![]() |
|
JimH wrote:
"Jim," wrote in message ... JimH wrote: "Jim," wrote in message ... JimH wrote: "JimH" wrote in message ... "Jim," wrote in message ... JimH wrote: "Jim," wrote in message ... JimH wrote: "Jim," wrote in message .. . JimH wrote: "Jim," wrote in message .. . JimH wrote: "Jim," wrote in message . .. JimH wrote: "Jim," wrote in message ... JimH wrote: It is not a one size fits all situation. Iraq and Iran are different animals. However, we did try the diplomatic route in Iraq, similar to what we are doing in Iran, prior to the invasion. Sometimes diplomacy and discussions work, sometimes not. They did not work with Iraq. They may work with Iran. So what is your point Jim? Did you forget that last week Bush declined to join the Europeans in negotiations. He was going to be the lone Cowboy who did things HIS way? No I do not remember. I am not saying you are wrong, but perhaps you can provide a link. Regardless, what is wrong with him deciding to join in with Europe in the negotiations? You see this as a bad thing? Convienent memory! -- No, I simply did not remember. Why the slam? I see this as a good thing, but last week it was a bad thing. The question asked was "is this a flip or a flop? Nope, things change, especially when dealing with international politics. Would you rather that a President have one and only one way to deal with other Countries? From your favorite news source http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,148304,00.html "The United States has refused to get involved in the bargaining with Tehran or to make commitments about incentives, insisting that Tehran abandon its program." Thank you for the link. And what makes you think that Fox is my favorite news source? Just because I am a political conservative? Again, another attempted slam on your part. Can you discuss things without the attempted personal attacks Jimcomma? OK -- what IS your favorite news source? Tell the world. I don't have a favorite. Why do I have to? http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/N03564569.htm Supporting Europe on the incentives would mark a significant shift in strategy for Bush, who has been reluctant to consider them before to avoid being seen as rewarding Iran for bad behavior. Great. Bush is doing good....eh? I'll give him this one During his first term Bush branded Iran part of an "axis of evil," along with North Korea and Saddam Hussein's Iraq. Nothing has changed. Your point is? Now maybe we should negotiate with N Korea? We already are. And Tehran has been an antagonist of Washington since the 1979 Iranian revolution and the seizure that year of more than 60 hostages in the U.S. Embassy in a crisis that lasted 444 days. Correct. And that would include Carter and Clinton during those years, as it would Bush Sr and Jr, and Reagan Your point is? The question asked was "is this a flip or a flop? Bush made a big issue of flip flopping during the campaign. No it was not a flip flop. One *has* to remain flexible when dealing with international politics. One has to, however, remain true to their core beliefs. Bush has, remained consistent with his core beliefs, including with the war on terror, fixing social security, fixing the tax code, abortion, tort reform and believing that forceful action will sometimes be called for in his dealing with other countries. Kerry on the other hand changed his core beliefs on abortion, Pro Choice -- http://www.issues2000.org/2004/John_Kerry_Abortion.htm the war on terror, He was deceived by Bush, rice, et all troop funding, Again deceived Bull**** and a lame excuse. ANWAR, Evidence please As I understand, he has always been against drilling. http://www.nojohnkerry.org/kerryhtml...lops.htm#ANWAR http://www.usatoday.com/news/politic...ry-nafta_x.htm welfare reform, http://www.issues2000.org/2004/John_..._+_Poverty.htm the death penalty Not so http://deadlinethemovie.com/blog/joh...th_penalty.php the Patriot Act, Agreed affirmative action See http://www.nationalreview.com/commen...0403090827.asp ....and on and on and on. Go to this link for other support of my claims on his flip flops. http://www.nojohnkerry.org/kerryhtml/flipflops.htm The fact remains that Kerry constantly changed his core beliefs and Bush hasn't. Yes, Kerry deserved the title of flip flop king. Suppose you can find an UNbiased, responsiblle source? Yep, perhaps biased against Kerry. But what specifically is untrue in what they say? Didn't bother to read it -- I figured as much. - find me something from Cnn, cnbc or even faux. Find it yourself. Oh, what the hell. Here you go: http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/...in646435.shtml “We should not have gone to war knowing the information that we know today," Kerry said Wednesday on ABC’s “Good Morning America.” "Knowing there was no imminent threat to America, knowing there were no weapons of mass destruction, knowing there was no connection of Saddam Hussein to al Qaeda, I would not have gone to war. That's plain and simple." Like (as?) I said -- he was deceived. http://washingtontimes.com/national/...5616-3546r.htm In that same speech, he vowed to round up all the unguarded nuclear material in the world within four years, mainly through negotiations. In another speech, Mr. Kerry promised to name a national coordinator to combat bioterrorism. http://mediamatters.org/items/200407060009 (includes clips from CNN) While CNN considered these relatively innocuous comments a "classic" flip-flop, the network has ignored much more significant "flip-flops" by President George W. Bush. As just one example, in a June 22 article about the Supreme Court's rejection of state laws that give patients in managed care the right to sue insurance companies for damages, The New York Times noted: http://www.nationalreview.com/kerry/waffles.asp YASSER ARAFAT [07/14 09:52 AM] FIRST HE SAID: "Terrorist organizations with specific political agendas may be encouraged and emboldened by Yasser Arafat's transformation from outlaw to statesman.... [Terrorists] whose only object is to disrupt society require no such 'role models' as Arafat." — The New War, by John Kerry, published June 1997 THEN HE SAID: "Obviously, Yasser Arafat has been an impediment to the peace process... As far as I'm concerned, he's an outlaw to the peace process." — John Kerry, interview with the Associated Press, March 10, 2004 (A lot can happen in 7 years) http://news.forum.publicradio.org/ar.../10/01/0553207 This is no more than a message board for partisan comments, by individuals -- scroll down. http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/ar...TICLE_ID=40491 The apparent flip-flops were noted by the American Family Association, a group battling against moves to establish same-sex marriage. American Family Association -- yeaj! that's non biased! Enough -- this is all pollitical BS. http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1119904/posts http://www.jewishjournal.com/home/se...w.php?id=12261 http://www.weeklystandard.com/Conten...4/835wicnq.asp Hundreds more. It was easy. ;-) Sure just look up all the heo-con comments Deja Vu......So I ask again what information posted in those links was not true? Who cares if they came from CNN, ABC or the Weekly Standard....don't discredit the information because of the source....discredit the information they posted. I await your reply. ;-) You can play the game any way you want -- google bush lies vs Kerry lies, bush flip flops vs kerry flip flops. You can build a case either way. Way up at the top of this is a question asking if Bushs' latest move is a flip or a flop. Closest answer to date was Harry Kraus. As usual, you did not answer my question but answered with a spin. Once again: So I ask again what information posted in those links was not true? Who cares if they came from CNN, ABC or the Weekly Standard....don't discredit the information because of the source....discredit the information they posted. I await your reply. ;-) Before I retired, I had a stamp made for most corporate announcements "Ignored By (my name) That would be appropriate here |
"Jim," wrote in message ... JimH wrote: "Jim," wrote in message ... JimH wrote: "Jim," wrote in message ... JimH wrote: "JimH" wrote in message ... "Jim," wrote in message ... JimH wrote: "Jim," wrote in message ... JimH wrote: "Jim," wrote in message . .. JimH wrote: "Jim," wrote in message . .. JimH wrote: "Jim," wrote in message ... JimH wrote: "Jim," wrote in message y... JimH wrote: It is not a one size fits all situation. Iraq and Iran are different animals. However, we did try the diplomatic route in Iraq, similar to what we are doing in Iran, prior to the invasion. Sometimes diplomacy and discussions work, sometimes not. They did not work with Iraq. They may work with Iran. So what is your point Jim? Did you forget that last week Bush declined to join the Europeans in negotiations. He was going to be the lone Cowboy who did things HIS way? No I do not remember. I am not saying you are wrong, but perhaps you can provide a link. Regardless, what is wrong with him deciding to join in with Europe in the negotiations? You see this as a bad thing? Convienent memory! -- No, I simply did not remember. Why the slam? I see this as a good thing, but last week it was a bad thing. The question asked was "is this a flip or a flop? Nope, things change, especially when dealing with international politics. Would you rather that a President have one and only one way to deal with other Countries? From your favorite news source http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,148304,00.html "The United States has refused to get involved in the bargaining with Tehran or to make commitments about incentives, insisting that Tehran abandon its program." Thank you for the link. And what makes you think that Fox is my favorite news source? Just because I am a political conservative? Again, another attempted slam on your part. Can you discuss things without the attempted personal attacks Jimcomma? OK -- what IS your favorite news source? Tell the world. I don't have a favorite. Why do I have to? http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/N03564569.htm Supporting Europe on the incentives would mark a significant shift in strategy for Bush, who has been reluctant to consider them before to avoid being seen as rewarding Iran for bad behavior. Great. Bush is doing good....eh? I'll give him this one During his first term Bush branded Iran part of an "axis of evil," along with North Korea and Saddam Hussein's Iraq. Nothing has changed. Your point is? Now maybe we should negotiate with N Korea? We already are. And Tehran has been an antagonist of Washington since the 1979 Iranian revolution and the seizure that year of more than 60 hostages in the U.S. Embassy in a crisis that lasted 444 days. Correct. And that would include Carter and Clinton during those years, as it would Bush Sr and Jr, and Reagan Your point is? The question asked was "is this a flip or a flop? Bush made a big issue of flip flopping during the campaign. No it was not a flip flop. One *has* to remain flexible when dealing with international politics. One has to, however, remain true to their core beliefs. Bush has, remained consistent with his core beliefs, including with the war on terror, fixing social security, fixing the tax code, abortion, tort reform and believing that forceful action will sometimes be called for in his dealing with other countries. Kerry on the other hand changed his core beliefs on abortion, Pro Choice -- http://www.issues2000.org/2004/John_Kerry_Abortion.htm the war on terror, He was deceived by Bush, rice, et all troop funding, Again deceived Bull**** and a lame excuse. ANWAR, Evidence please As I understand, he has always been against drilling. http://www.nojohnkerry.org/kerryhtml...lops.htm#ANWAR http://www.usatoday.com/news/politic...ry-nafta_x.htm welfare reform, http://www.issues2000.org/2004/John_..._+_Poverty.htm the death penalty Not so http://deadlinethemovie.com/blog/joh...th_penalty.php the Patriot Act, Agreed affirmative action See http://www.nationalreview.com/commen...0403090827.asp ....and on and on and on. Go to this link for other support of my claims on his flip flops. http://www.nojohnkerry.org/kerryhtml/flipflops.htm The fact remains that Kerry constantly changed his core beliefs and Bush hasn't. Yes, Kerry deserved the title of flip flop king. Suppose you can find an UNbiased, responsiblle source? Yep, perhaps biased against Kerry. But what specifically is untrue in what they say? Didn't bother to read it -- I figured as much. - find me something from Cnn, cnbc or even faux. Find it yourself. Oh, what the hell. Here you go: http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/...in646435.shtml “We should not have gone to war knowing the information that we know today," Kerry said Wednesday on ABC’s “Good Morning America.” "Knowing there was no imminent threat to America, knowing there were no weapons of mass destruction, knowing there was no connection of Saddam Hussein to al Qaeda, I would not have gone to war. That's plain and simple." Like (as?) I said -- he was deceived. http://washingtontimes.com/national/...5616-3546r.htm In that same speech, he vowed to round up all the unguarded nuclear material in the world within four years, mainly through negotiations. In another speech, Mr. Kerry promised to name a national coordinator to combat bioterrorism. http://mediamatters.org/items/200407060009 (includes clips from CNN) While CNN considered these relatively innocuous comments a "classic" flip-flop, the network has ignored much more significant "flip-flops" by President George W. Bush. As just one example, in a June 22 article about the Supreme Court's rejection of state laws that give patients in managed care the right to sue insurance companies for damages, The New York Times noted: http://www.nationalreview.com/kerry/waffles.asp YASSER ARAFAT [07/14 09:52 AM] FIRST HE SAID: "Terrorist organizations with specific political agendas may be encouraged and emboldened by Yasser Arafat's transformation from outlaw to statesman.... [Terrorists] whose only object is to disrupt society require no such 'role models' as Arafat." — The New War, by John Kerry, published June 1997 THEN HE SAID: "Obviously, Yasser Arafat has been an impediment to the peace process... As far as I'm concerned, he's an outlaw to the peace process." — John Kerry, interview with the Associated Press, March 10, 2004 (A lot can happen in 7 years) http://news.forum.publicradio.org/ar.../10/01/0553207 This is no more than a message board for partisan comments, by individuals -- scroll down. http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/ar...TICLE_ID=40491 The apparent flip-flops were noted by the American Family Association, a group battling against moves to establish same-sex marriage. American Family Association -- yeaj! that's non biased! Enough -- this is all pollitical BS. http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1119904/posts http://www.jewishjournal.com/home/se...w.php?id=12261 http://www.weeklystandard.com/Conten...4/835wicnq.asp Hundreds more. It was easy. ;-) Sure just look up all the heo-con comments Deja Vu......So I ask again what information posted in those links was not true? Who cares if they came from CNN, ABC or the Weekly Standard....don't discredit the information because of the source....discredit the information they posted. I await your reply. ;-) You can play the game any way you want -- google bush lies vs Kerry lies, bush flip flops vs kerry flip flops. You can build a case either way. Way up at the top of this is a question asking if Bushs' latest move is a flip or a flop. Closest answer to date was Harry Kraus. As usual, you did not answer my question but answered with a spin. Once again: So I ask again what information posted in those links was not true? Who cares if they came from CNN, ABC or the Weekly Standard....don't discredit the information because of the source....discredit the information they posted. I await your reply. ;-) Before I retired, I had a stamp made for most corporate announcements "Ignored By (my name) That would be appropriate here So you cannot show that my links posted any incorrect information when showing Kerry's flip flops. Ergo, as I alleged earlier the information was correct. Ergo, as I alleged earlier Kerry flip flopped on his core values. I agree. Thanks. All the best! Thanks. ;-) |
"'''' Tuukarrhea!.....that's a great label. Maybe you should coin that
phrase!""''' ahhhh,,, the 1, 2, 3 punch must have got you there white,,, lol,,, and confirmed accuracy,,, lol,,, white,,, you sure you don't have a ring in your nose like a dumb bull??? I just took you for a walk through the park,,, lol,,,, I bet you would be the last butter jam tart left over on the tray at a party,,,, lol,,,, oooo my,,,,,,, definatly confirms number 3,,, you be a krause puppet for life,,, You wouldn't happen to be sharpening his pencils,,, washing his car,, painting his fence,,, or supplying him his prescription meds there from Canada ,,, would you there white???? awful white of you there white,,, you shinning his pipe also??? "Don White" wrote in message ... "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... You know, it just occurred to me. Perhaps Herring is suffering from Tuukarrhea Tuukarrhea!.....that's a great label. Maybe you should coin that phrase! |
"JimH" wrote in message ... More childish personal attacks....more proof of my earlier claim that most come from the left. Why not address the subject of this thread instead of throwing out childish insults? Now Jimmy...didn't you start a crusade to not call other posters names...and here you are calling me/Harry or both 'childish'? You can't control yourself and that's why I didn't sign on to your group hug. BTW...it's best to lead by example....talk is cheap! |
"Harry Krause" wrote in message ... It's a disease whose symptoms include getting everything wrong, running off at the mouth, and facilitating morons. You think Herring suffers from it? I don't know why JohnH would even want to associate with someone unstable like Tuuk. Wonder if he would take him for a ride in that fancy Mustang. I doubt it. |
"Don White" wrote in message ... "JimH" wrote in message ... More childish personal attacks....more proof of my earlier claim that most come from the left. Why not address the subject of this thread instead of throwing out childish insults? Now Jimmy...didn't you start a crusade to not call other posters names...and here you are calling me/Harry or both 'childish'? You can't control yourself and that's why I didn't sign on to your group hug. BTW...it's best to lead by example....talk is cheap! I rest my case. |
"Don White" wrote in message ... "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... It's a disease whose symptoms include getting everything wrong, running off at the mouth, and facilitating morons. You think Herring suffers from it? I don't know why JohnH would even want to associate with someone unstable like Tuuk. Wonder if he would take him for a ride in that fancy Mustang. I doubt it. See your post in this thread from 11:21 p.m. You and Harry once again proved my point. Thank you and good night Don. BTW: Grow up. |
"JimH" wrote in message ... I rest my case. You seem to resting a lot lately....from boating...from common sense......integrity....etc. |
"Don White" wrote in message ... "JimH" wrote in message ... I rest my case. You seem to resting a lot lately....from boating...from common sense......integrity....etc. Yes, I am resting from owning a boat for a while. When will you rest from being an a-hole Don? |
Don are you guilty of pig piling? ; )
"Don White" wrote in message ... "JimH" wrote in message ... More childish personal attacks....more proof of my earlier claim that most come from the left. Why not address the subject of this thread instead of throwing out childish insults? Now Jimmy...didn't you start a crusade to not call other posters names...and here you are calling me/Harry or both 'childish'? You can't control yourself and that's why I didn't sign on to your group hug. BTW...it's best to lead by example....talk is cheap! |
"JimH" wrote in message ... When will you rest from being an a-hole Don? Not as long as we have 'turds' in this newsgroup that need expelling. |
"Dr. Jonathan Smithers, MD Phd." wrote in message ... Don are you guilty of pig piling? ; ) Even though I didn't sign on to JimH's bogus crusade, I still wouldn't call him a 'pig'. ;-) |
"JimH" wrote in message ... I am curious Don. When was the last time you contributed anything of interest to this NG? Since you don't boat Jim, I've probably never posted anything of interest to you. |
"HarryKrause" wrote in message ... Why bother with Hertvik at all, Don? Really. Just bozo bin him, along with the rest of his ilk. Right you are...It is silly trying to be rational with him. |
"JimH" wrote in message ... "Don White" wrote in message ... Not as long as we have 'turds' in this newsgroup that need expelling. I am curious Don. When was the last time you contributed anything of interest to this NG? Donny is projecting again. |
"Don White" wrote in message ... "JimH" wrote in message ... I am curious Don. When was the last time you contributed anything of interest to this NG? Since you don't boat Jim, I've probably never posted anything of interest to you. I may not own a boat now but I certainly still boat. The fact that I am without a boat right now really bothers you for some strange reason Don as you need to continually bring it up. |
LOL, I will have to remember that come back.
"Don White" wrote in message ... "Dr. Jonathan Smithers, MD Phd." wrote in message ... Don are you guilty of pig piling? ; ) Even though I didn't sign on to JimH's bogus crusade, I still wouldn't call him a 'pig'. ;-) |
"HarryKrause" wrote in message ... Tuuk, of course, has his own filter. But I dump all of his posts, including the headers, into a file I download every two weeks and copy onto a CDR for my friendly neighborhood deputy sheriff. I think he's just keeping them on file now, but I know with the first few, the guys at the district were using them as training materials for recognizing on-line psychotics. :} Is your wife, the Dr. Dr. teaching the class? |
"HarryKrause" wrote in message ... snip... Tuuk, of course, has his own filter. But I dump all of his posts, including the headers, into a file I download every two weeks and copy onto a CDR for my friendly neighborhood deputy sheriff. I think he's just keeping them on file now, but I know with the first few, the guys at the district were using them as training materials for recognizing on-line psychotics. :} snip.... Forgetting for a moment Tuuk's threats and on-line harassment of you, it's what he does on a regular basis that should outrage regular posters. I have seen time & time again, new posters come on asking sensible questions. I'm assuming it's Tuuk...steals your identity and makes idiotic responses to the new posts. Some may find this funny, but new blood may be driven away by this foolishness. New members with legit concerns deserve the best advice this group can offer. |
Ya,,
Ok krause you are a liar and your bozo buddy up the lane is laughing at you all day long,,, lol,, First he (assuming he is a he,, also assuming he is real) laughed at you as your first wife ran away from you ,,, burning up the street,, Second he laughed at you as your second wife ran away from you,,, Third he laughed at you as your children ran to their mother,,, Now he is laughing at you as you court one of your students,, a law student 20 years your junior,,, Then he laughs at you as you stroll buy on your way to the upscale liquor store,, then he laughs at you if he reads all your lies,,, lol,,, krause,,, you are such a liar,, if this bozo cop buddy of yours was receiving all these posts you claim to give him,, you think he would log onto the group to see?? Then see all your lies?? then continue to even admit he knows you??? lol,,, ouch,,, oooo ,, ooo my,,,, or is he just some pencil pushing desk jockey coffee making donut eating clerk down at the cop shop,,, lol,,, or is he just a figment of your imagination,,, that is my guess,,, lol,,, Come on krause,,, its sunday,,, give mom a call,, also call the care people,, I know it is only the second sunday of the month but you and white should authorize and pay for the care people to bath mom today and not wait for the last sunday of the month every month,,, At least white stuffed his in his basement,, doesn't want to blow any of that inheritance,,, krause your mom had to run as far as she could afford away from you,,, I bet the cop is laughing at you krause,,, Did you tell the cop that you invited me to your home krause??? Then you said you have hand guns upstairs and downstairs loaded and in the drawer? Then you claimed a day later you didn't have these hand guns,, then you claimed you have loaded shot guns in your front door closet and you like to aim for the knees,,, lol,,, krause,,,, you are an idiot liar and I will prove it... When I accept your invitation,, I will prove that you are just an old toothless old senile old fool with nothing,, no family,,, lots of meds,,, no boat,,, and krause,,, I am pleased to accept,, I wouldn't miss this one for anything,,,, lol,,,, Besides,, I want to hear all those comments you made about my sister ,, my mother,, my people,,, lol,,, krause,, I cannot wait to see if you can make those comments in person,,, so I accept your invitation,,, Seeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeyaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa "HarryKrause" wrote in message ... Don White wrote: "HarryKrause" wrote in message ... Why bother with Hertvik at all, Don? Really. Just bozo bin him, along with the rest of his ilk. Right you are...It is silly trying to be rational with him. Well, that's one reason. There are a couple like him I haven't "bozo-binned" yet. Their responses usually are so bizarre and off-the-wall that they harm their cause, and therefore it is a bit of fun to watch them twist themselves in the wind. Tuuk, of course, has his own filter. But I dump all of his posts, including the headers, into a file I download every two weeks and copy onto a CDR for my friendly neighborhood deputy sheriff. I think he's just keeping them on file now, but I know with the first few, the guys at the district were using them as training materials for recognizing on-line psychotics. :} Every couple of days, I look through the bozo-bin "log" to see which inhabitants have been active again. I don't see the posts themselves, just the basic header info. Hertvik is the most active, followed by Fritz and whatever fake ID "Smithers" is using that day. |
On Sun, 13 Mar 2005 16:53:19 GMT, "Don White"
wrote: "HarryKrause" wrote in message ... snip... Tuuk, of course, has his own filter. But I dump all of his posts, including the headers, into a file I download every two weeks and copy onto a CDR for my friendly neighborhood deputy sheriff. I think he's just keeping them on file now, but I know with the first few, the guys at the district were using them as training materials for recognizing on-line psychotics. :} snip.... Forgetting for a moment Tuuk's threats and on-line harassment of you, it's what he does on a regular basis that should outrage regular posters. I have seen time & time again, new posters come on asking sensible questions. I'm assuming it's Tuuk...steals your identity and makes idiotic responses to the new posts. Some may find this funny, but new blood may be driven away by this foolishness. New members with legit concerns deserve the best advice this group can offer. Perhaps the best advice to offer would be, "Pay no attention to posts authored by Harry Krause." That would cover everything, right? -- John H "All decisions are the result of binary thinking." |
How can filtering Harry Krause be detrimental to the NG?
"HarryKrause" wrote in message ... Don White wrote: "HarryKrause" wrote in message ... snip... Tuuk, of course, has his own filter. But I dump all of his posts, including the headers, into a file I download every two weeks and copy onto a CDR for my friendly neighborhood deputy sheriff. I think he's just keeping them on file now, but I know with the first few, the guys at the district were using them as training materials for recognizing on-line psychotics. :} snip.... Forgetting for a moment Tuuk's threats and on-line harassment of you, it's what he does on a regular basis that should outrage regular posters. I have seen time & time again, new posters come on asking sensible questions. I'm assuming it's Tuuk...steals your identity and makes idiotic responses to the new posts. Some may find this funny, but new blood may be driven away by this foolishness. New members with legit concerns deserve the best advice this group can offer. There are a couple of posters here so obsessed with me that they play identity theft and try to pretend they are me. They do this for a couple reasons, one of which, of course, is to clog up this newsgroup with so many posts that appear as if they are coming from me that some posters will just filter me out. These jerks, all right-wingers, are determined to destroy what remains of this newsgroup. |
It can't. I have him filtered and the only time I see his crap is when
someone responds to it. The funny thing is Harry Krause does not even accept the fact that he alone ruined this NG several years ago and has to make it a political, blaming only the right wing members here. "Dr. Jonathan Smithers, MD Phd." wrote in message ... How can filtering Harry Krause be detrimental to the NG? "HarryKrause" wrote in message ... Don White wrote: "HarryKrause" wrote in message ... snip... Tuuk, of course, has his own filter. But I dump all of his posts, including the headers, into a file I download every two weeks and copy onto a CDR for my friendly neighborhood deputy sheriff. I think he's just keeping them on file now, but I know with the first few, the guys at the district were using them as training materials for recognizing on-line psychotics. :} snip.... Forgetting for a moment Tuuk's threats and on-line harassment of you, it's what he does on a regular basis that should outrage regular posters. I have seen time & time again, new posters come on asking sensible questions. I'm assuming it's Tuuk...steals your identity and makes idiotic responses to the new posts. Some may find this funny, but new blood may be driven away by this foolishness. New members with legit concerns deserve the best advice this group can offer. There are a couple of posters here so obsessed with me that they play identity theft and try to pretend they are me. They do this for a couple reasons, one of which, of course, is to clog up this newsgroup with so many posts that appear as if they are coming from me that some posters will just filter me out. These jerks, all right-wingers, are determined to destroy what remains of this newsgroup. |
"JimH" wrote in message ... It can't. I have him filtered and the only time I see his crap is when someone responds to it. The funny thing is Harry Krause does not even accept the fact that he alone ruined this NG several years ago and has to make it political, blaming only the right wing members here. "Dr. Jonathan Smithers, MD Phd." wrote in message ... How can filtering Harry Krause be detrimental to the NG? "HarryKrause" wrote in message ... Don White wrote: "HarryKrause" wrote in message ... snip... Tuuk, of course, has his own filter. But I dump all of his posts, including the headers, into a file I download every two weeks and copy onto a CDR for my friendly neighborhood deputy sheriff. I think he's just keeping them on file now, but I know with the first few, the guys at the district were using them as training materials for recognizing on-line psychotics. :} snip.... Forgetting for a moment Tuuk's threats and on-line harassment of you, it's what he does on a regular basis that should outrage regular posters. I have seen time & time again, new posters come on asking sensible questions. I'm assuming it's Tuuk...steals your identity and makes idiotic responses to the new posts. Some may find this funny, but new blood may be driven away by this foolishness. New members with legit concerns deserve the best advice this group can offer. There are a couple of posters here so obsessed with me that they play identity theft and try to pretend they are me. They do this for a couple reasons, one of which, of course, is to clog up this newsgroup with so many posts that appear as if they are coming from me that some posters will just filter me out. These jerks, all right-wingers, are determined to destroy what remains of this newsgroup. |
"Dr. Jonathan Smithers, MD Phd." wrote in message ... How can filtering Harry Krause be detrimental to the NG? Notice how harry has to keep changing his ID in order to be noticed? "HarryKrause" wrote in message ... Don White wrote: "HarryKrause" wrote in message ... snip... Tuuk, of course, has his own filter. But I dump all of his posts, including the headers, into a file I download every two weeks and copy onto a CDR for my friendly neighborhood deputy sheriff. I think he's just keeping them on file now, but I know with the first few, the guys at the district were using them as training materials for recognizing on-line psychotics. :} snip.... Forgetting for a moment Tuuk's threats and on-line harassment of you, it's what he does on a regular basis that should outrage regular posters. I have seen time & time again, new posters come on asking sensible questions. I'm assuming it's Tuuk...steals your identity and makes idiotic responses to the new posts. Some may find this funny, but new blood may be driven away by this foolishness. New members with legit concerns deserve the best advice this group can offer. There are a couple of posters here so obsessed with me that they play identity theft and try to pretend they are me. They do this for a couple reasons, one of which, of course, is to clog up this newsgroup with so many posts that appear as if they are coming from me that some posters will just filter me out. These jerks, all right-wingers, are determined to destroy what remains of this newsgroup. |
""''''These jerks, all right-wingers, are determined to destroy what remains
of this newsgroup."'''''' krause,, you didn't leave much,,, "HarryKrause" wrote in message ... Don White wrote: "HarryKrause" wrote in message ... snip... Tuuk, of course, has his own filter. But I dump all of his posts, including the headers, into a file I download every two weeks and copy onto a CDR for my friendly neighborhood deputy sheriff. I think he's just keeping them on file now, but I know with the first few, the guys at the district were using them as training materials for recognizing on-line psychotics. :} snip.... Forgetting for a moment Tuuk's threats and on-line harassment of you, it's what he does on a regular basis that should outrage regular posters. I have seen time & time again, new posters come on asking sensible questions. I'm assuming it's Tuuk...steals your identity and makes idiotic responses to the new posts. Some may find this funny, but new blood may be driven away by this foolishness. New members with legit concerns deserve the best advice this group can offer. There are a couple of posters here so obsessed with me that they play identity theft and try to pretend they are me. They do this for a couple reasons, one of which, of course, is to clog up this newsgroup with so many posts that appear as if they are coming from me that some posters will just filter me out. These jerks, all right-wingers, are determined to destroy what remains of this newsgroup. |
On Sun, 13 Mar 2005 16:21:13 -0500, "Dr. Jonathan Smithers, MD Phd."
wrote: How can filtering Harry Krause be detrimental to the NG? "HarryKrause" wrote in message ... There are a couple of posters here so obsessed with me that they play identity theft and try to pretend they are me. They do this for a couple reasons, one of which, of course, is to clog up this newsgroup with so many posts that appear as if they are coming from me that some posters will just filter me out. These jerks, all right-wingers, are determined to destroy what remains of this newsgroup. What a ****ing ego! -- John H "All decisions are the result of binary thinking." |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:29 AM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com