|
Free preview of boating movie avail in selected cities
From Today's email:
(I think anybody who responds to the website is automatically invited) Dear Leader, Motive Marketing cordially invites you and a friend to a FREE advance screening of MADISON on March 19th @ 10am. This is the next film to star Jim Caviezel (The Passion of The Christ, Frequency, The Count of Monte Cristo), which will be released nationwide on April 22nd. MADISON is a father-son action drama based on the inspiring true story of the tiny, dying river town of Madison, Indiana and its legendary 1971 comeback race for the Gold cup in hydroplane boat racing. Led by a talented cast and combined with a powerful underdog story, this film is poised to become a family classic in the ranks of Miracle, Remember the Titans, and Hoosiers. Motive Marketing will be screening MADISON in selected cities to leaders in the community like yourself for an exclusive FREE first look at the film! For more info on the film please visit http://www.madisonthemovie.com To RSVP, please go to http://filmpr.com/madisonpress/rsvp SPACE IS LIMITED! SEATING AVAILABLE ON A FIRST-COME, FIRST-SERVED BASIS! RSVP REQUIRED! Screening Info: Saturday 3/19/05 @ 10AM Big Picture 2505 First Ave Seattle, WA 98121 21 & Older Facility Sincerely, Christof Meyer MOTIVE Entertainment __________________________________________________ ______________________ ABOUT MOTIVE MARKETING Motive Marketing (http://www.moviemarketing.biz) is a leader in the grass-roots marketing of films to the family and faith communities. We support films that strive to inspire, engage, enlighten and entertain. Motive believes that high quality entertainment can embody family friendly messages. For more information or to learn about other films we've partnered with, please visit our website. |
"HarryKrause" wrote in message ... Uh oh...methinks Chuck's post will result in yet another psychotic screed from the slut of the southern hemisphere. Karen is trying to be the 'perfect lady' lately.....she's unusually quiet. Chuck might have to look out for the Cleveland Crusader instead. |
I don't think anybody will have heartburn over an offer of free tickets
to a boating movie. Somebody is supposed to be making money when there's SPAM involved, right? |
Chuck might have to look out for the Cleveland Crusader instead.
************************* Bouncing ball sing-along: "Me and my shadow, strolling through the NG que....." |
wrote in message ups.com... Chuck might have to look out for the Cleveland Crusader instead. ************************* Bouncing ball sing-along: "Me and my shadow, strolling through the NG que....." Looks like it's just a circle jerk of you left wing idiots, huh? Enjoying the reach-arounds, are you? |
Jack Goff wrote:
Looks like it's just a circle jerk of you left wing idiots, huh? Enjoying the reach-arounds, are you? ****** Does that mean you *won't* be going to the movie? |
Would this qualify as a pig pile?
wrote in message ups.com... Chuck might have to look out for the Cleveland Crusader instead. ************************* Bouncing ball sing-along: "Me and my shadow, strolling through the NG que....." |
The bogus doctor quacked:
Would this qualify as a pig pile? ******************************************* Hard to say. I only e-hummed a few bars of "me and my shadow". Unless you know of somebody who would could be described as my shadow, how could that be insulting? Besides, I can't see where any comments were made about my shadow, pro or con, only that it followed me around. Doesn't your shadow do the same? I don't think any names were named, so do you think that shoe actually fits somebody? That would be surprising, indeed! If so, who would that be? I think Don referred to somebody as the Cleveland Crusader, but who would that be? The only NG poster that I know of who is living in Ohio for certain is my close friend JimH, and he lives in Avon Lake, Ohio- not Cleveland. Whom do you suppose Don had in mind? Harry did warn me that my special friend Karen of OZ was likely to weigh in with a negative remark or two because the name of the company giving away the free tickets was included in the email I reposted. If you check the thread, I believe you'll see that I told Harry that Karen shouldn't have a problem with something being given away absolutely free and with no strings attached...it's pretty hard to call that SPAM. I sort of defended her against Harry's remark- but I expect no particular thanks and that's a fact. So no, Doc. That's not a pig pile. A pig pile has to have a victim, does it not? No victim was named, no insults were posted (at least not by me), and if your imagination leads you to conclude that a specific person was at the bottom of the pile, you might want to ask yourself why you would draw such a conclusion. Whose behavior would be so singularly unique that you would just "assume" any negative comments must be directed at that person? Whose behavior would be so destructive that you would just "assume" the mere mention of a person's name or general description of the person's behavior would have to be an insult? I'll be waiting to hear just who you think fits the general description of my shadow, why you think that person would qualify, and why you believe that being called a shadow is insulting. Should prove interesting. At least then we'll have a clear idea of the identity of the party upon whom you feel we pig piled. :-) |
Kewl, Thanks for explaining the rules to me.
wrote in message oups.com... The bogus doctor quacked: Would this qualify as a pig pile? ******************************************* Hard to say. I only e-hummed a few bars of "me and my shadow". Unless you know of somebody who would could be described as my shadow, how could that be insulting? Besides, I can't see where any comments were made about my shadow, pro or con, only that it followed me around. Doesn't your shadow do the same? I don't think any names were named, so do you think that shoe actually fits somebody? That would be surprising, indeed! If so, who would that be? I think Don referred to somebody as the Cleveland Crusader, but who would that be? The only NG poster that I know of who is living in Ohio for certain is my close friend JimH, and he lives in Avon Lake, Ohio- not Cleveland. Whom do you suppose Don had in mind? Harry did warn me that my special friend Karen of OZ was likely to weigh in with a negative remark or two because the name of the company giving away the free tickets was included in the email I reposted. If you check the thread, I believe you'll see that I told Harry that Karen shouldn't have a problem with something being given away absolutely free and with no strings attached...it's pretty hard to call that SPAM. I sort of defended her against Harry's remark- but I expect no particular thanks and that's a fact. So no, Doc. That's not a pig pile. A pig pile has to have a victim, does it not? No victim was named, no insults were posted (at least not by me), and if your imagination leads you to conclude that a specific person was at the bottom of the pile, you might want to ask yourself why you would draw such a conclusion. Whose behavior would be so singularly unique that you would just "assume" any negative comments must be directed at that person? Whose behavior would be so destructive that you would just "assume" the mere mention of a person's name or general description of the person's behavior would have to be an insult? I'll be waiting to hear just who you think fits the general description of my shadow, why you think that person would qualify, and why you believe that being called a shadow is insulting. Should prove interesting. At least then we'll have a clear idea of the identity of the party upon whom you feel we pig piled. :-) |
Don White wrote:
"HarryKrause" wrote in message ... Uh oh...methinks Chuck's post will result in yet another psychotic screed from the slut of the southern hemisphere. Karen is trying to be the 'perfect lady' lately.....she's unusually quiet. Chuck might have to look out for the Cleveland Crusader instead. Just wanting a copy on my system & after all gormless Gould is the biggest spammer of rec.boats since... well since gormless Gould:-) K Krause's lie of the day is a bit of a double header sorry, but so many lies so little time:-) Whenever his total lack of any real boating knowledge looks like uncovering him as the sad little liar he is, he posts some crazy list of boats he claims are his base, here are just a few of his claims, he has tried to sustain these lies & as each one is shown to be a fabrication he just invents a new one, the latest is the "Parker". Don't feel conned nor stupid if you've been taken in by him, he make exactly the same lies up in the jet ski NGs when he used to pollute them with his crap, can you believe it he claimed to be a jet skier!!!!! (responsible & caring in the socialist way of course:-)) This idiot has never owned a boat & never will he is totally devoid of any boating experience nor knowledge, other than what he picks up in this NG & the occasional paid charter fishing trip. Here are some: Hatteras 43' sportfish Swan 41' racing/cruising sloop Morgan 33 O'Day 30 Cruisers, Inc., Mackinac 22 Century Coronado Bill Luders 16, as sweet a sailboat as ever caught a breeze. Century 19' wood lapstrake with side wheel steering Cruisers, Inc. 18' and 16' wood lapstrakes Wolverines. Molded plywood. Gorgeous. Several. 14,15,17 footers with various Evinrudes Lighting class sailboat Botved Coronet with twin 50 hp Evinrudes. Interesting boat. Aristocraft (a piece of junk...13', fast, held together with spit) Alcort Sunfish Ancarrow Marine Aquiflyer. 22' footer with two Caddy Crusaders. Guaranteed 60 mph. In the late 1950's. Skimmar brand skiff Arkansas Traveler fiberglass bowrider (I think it was a bowrider) Dyer Dhow Su-Mark round bilge runabout, fiberglass Penn Yan runabouts. Wood. Old Town wood and canvas canoe Old Town sailing canoe...different than above canoe I own the following boats: a 36' "lobster" style boat a 19' center console fishing boat an 11' inflatable dinghy 1/2 of a canoe Those are the types of boats I currently own. I'm also in the market for some interesting kind of lightweight flatbottomed skiff, similar to the old Skimmar, for the "new" 51-year-old 10 hp outboard I recently bought. One of the boats is kept on dry land within a half mile of Chesapeake Bay. One is kept at a private covered boat dock in a little creek off Chesapeake Bay. One is kept in the backyard of a friend who lives much closer to the Shenandoah River than I do. And one is kept next to the 36-footer." |
Just like a energizer bunny. Some people spew spam, or political posts and
then act indignant when they are called on the carpet. "K. Smith" wrote in message ... Don White wrote: "HarryKrause" wrote in message ... Uh oh...methinks Chuck's post will result in yet another psychotic screed from the slut of the southern hemisphere. Karen is trying to be the 'perfect lady' lately.....she's unusually quiet. Chuck might have to look out for the Cleveland Crusader instead. Just wanting a copy on my system & after all gormless Gould is the biggest spammer of rec.boats since... well since gormless Gould:-) K Krause's lie of the day is a bit of a double header sorry, but so many lies so little time:-) Whenever his total lack of any real boating knowledge looks like uncovering him as the sad little liar he is, he posts some crazy list of boats he claims are his base, here are just a few of his claims, he has tried to sustain these lies & as each one is shown to be a fabrication he just invents a new one, the latest is the "Parker". Don't feel conned nor stupid if you've been taken in by him, he make exactly the same lies up in the jet ski NGs when he used to pollute them with his crap, can you believe it he claimed to be a jet skier!!!!! (responsible & caring in the socialist way of course:-)) This idiot has never owned a boat & never will he is totally devoid of any boating experience nor knowledge, other than what he picks up in this NG & the occasional paid charter fishing trip. Here are some: Hatteras 43' sportfish Swan 41' racing/cruising sloop Morgan 33 O'Day 30 Cruisers, Inc., Mackinac 22 Century Coronado Bill Luders 16, as sweet a sailboat as ever caught a breeze. Century 19' wood lapstrake with side wheel steering Cruisers, Inc. 18' and 16' wood lapstrakes Wolverines. Molded plywood. Gorgeous. Several. 14,15,17 footers with various Evinrudes Lighting class sailboat Botved Coronet with twin 50 hp Evinrudes. Interesting boat. Aristocraft (a piece of junk...13', fast, held together with spit) Alcort Sunfish Ancarrow Marine Aquiflyer. 22' footer with two Caddy Crusaders. Guaranteed 60 mph. In the late 1950's. Skimmar brand skiff Arkansas Traveler fiberglass bowrider (I think it was a bowrider) Dyer Dhow Su-Mark round bilge runabout, fiberglass Penn Yan runabouts. Wood. Old Town wood and canvas canoe Old Town sailing canoe...different than above canoe I own the following boats: a 36' "lobster" style boat a 19' center console fishing boat an 11' inflatable dinghy 1/2 of a canoe Those are the types of boats I currently own. I'm also in the market for some interesting kind of lightweight flatbottomed skiff, similar to the old Skimmar, for the "new" 51-year-old 10 hp outboard I recently bought. One of the boats is kept on dry land within a half mile of Chesapeake Bay. One is kept at a private covered boat dock in a little creek off Chesapeake Bay. One is kept in the backyard of a friend who lives much closer to the Shenandoah River than I do. And one is kept next to the 36-footer." |
Dr. Dr. & Mr Karen Greer wrote:
Just like a energizer bunny. Some people spew spam, or political posts and then act indignant when they are called on the carpet. Spamming, OT, & non boating idiots the pair of them as far as I'm concerned. K Krause's lie of the day is a bit of a double header sorry, but so many lies so little time:-) Whenever his total lack of any real boating knowledge looks like uncovering him as the sad little liar he is, he posts some crazy list of boats he claims are his base, here are just a few of his claims, he has tried to sustain these lies & as each one is shown to be a fabrication he just invents a new one, the latest is the "Parker". Don't feel conned nor stupid if you've been taken in by him, he make exactly the same lies up in the jet ski NGs when he used to pollute them with his crap, can you believe it he claimed to be a jet skier!!!!! (responsible & caring in the socialist way of course:-)) This idiot has never owned a boat & never will he is totally devoid of any boating experience nor knowledge, other than what he picks up in this NG & the occasional paid charter fishing trip. Here are some: Hatteras 43' sportfish Swan 41' racing/cruising sloop Morgan 33 O'Day 30 Cruisers, Inc., Mackinac 22 Century Coronado Bill Luders 16, as sweet a sailboat as ever caught a breeze. Century 19' wood lapstrake with side wheel steering Cruisers, Inc. 18' and 16' wood lapstrakes Wolverines. Molded plywood. Gorgeous. Several. 14,15,17 footers with various Evinrudes Lighting class sailboat Botved Coronet with twin 50 hp Evinrudes. Interesting boat. Aristocraft (a piece of junk...13', fast, held together with spit) Alcort Sunfish Ancarrow Marine Aquiflyer. 22' footer with two Caddy Crusaders. Guaranteed 60 mph. In the late 1950's. Skimmar brand skiff Arkansas Traveler fiberglass bowrider (I think it was a bowrider) Dyer Dhow Su-Mark round bilge runabout, fiberglass Penn Yan runabouts. Wood. Old Town wood and canvas canoe Old Town sailing canoe...different than above canoe I own the following boats: a 36' "lobster" style boat a 19' center console fishing boat an 11' inflatable dinghy 1/2 of a canoe Those are the types of boats I currently own. I'm also in the market for some interesting kind of lightweight flatbottomed skiff, similar to the old Skimmar, for the "new" 51-year-old 10 hp outboard I recently bought. One of the boats is kept on dry land within a half mile of Chesapeake Bay. One is kept at a private covered boat dock in a little creek off Chesapeake Bay. One is kept in the backyard of a friend who lives much closer to the Shenandoah River than I do. And one is kept next to the 36-footer." "K. Smith" wrote in message ... Don White wrote: "HarryKrause" wrote in message ... Uh oh...methinks Chuck's post will result in yet another psychotic screed from the slut of the southern hemisphere. Karen is trying to be the 'perfect lady' lately.....she's unusually quiet. Chuck might have to look out for the Cleveland Crusader instead. Just wanting a copy on my system & after all gormless Gould is the biggest spammer of rec.boats since... well since gormless Gould:-) K Krause's lie of the day is a bit of a double header sorry, but so many lies so little time:-) Whenever his total lack of any real boating knowledge looks like uncovering him as the sad little liar he is, he posts some crazy list of boats he claims are his base, here are just a few of his claims, he has tried to sustain these lies & as each one is shown to be a fabrication he just invents a new one, the latest is the "Parker". Don't feel conned nor stupid if you've been taken in by him, he make exactly the same lies up in the jet ski NGs when he used to pollute them with his crap, can you believe it he claimed to be a jet skier!!!!! (responsible & caring in the socialist way of course:-)) This idiot has never owned a boat & never will he is totally devoid of any boating experience nor knowledge, other than what he picks up in this NG & the occasional paid charter fishing trip. Here are some: Hatteras 43' sportfish Swan 41' racing/cruising sloop Morgan 33 O'Day 30 Cruisers, Inc., Mackinac 22 Century Coronado Bill Luders 16, as sweet a sailboat as ever caught a breeze. Century 19' wood lapstrake with side wheel steering Cruisers, Inc. 18' and 16' wood lapstrakes Wolverines. Molded plywood. Gorgeous. Several. 14,15,17 footers with various Evinrudes Lighting class sailboat Botved Coronet with twin 50 hp Evinrudes. Interesting boat. Aristocraft (a piece of junk...13', fast, held together with spit) Alcort Sunfish Ancarrow Marine Aquiflyer. 22' footer with two Caddy Crusaders. Guaranteed 60 mph. In the late 1950's. Skimmar brand skiff Arkansas Traveler fiberglass bowrider (I think it was a bowrider) Dyer Dhow Su-Mark round bilge runabout, fiberglass Penn Yan runabouts. Wood. Old Town wood and canvas canoe Old Town sailing canoe...different than above canoe I own the following boats: a 36' "lobster" style boat a 19' center console fishing boat an 11' inflatable dinghy 1/2 of a canoe Those are the types of boats I currently own. I'm also in the market for some interesting kind of lightweight flatbottomed skiff, similar to the old Skimmar, for the "new" 51-year-old 10 hp outboard I recently bought. One of the boats is kept on dry land within a half mile of Chesapeake Bay. One is kept at a private covered boat dock in a little creek off Chesapeake Bay. One is kept in the backyard of a friend who lives much closer to the Shenandoah River than I do. And one is kept next to the 36-footer." |
|
On Sat, 19 Mar 2005 18:29:51 +1100, "K. Smith" wrote:
Don White wrote: "HarryKrause" wrote in message One of the boats is kept on dry land within a half mile of Chesapeake Bay. One is kept at a private covered boat dock in a little creek off Chesapeake Bay. One is kept in the backyard of a friend who lives much closer to the Shenandoah River than I do. And one is kept next to the 36-footer." When Harry kept the Parker at Harbor Cove Marina (private) in a little creek (Rockhold Creek through Deale, MD), which is off the Chesapeake Bay, it was *not* in a covered dock. The marina has a boatel, in which I keep the PocoLoco, but Harry kept his in the trailer parking lot. -- John H "All decisions are the result of binary thinking." |
"Dr. Dr. & Mr Karen Greer" wrote in message ... Kewl, Thanks for explaining the rules to me. Those rules only apply to one person here. And those rules are constantly evolving depending on the circumstances. We of course are held to a different set of rules. |
On Sat, 19 Mar 2005 07:42:43 -0500, HarryKrause wrote:
John H wrote: On Sat, 19 Mar 2005 18:29:51 +1100, "K. Smith" wrote: Don White wrote: "HarryKrause" wrote in message One of the boats is kept on dry land within a half mile of Chesapeake Bay. One is kept at a private covered boat dock in a little creek off Chesapeake Bay. One is kept in the backyard of a friend who lives much closer to the Shenandoah River than I do. And one is kept next to the 36-footer." When Harry kept the Parker at Harbor Cove Marina (private) in a little creek (Rockhold Creek through Deale, MD), which is off the Chesapeake Bay, it was *not* in a covered dock. The marina has a boatel, in which I keep the PocoLoco, but Harry kept his in the trailer parking lot. Ahh, yes, a "trailer parking lot," which, of course was "dry land" "off Chesapeake Bay." Actually, that boat moved closer to the water when the marina began storing it on an outdoor rack close to the forklift launchers. I recall Herring whining about that, too. But, then, he's "obsessed with Harry." I'm not sure where I'll keep this boat this season. It is for sale. The "private covered boat dock" we used was in Chesapeake Beach, which I mentioned several times. But that boat has been relocated to a Solomons Island marina, along with its rubber dinghy. My half of the canoe, along with the other half, is at the Shenandoah, in Rileyville, Virginia. Herring lives in Alexandria, Virginia, on ________________________. Well, that wouldn't be the right thing to do, would it. Well, let's see. Anyone who can use 'AnyWho' could easily determine it's on either Stewart Ave or Mayfair Ln. Unlike you, I have no reason to be paranoid. I've not called enough names, or made enough insults to have reason to fear the people in the newsgroup. It's a shame you're who you are, Harry. I might, otherwise, be interested in your boat. -- John H "All decisions are the result of binary thinking." |
"John H" wrote in message ... On Sat, 19 Mar 2005 07:42:43 -0500, HarryKrause wrote: John H wrote: On Sat, 19 Mar 2005 18:29:51 +1100, "K. Smith" wrote: Don White wrote: "HarryKrause" wrote in message One of the boats is kept on dry land within a half mile of Chesapeake Bay. One is kept at a private covered boat dock in a little creek off Chesapeake Bay. One is kept in the backyard of a friend who lives much closer to the Shenandoah River than I do. And one is kept next to the 36-footer." When Harry kept the Parker at Harbor Cove Marina (private) in a little creek (Rockhold Creek through Deale, MD), which is off the Chesapeake Bay, it was *not* in a covered dock. The marina has a boatel, in which I keep the PocoLoco, but Harry kept his in the trailer parking lot. Ahh, yes, a "trailer parking lot," which, of course was "dry land" "off Chesapeake Bay." Actually, that boat moved closer to the water when the marina began storing it on an outdoor rack close to the forklift launchers. I recall Herring whining about that, too. But, then, he's "obsessed with Harry." I'm not sure where I'll keep this boat this season. It is for sale. The "private covered boat dock" we used was in Chesapeake Beach, which I mentioned several times. But that boat has been relocated to a Solomons Island marina, along with its rubber dinghy. My half of the canoe, along with the other half, is at the Shenandoah, in Rileyville, Virginia. Herring lives in Alexandria, Virginia, on ________________________. Well, that wouldn't be the right thing to do, would it. Well, let's see. Anyone who can use 'AnyWho' could easily determine it's on either Stewart Ave or Mayfair Ln. Unlike you, I have no reason to be paranoid. I've not called enough names, or made enough insults to have reason to fear the people in the newsgroup. It's a shame you're who you are, Harry. I might, otherwise, be interested in your boat. -- John H "All decisions are the result of binary thinking." I guess then he is at one of the 12 marinas on Solomon Island. Here is the website that links to those marinas with phone numbers. http://www.baydreaming.com/solomons.htm |
On Sat, 19 Mar 2005 08:54:29 -0500, HarryKrause wrote:
John H wrote: On Sat, 19 Mar 2005 07:42:43 -0500, HarryKrause wrote: Herring lives in Alexandria, Virginia, on ________________________. Well, that wouldn't be the right thing to do, would it. Well, let's see. Anyone who can use 'AnyWho' could easily determine it's on either Stewart Ave or Mayfair Ln. Sorry, I am not a facilitator of mischief. You've mentioned often enough that you live in Alexandria and subteach in the Fairfax County schools. Unlike you, I have no reason to be paranoid. I've not called enough names, or made enough insults to have reason to fear the people in the newsgroup. It's a shame you're who you are, Harry. I might, otherwise, be interested in your boat. Your loss. Ah, yes. It's my loss that so few people are after my ass. You're correct, of course. I would much rather be in your shoes - afraid of those I've slandered or denigrated, or both. -- John H "All decisions are the result of binary thinking." |
My special friend from Avon Lake, the man I can count on to "watch my
back" at all times, remarked: Those rules only apply to one person here. And those rules are constantly evolving depending on the circumstances. We of course are held to a different set of rules ********************* I don't make rules. Who is "we"? Are you self identifying as part of some group? What group would that be? Are the other members of the group pleased to be associated with you, or are you merely assuming that they assent to inclusion? Here's a free lesson in style and technique for you. Not that you would ever consider posting an insult, of course, but if you were so inclined there are more effective and less effective ways to go about it. People who lack imagination and just don't do nuance at all, will post "So and so is a such and such!" Fine, but you can hear the same on any grade school playground in the country and most actual adults will grant the tirade about an equal amount of credibility. A more subtle, and probably more effective approach would be to describe behavior, without naming names, and allow people to draw personal conclusions about whether the description fits anyone they know. If the reader associates a description of behavior with a specific individual, there must be some reason for that association (at least in the reader's mind). If the description of behavior is inaccurate and without merit, then nobody will associate any particular individual with the description and there hasn't been any insult. For example: If you posted, "Gould is 11-feet tall, has green hair, bathes once a year whether he needs to or not, cheats on his wife, kills and eats the neighborhood dogs, and is plotting with Al Qaida to overthrow the Bush Administration......" that would be a direct insult. However, if you posted, "One of the posters to this group is 11-feet tall, has green hair, bathes once a year whether he needs to or not, cheats on his wife, kills and eats the neighborhood dogs, and is plotting with Al Qaida to overthrow the Bush Administration......" without naming any names, there is no direct insult. In fact, if my *own behavior* had in no way already confirmed your charges, nobody would have the slightest idea who you might be talking about. Here's where it gets to be pretty funny, as well. After posting something (for example) about the childish or destructive behavior of an individual or group but without specficially naming anybody, the denials and countercharges begin rolling in. IOW, the very people you avoid identifying so often jump up and identify themselves. As I said, no charge for the lesson. Why would I charge you for something you will never use? Just yesterday you posted that you carry on discussions without resorting to personal insult, and why would I be inclined to brand you a liar? Should you ever resort to insult, either as an aggressor or defender in a discussion, consider taking a more subtle approach. It stings your victim far worse than a mere "nonny nonny poo poo", if that's what you have in mind to accomplish. |
On Sat, 19 Mar 2005 08:59:53 -0500, "JimH" wrote:
"John H" wrote in message .. . On Sat, 19 Mar 2005 07:42:43 -0500, HarryKrause wrote: John H wrote: On Sat, 19 Mar 2005 18:29:51 +1100, "K. Smith" wrote: Don White wrote: "HarryKrause" wrote in message One of the boats is kept on dry land within a half mile of Chesapeake Bay. One is kept at a private covered boat dock in a little creek off Chesapeake Bay. One is kept in the backyard of a friend who lives much closer to the Shenandoah River than I do. And one is kept next to the 36-footer." When Harry kept the Parker at Harbor Cove Marina (private) in a little creek (Rockhold Creek through Deale, MD), which is off the Chesapeake Bay, it was *not* in a covered dock. The marina has a boatel, in which I keep the PocoLoco, but Harry kept his in the trailer parking lot. Ahh, yes, a "trailer parking lot," which, of course was "dry land" "off Chesapeake Bay." Actually, that boat moved closer to the water when the marina began storing it on an outdoor rack close to the forklift launchers. I recall Herring whining about that, too. But, then, he's "obsessed with Harry." I'm not sure where I'll keep this boat this season. It is for sale. The "private covered boat dock" we used was in Chesapeake Beach, which I mentioned several times. But that boat has been relocated to a Solomons Island marina, along with its rubber dinghy. My half of the canoe, along with the other half, is at the Shenandoah, in Rileyville, Virginia. Herring lives in Alexandria, Virginia, on ________________________. Well, that wouldn't be the right thing to do, would it. Well, let's see. Anyone who can use 'AnyWho' could easily determine it's on either Stewart Ave or Mayfair Ln. Unlike you, I have no reason to be paranoid. I've not called enough names, or made enough insults to have reason to fear the people in the newsgroup. It's a shame you're who you are, Harry. I might, otherwise, be interested in your boat. -- John H "All decisions are the result of binary thinking." I guess then he is at one of the 12 marinas on Solomon Island. Here is the website that links to those marinas with phone numbers. http://www.baydreaming.com/solomons.htm His boat is not in Solomon's Island. His boat is at Breezy Point, on a trailer, where it's been sitting in the sun and dirt for a long time. He must be implying that the lobsta boat is at Solomons. Of course, that would imply that he really owned the lobsta boat. -- John H "All decisions are the result of binary thinking." |
wrote in message oups.com... My special friend from Avon Lake, the man I can count on to "watch my back" at all times, remarked: Those rules only apply to one person here. And those rules are constantly evolving depending on the circumstances. We of course are held to a different set of rules ********************* I don't make rules. Who said I was talking about you? "You're so vain, you probably think this song is about you......" |
"JimH" wrote in message ... wrote in message oups.com... My special friend from Avon Lake, the man I can count on to "watch my back" at all times, remarked: Those rules only apply to one person here. And those rules are constantly evolving depending on the circumstances. We of course are held to a different set of rules ********************* I don't make rules. Who said I was talking about you? "You're so vain, you probably think this song is about you......" Almost forgot: If the shoe fits....... |
"JimH" wrote in message ... wrote in message oups.com... My special friend from Avon Lake, the man I can count on to "watch my back" at all times, remarked: Those rules only apply to one person here. And those rules are constantly evolving depending on the circumstances. We of course are held to a different set of rules ********************* I don't make rules. Who said I was talking about you? "You're so vain, you probably think this song is about you......" Almost forgot: PS Why the need to shadow me Chuck? "Me and my shadow..." ;-) |
Since we are giving out private information whose phone number is:
888-880-882_ "HarryKrause" wrote in message ... John H wrote: On Sat, 19 Mar 2005 07:42:43 -0500, HarryKrause wrote: Herring lives in Alexandria, Virginia, on ________________________. Well, that wouldn't be the right thing to do, would it. Well, let's see. Anyone who can use 'AnyWho' could easily determine it's on either Stewart Ave or Mayfair Ln. Sorry, I am not a facilitator of mischief. You've mentioned often enough that you live in Alexandria and subteach in the Fairfax County schools. Unlike you, I have no reason to be paranoid. I've not called enough names, or made enough insults to have reason to fear the people in the newsgroup. It's a shame you're who you are, Harry. I might, otherwise, be interested in your boat. Your loss. |
Gould,
What makes you think he was talking about you? He did not mention any names. You must be very guilty if you think his comment was directed towards you. wrote in message oups.com... My special friend from Avon Lake, the man I can count on to "watch my back" at all times, remarked: Those rules only apply to one person here. And those rules are constantly evolving depending on the circumstances. We of course are held to a different set of rules ********************* I don't make rules. Who is "we"? Are you self identifying as part of some group? What group would that be? Are the other members of the group pleased to be associated with you, or are you merely assuming that they assent to inclusion? Here's a free lesson in style and technique for you. Not that you would ever consider posting an insult, of course, but if you were so inclined there are more effective and less effective ways to go about it. People who lack imagination and just don't do nuance at all, will post "So and so is a such and such!" Fine, but you can hear the same on any grade school playground in the country and most actual adults will grant the tirade about an equal amount of credibility. A more subtle, and probably more effective approach would be to describe behavior, without naming names, and allow people to draw personal conclusions about whether the description fits anyone they know. If the reader associates a description of behavior with a specific individual, there must be some reason for that association (at least in the reader's mind). If the description of behavior is inaccurate and without merit, then nobody will associate any particular individual with the description and there hasn't been any insult. For example: If you posted, "Gould is 11-feet tall, has green hair, bathes once a year whether he needs to or not, cheats on his wife, kills and eats the neighborhood dogs, and is plotting with Al Qaida to overthrow the Bush Administration......" that would be a direct insult. However, if you posted, "One of the posters to this group is 11-feet tall, has green hair, bathes once a year whether he needs to or not, cheats on his wife, kills and eats the neighborhood dogs, and is plotting with Al Qaida to overthrow the Bush Administration......" without naming any names, there is no direct insult. In fact, if my *own behavior* had in no way already confirmed your charges, nobody would have the slightest idea who you might be talking about. Here's where it gets to be pretty funny, as well. After posting something (for example) about the childish or destructive behavior of an individual or group but without specficially naming anybody, the denials and countercharges begin rolling in. IOW, the very people you avoid identifying so often jump up and identify themselves. As I said, no charge for the lesson. Why would I charge you for something you will never use? Just yesterday you posted that you carry on discussions without resorting to personal insult, and why would I be inclined to brand you a liar? Should you ever resort to insult, either as an aggressor or defender in a discussion, consider taking a more subtle approach. It stings your victim far worse than a mere "nonny nonny poo poo", if that's what you have in mind to accomplish. |
"Dr. Dr. & Mr Karen Grear" wrote in message ... Gould, What makes you think he was talking about you? He did not mention any names. You must be very guilty if you think his comment was directed towards you. Well didn't he say this: "If the reader associates a description of behavior with a specific individual, there must be some reason for that association (at least in the reader's mind). If the description of behavior is inaccurate and without merit, then nobody will associate any particular individual with the description and there hasn't been any insult." How absolutely delightful. |
Some people try to place themselves above it all, while wallowing in the mud
like a pig doing a great imitation of a ridiculous asshole whose life is a series of failed endeavors. "JimH" wrote in message ... "Dr. Dr. & Mr Karen Grear" wrote in message ... Gould, What makes you think he was talking about you? He did not mention any names. You must be very guilty if you think his comment was directed towards you. Well didn't he say this: "If the reader associates a description of behavior with a specific individual, there must be some reason for that association (at least in the reader's mind). If the description of behavior is inaccurate and without merit, then nobody will associate any particular individual with the description and there hasn't been any insult." How absolutely delightful. |
Gould,
What makes you think he was talking about you? He did not mention any names. You must be very guilty if you think his comment was directed towards you. ****** 1. You said, "Thanks for clarifying the rules." 2. JimH responded that the rules I clarified only applied to a single person. Other than that, nice try fellas. Maybe you will learn something from my post a little earlier up the line. |
As per my reply to the phony doctor:
1. You said, "Thanks for clarifying the rules." 2. JimH responded that the rules I clarified only applied to a single person. Other than that, nice try fellas. Maybe you will learn something from my post a little earlier up the line. |
Yes, but no where did he say they applied to you. You must feel that you do
apply a double standard in your life. wrote in message oups.com... As per my reply to the phony doctor: 1. You said, "Thanks for clarifying the rules." 2. JimH responded that the rules I clarified only applied to a single person. Other than that, nice try fellas. Maybe you will learn something from my post a little earlier up the line. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:05 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com