He's a uniter, not a liar.
 

"Harry Krause" wrote in message news:c18un8

Hmmm. John Fitzgerald Kennedy once claimed "Ich bin ein Berliner..." and
that claim played quite well in Berlin. Do you suppose that upset his
Irish ancestors back home in Boston?

You are such a nimrod. You know damn well that you have taken Kennedy's
famous query out of context, that he wasn't even speaking in the first
person in that speech. You know these things, because you're smart enough
to have looked it up, but you knowingly and deliberately lie about this and
many other things, because that's just the way you operate.

For the record, the complete Kennedy quote is as follows: "Two thousand
years ago the proudest boast was 'civis Romanus sum.' Today, in the world
of freedom, the proudest boast is 'Ich bin ein Berliner.' "

He's a uniter, not a liar.
 

It's all more of the same old "politics-as-a-blood-sport" BS. Are
there any candidates that advocate normalization of relations with
Cuba? I'd like to be able to cruise there legally, and they'd get my
vote.

================================================== ===

On Sun, 22 Feb 2004 03:44:19 GMT, "NOYB" wrote:

First, Kerry told us this:

"(W)e need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator,
leading an oppressive regime. We all know the litany of his offenses. He
presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone
to miscalculation. ...And now he is miscalculating America’s response to his
continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction.
That is why the world, through the United Nations Security Council, has
spoken with one voice, demanding that Iraq disclose its weapons programs and
disarm. So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is
real, but it is not new. It has been with us since the end of the Persian
Gulf War." -- John Kerry, Jan 23, 2003

"The threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real, but
as I said, it is not new. It has been with us since the end of that war, and
particularly in the last 4 years we know after Operation Desert Fox failed
to force him to reaccept them, that he has continued to build those weapons.
He has had a free hand for 4 years to reconstitute these weapons, allowing
the world, during the interval, to lose the focus we had on weapons of mass
destruction and the issue of proliferation." -- John Kerry, October 9, 2002

"I will be voting to give the president of the United States the authority
to use force - if necessary - to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe
that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real
and grave threat to our security." -- John F. Kerry, Oct 2002

-------------------------------------------------------

Now, Kerry tells us this:



June 2003:

"He (Bush) misled every one of us. I will not let him off the hook
throughout this campaign with respect to America's credibility and
credibility to me because if he lied he lied to me personally"

He's a uniter, not a liar.
 

Wayne.B wrote:

It's all more of the same old "politics-as-a-blood-sport" BS. Are
there any candidates that advocate normalization of relations with
Cuba? I'd like to be able to cruise there legally, and they'd get my
vote.


Hear, hear...

He's a uniter, not a liar.
 

John Gaquin wrote:

"Harry Krause" wrote in message

..... it is quite telling that you feel it necessary
to point out what you believe is the religion of some of Kerry's
ancestors. So tell us, do you believe it was Kerry's Czech ancestors who
were Jewish or were Kerry's Hungarian ancestors Jewish? If they were,
what significance does that have? And, if they were, does that have any
signifance in correlation to the fact that his wife, if I recall, is an
African?

My, my, Harry! Aren't we touchy tonight?

Did someone hit a hot-button?


Of course, krause is jewish.

Nothing wrong with being jewish but you have to wonder why the guy feels
the need to hide the fact. I guess he's ashamed.

-- Charlie


----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

He's a uniter, not a liar.
 

Harry Krause wrote:


Once more, concrete-for-brains, I have NO interest in swaying the
opinion of anyone in this newsgroup to the center or even to the left. I
have stated this any number of times.

Yea, right.

-- Charlie


----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

He's a uniter, not a liar.
 

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
news:c194vl$1g0p1j$1@ID-

Once more, concrete-for-brains, I have NO interest in swaying the
opinion of anyone in this newsgroup to the center or even to the left. I
have stated this any number of times.

OK,

If we hold this to be true, than *what* is your reason for such prolific OT
posting?

Back to the old binary thinking: You are doing it A) to sway hearts and
minds. B) To just get a rise out of others.

Since you ruled out A, that kinda leaves B. I would submit that posting all
this stuff just to get a reaction or attention, is in fact disruptive to the
health of the NG as a whole. No?

-W

He's a uniter, not a liar.
 

Clams Canino wrote:

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
news:c194vl$1g0p1j$1@ID-

Once more, concrete-for-brains, I have NO interest in swaying the
opinion of anyone in this newsgroup to the center or even to the left. I
have stated this any number of times.

OK,

If we hold this to be true, than *what* is your reason for such prolific OT
posting?

Back to the old binary thinking: You are doing it A) to sway hearts and
minds. B) To just get a rise out of others.

Since you ruled out A, that kinda leaves B. I would submit that posting all
this stuff just to get a reaction or attention, is in fact disruptive to the
health of the NG as a whole. No?

-W



C. The answer is C, and I have posted an explanation of C several times.
There's more to life than binary thinking.

Think it through.

There's nothing anyone could post here that would convince any of the
die-hard Bu****es of the error of their support. Their minds are made
up, closed, and there is no capacity for growth or change there. That
much is obvious.

So, posting information that would result in their thinking and perhaps
coming to a different conclusion about Bush is a waste of time. "A" is
not my reason.

I don't care whether I "get a rise" out of them. It matters little to me
whether they respond or not. In fact, I have oft-stated that I don't
care whether neocons live or die. I don't view them as contributors to
the forward movement of civilization or even our society, but I don't
wish them ill, either. I simply don't care about them.

There you go.

He's a uniter, not a liar.
 

On Sun, 22 Feb 2004 11:31:49 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

Clams Canino wrote:

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
news:c194vl$1g0p1j$1@ID-

Once more, concrete-for-brains, I have NO interest in swaying the
opinion of anyone in this newsgroup to the center or even to the left. I
have stated this any number of times.

OK,

If we hold this to be true, than *what* is your reason for such prolific OT
posting?

Back to the old binary thinking: You are doing it A) to sway hearts and
minds. B) To just get a rise out of others.

Since you ruled out A, that kinda leaves B. I would submit that posting all
this stuff just to get a reaction or attention, is in fact disruptive to the
health of the NG as a whole. No?

-W



C. The answer is C, and I have posted an explanation of C several times.
There's more to life than binary thinking.

Think it through.

There's nothing anyone could post here that would convince any of the
die-hard Bu****es of the error of their support. Their minds are made
up, closed, and there is no capacity for growth or change there. That
much is obvious.

So, posting information that would result in their thinking and perhaps
coming to a different conclusion about Bush is a waste of time. "A" is
not my reason.

I don't care whether I "get a rise" out of them. It matters little to me
whether they respond or not. In fact, I have oft-stated that I don't
care whether neocons live or die. I don't view them as contributors to
the forward movement of civilization or even our society, but I don't
wish them ill, either. I simply don't care about them.

There you go.


We should all be thankful for Harry's presence. His intellectual
integrity and acumen are inspirational.



John H

On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

He's a uniter, not a liar.
 

Harry Krause wrote:

Well, John, some of us have to be open-minded and bright, like me, and
others of us have to be close-minded and dull, like you.

Interesting how some who think they are open-minded and bright and
really the most closed minded and dumb people, like you.



We each of us have our assigned rice bowls.

I think your parents had alot to do with your assigned rice bowl.

-- Charlie


----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

He's a uniter, not a liar.
 

On Sun, 22 Feb 2004 16:17:06 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

John H wrote:
On Sun, 22 Feb 2004 11:31:49 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

Clams Canino wrote:

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
news:c194vl$1g0p1j$1@ID-

Once more, concrete-for-brains, I have NO interest in swaying the
opinion of anyone in this newsgroup to the center or even to the left. I
have stated this any number of times.

OK,

If we hold this to be true, than *what* is your reason for such prolific OT
posting?

Back to the old binary thinking: You are doing it A) to sway hearts and
minds. B) To just get a rise out of others.

Since you ruled out A, that kinda leaves B. I would submit that posting all
this stuff just to get a reaction or attention, is in fact disruptive to the
health of the NG as a whole. No?

-W



C. The answer is C, and I have posted an explanation of C several times.
There's more to life than binary thinking.

Think it through.

There's nothing anyone could post here that would convince any of the
die-hard Bu****es of the error of their support. Their minds are made
up, closed, and there is no capacity for growth or change there. That
much is obvious.

So, posting information that would result in their thinking and perhaps
coming to a different conclusion about Bush is a waste of time. "A" is
not my reason.

I don't care whether I "get a rise" out of them. It matters little to me
whether they respond or not. In fact, I have oft-stated that I don't
care whether neocons live or die. I don't view them as contributors to
the forward movement of civilization or even our society, but I don't
wish them ill, either. I simply don't care about them.

There you go.


We should all be thankful for Harry's presence. His intellectual
integrity and acumen are inspirational.



John H


Well, John, some of us have to be open-minded and bright, like me, and
others of us have to be close-minded and dull, like you.

We each of us have our assigned rice bowls.

Yes, Harry, the acumen just drips from your chin.

John H

On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!