Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
John H
 
Posts: n/a
Default Typical NY Times approach -- OT

Here's the headline and first couple paragraphs:

************************************************** *****
Under Bush, a New Age of Prepackaged TV News
By DAVID BARSTOW and ROBIN STEIN

Published: March 13, 2005

It is the kind of TV news coverage every president covets.

"Thank you, Bush. Thank you, U.S.A.," a jubilant Iraqi-American told a camera
crew in Kansas City for a segment about reaction to the fall of Baghdad. A
second report told of "another success" in the Bush administration's "drive to
strengthen aviation security"; the reporter called it "one of the most
remarkable campaigns in aviation history." A third segment, broadcast in
January, described the administration's determination to open markets for
American farmers.

To a viewer, each report looked like any other 90-second segment on the local
news. In fact, the federal government produced all three. The report from Kansas
City was made by the State Department. The "reporter" covering airport safety
was actually a public relations professional working under a false name for the
Transportation Security Administration. The farming segment was done by the
Agriculture Department's office of communications.
**************************************

Now, the implication is that Bush has started some new manner of deceiving the
public. Not until almost halfway into this "news article" do we get to:

***************************************
The practice, which also occurred in the Clinton administration, is
continuing...
************************************

Yup. That's unbiased reporting.



--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."
  #2   Report Post  
Doug Kanter
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"John H" wrote in message
...
Here's the headline and first couple paragraphs:

************************************************** *****
Under Bush, a New Age of Prepackaged TV News
By DAVID BARSTOW and ROBIN STEIN

Published: March 13, 2005

It is the kind of TV news coverage every president covets.

"Thank you, Bush. Thank you, U.S.A.," a jubilant Iraqi-American told a
camera
crew in Kansas City for a segment about reaction to the fall of Baghdad. A
second report told of "another success" in the Bush administration's
"drive to
strengthen aviation security"; the reporter called it "one of the most
remarkable campaigns in aviation history." A third segment, broadcast in
January, described the administration's determination to open markets for
American farmers.

To a viewer, each report looked like any other 90-second segment on the
local
news. In fact, the federal government produced all three. The report from
Kansas
City was made by the State Department. The "reporter" covering airport
safety
was actually a public relations professional working under a false name
for the
Transportation Security Administration. The farming segment was done by
the
Agriculture Department's office of communications.
**************************************

Now, the implication is that Bush has started some new manner of deceiving
the
public. Not until almost halfway into this "news article" do we get to:

***************************************
The practice, which also occurred in the Clinton administration, is
continuing...
************************************

Yup. That's unbiased reporting.


I guess the practice is OK as long as it's reported by a news source you've
been instructed not to like.


  #3   Report Post  
John H
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 20:43:00 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote:


"John H" wrote in message
.. .
Here's the headline and first couple paragraphs:

************************************************** *****
Under Bush, a New Age of Prepackaged TV News
By DAVID BARSTOW and ROBIN STEIN

Published: March 13, 2005

It is the kind of TV news coverage every president covets.

"Thank you, Bush. Thank you, U.S.A.," a jubilant Iraqi-American told a
camera
crew in Kansas City for a segment about reaction to the fall of Baghdad. A
second report told of "another success" in the Bush administration's
"drive to
strengthen aviation security"; the reporter called it "one of the most
remarkable campaigns in aviation history." A third segment, broadcast in
January, described the administration's determination to open markets for
American farmers.

To a viewer, each report looked like any other 90-second segment on the
local
news. In fact, the federal government produced all three. The report from
Kansas
City was made by the State Department. The "reporter" covering airport
safety
was actually a public relations professional working under a false name
for the
Transportation Security Administration. The farming segment was done by
the
Agriculture Department's office of communications.
**************************************

Now, the implication is that Bush has started some new manner of deceiving
the
public. Not until almost halfway into this "news article" do we get to:

***************************************
The practice, which also occurred in the Clinton administration, is
continuing...
************************************

Yup. That's unbiased reporting.


I guess the practice is OK as long as it's reported by a news source you've
been instructed not to like.


I guess you missed the whole point.
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."
  #4   Report Post  
Doug Kanter
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"John H" wrote in message
news
On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 20:43:00 GMT, "Doug Kanter"

wrote:


"John H" wrote in message
. ..
Here's the headline and first couple paragraphs:

************************************************** *****
Under Bush, a New Age of Prepackaged TV News
By DAVID BARSTOW and ROBIN STEIN

Published: March 13, 2005

It is the kind of TV news coverage every president covets.

"Thank you, Bush. Thank you, U.S.A.," a jubilant Iraqi-American told a
camera
crew in Kansas City for a segment about reaction to the fall of Baghdad.
A
second report told of "another success" in the Bush administration's
"drive to
strengthen aviation security"; the reporter called it "one of the most
remarkable campaigns in aviation history." A third segment, broadcast in
January, described the administration's determination to open markets
for
American farmers.

To a viewer, each report looked like any other 90-second segment on the
local
news. In fact, the federal government produced all three. The report
from
Kansas
City was made by the State Department. The "reporter" covering airport
safety
was actually a public relations professional working under a false name
for the
Transportation Security Administration. The farming segment was done by
the
Agriculture Department's office of communications.
**************************************

Now, the implication is that Bush has started some new manner of
deceiving
the
public. Not until almost halfway into this "news article" do we get to:

***************************************
The practice, which also occurred in the Clinton administration, is
continuing...
************************************

Yup. That's unbiased reporting.


I guess the practice is OK as long as it's reported by a news source
you've
been instructed not to like.


I guess you missed the whole point.


Actually, we both did, but I did it with more style. :-)


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Great article about boating in the LA Times Jason Boat Building 15 August 31st 04 07:42 AM
OT--More NY Times bias NOYB General 68 July 26th 04 02:32 PM
OT - Where is the lie? (especially for jcs) jps General 33 July 28th 03 12:56 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:54 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017