![]() |
What on-line weather service do you use?
|
http://wwwa.accuweather.com/
You can customize it to your home and where you go boating. "JimH" wrote in message ... This is the best I have found http://weather.noaa.gov/radar/national.html |
"JimH" wrote in message ... This is the best I have found http://weather.noaa.gov/radar/national.html This is what I use. http://weatheroffice.ec.gc.ca/marine/index_e.html James D. Carter "The Boat" Bayfield |
On Thu, 7 Apr 2005 17:44:23 -0400, "JimH" wrote:
This is the best I have found http://weather.noaa.gov/radar/national.html Here's the most accurate I've found. http://wwwa.accuweather.com/adcbin/p...er=accuweather -- John H "All decisions are the result of binary thinking." |
On Thu, 7 Apr 2005 18:23:52 -0400, "Me Again" wrote:
http://wwwa.accuweather.com/ You can customize it to your home and where you go boating. "JimH" wrote in message ... This is the best I have found http://weather.noaa.gov/radar/national.html Shoulda read first, posted second. Great minds..... -- John H "All decisions are the result of binary thinking." |
"Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Gene Kearns wrote: On Thu, 07 Apr 2005 21:12:38 -0400, Harry Krause wrote: Those are the sites I use. I make my best guess based upon their predictions and my observations. I find their wind velocity observations more wrong than right. Locally, we find their wave heights sort of dark humor........ I never pay any attention to those; they're never right on the Bay. Of course, it is so churned up by so many boats, who really knows what the wave heights would be. Before I go out, I check the flags in the neighborhood. I've found that this wave height predictor is spot on most of the time: https://www.navo.navy.mil/cgi-bin/gr...336/21/0-0-1/2 |
Here's the link for the Mid-Atlantic:
https://www.navo.navy.mil/cgi-bin/gr...112/21/0-0-1/0 (Remember that the date/time is Zulu time). "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Gene Kearns wrote: On Thu, 07 Apr 2005 21:12:38 -0400, Harry Krause wrote: Those are the sites I use. I make my best guess based upon their predictions and my observations. I find their wind velocity observations more wrong than right. Locally, we find their wave heights sort of dark humor........ I never pay any attention to those; they're never right on the Bay. Of course, it is so churned up by so many boats, who really knows what the wave heights would be. Before I go out, I check the flags in the neighborhood. -- Bush and the NeoConvicts who control him are destroying the once-great United States. |
"Steven Shelikoff" wrote in message ... On Thu, 7 Apr 2005 17:44:23 -0400, "JimH" wrote: This is the best I have found http://weather.noaa.gov/radar/national.html http://www.intellicast.com/ Steve Fortunately where I boat and fish it takes really drastic weather changes to make it dangerous. |
On Fri, 08 Apr 2005 01:10:14 GMT, Gene Kearns
wrote: On Thu, 7 Apr 2005 17:44:23 -0400, "JimH" wrote: This is the best I have found http://weather.noaa.gov/radar/national.html That is a great source, however...... I have found that no one source is truly reliable...... since everyone here is so politically charged, perhaps you will find the analogy reasonable; that I wouldn't base any one offshore trip on the assurances of either PBS or FOX..... Thus, I offer the following sources: http://www.wunderground.com/MAR/ http://wwwa.accuweather.com/adcbin/p...er=accuweather I suggest digesting the three (or more) and making an informed judgment based upon your experience, skill level, and the capability of your boat, such that you can make an informed decision. Binary thinking aboard a boat is an excellent way to get killed... and take your passengers with you. Unfortunately, the greatest disservice done to this newsgroups is the political good guys vs the bad guys mentality.... in another word binary thinking. The weather is either good enough to go out, or it's not. Binary thinking. -- John H "All decisions are the result of binary thinking." |
"John H" wrote in message ... On Fri, 08 Apr 2005 01:10:14 GMT, Gene Kearns wrote: On Thu, 7 Apr 2005 17:44:23 -0400, "JimH" wrote: This is the best I have found http://weather.noaa.gov/radar/national.html That is a great source, however...... I have found that no one source is truly reliable...... since everyone here is so politically charged, perhaps you will find the analogy reasonable; that I wouldn't base any one offshore trip on the assurances of either PBS or FOX..... Thus, I offer the following sources: http://www.wunderground.com/MAR/ http://wwwa.accuweather.com/adcbin/p...rtner=accuweat her I suggest digesting the three (or more) and making an informed judgment based upon your experience, skill level, and the capability of your boat, such that you can make an informed decision. Binary thinking aboard a boat is an excellent way to get killed... and take your passengers with you. Unfortunately, the greatest disservice done to this newsgroups is the political good guys vs the bad guys mentality.... in another word binary thinking. The weather is either good enough to go out, or it's not. Binary thinking. -- John H "All decisions are the result of binary thinking." But I live 45 miles from the Pillar Point Harbor. It can be sunny and nice at home and the ocean can be sunny and big swells with wind waves. One of our local buoy. http://www.ndbc.noaa.gov/station_page.php?station=46042 |
"John H" wrote in message ... On Fri, 08 Apr 2005 01:10:14 GMT, Gene Kearns wrote: On Thu, 7 Apr 2005 17:44:23 -0400, "JimH" wrote: This is the best I have found http://weather.noaa.gov/radar/national.html That is a great source, however...... I have found that no one source is truly reliable...... since everyone here is so politically charged, perhaps you will find the analogy reasonable; that I wouldn't base any one offshore trip on the assurances of either PBS or FOX..... Thus, I offer the following sources: http://www.wunderground.com/MAR/ http://wwwa.accuweather.com/adcbin/p...er=accuweather I suggest digesting the three (or more) and making an informed judgment based upon your experience, skill level, and the capability of your boat, such that you can make an informed decision. Binary thinking aboard a boat is an excellent way to get killed... and take your passengers with you. Unfortunately, the greatest disservice done to this newsgroups is the political good guys vs the bad guys mentality.... in another word binary thinking. The weather is either good enough to go out, or it's not. Binary thinking. -- John H "All decisions are the result of binary thinking." We also have live webcams on Lake Erie so you can actually see the condition of the Lake on your computer. Here is Huron, OH http://www.weatherusa.net/skycamnet/...ate=Ohio&id=32 |
On Fri, 08 Apr 2005 18:35:18 GMT, "Calif Bill"
wrote: "John H" wrote in message .. . On Fri, 08 Apr 2005 01:10:14 GMT, Gene Kearns wrote: On Thu, 7 Apr 2005 17:44:23 -0400, "JimH" wrote: This is the best I have found http://weather.noaa.gov/radar/national.html That is a great source, however...... I have found that no one source is truly reliable...... since everyone here is so politically charged, perhaps you will find the analogy reasonable; that I wouldn't base any one offshore trip on the assurances of either PBS or FOX..... Thus, I offer the following sources: http://www.wunderground.com/MAR/ http://wwwa.accuweather.com/adcbin/p...rtner=accuweat her I suggest digesting the three (or more) and making an informed judgment based upon your experience, skill level, and the capability of your boat, such that you can make an informed decision. Binary thinking aboard a boat is an excellent way to get killed... and take your passengers with you. Unfortunately, the greatest disservice done to this newsgroups is the political good guys vs the bad guys mentality.... in another word binary thinking. The weather is either good enough to go out, or it's not. Binary thinking. -- John H "All decisions are the result of binary thinking." But I live 45 miles from the Pillar Point Harbor. It can be sunny and nice at home and the ocean can be sunny and big swells with wind waves. One of our local buoy. http://www.ndbc.noaa.gov/station_page.php?station=46042 It's either good enough to drive to Pillar Point Harbor, or it's not. Once there, it's either good enough to go out, or it's not. All binary! -- John H "All decisions are the result of binary thinking." |
Personally, I use NOAA for their weather maps, then listen to NOAA weather
radio for a closer synopsis, then check with a local forecaster who's familiar with the local variations, that none of the other sites are apt to show/mention. Problem with this is, that the local expert may not be familiar with other areas you may move into, so that you would need a list ..... good news is that you can frequently find a local expert who may cover a wide area. otn |
"otnmbrd" wrote in message ink.net... Personally, I use NOAA for their weather maps, then listen to NOAA weather radio for a closer synopsis, then check with a local forecaster who's familiar with the local variations, that none of the other sites are apt to show/mention. Problem with this is, that the local expert may not be familiar with other areas you may move into, so that you would need a list ..... good news is that you can frequently find a local expert who may cover a wide area. otn NOAA has consistently over exaggerated or under reported wave heights for us when listening to the present conditions and forecasts on the western end of Lake Erie. |
"John H" wrote in message ... On Fri, 08 Apr 2005 18:35:18 GMT, "Calif Bill" wrote: "John H" wrote in message .. . On Fri, 08 Apr 2005 01:10:14 GMT, Gene Kearns wrote: On Thu, 7 Apr 2005 17:44:23 -0400, "JimH" wrote: This is the best I have found http://weather.noaa.gov/radar/national.html That is a great source, however...... I have found that no one source is truly reliable...... since everyone here is so politically charged, perhaps you will find the analogy reasonable; that I wouldn't base any one offshore trip on the assurances of either PBS or FOX..... Thus, I offer the following sources: http://www.wunderground.com/MAR/ http://wwwa.accuweather.com/adcbin/p...artner=accuwea t her I suggest digesting the three (or more) and making an informed judgment based upon your experience, skill level, and the capability of your boat, such that you can make an informed decision. Binary thinking aboard a boat is an excellent way to get killed... and take your passengers with you. Unfortunately, the greatest disservice done to this newsgroups is the political good guys vs the bad guys mentality.... in another word binary thinking. The weather is either good enough to go out, or it's not. Binary thinking. -- John H "All decisions are the result of binary thinking." But I live 45 miles from the Pillar Point Harbor. It can be sunny and nice at home and the ocean can be sunny and big swells with wind waves. One of our local buoy. http://www.ndbc.noaa.gov/station_page.php?station=46042 It's either good enough to drive to Pillar Point Harbor, or it's not. Once there, it's either good enough to go out, or it's not. All binary! -- John H "All decisions are the result of binary thinking." No it is all the 1's and 0's t takes to pay the trip cost. $2.60 gallon for the diesel truck and $6.25 for the San Mateo bridge toll. I would rather know it is safe to launch before spending those funds. |
On Sat, 09 Apr 2005 00:32:57 GMT, "Calif Bill"
wrote: "John H" wrote in message .. . On Fri, 08 Apr 2005 18:35:18 GMT, "Calif Bill" wrote: "John H" wrote in message .. . On Fri, 08 Apr 2005 01:10:14 GMT, Gene Kearns wrote: On Thu, 7 Apr 2005 17:44:23 -0400, "JimH" wrote: This is the best I have found http://weather.noaa.gov/radar/national.html That is a great source, however...... I have found that no one source is truly reliable...... since everyone here is so politically charged, perhaps you will find the analogy reasonable; that I wouldn't base any one offshore trip on the assurances of either PBS or FOX..... Thus, I offer the following sources: http://www.wunderground.com/MAR/ http://wwwa.accuweather.com/adcbin/p...artner=accuwea t her I suggest digesting the three (or more) and making an informed judgment based upon your experience, skill level, and the capability of your boat, such that you can make an informed decision. Binary thinking aboard a boat is an excellent way to get killed... and take your passengers with you. Unfortunately, the greatest disservice done to this newsgroups is the political good guys vs the bad guys mentality.... in another word binary thinking. The weather is either good enough to go out, or it's not. Binary thinking. -- John H "All decisions are the result of binary thinking." But I live 45 miles from the Pillar Point Harbor. It can be sunny and nice at home and the ocean can be sunny and big swells with wind waves. One of our local buoy. http://www.ndbc.noaa.gov/station_page.php?station=46042 It's either good enough to drive to Pillar Point Harbor, or it's not. Once there, it's either good enough to go out, or it's not. All binary! -- John H "All decisions are the result of binary thinking." No it is all the 1's and 0's t takes to pay the trip cost. $2.60 gallon for the diesel truck and $6.25 for the San Mateo bridge toll. I would rather know it is safe to launch before spending those funds. I agree! I have to drive for 45 minutes to get to the boat. But, it's still a binary decision - do I go or not go. -- John H "All decisions are the result of binary thinking." |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:28 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com