OT Bill and Fritz, an official reply from Labatt
 

To prove that I am right, and you two aren't, I emailed Labatt, and
asked their take on the Labatt vs. Labatt's issue. As you know, you two
claim that Labatt's is correct. I've stated it hasn't been correct
since the 70's. Anyway, this should steam you two!:

Thank you for your e-mail Curtis and taking the time to leave us your
comments. Our corporate name becomes more one language without the "s"

and
can be used in a consistent manner for French language communication
activities. This issue became more significant when we acquired
breweries
in Italy in the late 1970's and more recently as we expanded our
presence in
Mexico and other South American countries. All of our Labatt products
as of 1970's do not have the 's, and the registered trademark of our
various beers and ales is Labatt. As Labatt's was officially changed to
Labatt, it is no longer part of our registered trademark agreements.


Regards,

Yvette
Labatt Customer Service

-----Original Message-----
From: ]
Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 3:52 AM
To:
Subject: Curtis has a Labatt Web Site: Request


realname: Curtis
01-street:
02-city: Smyrna
03-province: Georgia
04-country: US
05-othercountry:
06-code:
email:
07-phone:
08-fax:
subject: Labatt Web Site: Request
10-comments: Hi, I'd like to know about the name change from Labatt's
Blue,
to Labatt Blue, without the 's. Someone in a newsgroup I belong to
contends
that it is Labatt's, I say it's not. Your bottle label proves that,
but,
he's pretty dumb, so I thought that if he heard it from the horse's
mouth,
so to speak.....

Do you know what I thought of when I read this? A little kid bending
forwards, sticking his tongue out and saying NA-NA-NA-NA-NA.

But glad you were finally able to get this thing squared away in your mind
so you can move on already.

"JimH" wrote in message
...
Do you know what I thought of when I read this? A little kid bending
forward, sticking his tongue out and saying NA-NA-NA-NA-NA.

But glad you were finally able to get this thing squared away in your mind
so you can move on already.


Edit...'forward'...not 'forwards'.

On Fri, 1 Apr 2005 16:52:26 -0500, "JimH" wrote:

Do you know what I thought of when I read this? A little kid bending
forwards, sticking his tongue out and saying NA-NA-NA-NA-NA.

But glad you were finally able to get this thing squared away in your mind
so you can move on already.


I'll bet you could make up a better email from Labatt explaining why it's really
Labatt's!
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

realname: Curtis
01-street:
02-city: Smyrna
03-province: Georgia
04-country: US
05-othercountry:
06-code:

Why not use your real name, Kevin Noble?

"JimH" wrote in message
...
Do you know what I thought of when I read this? A little kid bending
forwards, sticking his tongue out and saying NA-NA-NA-NA-NA.

But glad you were finally able to get this thing squared away in your
mind
so you can move on already.




Since asslicker has long been killfiled I have no idea what he
said...though I can guess it,
The fact is that Labatt's is commonly still used has I proved in numerous
links, unlike his supposed "cow down" or 'schnapps = whiskey' or his degree
from Ga. Tech.

JimH wrote:
Do you know what I thought of when I read this? A little kid bending

forwards, sticking his tongue out and saying NA-NA-NA-NA-NA.

But glad you were finally able to get this thing squared away in your
mind
so you can move on already.

After all of the petty, childish name calling that Fritz does? After
the repeated attacks by Fritz and Bill on this very issue? After they
BOTH called me and idiot, said I was stupid, etc. over this very issue?

P. Fritz wrote:
"JimH" wrote in message
...
Do you know what I thought of when I read this? A little kid
bending
forwards, sticking his tongue out and saying NA-NA-NA-NA-NA.

But glad you were finally able to get this thing squared away in
your
mind
so you can move on already.




Since asslicker has long been killfiled I have no idea what he
said...though I can guess it,
The fact is that Labatt's is commonly still used has I proved in
numerous
links, unlike his supposed "cow down" or 'schnapps = whiskey' or his
degree
from Ga. Tech.

So, I take it you don't even believe the response DIRECTLY FROM
LABATT???? I suppose you'll call THEM idiots, and say THEY don't know
what they are talking about?? I gave you the entire response, Fritz.
Please don't tell me that you aren't smart enough to realize that you
were wrong. Killfiled, huh? Then why is it that you respond to every
single post I make????

Trevor wrote:
realname: Curtis
01-street:
02-city: Smyrna
03-province: Georgia
04-country: US
05-othercountry:
06-code:

Why not use your real name, Kevin Noble?

Hehe, been listening to others here too much, I see.

John H wrote:
On Fri, 1 Apr 2005 16:52:26 -0500, "JimH" wrote:

Do you know what I thought of when I read this? A little kid
bending
forwards, sticking his tongue out and saying NA-NA-NA-NA-NA.

But glad you were finally able to get this thing squared away in
your mind
so you can move on already.


I'll bet you could make up a better email from Labatt explaining why
it's really
Labatt's!
--
John H

Hmm, why don't YOU do this John? YOU email Labatt, it's easy go to
http://www.labatt.com Notice, no 's'. There is a place to contact them.
You can either phone them, or email them. YOU ask them. You'll get the
same response!

John H wrote:
On Fri, 1 Apr 2005 16:52:26 -0500, "JimH" wrote:

Do you know what I thought of when I read this? A little kid
bending
forwards, sticking his tongue out and saying NA-NA-NA-NA-NA.

But glad you were finally able to get this thing squared away in
your mind
so you can move on already.


I'll bet you could make up a better email from Labatt explaining why
it's really
Labatt's!
--
John H

John, here's the complete header. Are you trying to say I'm lying? You
give it a try!

Authentication-Results: mta208.mail.dcn.yahoo.com from=labatt.com;
domainkeys=neutral (no sig)
X-Originating-IP: [207.61.44.236]
Return-Path:
Received: from 207.61.44.236 (EHLO smtpmx1.labatt.com) (207.61.44.236)
by mta208.mail.dcn.yahoo.com with SMTP; Fri, 01 Apr 2005 07:55:33 -0800

Received: from NALDNMX1.na.interbrew.net ([172.20.71.41]) by
smtpmx1.labatt.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Fri, 1 Apr
2005 10:55:41 -0500
Received: by naldnmx1.na.interbrew.net with Internet Mail Service
(5.5.2653.19) id G5DFJLNZ; Fri, 1 Apr 2005 10:54:32 -0500
Message-ID:
23188AA6AA75144486BDBE8CE75E9E5402EAFD41@nahfxms1 .na.interbrew.net
From: "LCS Internet Mail" Add to Address Book
To: '" , "LCS Internet Mail"

Subject: Curtis has a Labatt Web Site: Request
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2005 10:54:26 -0500
Return-Receipt-To: LCS Internet Mail
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-Path:
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 Apr 2005 15:55:41.0187 (UTC)
FILETIME=[4152C530:01C536D3]
Content-Length: 684

Kevin,
It was you who used the email address of

"basskisser" wrote in message
oups.com...

Trevor wrote:
realname: Curtis
01-street:
02-city: Smyrna
03-province: Georgia
04-country: US
05-othercountry:
06-code:

Why not use your real name, Kevin Noble?

Hehe, been listening to others here too much, I see.

Dr. Dr. K.G. Sherlock wrote:
Kevin,
It was you who used the email address of

so? Do you have a point you're trying to make?

"basskisser" wrote in message
oups.com...

Trevor wrote:
realname: Curtis
01-street:
02-city: Smyrna
03-province: Georgia
04-country: US
05-othercountry:
06-code:

Why not use your real name, Kevin Noble?

Hehe, been listening to others here too much, I see.

Yes, my point is you are Kevin noble . ; )


"basskisser" wrote in message
oups.com...

Dr. Dr. K.G. Sherlock wrote:
Kevin,
It was you who used the email address of

so? Do you have a point you're trying to make?

"basskisser" wrote in message
oups.com...

Trevor wrote:
realname: Curtis
01-street:
02-city: Smyrna
03-province: Georgia
04-country: US
05-othercountry:
06-code:

Why not use your real name, Kevin Noble?

Hehe, been listening to others here too much, I see.

"Dr. Dr. K.G. Sherlock" wrote in message
...
Yes, my point is you are Kevin noble . ; )

asslicker playing stupid once again.......why is that not a surprise?



"basskisser" wrote in message
oups.com...

Dr. Dr. K.G. Sherlock wrote:
Kevin,
It was you who used the email address of

so? Do you have a point you're trying to make?

"basskisser" wrote in message
oups.com...

Trevor wrote:
realname: Curtis
01-street:
02-city: Smyrna
03-province: Georgia
04-country: US
05-othercountry:
06-code:

Why not use your real name, Kevin Noble?

Hehe, been listening to others here too much, I see.

On 4 Apr 2005 04:47:38 -0700, "basskisser" wrote:


JimH wrote:
Do you know what I thought of when I read this? A little kid bending

forwards, sticking his tongue out and saying NA-NA-NA-NA-NA.

But glad you were finally able to get this thing squared away in your
mind
so you can move on already.

After all of the petty, childish name calling that Fritz does? After
the repeated attacks by Fritz and Bill on this very issue? After they
BOTH called me and idiot, said I was stupid, etc. over this very issue?


Speaking of name-calling, basskisser, do you remember this famous post?

**************************************
On 2 Mar 2005 12:07:35 -0800, wrote:


And all of the conservatives here are lying ****ing pigs, just like
you, liar.
********************************

That was a jewel.
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

On 4 Apr 2005 04:52:59 -0700, "basskisser" wrote:


John H wrote:
On Fri, 1 Apr 2005 16:52:26 -0500, "JimH" wrote:

Do you know what I thought of when I read this? A little kid
bending
forwards, sticking his tongue out and saying NA-NA-NA-NA-NA.

But glad you were finally able to get this thing squared away in
your mind
so you can move on already.


I'll bet you could make up a better email from Labatt explaining why
it's really
Labatt's!
--
John H

Hmm, why don't YOU do this John? YOU email Labatt, it's easy go to
http://www.labatt.com Notice, no 's'. There is a place to contact them.
You can either phone them, or email them. YOU ask them. You'll get the
same response!

Why?
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

On 4 Apr 2005 05:21:09 -0700, "basskisser" wrote:


John H wrote:
On Fri, 1 Apr 2005 16:52:26 -0500, "JimH" wrote:

Do you know what I thought of when I read this? A little kid
bending
forwards, sticking his tongue out and saying NA-NA-NA-NA-NA.

But glad you were finally able to get this thing squared away in
your mind
so you can move on already.


I'll bet you could make up a better email from Labatt explaining why
it's really
Labatt's!
--
John H

John, here's the complete header. Are you trying to say I'm lying? You
give it a try!

Why?
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

P.Fritz wrote:
"Dr. Dr. K.G. Sherlock" wrote in message

...
Yes, my point is you are Kevin noble . ; )

asslicker playing stupid once again.......why is that not a surprise?

I thought you had me killfiled? If so, why do you stalk me?

John H wrote:
On 4 Apr 2005 04:52:59 -0700, "basskisser"
wrote:


John H wrote:
On Fri, 1 Apr 2005 16:52:26 -0500, "JimH" wrote:

Do you know what I thought of when I read this? A little kid
bending
forwards, sticking his tongue out and saying NA-NA-NA-NA-NA.

But glad you were finally able to get this thing squared away in
your mind
so you can move on already.


I'll bet you could make up a better email from Labatt explaining
why
it's really
Labatt's!
--
John H

Hmm, why don't YOU do this John? YOU email Labatt, it's easy go to
http://www.labatt.com Notice, no 's'. There is a place to contact
them.
You can either phone them, or email them. YOU ask them. You'll get
the
same response!

Why?
--
John H

Because you've implied that the email I sent was "made up" by saying
this:
"I'll bet you could make up a better email from Labatt explaining why
it's really Labatt's!" I'll tell you one thing, you won't find anything
from the Labatt people that states that it's called "Labatt's". Only
from Fritz and Bill.

Dr. Dr. K.G. Sherlock wrote:
Yes, my point is you are Kevin noble . ; )

Think what you want! As a matter of fact, we can make this the end of
the discussion. It seems you've made your mind up, so have at it, just
let it be known that you've taken a wrong turn!

John H wrote:
On 4 Apr 2005 04:47:38 -0700, "basskisser"
wrote:


JimH wrote:
Do you know what I thought of when I read this? A little kid
bending

forwards, sticking his tongue out and saying NA-NA-NA-NA-NA.

But glad you were finally able to get this thing squared away in
your
mind
so you can move on already.

After all of the petty, childish name calling that Fritz does? After
the repeated attacks by Fritz and Bill on this very issue? After
they
BOTH called me and idiot, said I was stupid, etc. over this very
issue?


Speaking of name-calling, basskisser, do you remember this famous
post?

**************************************
On 2 Mar 2005 12:07:35 -0800, wrote:


And all of the conservatives here are lying ****ing pigs, just like
you, liar.
Hmm, John, care to post the whole thing, so it can be taken in context?
And, do you remember when you posted hundreds of posts saying nothing
but "Harry, you are a ****ing liar"? Do you remember THOSE famous
posts? One right after the other, for days?

Kevin,
I would be curious why did you decide on using as your
gmail address. I would assume the gmail address is your throw away address,
and most experts recommend not using your real name for throw away email
accounts.


"basskisser" wrote in message
oups.com...

Dr. Dr. K.G. Sherlock wrote:
Yes, my point is you are Kevin noble . ; )

Think what you want! As a matter of fact, we can make this the end of
the discussion. It seems you've made your mind up, so have at it, just
let it be known that you've taken a wrong turn!

I did not call you stupid over this. Maybe ignorant. I pointed out it was
a possessive "s" and you went ballistic as usual.

"basskisser" wrote in message
oups.com...

JimH wrote:
Do you know what I thought of when I read this? A little kid bending

forwards, sticking his tongue out and saying NA-NA-NA-NA-NA.

But glad you were finally able to get this thing squared away in your
mind
so you can move on already.

After all of the petty, childish name calling that Fritz does? After
the repeated attacks by Fritz and Bill on this very issue? After they
BOTH called me and idiot, said I was stupid, etc. over this very issue?

On 4 Apr 2005 10:59:47 -0700, "basskisser" wrote:


John H wrote:
On 4 Apr 2005 04:52:59 -0700, "basskisser"
wrote:


John H wrote:
On Fri, 1 Apr 2005 16:52:26 -0500, "JimH" wrote:

Do you know what I thought of when I read this? A little kid
bending
forwards, sticking his tongue out and saying NA-NA-NA-NA-NA.

But glad you were finally able to get this thing squared away in
your mind
so you can move on already.


I'll bet you could make up a better email from Labatt explaining
why
it's really
Labatt's!
--
John H

Hmm, why don't YOU do this John? YOU email Labatt, it's easy go to
http://www.labatt.com Notice, no 's'. There is a place to contact
them.
You can either phone them, or email them. YOU ask them. You'll get
the
same response!

Why?
--
John H

Because you've implied that the email I sent was "made up" by saying
this:
"I'll bet you could make up a better email from Labatt explaining why
it's really Labatt's!" I'll tell you one thing, you won't find anything
from the Labatt people that states that it's called "Labatt's". Only
from Fritz and Bill.

You're getting your implications mixed up. I 'suggested' that someone could make
up and email...

I said nothing about 'your' email.
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

On 4 Apr 2005 11:03:26 -0700, "basskisser" wrote:


John H wrote:
On 4 Apr 2005 04:47:38 -0700, "basskisser"
wrote:


JimH wrote:
Do you know what I thought of when I read this? A little kid
bending

forwards, sticking his tongue out and saying NA-NA-NA-NA-NA.

But glad you were finally able to get this thing squared away in
your
mind
so you can move on already.

After all of the petty, childish name calling that Fritz does? After
the repeated attacks by Fritz and Bill on this very issue? After
they
BOTH called me and idiot, said I was stupid, etc. over this very
issue?


Speaking of name-calling, basskisser, do you remember this famous
post?

**************************************
On 2 Mar 2005 12:07:35 -0800, wrote:


And all of the conservatives here are lying ****ing pigs, just like
you, liar.
Hmm, John, care to post the whole thing, so it can be taken in context?
And, do you remember when you posted hundreds of posts saying nothing
but "Harry, you are a ****ing liar"? Do you remember THOSE famous
posts? One right after the other, for days?

And I apologized to the group for my stupidity. Remember?

Why would the context of the message, from only one person, be important? You
called a whole bunch of people a name with one post. It's a classic, especially
from one who is so often castigating others for name-calling.
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

"Just Me" wrote in message
...
Kevin,
I would be curious why did you decide on using as your
gmail address. I would assume the gmail address is your throw away
address, and most experts recommend not using your real name for throw
away email accounts.


"basskisser" wrote in message
oups.com...

Dr. Dr. K.G. Sherlock wrote:
Yes, my point is you are Kevin noble . ; )

Think what you want! As a matter of fact, we can make this the end of
the discussion. It seems you've made your mind up, so have at it, just
let it be known that you've taken a wrong turn!




Asslicker....aka Kevin Noble..........needs to learn that denial is not a
river in Egypt.

"Calif Bill" wrote in message
.net...
I did not call you stupid over this. Maybe ignorant. I pointed out it was
a possessive "s" and you went ballistic as usual.

"basskisser" wrote in message
oups.com...

JimH wrote:
Do you know what I thought of when I read this? A little kid bending

forwards, sticking his tongue out and saying NA-NA-NA-NA-NA.

But glad you were finally able to get this thing squared away in your
mind
so you can move on already.

After all of the petty, childish name calling that Fritz does? After
the repeated attacks by Fritz and Bill on this very issue? After they
BOTH called me and idiot, said I was stupid, etc. over this very issue?



I said he was an idiot for his lame flame attempts........."Labatt's" is
commonly used in advertising to this day by liquor stores, restaurants,
etc..........unlike his misuse of 'kow tow ' as 'cow down' or his ignorant
claim that schnapps is whiskey.

"John H" wrote in message
...
On 4 Apr 2005 11:03:26 -0700, "basskisser" wrote:


John H wrote:
On 4 Apr 2005 04:47:38 -0700, "basskisser"
wrote:


JimH wrote:
Do you know what I thought of when I read this? A little kid
bending

forwards, sticking his tongue out and saying NA-NA-NA-NA-NA.

But glad you were finally able to get this thing squared away in
your
mind
so you can move on already.

After all of the petty, childish name calling that Fritz does? After
the repeated attacks by Fritz and Bill on this very issue? After
they
BOTH called me and idiot, said I was stupid, etc. over this very
issue?


Speaking of name-calling, basskisser, do you remember this famous
post?

**************************************
On 2 Mar 2005 12:07:35 -0800, wrote:


And all of the conservatives here are lying ****ing pigs, just like
you, liar.
Hmm, John, care to post the whole thing, so it can be taken in context?
And, do you remember when you posted hundreds of posts saying nothing
but "Harry, you are a ****ing liar"? Do you remember THOSE famous
posts? One right after the other, for days?

And I apologized to the group for my stupidity. Remember?

Why would the context of the message, from only one person, be important?
You
called a whole bunch of people a name with one post. It's a classic,
especially
from one who is so often castigating others for name-calling.

John.......why bother debating a tree stump?


--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

On Mon, 4 Apr 2005 16:02:45 -0400, "P.Fritz"
wrote:


"John H" wrote in message
.. .
On 4 Apr 2005 11:03:26 -0700, "basskisser" wrote:


John H wrote:
On 4 Apr 2005 04:47:38 -0700, "basskisser"
wrote:


JimH wrote:
Do you know what I thought of when I read this? A little kid
bending

forwards, sticking his tongue out and saying NA-NA-NA-NA-NA.

But glad you were finally able to get this thing squared away in
your
mind
so you can move on already.

After all of the petty, childish name calling that Fritz does? After
the repeated attacks by Fritz and Bill on this very issue? After
they
BOTH called me and idiot, said I was stupid, etc. over this very
issue?


Speaking of name-calling, basskisser, do you remember this famous
post?

**************************************
On 2 Mar 2005 12:07:35 -0800, wrote:


And all of the conservatives here are lying ****ing pigs, just like
you, liar.
Hmm, John, care to post the whole thing, so it can be taken in context?
And, do you remember when you posted hundreds of posts saying nothing
but "Harry, you are a ****ing liar"? Do you remember THOSE famous
posts? One right after the other, for days?

And I apologized to the group for my stupidity. Remember?

Why would the context of the message, from only one person, be important?
You
called a whole bunch of people a name with one post. It's a classic,
especially
from one who is so often castigating others for name-calling.

John.......why bother debating a tree stump?

Just 'cause.

--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

"John H" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 4 Apr 2005 16:02:45 -0400, "P.Fritz"

wrote:


"John H" wrote in message
. ..
On 4 Apr 2005 11:03:26 -0700, "basskisser" wrote:


John H wrote:
On 4 Apr 2005 04:47:38 -0700, "basskisser"
wrote:


JimH wrote:
Do you know what I thought of when I read this? A little kid
bending

forwards, sticking his tongue out and saying NA-NA-NA-NA-NA.

But glad you were finally able to get this thing squared away in
your
mind
so you can move on already.

After all of the petty, childish name calling that Fritz does?
After
the repeated attacks by Fritz and Bill on this very issue? After
they
BOTH called me and idiot, said I was stupid, etc. over this very
issue?


Speaking of name-calling, basskisser, do you remember this famous
post?

**************************************
On 2 Mar 2005 12:07:35 -0800, wrote:


And all of the conservatives here are lying ****ing pigs, just like
you, liar.
Hmm, John, care to post the whole thing, so it can be taken in
context?
And, do you remember when you posted hundreds of posts saying nothing
but "Harry, you are a ****ing liar"? Do you remember THOSE famous
posts? One right after the other, for days?

And I apologized to the group for my stupidity. Remember?

Why would the context of the message, from only one person, be
important?
You
called a whole bunch of people a name with one post. It's a classic,
especially
from one who is so often castigating others for name-calling.

John.......why bother debating a tree stump?

Just 'cause.


LMAO

--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."