On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 17:40:04 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
.. .


Chuck, I posted the mission of the forces. Which part of the mission is a
crock
of crap?
--
John H

Since you keep repeating yourself, I'm assuming you're home with a high
fever, and as a result, you're delirious today. I'd like to confirm what
your question is before answering it.

"Which part of the mission is a crock of crap?"

You typed that, and it ended with a question mark. Therefore, we'll assume
that is your question.

The answer:
The entire mission is a crock of crap. Democracy in Iraq is of no
consequence to us. If it was meant to reach that stage in the future, it
would have done so in due time. No WMDs were found, OBL was allowed to
escape, and as Chuck has pointed out, your president's sitters have told him
to align himself with Pakistan, which has been, and will continue to be
rattling sabres at India, a nation which has possessed nuclear weapons for
quite some time. As a whole, the mission is questionable because the primary
benefit thus far has been to guarantee Cheney a job at the end of his next
term.


Just as the other one, you are not addressing the mission of the military to
which Chuck referred.

You are addressing politics, results of actions, and your political feelings.
None of that has to do with my question to Chuck.
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."