Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#33
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 04 Feb 2004 18:33:21 GMT, "Calif Bill"
wrote: "Rosalie B." wrote in message .. . x-no-archive:yes Larry Weiss wrote: I understand that it is against maritime law to restrict or prohibit waterway access. Anyone know if this is true and/or what the law actually says, and where it may be found? Larry Weiss "...Ever After!" "a little after..." I think this depends a lot on where it is you are talking about. For one thing, what country? And why would you think maritime law had jurisdiction? I would have thought that ordinary laws applied in most inland or near coastal waters. I don't think maritime law applies to an ordinary creek or lake or something like that. No one has to allow someone else to cross their property to launch a boat for instance, or to allow people to come ashore by dinghy and party on the beach that they own. But there is some law in Annapolis (Maryland) that says something to the effect that any street that ends in the water has to allow dinghies to land. I think that is far from usual though. I think in many cases, beaches are public from the high tide mark seaward. And in some cases, all of the beach part is public. In some cases, the Coast Guard has jurisdiction, like in the ICW. I walked up on the Boot Key Harbor bridge today, and the bridge tender came out and talked a bit. He said the Coast Guard had jurisdiction - that the channel was part of the ICW (I'm not sure that he's right about that) and that they said the bridge had to be manned 24 hours a day 7 days a week so that access could be maintained. I asked him why not leave the bridge open at night, and he said that if they did that the emergency people couldn't get to the radio tower on Boot Key. USCG also patrols lots of inland waters. Great Lakes, Lake Tahoe, and most of the large river systems. At least in California, if the waterway is navigable then you can not block it. This does not mean someone has to let you across their property to get to the water. About 30 years ago, Butte Creek in Central Calif was blocked by the farmers running fences across the small river. Was a great fishing and duck hunting venue. Local judge floated down the river in a canoe, cutting the fences. He ruled it was a navigable waterway, and could not be blocked. Seems as if local area do list some areas as enviromentallay special areas and block boat access. Latest is the City of Berkeley and the waterfront commission has ruled (couple of weeks ago) out boat and people access to some coves on San Francisco Bay. These coves have been fished and even hunted for as long as I have known them. I fished them 50 years ago from the shore. May be court dates in the future for this. But may not be anybody with enough money to fight the city, so they win anyway. Berkeley - figures. ;) Anyway, there is precidence and "prior practice" here for somebody with half a mind to take the city to court. Later, Tom S. Woodstock, CT ---------- "I thought I'd just go fishin', but the fish were not amused. And I caught myself just wishin' that I was in the fishes shoes. Just swimmin' in some deep blue water not a care in my head, watchin' some fool with a line and a pole hidin' by the riverbed." Joe Ely, "Back To My Old Molehill" - "Flatlanders, Wheels of Fortune - 2004" |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Anyone familiar with Sears Sea-Vee 15' fibreglass? | General |