![]() |
OT - Demonstrably Stupid
Demonstrably Stupid
Some people say human death seems to come in threes. They delight in citing examples. Recently, Johnny Cochran, the "if the glove doesn't fit, you must acquit" lawyer who got murderer O.J. Simpson acquitted, died. Number two is Terri Schiavo, the cortex-deprived woman who, after fifteen years in a vegetative state, recently was granted her wish to not be kept alive by artificial means. Now, we hear Pope John Paul is experiencing heart failure and is gravely ill. His death will likely render a pair three of a kind in some people's minds. Never mind that the three coincidentally died within days of each other, many people will still claim that famous people die in threes. There is commonality in the coincidence, however. What all three deaths have in common is stupid people use these three individuals to publicly demonstrate their stupidity, to push their politics and to foster more stupidity. In the case of Johnny Cochran, stupid jurors were responsible for his fame. Mr. Cochran and O.J. Simpson were fortunate to have been the beneficiary of a half-dozen cretins with more chimpanzee genes than human sitting in the jury box and a culture of African American bias and ignorance at a bonobo cranial capacity level. We had the politics of culture bias and reverse discrimination against a murdered white woman. Terri Schiavo inspired the mass insanity of thousands of right-wingers who, share with liberal, failed Vice Presidential candidate, John Edwards, the belief that Terri, like Christopher Reeves, would be up and walking if it weren't for conservative judges, and the liberal culture of death. Nonsensical and stupid! We see the politics of liberal vs. conservative. When the Pope goes to his reward, stupid people will say all sorts of stupid Things, not the least among them, the idiocy that the Pope's death proves famous people die in threes. We will see the politics of church vs. state. Dear reader, let's get to the heart of the matter. We see increasing strife the world over. It seems to be particularly rampant in the U.S.A. and we've even seen more than our fair share of it here in a sailing newsgroup. We now have this red state/blue state mentality couching stupidity in political terms. There is a divide in the U.S.A. But, make no mistake, it's NOT a political divide. It's an intelligence divide. It is the stupid vs. the intelligent. It's only stupid people who believe the death of famous people comes in threes. Only stupid people believe those with severed spinal chords and cortexes of Jell-O will walk again in contemporary times. Only stupid idiots think famous deaths come in threes, politics explain everything, being simple-minded is a virtue, being mindless is human, being stupid is something to brag about and censorship is a right. Respectfully, Capt. Neal "It is my opinion that a man should not mince words just to spare the sensibilities of the thin-skinned or the ignorant." --Capt. Neal® |
Capt Neal, (Master of a Troller), had the balz to write:
In the case of Johnny Cochran, stupid jurors were responsible for his fame. Mr. Cochran and O.J. Simpson were fortunate to have been the beneficiary of a half-dozen cretins with more chimpanzee genes than human sitting in the jury box and a culture of African American bias and ignorance at a bonobo cranial capacity level. We had the politics of culture bias and reverse discrimination against a murdered white woman. **** .....Proving beyond a shadow of a doubt that while famous people may "die in threes", hateful bigots post one at a time. |
On Fri, 1 Apr 2005 12:00:22 -0500, Capt. Neal®
wrote: Demonstrably Stupid In the case of Johnny Cochran, stupid jurors were responsible for his fame. .... Respectfully, Capt. Neal Cochran was a respected civil rights lawyer who acted for poor black people - often when nobody else would - earlier in his career. I count that as a countervailing factor, just as I see a former President's Habitat house-building as a saving grace too. Brian W |
I thought it was a great rant! How come everybody who has an opinion is
a "hateful bigot"? Lighten up! |
|
wrote in message oups.com... I thought it was a great rant! How come everybody who has an opinion is a "hateful bigot"? Lighten up! Now, here's one intelligent person, at least. CN |
I thought it was a great rant! How come everybody who has an opinion is
a "hateful bigot"? Lighten up! ************* Of course everybody with an opinion is not a hateful bigot. However, any person who would describe a fellow human being as genetically closer to a chimpanzee than to a man is expressing an opinion that unquestionably places him or her in the "hateful bigot" category. |
I read in Scientific American that chimpanzees' DNA is 94% the same as
humans'. So, if humans waver as little as minus 4% in their DNA, well... pass the bananas. (And if you follow the debates in the Ontario legislature, you know what I mean.) Cheers! |
wrote in message ups.com... I read in Scientific American that chimpanzees' DNA is 94% the same as humans'. So, if humans waver as little as minus 4% in their DNA, well... pass the bananas. (And if you follow the debates in the Ontario legislature, you know what I mean.) Cheers! Try not to believe every thing you read. If so, you will become demonstrability stupid. Somewhat like another citizen of you fine country, with a propensity of sailing to Cuba. |
|
"akheel" wrote in message ... snipped spelling lesson and there are a dozen people on a crimianl jury, not a half-dozen. Reading comprehension a wee bit lacking. A half-dozen were Negroes. As for studpidity, there's nothing I can do about that. Apparently so . . . CN |
"WaIIy" wrote in message ... On Fri, 1 Apr 2005 12:00:22 -0500, Capt. Neal® wrote: There is a divide in the U.S.A. But, make no mistake, it's NOT a political divide. It's an intelligence divide. It is the stupid vs. the intelligent. I admire deep thinkers like you. Why, thank you! CN |
On Sat, 02 Apr 2005 14:36:43 -0500, Harry Krause wrote:
I don't keep as close watch on the idiots as I used to...is Neal one of the demonstrably stupid JaxAssby's nom de plumes? Nope, the Cedar Bucket is presumably a different person. There is a major flame war going on over at alt.sailing.asa, his usual haunt. There is no telling his reasons for posting here. |
On Sat, 02 Apr 2005 15:07:53 -0500, Harry Krause wrote:
Ah, thanks. I don't know which I am insulting by thinking their posts read alike, JaxAss or Neal. Hopefully, both. Uh...what's the "asa" suffix stand for in alt.sailing.asa? American Sailing Association, I believe. |
Now, THAT'S a hateful, bigoted, ass-brained remark. You ought to be
ashamed of yourself. I think the rest of us are working on a much higher intellectual level than you. So why don't you just be quiet and go polish your jack boots? GMD Capt. Neal=AE wrote: Reading comprehension a wee bit lacking. A half-dozen were Negroes. |
On Sat, 02 Apr 2005 13:08:36 -0800, gkmd wrote:
Now, THAT'S a hateful, bigoted, ass-brained remark. You ought to be ashamed of yourself. I think the rest of us are working on a much higher intellectual level than you. So why don't you just be quiet and go polish your jack boots? Guy, you have been trolled by the master baiter. http://groups-beta.google.com/groups?q=%22capt.+neal%22 |
Gene,
Your grandmother was very wise. Paul Gene Kearns wrote: snipped as my wise grandmother advised me, "It is better to remain quiet if you have nothing good to say." snipped |
wrote in message oups.com... Now, THAT'S a hateful, bigoted, ass-brained remark. You ought to be ashamed of yourself. I think the rest of us are working on a much higher intellectual level than you. So why don't you just be quiet and go polish your jack boots? Since when are the facts bigotted and hateful? CN Capt. Neal® wrote: Reading comprehension a wee bit lacking. A half-dozen were Negroes. |
On Fri, 01 Apr 2005 13:17:30 -0500, HaKrause
wrote: Brian Whatcott wrote: On Fri, 1 Apr 2005 12:00:22 -0500, Capt. Neal® wrote: Demonstrably Stupid In the case of Johnny Cochran, stupid jurors were responsible for his fame. ... Respectfully, Capt. Neal Cochran was a respected civil rights lawyer who acted for poor black people - often when nobody else would - earlier in his career. I count that as a countervailing factor, just as I see a former President's Habitat house-building as a saving grace too. Brian W Cochran was a first-class criminal defense attorney who did his job well, and with style. The job of a criminal defense attorney is to defend his/her clients. The guilt or innocence of those clients is not relevant, nor should it be. OJ killed Nicole. Incompetent prosecutors and crooked cops made Cochran's job easier. If you are curious about our criminal justice system, check out the number of poor people accused of murder, convicted and sentenced who are now being released on the basis of DNA evidence. I wonder how many of those convicted of murder but actually innocent our society has put to death? Probably about the same ratio as those guilty of a crime and set free on a "technicality"...... Dave |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:00 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com