in Ohio power plants and found it in
bodies of water in upstate NY. The rest is simple: Some fish don't live at
certain pH levels. End of story.


And, Doug, how come you're not working???

I'm multitasking.

And the Bush lies just keep on coming
 

On Tue, 02 Mar 2004 21:11:42 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
.. .
On 2 Mar 2004 12:03:57 -0800, (basskisser) wrote:

John H wrote in message
John, what you seem to forget is that scientists use SCIENCE.
Regardless of their political bend. The basis of their report is not
their political referendum, it's the science that they use, to know
for a FACT, what Bush is doing to the environment.

Oh, I see. So there is always 100% agreement among scientists because
they all use science. So scientists are never biased one way or the
other.

Do you really believe that?

Absolutely. Good science can not be biased. If it WERE flawed, it
would be easily reputed.

John H

On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

Bear with me, b'asskisser, I'm a little slow. Are you suggesting that
anyone who calls himself a 'scientist' uses only 'good' science?
Wouldn't that mean that scientists could never disagree?

John H

What a silly question! Of course good scientists disagree. Just last week, I
read that there are two vastly different approaches to the true cause of mad
cow disease. The prion theory is one, and the other is....something else-I
don't remember. Neither side is calling the other stupid.


Oh, I thought they called it PMS because Mad Cow Disease was already
taken. Everything I ever thought I knew anything about is getting
totally shaken up in this one thread.

If you're right, that good scientists disagree, then b'asskisser must
be wrong. Since b'asskisser is never wrong, something's wrong.

John H

On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

And the Bush lies just keep on coming
 

"John H" wrote in message
...

Bear with me, b'asskisser, I'm a little slow. Are you suggesting that
anyone who calls himself a 'scientist' uses only 'good' science?
Wouldn't that mean that scientists could never disagree?

John H

What a silly question! Of course good scientists disagree. Just last
week, I
read that there are two vastly different approaches to the true cause of
mad
cow disease. The prion theory is one, and the other is....something
else-I
don't remember. Neither side is calling the other stupid.


Oh, I thought they called it PMS because Mad Cow Disease was already
taken. Everything I ever thought I knew anything about is getting
totally shaken up in this one thread.

If you're right, that good scientists disagree, then b'asskisser must
be wrong. Since b'asskisser is never wrong, something's wrong.

It's a mystery! We need a Vulcan to solve this one.

And the Bush lies just keep on coming
 

On Tue, 02 Mar 2004 21:43:38 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
.. .

Bear with me, b'asskisser, I'm a little slow. Are you suggesting that
anyone who calls himself a 'scientist' uses only 'good' science?
Wouldn't that mean that scientists could never disagree?

John H

What a silly question! Of course good scientists disagree. Just last
week, I
read that there are two vastly different approaches to the true cause of
mad
cow disease. The prion theory is one, and the other is....something
else-I
don't remember. Neither side is calling the other stupid.


Oh, I thought they called it PMS because Mad Cow Disease was already
taken. Everything I ever thought I knew anything about is getting
totally shaken up in this one thread.

If you're right, that good scientists disagree, then b'asskisser must
be wrong. Since b'asskisser is never wrong, something's wrong.

It's a mystery! We need a Vulcan to solve this one.

I finished my income taxes, electronically filed them, and now I've
got to fix dinner. The wife will be home from work soon, and I can't
show her all this stuff as a reason for not cooking!

Have a good day!

John H

On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

And the Bush lies just keep on coming
 

On Tue, 02 Mar 2004 21:36:06 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
.. .

Why??? The has no attractive qualities. Were you unimpressed with the
other
choices?

I wanted to **** off Wesley Clark. I thought he was a scumbag of the
first order. I even got my wife to vote for Sharpton. I really wanted
Sharpton to get more votes than Clark, but it didn't happen.

If Edwards became the Democrat's choice, I might consider voting for
him. Not Kerry though. I think the alternative, Bush, is still better
than Kerry.

Well....I guess if you feel everyone should have equal rights....even
idiots... I prefer a shifty smart person to a dolt, though.


I agree with the shifty smart person, but I don't think Bush is a
dolt. I think he just can't speak publicly. He does OK when he's
reading, and he did learn to fly an F-102. That takes some smarts.

John H

On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

And the Bush lies just keep on coming
 

John H wrote:

On Tue, 02 Mar 2004 16:30:14 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote:

.....and in the final analysis, pollution credits may not matter, anyway.
Your boy is managing to alienate former supporters every day. Must be his
hobby.

Go here...
http://www.npr.org/rundowns/rundown....ate=1-Mar-2004

...and scroll about 2/3 of the way down the page to this heading. It's a
sound file containing a story from yesterday's broadcast.
Outdoors Enthusiasts Question Bush Policies


My boy? The last time I voted it was for Al Sharpton.

John H


Which just proves what a sleaze you are, because if you did vote for
Sharpton, you voted in the Democratic primary, and since you are a
Republican, you cast your vote as a would-be spoiler.

And the Bush lies just keep on coming
 

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
John H wrote:

My boy? The last time I voted it was for Al Sharpton.

John H


Which just proves what a sleaze you are, because if you did vote for
Sharpton, you voted in the Democratic primary, and since you are a
Republican, you cast your vote as a would-be spoiler.

Harry, we are learning! Don't you remember the last gubernatorial election
in Maryland? The one where Democrats were -re-registering as Republicans in
the primary and then re-reregistering as Democrats in the regular election.
They tried to get anybody but Erlich as the Rebublican nominee.

And the Bush lies just keep on coming
 

Bert Robbins wrote:

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
John H wrote:

My boy? The last time I voted it was for Al Sharpton.

John H


Which just proves what a sleaze you are, because if you did vote for
Sharpton, you voted in the Democratic primary, and since you are a
Republican, you cast your vote as a would-be spoiler.

Harry, we are learning! Don't you remember the last gubernatorial election
in Maryland? The one where Democrats were -re-registering as Republicans in
the primary and then re-reregistering as Democrats in the regular election.
They tried to get anybody but Erlich as the Rebublican nominee.


Nope. I don't remember hearing of any Democrats who registered as
Republicans
in order to vote in someone other than Erlich as the nominee. A large
number of Republicans in Georgia
crossed over to vote for Edwards, in order to stymie Kerry, but I think
Kerry will carry Georgia.

I think Bush is in deep, deep trouble. Almost every time he opens his
mouth, he's caught in a series of lies...and all he has left at the
moment is trying to trash Kerry. Not very presidential.

And the Bush lies just keep on coming
 

basskisser wrote:

Absolutely. Good science can not be biased. If it WERE flawed, it
would be easily reputed.

Reputed?

Good God Almighty.

-- Charlie

And the Bush lies just keep on coming
 

Charles wrote in message ...
basskisser wrote:

Absolutely. Good science can not be biased. If it WERE flawed, it
would be easily reputed.

Reputed?

Good God Almighty.

-- Charlie

Never made a typo, there, Charlie?

And the Bush lies just keep on coming
 

Charles wrote in message ...
basskisser wrote:

Absolutely. Good science can not be biased. If it WERE flawed, it
would be easily reputed.

Reputed?

Good God Almighty.

-- Charlie

Charlie, in the interest of fairness, I've taken two whole minutes to
bring up some of YOUR jewels. Good God almighty.

Interesting how some who think they are open-minded and bright and
really the most closed minded and dumb people, like you.

What to HELL does that above sentence mean?

LOL! Gawd, it never stops with you.

Gawd??? Is that a word?


kinda like b'asskisser listening to rush limbaugh.

A person's name, being a proper noun, should be capitalized, and if
you were to look at my screen name, it is basskisser.


Figures. Same way you democrats handle taxpayers now.

Figures, punctuated like it is a complete sentence?

And the Bush lies just keep on coming
 

"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
Charles wrote in message
...
basskisser wrote:

Absolutely. Good science can not be biased. If it WERE flawed, it
would be easily reputed.

Reputed?

Good God Almighty.

-- Charlie

Never made a typo, there, Charlie?

It could certainly be a typo if the "p" and the "f" keys were next to or
close to each other. The problem is, they are not.

It was not a typo. Just as your spelling of the word "intelligence" (you
spelled it "intelligents") was not.

No one would care about your lack of spelling skills if you did not
continually call people "stupid".

Learn a lesson from this, laugh about it and move on.

And the Bush lies just keep on coming
 

"John H" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 02 Mar 2004 21:36:06 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
.. .

Why??? The has no attractive qualities. Were you unimpressed with the
other
choices?

I wanted to **** off Wesley Clark. I thought he was a scumbag of the
first order. I even got my wife to vote for Sharpton. I really wanted
Sharpton to get more votes than Clark, but it didn't happen.

If Edwards became the Democrat's choice, I might consider voting for
him. Not Kerry though. I think the alternative, Bush, is still better
than Kerry.

Well....I guess if you feel everyone should have equal rights....even
idiots... I prefer a shifty smart person to a dolt, though.


I agree with the shifty smart person, but I don't think Bush is a
dolt. I think he just can't speak publicly. He does OK when he's
reading, and he did learn to fly an F-102. That takes some smarts.

John H


So, why did you vote for Sharpton instead of Bush?

And the Bush lies just keep on coming
 

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"John H" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 02 Mar 2004 21:36:06 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
.. .

Why??? The has no attractive qualities. Were you unimpressed with
the
other
choices?

I wanted to **** off Wesley Clark. I thought he was a scumbag of the
first order. I even got my wife to vote for Sharpton. I really wanted
Sharpton to get more votes than Clark, but it didn't happen.

If Edwards became the Democrat's choice, I might consider voting for
him. Not Kerry though. I think the alternative, Bush, is still better
than Kerry.

Well....I guess if you feel everyone should have equal rights....even
idiots... I prefer a shifty smart person to a dolt, though.


I agree with the shifty smart person, but I don't think Bush is a
dolt. I think he just can't speak publicly. He does OK when he's
reading, and he did learn to fly an F-102. That takes some smarts.

John H


So, why did you vote for Sharpton instead of Bush?



Because, Bush may not have been on his ballot.

And the Bush lies just keep on coming
 

On Wed, 03 Mar 2004 15:29:58 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
.. .
On Tue, 02 Mar 2004 21:36:06 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
.. .

Why??? The has no attractive qualities. Were you unimpressed with the
other
choices?

I wanted to **** off Wesley Clark. I thought he was a scumbag of the
first order. I even got my wife to vote for Sharpton. I really wanted
Sharpton to get more votes than Clark, but it didn't happen.

If Edwards became the Democrat's choice, I might consider voting for
him. Not Kerry though. I think the alternative, Bush, is still better
than Kerry.

Well....I guess if you feel everyone should have equal rights....even
idiots... I prefer a shifty smart person to a dolt, though.


I agree with the shifty smart person, but I don't think Bush is a
dolt. I think he just can't speak publicly. He does OK when he's
reading, and he did learn to fly an F-102. That takes some smarts.

John H


So, why did you vote for Sharpton instead of Bush?

Bush wasn't on the Democratic primary ticket. Al was.

John H

On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

And the Bush lies just keep on coming
 

On Tue, 02 Mar 2004 19:04:48 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

John H wrote:

On Tue, 02 Mar 2004 16:30:14 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote:

.....and in the final analysis, pollution credits may not matter, anyway.
Your boy is managing to alienate former supporters every day. Must be his
hobby.

Go here...
http://www.npr.org/rundowns/rundown....ate=1-Mar-2004

...and scroll about 2/3 of the way down the page to this heading. It's a
sound file containing a story from yesterday's broadcast.
Outdoors Enthusiasts Question Bush Policies


My boy? The last time I voted it was for Al Sharpton.

John H


Which just proves what a sleaze you are, because if you did vote for
Sharpton, you voted in the Democratic primary, and since you are a
Republican, you cast your vote as a would-be spoiler.

Brilliant mosquitoes, no less!

John H

On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

And the Bush lies just keep on coming
 

"John H" wrote in message
...
So, why did you vote for Sharpton instead of Bush?

Bush wasn't on the Democratic primary ticket. Al was.

John H

OK...I missed the part about "primary", and I didn't recall if Sharpton ran
with one of the "other" parties in the last pres election. Come to think of
it, I've lost track of whether you were were referring to yesterday's
primary, or something 4 years ago. Never mind. :-)

And the Bush lies just keep on coming
 

On Wed, 03 Mar 2004 21:01:08 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
.. .
So, why did you vote for Sharpton instead of Bush?

Bush wasn't on the Democratic primary ticket. Al was.

John H

OK...I missed the part about "primary", and I didn't recall if Sharpton ran
with one of the "other" parties in the last pres election. Come to think of
it, I've lost track of whether you were were referring to yesterday's
primary, or something 4 years ago. Never mind. :-)

The demo primaries were last Tues here in Virginia. No party
affiliation is required to vote in the primaries.

John H

On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

And the Bush lies just keep on coming
 

"John H" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 03 Mar 2004 21:01:08 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
.. .
So, why did you vote for Sharpton instead of Bush?

Bush wasn't on the Democratic primary ticket. Al was.

John H

OK...I missed the part about "primary", and I didn't recall if Sharpton
ran
with one of the "other" parties in the last pres election. Come to think
of
it, I've lost track of whether you were were referring to yesterday's
primary, or something 4 years ago. Never mind. :-)

The demo primaries were last Tues here in Virginia. No party
affiliation is required to vote in the primaries.

John H

Speaking of quality: You know what this country needs, John? A shower caddy
made out of solid stainless steel, not that chrome plated pig-iron from
China.

And the Bush lies just keep on coming
 

On Wed, 03 Mar 2004 21:13:25 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
.. .
On Wed, 03 Mar 2004 21:01:08 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
.. .
So, why did you vote for Sharpton instead of Bush?

Bush wasn't on the Democratic primary ticket. Al was.

John H

OK...I missed the part about "primary", and I didn't recall if Sharpton
ran
with one of the "other" parties in the last pres election. Come to think
of
it, I've lost track of whether you were were referring to yesterday's
primary, or something 4 years ago. Never mind. :-)

The demo primaries were last Tues here in Virginia. No party
affiliation is required to vote in the primaries.

John H

Speaking of quality: You know what this country needs, John? A shower caddy
made out of solid stainless steel, not that chrome plated pig-iron from
China.


Yup. And it would be nice if the damn suction cups would stick to the
damn wall instead of releasing just when your head is under it!

John H

On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

And the Bush lies just keep on coming
 

Jim-- wrote:

"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
Charles wrote in message
...
basskisser wrote:

Absolutely. Good science can not be biased. If it WERE flawed, it
would be easily reputed.

Reputed?

Good God Almighty.

-- Charlie

Never made a typo, there, Charlie?

It could certainly be a typo if the "p" and the "f" keys were next to or
close to each other. The problem is, they are not.

It was not a typo. Just as your spelling of the word "intelligence" (you
spelled it "intelligents") was not.

Exactly.

-- Charlie

And the Bush lies just keep on coming
 

"John H" wrote in message
...

Speaking of quality: You know what this country needs, John? A shower
caddy
made out of solid stainless steel, not that chrome plated pig-iron from
China.


Yup. And it would be nice if the damn suction cups would stick to the
damn wall instead of releasing just when your head is under it!

John H

I wonder if anyone would pay $89 for a shower caddy made correctly?

And the Bush lies just keep on coming
 

On Thu, 04 Mar 2004 05:51:06 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
.. .

Speaking of quality: You know what this country needs, John? A shower
caddy
made out of solid stainless steel, not that chrome plated pig-iron from
China.


Yup. And it would be nice if the damn suction cups would stick to the
damn wall instead of releasing just when your head is under it!

John H

I wonder if anyone would pay $89 for a shower caddy made correctly?

I've done a lot of research on this subject. The results can be found
he http://ths.gardenweb.com/forums/load...131323237.html

Note that this *is* a hot topic!

John H

On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

And the Bush lies just keep on coming
 

Charles wrote in message ...
Jim-- wrote:

"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
Charles wrote in message
...
basskisser wrote:

Absolutely. Good science can not be biased. If it WERE flawed, it
would be easily reputed.

Reputed?

Good God Almighty.

-- Charlie

Never made a typo, there, Charlie?

It could certainly be a typo if the "p" and the "f" keys were next to or
close to each other. The problem is, they are not.

It was not a typo. Just as your spelling of the word "intelligence" (you
spelled it "intelligents") was not.

Exactly.

-- Charlie

Charlie, would you care for me to google up some of YOUR gems?
Exactly.

And the Bush lies just keep on coming
 

On 4 Mar 2004 05:00:41 -0800, (basskisser) wrote:

Charles wrote in message ...
Jim-- wrote:

"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
Charles wrote in message
...
basskisser wrote:

Absolutely. Good science can not be biased. If it WERE flawed, it
would be easily reputed.

Reputed?

Good God Almighty.

-- Charlie

Never made a typo, there, Charlie?

It could certainly be a typo if the "p" and the "f" keys were next to or
close to each other. The problem is, they are not.

It was not a typo. Just as your spelling of the word "intelligence" (you
spelled it "intelligents") was not.

Exactly.

-- Charlie

Charlie, would you care for me to google up some of YOUR gems?
Exactly.

You've got a lot of 'googling' to do, b'asskisser. Just remember, I'm
first!

John H

On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

And the Bush lies just keep on coming
 

"John H" wrote in message
...
On 4 Mar 2004 05:00:41 -0800, (basskisser) wrote:

Charles wrote in message
...
Jim-- wrote:

"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
Charles wrote in message
...
basskisser wrote:

Absolutely. Good science can not be biased. If it WERE flawed,
it
would be easily reputed.

Reputed?

Good God Almighty.

-- Charlie

Never made a typo, there, Charlie?

It could certainly be a typo if the "p" and the "f" keys were next to
or
close to each other. The problem is, they are not.

It was not a typo. Just as your spelling of the word "intelligence"
(you
spelled it "intelligents") was not.

Exactly.

-- Charlie

Charlie, would you care for me to google up some of YOUR gems?
Exactly.

You've got a lot of 'googling' to do, b'asskisser. Just remember, I'm
first!

John H

On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

And I am third. I believe that Henry was second.

And the Bush lies just keep on coming
 

On Thu, 4 Mar 2004 09:00:24 -0500, "Jim--" wrote:


"John H" wrote in message
.. .
On 4 Mar 2004 05:00:41 -0800, (basskisser) wrote:

Charles wrote in message
...
Jim-- wrote:

"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
Charles wrote in message
...
basskisser wrote:

Absolutely. Good science can not be biased. If it WERE flawed,
it
would be easily reputed.

Reputed?

Good God Almighty.

-- Charlie

Never made a typo, there, Charlie?

It could certainly be a typo if the "p" and the "f" keys were next to
or
close to each other. The problem is, they are not.

It was not a typo. Just as your spelling of the word "intelligence"
(you
spelled it "intelligents") was not.

Exactly.

-- Charlie

Charlie, would you care for me to google up some of YOUR gems?
Exactly.

You've got a lot of 'googling' to do, b'asskisser. Just remember, I'm
first!

John H

On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

And I am third. I believe that Henry was second.


Well I damn sure don't want to lose my place, so don't be hogging all
b'asskisser's time!

John H

On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

And the Bush lies just keep on coming
 

"John H" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 04 Mar 2004 05:51:06 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
.. .

Speaking of quality: You know what this country needs, John? A shower
caddy
made out of solid stainless steel, not that chrome plated pig-iron
from
China.


Yup. And it would be nice if the damn suction cups would stick to the
damn wall instead of releasing just when your head is under it!

Slice a piece of clear plastic tubing and slip it over the pipe. Around
that, place a fat nylon wire tie. Put the loop of the shower caddy between
this arrangement and the wall.

John H

I wonder if anyone would pay $89 for a shower caddy made correctly?

I've done a lot of research on this subject. The results can be found
he http://ths.gardenweb.com/forums/load...131323237.html

Note that this *is* a hot topic!

And, since a non-rusting model would be useful in a boat, this is not OT for
this newsgroup. :-)

And the Bush lies just keep on coming
 

basskisser wrote:

Charlie, would you care for me to google up some of YOUR gems?
Exactly.

Are you sure you didn't mean YOU'RE?

Goggle away there guy. Just remember, krause does not approve of
googling up past posts.

-- Charlie

And the Bush lies just keep on coming
 

On Thu, 04 Mar 2004 14:49:22 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
.. .
On Thu, 04 Mar 2004 05:51:06 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
.. .

Speaking of quality: You know what this country needs, John? A shower
caddy
made out of solid stainless steel, not that chrome plated pig-iron
from
China.


Yup. And it would be nice if the damn suction cups would stick to the
damn wall instead of releasing just when your head is under it!

Slice a piece of clear plastic tubing and slip it over the pipe. Around
that, place a fat nylon wire tie. Put the loop of the shower caddy between
this arrangement and the wall.

John H

I wonder if anyone would pay $89 for a shower caddy made correctly?

I've done a lot of research on this subject. The results can be found
he http://ths.gardenweb.com/forums/load...131323237.html

Note that this *is* a hot topic!

And, since a non-rusting model would be useful in a boat, this is not OT for
this newsgroup. :-)

Hell no. A good shower caddy would make a great way to store lures!

The wire-tie idea is a good one. I'll have to give that some thought.

John H

On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

And the Bush lies just keep on coming
 

"John H" wrote in message
...

The wire-tie idea is a good one. I'll have to give that some thought.

Some thought? Whattya need to think about? Are you going to submit the idea
to a committee at church? The method is perfect. I never lie and I'm always
right.

And the Bush lies just keep on coming
 

On Thu, 04 Mar 2004 15:18:19 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
.. .

The wire-tie idea is a good one. I'll have to give that some thought.

Some thought? Whattya need to think about? Are you going to submit the idea
to a committee at church? The method is perfect. I never lie and I'm always
right.

How big? What color? Whether to wind clockwise or counterclockwise?
Whether it's worth wasting a good wire tie when I could spend $89 on a
better shower caddy? If my wife will let me hang lures all over the
boat?

Give me a break. I've not got the shower-caddy acumen of a Harry
Krause here.

John H

On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

And the Bush lies just keep on coming
 

"John H" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 04 Mar 2004 15:18:19 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
.. .

The wire-tie idea is a good one. I'll have to give that some thought.

Some thought? Whattya need to think about? Are you going to submit the
idea
to a committee at church? The method is perfect. I never lie and I'm
always
right.

How big? What color? Whether to wind clockwise or counterclockwise?
Whether it's worth wasting a good wire tie when I could spend $89 on a
better shower caddy? If my wife will let me hang lures all over the
boat?

Give me a break. I've not got the shower-caddy acumen of a Harry
Krause here.

White wire ties and clear tubing, so you can easily see if mildew is growing
on them. :-) I found this thick-walled (1/8") tubing at a local hardware
store - no idea what it's used for. It should cut in a piece between .465"
and .483" long. Much longer than that and you're courting disaster.

And the Bush lies just keep on coming
 

On Thu, 04 Mar 2004 15:49:11 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
.. .
On Thu, 04 Mar 2004 15:18:19 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
.. .

The wire-tie idea is a good one. I'll have to give that some thought.

Some thought? Whattya need to think about? Are you going to submit the
idea
to a committee at church? The method is perfect. I never lie and I'm
always
right.

How big? What color? Whether to wind clockwise or counterclockwise?
Whether it's worth wasting a good wire tie when I could spend $89 on a
better shower caddy? If my wife will let me hang lures all over the
boat?

Give me a break. I've not got the shower-caddy acumen of a Harry
Krause here.

White wire ties and clear tubing, so you can easily see if mildew is growing
on them. :-) I found this thick-walled (1/8") tubing at a local hardware
store - no idea what it's used for. It should cut in a piece between .465"
and .483" long. Much longer than that and you're courting disaster.


I've called the local hardware stores. Only Wal-Mart sells this stuff
by the thousandth of an inch, and if I shopped there no one would ever
talk to me again.

John H

On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

And the Bush lies just keep on coming
 

"John H" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 04 Mar 2004 15:49:11 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
.. .
On Thu, 04 Mar 2004 15:18:19 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
.. .

The wire-tie idea is a good one. I'll have to give that some
thought.

Some thought? Whattya need to think about? Are you going to submit the
idea
to a committee at church? The method is perfect. I never lie and I'm
always
right.

How big? What color? Whether to wind clockwise or counterclockwise?
Whether it's worth wasting a good wire tie when I could spend $89 on a
better shower caddy? If my wife will let me hang lures all over the
boat?

Give me a break. I've not got the shower-caddy acumen of a Harry
Krause here.

White wire ties and clear tubing, so you can easily see if mildew is
growing
on them. :-) I found this thick-walled (1/8") tubing at a local hardware
store - no idea what it's used for. It should cut in a piece between
..465"
and .483" long. Much longer than that and you're courting disaster.


I've called the local hardware stores. Only Wal-Mart sells this stuff
by the thousandth of an inch, and if I shopped there no one would ever
talk to me again.

You buy a foot and cut it yourself, professor. :-)

And the Bush lies just keep on coming
 

" Tuuk" wrote in message ...
LOL

Asskisser,, you are the limit,,,

Why should I have to argue with you when you put your foot in your mouth on
your own. You did this on purpose. Nobody can be this stupid. Are you having
fun here now? You trying to make a joke?
LoL,, come on there asskisser,,, give the head a shake....

What a stupid putz you are, Tuuk. THAT, for your information, was
written by someone else. I simply cut and pasted it. Yes, I am having
fun, it's quite fun to needle someone as narrow minded as you. Give
your ass a shake, Tuuk.