Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 23 Feb 2004 23:22:55 GMT, "Rich" wrote:
"Wayne.B" wrote in message .. . 160 is OK for fresh water usage but not for salt water. Why is that? ========================================= Salt begins to precipitate out of solution as temperatures increase and will cause clogged cooling passages. |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
If this were true, there would be no need for a choke
on a carbed engine. Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Mon, 23 Feb 2004 20:10:04 GMT, "Geoff 93 RRC" wrote: It seems most new boats have a 160 thermostat these days. I have a '93 Mercruiser 4.3LX. Can I use the 160 thermostat? I boat exclusively in fresh water. I want to get the cleaner combustion that the higher temps give. Ok, I've a different opinion. I prefer to run a little cooler thermostat with a hotter plug. I've done this on my antigue trucks and this technique works great. If you are looking for power and clean combustion, a hotter plug is always the best choice over fooling around with the thermostat. You have to remember that the reason you have a thermostat is to maintain a constant temperature on the block for expansion/contraction reasons - not for combustion. Combustion is strictly the pervue of how hot the spark is. Curiosity question - raw water cooled or fresh. Later, Tom S. Woodstock, CT ---------- Basic Fishing Program: 10 - Fish 20 - Eat 30 - Sleep 40 - Goto 10 |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Geoff 93 RRC" wrote in message m... It seems most new boats have a 160 thermostat these days. I have a '93 Mercruiser 4.3LX. Can I use the 160 thermostat? You probably would not notice a difference in engine performance or efficiency during normal boating operation. MercCruiser uses a 140 degree thermostat in the same 4.3 engine that Volvo and the former OMC use with a 160 degree version. Bill Grannis service manager |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
The boat is fresh water cooled. What hotter range plug would you recommend
and how much hotter is it than the standard plug? Thanks, Geoff "Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message ... On Mon, 23 Feb 2004 20:10:04 GMT, "Geoff 93 RRC" wrote: It seems most new boats have a 160 thermostat these days. I have a '93 Mercruiser 4.3LX. Can I use the 160 thermostat? I boat exclusively in fresh water. I want to get the cleaner combustion that the higher temps give. Ok, I've a different opinion. I prefer to run a little cooler thermostat with a hotter plug. I've done this on my antigue trucks and this technique works great. If you are looking for power and clean combustion, a hotter plug is always the best choice over fooling around with the thermostat. You have to remember that the reason you have a thermostat is to maintain a constant temperature on the block for expansion/contraction reasons - not for combustion. Combustion is strictly the pervue of how hot the spark is. Curiosity question - raw water cooled or fresh. Later, Tom S. Woodstock, CT ---------- Basic Fishing Program: 10 - Fish 20 - Eat 30 - Sleep 40 - Goto 10 |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Woops, I meant raw water cooled - no heat exchanger. I think I am sticking
with the cooler 143 degree thermostat. We boat on Lake Travis in Austin, TX and although very clean, its "hard" water. I have the scale on my outdrive to prove it. Seems the cooler running temps will limit mineral precipation as it does for sea salt. Thanks for all of the replies. "Geoff 93 RRC" wrote in message m... The boat is fresh water cooled. What hotter range plug would you recommend and how much hotter is it than the standard plug? Thanks, Geoff "Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message ... On Mon, 23 Feb 2004 20:10:04 GMT, "Geoff 93 RRC" wrote: It seems most new boats have a 160 thermostat these days. I have a '93 Mercruiser 4.3LX. Can I use the 160 thermostat? I boat exclusively in fresh water. I want to get the cleaner combustion that the higher temps give. Ok, I've a different opinion. I prefer to run a little cooler thermostat with a hotter plug. I've done this on my antigue trucks and this technique works great. If you are looking for power and clean combustion, a hotter plug is always the best choice over fooling around with the thermostat. You have to remember that the reason you have a thermostat is to maintain a constant temperature on the block for expansion/contraction reasons - not for combustion. Combustion is strictly the pervue of how hot the spark is. Curiosity question - raw water cooled or fresh. Later, Tom S. Woodstock, CT ---------- Basic Fishing Program: 10 - Fish 20 - Eat 30 - Sleep 40 - Goto 10 |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 24 Feb 2004 02:36:53 GMT, Jim Kelly wrote:
If this were true, there would be no need for a choke on a carbed engine. Huh? What does choking an engine (limiting the air in the fuel mixture for a quicker start) have to do with hot plugs? Just curious. Later, Tom S. Woodstock, CT ---------- Basic Fishing Program: 10 - Fish 20 - Eat 30 - Sleep 40 - Goto 10 |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I am questioning your assertion that "combustion is strictly the pervue
of how hot the spark is." I contend that that it is necessary to increase the fuel to air ratio on a cold engine because the engine is not imparting enough heat to the mix to create a combustible mix regardless of the heat range of the plug. Therefore, engine temperature has a direct effect on combustion. I agree with your contention that mechanical clearances in the engine are designed around a certain operating temperature. If the engine is operating above or below the design temperature, thermal expansion rates of the materials in the engine will result in clearances that are different than the design criteria. Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Tue, 24 Feb 2004 02:36:53 GMT, Jim Kelly wrote: If this were true, there would be no need for a choke on a carbed engine. Huh? What does choking an engine (limiting the air in the fuel mixture for a quicker start) have to do with hot plugs? Just curious. Later, Tom S. Woodstock, CT ---------- Basic Fishing Program: 10 - Fish 20 - Eat 30 - Sleep 40 - Goto 10 |
#18
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 25 Feb 2004 02:01:22 GMT, Jim Kelly wrote:
I am questioning your assertion that "combustion is strictly the pervue of how hot the spark is." I contend that that it is necessary to increase the fuel to air ratio on a cold engine because the engine is not imparting enough heat to the mix to create a combustible mix regardless of the heat range of the plug. Therefore, engine temperature has a direct effect on combustion. I can agree with that. However, combustion has to be initiated by the spark. The fact that a cylinder is operating at certain temperature only assures that the fuel/air mix on entering the chamber is fairly evenly dispursed. The source of ignition is still the spark. A hotter spark means that more energy is imparted to the explosive mixture resulting in a cleaner burn with more energy transfer. The gas expansion rate is better because the burn is initiated quicker. Additionally, a hotter plug in a cold normally aspirated engine means that one can use less choke on starting. Faster start, faster warm up. Later, Tom S. Woodstock, CT ---------- Basic Fishing Program: 10 - Fish 20 - Eat 30 - Sleep 40 - Goto 10 |
#19
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message ... On Wed, 25 Feb 2004 02:01:22 GMT, Jim Kelly wrote: I am questioning your assertion that "combustion is strictly the pervue of how hot the spark is." I contend that that it is necessary to increase the fuel to air ratio on a cold engine because the engine is not imparting enough heat to the mix to create a combustible mix regardless of the heat range of the plug. Therefore, engine temperature has a direct effect on combustion. I can agree with that. However, combustion has to be initiated by the spark. The fact that a cylinder is operating at certain temperature only assures that the fuel/air mix on entering the chamber is fairly evenly dispursed. The source of ignition is still the spark. A hotter spark means that more energy is imparted to the explosive mixture resulting in a cleaner burn with more energy transfer. The gas expansion rate is better because the burn is initiated quicker. Additionally, a hotter plug in a cold normally aspirated engine means that one can use less choke on starting. Faster start, faster warm up. Later, Tom S. Woodstock, CT ---------- Basic Fishing Program: 10 - Fish 20 - Eat 30 - Sleep 40 - Goto 10 Wrong! A hotter plug only keeps you from fouling at the temperature you are running. No hotter spark. Same coil and ignition driving the EMF. Same gap normally. A hotter plug, just does not transfer as much heat in the same time as cold plug. The heat is transferred to the head and cooling system. If you are running a cold engine, the burn is not as complete and with a normal heat range plug, it would foul and not fire. The hotter range plug just allows the carbon to burn off. Ideal would be a ceramic engine, that allows you run real high temps with out melting the piston, etc. Could get even more energy out of the gallon of gas. When starting, all the plugs are cold. More gas as the volatility of the fuel, does not allow as much vapor to ignite, so more fuel == more vapor. Why you get lots of carbon (black smoke) out the tail pipe on an engine with a stuck choke. |
#20
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
But the heat range of the plug is only a function of the heat transfer rate of
the insulator. Hotter plugs have a longer path from the tip to the metal body which transfers the heat to the head. So the tip of a hotter plug wood maintain a higher temperature. However, any plug capable of igniting combustion will create the same reaction in the combustion chamber and deliver the same amount of power. A hotter plug may have less of a tendency to foul if this is a problem. Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Wed, 25 Feb 2004 02:01:22 GMT, Jim Kelly wrote: I am questioning your assertion that "combustion is strictly the pervue of how hot the spark is." I contend that that it is necessary to increase the fuel to air ratio on a cold engine because the engine is not imparting enough heat to the mix to create a combustible mix regardless of the heat range of the plug. Therefore, engine temperature has a direct effect on combustion. I can agree with that. However, combustion has to be initiated by the spark. The fact that a cylinder is operating at certain temperature only assures that the fuel/air mix on entering the chamber is fairly evenly dispursed. The source of ignition is still the spark. A hotter spark means that more energy is imparted to the explosive mixture resulting in a cleaner burn with more energy transfer. The gas expansion rate is better because the burn is initiated quicker. Additionally, a hotter plug in a cold normally aspirated engine means that one can use less choke on starting. Faster start, faster warm up. Later, Tom S. Woodstock, CT ---------- Basic Fishing Program: 10 - Fish 20 - Eat 30 - Sleep 40 - Goto 10 |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
mercury force | General | |||
Price for Intake Manifold & Thermostat Housing Replacement (MECHANICS PLEASE COMMENT) | General | |||
Mechanics / Boat Savy: Exhaust Manifold & Thermostat Housing | General | |||
Johnson outboard cooling question. | General | |||
Confused by OMC 4.3L thermostat housing | General |