"JimH" wrote in message
...

"basskisser" wrote in message
oups.com...

JimH wrote:
"basskisser" wrote in message
oups.com...

JimH wrote:
"basskisser" wrote in message
oups.com...

JimH wrote:
"Ralf Header" wrote in
message
...

that you single-handedly turned rec.boats into wrecked.boats.
Is
that true
asshole? Do you post OT? Are you a left wing faggot?




According to the percentage given by Gene Kearns, Harry Krause
has
made
almost 21,000 OT/off topic posts to this forum. Not any one
person
even
comes close.

Yes, he single-handedly ruined this NG.

Do you really think that?

Yes.

He posts with anger and hatred towards those he disagrees with.

What about YOUR posts "with anger and hatred toward those you
disagree
with"?
How about NOYB's?
How about Fritz's?
How about JohnH's?

Do you need examples?


Yes, about 21,000 of them please.

Why would it take 21,000 of them? Are you that thick headed or
something, Jim? Does it take 21,000 posts for you to make an informed
decision? Now, I'll ask again, in a different manner, perhaps you'll
get it. You said that you feel that Harry single handedly ruined this
newsgroup because of his "posts with anger and hatred toward those he
disagrees with", correct? So, let's take a couple of other examples. If
Harry is so bad, then what about someone, who, let's just say, posts
out and out lie after lie about another member....KNOWINGLY lying about
that person. Do you think that would have a negative or positive affect
on the newsgroup? What about someone who stalks another person, never
offering the slightest bit of interesting or factual matter, but
instead berates, lies, and indulges in petty, childish name calling.
Would you say THAT person has a negative of positive affect on the
newsgroup? What about someone who, if anything is said by someone of
the liberal bent, instantly jumps to attention, and without any facts
or information, simply bashes them for being left-leaning, then works
hard to inform the group that he is the best there ever was at
anything, lives in the best house ever built, in the best place on
earth. Would you say THAT was a positive influence on rec.boats? What
about someone who, among other things, posts for DAYS, not saying
anything else but "Harry, you are a ****ing liar". Is THAT something
that is positive to the group? It goes on and on. I don't know how
anyone in their right mind could blame one person for the downfall of a
newsgroup.


I thought you promised to stop the insults and personal attacks Kevin.

To the point you obviously missed: Harry Krause has managed to write
21,000 OT posts to this NG, all with flames, name calling and personal
attacks.

When you can find 21,000 OT posts of me doing the same, please post them.

Got it?

And Kevin wonders why he is still the "King"

On Thu, 7 Apr 2005 14:29:25 -0400, "JimH" wrote:


"basskisser" wrote in message
roups.com...

JimH wrote:
"basskisser" wrote in message
oups.com...

JimH wrote:
"basskisser" wrote in message
oups.com...

JimH wrote:
"Ralf Header" wrote in
message
...

that you single-handedly turned rec.boats into wrecked.boats.
Is
that true
asshole? Do you post OT? Are you a left wing faggot?




According to the percentage given by Gene Kearns, Harry Krause
has
made
almost 21,000 OT/off topic posts to this forum. Not any one
person
even
comes close.

Yes, he single-handedly ruined this NG.

Do you really think that?

Yes.

He posts with anger and hatred towards those he disagrees with.

What about YOUR posts "with anger and hatred toward those you
disagree
with"?
How about NOYB's?
How about Fritz's?
How about JohnH's?

Do you need examples?


Yes, about 21,000 of them please.

Why would it take 21,000 of them? Are you that thick headed or
something, Jim? Does it take 21,000 posts for you to make an informed
decision? Now, I'll ask again, in a different manner, perhaps you'll
get it. You said that you feel that Harry single handedly ruined this
newsgroup because of his "posts with anger and hatred toward those he
disagrees with", correct?

That is correct.

So, let's take a couple of other examples. If
Harry is so bad, then what about someone, who, let's just say, posts
out and out lie after lie about another member....KNOWINGLY lying about
that person.

Um...thats what Krause does.

Do you think that would have a negative or positive affect
on the newsgroup? What about someone who stalks another person, never
offering the slightest bit of interesting or factual matter, but
instead berates, lies, and indulges in petty, childish name calling.

Krause again.

Would you say THAT person has a negative of positive affect on the
newsgroup?

Negitive.

What about someone who, if anything is said by someone of
the liberal bent, instantly jumps to attention, and without any facts
or information, simply bashes them for being left-leaning, then works
hard to inform the group that he is the best there ever was at
anything, lives in the best house ever built, in the best place on
earth.

Sounds like you are discribing him. :)

Would you say THAT was a positive influence on rec.boats? What
about someone who, among other things, posts for DAYS, not saying
anything else but "Harry, you are a ****ing liar". Is THAT something
that is positive to the group?

Well...fact is...Krause IS a liar, and he sure post more OT here than
anyone else. At least he used to. :)

It goes on and on. I don't know how
anyone in their right mind could blame one person for the downfall of a
newsgroup.

Its pretty easy. I would agree Krause is the #1 reason this group
sucks as it is...he has the least to contribute, and the most to offer
off-topic. And the facts that he is a liar, boatless, and a
coward...that plays into it too.

Gee...now I remebered why I kill filed you... :)