Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"no one" wrote in message ...
Yes, you found the website too. I'm looking for good price performance mods, not a marketing term. The center-bolt cylinder heads on GM V8's have a large wall in the intake port. It is easily visible with the intake manifold removed. This wall improved low end torque and emissions but is a huge restriction at higher RPM's. The new "Vortec" engines have performance heads without the intake restrictions and a heart shaped combustion chamber. I don't know if your motor has Vortec heads or not. I'm pretty sure the Mercruiser Scorpion engines did. These heads are very affordable and can make a significant performance improvement. Beware though, the Vortec intake port is slim and tall and doesn't match up well to intake manifolds not designed for them. Anyway, I found out some interesting stuff about MPFI from edlebrock I should share. Well, the local FI expert at edlebrock seems to think that since marine manifolds have dry areas, it's completely feasible (and has been done to extrodinary success) to place aftermarket MPFI systems on marine engines in a closed loop configuration - you simply sleeve the waterjacket with a larger hole down to the manifold itself and drill/tap a smaller hole for the sensor. An absolutely brilliant solution - Having a sensor looking at only one side of the motor is a compromise, but only a liability if it's out of tune in the first place, in which case the sensor's not gonna work or last in anycase. Now I got a lot of flak a couple months ago about using O2 sensors in marine applications ( a statement was made that O2 sensors are only valuable for emissions and catalyst health - which I personally do not agree with but am not in a position to argue) Comments on closed loop aftermarket MPFI marine applications??? Why? What purpose would closed-loop serve?? The computer knows how much air is entering the engine (displacement x RPM x throttle openning x temp) it can easily be programmed to supply the correct amount of fuel without post combustion feedback. The feedback is neccessary only to trim the fuel to improve catalytic converter effectiveness. I'll admit some racers are experimenting with wide band 02's but I question why they are neccessary. "Tom Ruta" wrote in message ... On Tue, 27 Jan 2004 18:30:58 -0800, "no one" wrote: I called summit, they didn't stock anything called vortec... Vortec is a word GM used to describe a swirling of the intake gasses in the cylinder and combustion chamber - what specifically are you talking about? The name "Vortec" originated in the 1986 4.3L V-6 engine that used "vortex technology" to create a vortex inside the combustion chamber. GM Powertrain engineers incorporated this phenomenon into their engines to achieve a better air-to-fuel mixture in the combustion process. The result is what has now developed into Vortec engines -- engines that are designed to deliver plenty of horsepower without sacrificing fuel efficiency. While the technology has evolved over time, the design philosophy remains the same. Vortec engines deliver both power and efficiency, all in a low-maintenance, durable package. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
restore salvaged performance sport fish? | General | |||
Performance data | General |